|
KettleWL posted:I was at my local (east Cincinnati) TJ Maxx tonight buying some socks and sweatpants and saw they had a few Nike On-Field Browns jerseys. Colt McCoy in medium and two larges, and a single Cribbs in medium. They were $15 each. So point of my post is threefold: Yeah the TJ Maxx stores near Pittsburgh have some older jerseys of players that don't play there anymore for $15 and other gear. I almost bought a Mike Wallace bumblebee jersey just because
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2013 08:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 02:42 |
|
|
Figured some of you guys might want to see this, and also since I'm not a hockey guy tell me how decent it looks. This is from oknfl.com  How is it? Looking at some pictures online the letter looks shorter and fatter. Kinda bums me out. Also the coloring seems off. Seems like the official jerseys are white as white can be, and these are a little off white. Comfortador fucked around with this message at 23:40 on Dec 11, 2013 |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2013 23:35
|
|
|
Comfortador posted:Figured some of you guys might want to see this, and also since I'm not a hockey guy tell me how decent it looks. This is from oknfl.com The official jerseys are off-white (for a vintage look), but the front crest is a bit small.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2013 03:08
|
|
|
The Giants are running some sort of one day sale next Tuesday at the main team store at the stadium where all the merch is %40 off and the jerseys are %50 off.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2013 01:46
|
|
|
AsInHowe posted:The official jerseys are off-white (for a vintage look), but the front crest is a bit small. We gave it to him and he appreciated that it even had the strap on it so the jersey couldn't be pulled up, so there's that. (I had no idea that even existed). It was a win I guess.
|
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2013 16:46
|
|
|
This is probably discussed somewhere in this colossal thread, but how do the Nike Elites fit? From the size charts on NFLshop, it looks like they're different from the rest of the Nike jerseys. I'm a 44L, and I can't figure out whether I should be buying my now-completely-essential Alshon Jeffery away jersey in a 44 or a 48.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 14:19
|
|
|
Get it in a 44. The length should still come to about your waist, unless you have an abnormally freakishly long torso. A 48 will be too big for you. If you get one, it'll be REALLY stiff when you first get it, but a couple of wears and maybe 1 wash and it'll fit far better than the jerseys from the last couple of years Reebok was making them.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 19:43
|
|
|
Going back to the Army/Navy uniforms, why does Army have "The Corps" on their helmets? Wouldn't that be more a Marines things? Edit: And you'd think there would be a single flag or a two-flag combo for "Army". It would be a pretty common word when supporting landings.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 20:29
|
|
|
Speleothing posted:Going back to the Army/Navy uniforms, why does Army have "The Corps" on their helmets? Wouldn't that be more a Marines things? I believe the student body is referred to as "The Corps of Cadets", much like Navy has Midshipmen/Middies
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 20:33
|
|
|
defiantgiant posted:This is probably discussed somewhere in this colossal thread, but how do the Nike Elites fit? From the size charts on NFLshop, it looks like they're different from the rest of the Nike jerseys. I'm a 44L, and I can't figure out whether I should be buying my now-completely-essential Alshon Jeffery away jersey in a 44 or a 48. You're probably best finding a store where you can try them on first. They're awesome shirts, but they fit differently than the other styles in the chest and shoulders. I ended up needing to go up a size in order to get a comfortable fit across my shoulders, but length was never an issue. Just something to keep in mind with the Elites.
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 23:32
|
|
|
My Keenan Allen jersey is in the mail 
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2013 23:48
|
|
|
I got a Smokey Grey Tennessee Manning jersey for Christmas. It owns.
|
|
#
?
Dec 26, 2013 19:30
|
|
|
Notre Dame is moving to Under Armour. http://espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/10270876/notre-dame-fighting-irish-select-armour-next-apparel-deal Time for Michigan to move there as well to continue poking at them.
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2014 05:16
|
|
|
I know some of you guys are waiting on some pics for a jersey order. On phone and can't check my pms I completely forgot . I'll post some tonight
|
|
#
?
Jan 10, 2014 05:19
|
|
|
The Bucs are getting a new logo and new helmets. Sapp mentioned a #chromegrill on twitter. I'm nervous about this one. If I had to guess it would be a white helmet so they can do the throwbacks again.
|
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 17:11
|
|
|
A white helmet with those dark jerseys would look terrible. E: Then again, maybe they won't have dark jerseys, considering every jersey in their team shop just went on sale. StupidSexyMothman fucked around with this message at 18:08 on Feb 18, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 18, 2014 17:20
|
|
|
oldskool posted:A white helmet with those dark jerseys would look terrible. Clicked on that link and work firewall stopped me, clearly trying to prevent the MRSA from spreading to our network.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 01:26
|
|
|
C. Everett Koop posted:Clicked on that link and work firewall stopped me, clearly trying to prevent the MRSA from spreading to our network. The sale price isn't posted (it makes you go to the shopping cart first  ), but I checked the Revis jerseys and they were 50% off, which is pretty drat good in my opinion.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 01:42
|
|
Chichevache posted:The sale price isn't posted (it makes you go to the shopping cart first have you like not shopped online in the past decade or something because that is absolutely A Thing that stores have been doing for like, as long as e-commerce has existed
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 02:13
|
|
|
wheez the roux posted:have you like not shopped online in the past decade or something because that is absolutely A Thing that stores have been doing for like, as long as e-commerce has existed I only remember seeing such tactics at Amazon & Newegg with a description that implies "They doesn't want us advertising this price, it's so unbelievably low!!!", which doesn't make sense when it's the owner's website doing it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 02:26
|
|
|
Not gonna lie... Kinda hoping for a bastardized new uni with their skeleton logo and their old orange creampop colors.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 02:32
|
|
|
wheez the roux posted:have you like not shopped online in the past decade or something because that is absolutely A Thing that stores have been doing for like, as long as e-commerce has existed I don't do much online shopping, true, but I have literally never seen an item advertised as "for sale" without also listing the sale price next to it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 02:38
|
|
|
smuggler posted:Not gonna lie... Kinda hoping for a bastardized new uni with their skeleton logo and their old orange creampop colors. Alternatively, zombie Bucco Bruce. Which brings up this in image search: 
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 03:29
|
|
|
Saw this posted on twitter, may or may not be the new Bucs helmet:
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 05:17
|
|
|
wandler20 posted:Saw this posted on twitter, may or may not be the new Bucs helmet: Meh. Not very striking.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 05:21
|
|
|
wandler20 posted:Saw this posted on twitter, may or may not be the new Bucs helmet: Told you bums it would be a minor tweak and not a massive logo revamp I hope they change the uniform scheme though, white helmets on the current red/dark pants is gonna look like rear end
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 05:26
|
|
|
Febreeze posted:Told you bums it would be a minor tweak and not a massive logo revamp Yeah, a Bucs beat writer said earlier it would be a tweak and nothing major. I agree that the white with dark home uni is going to look off.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 05:32
|
|
|
Febreeze posted:Told you bums it would be a minor tweak and not a massive logo revamp That long tail at the end looks kind of dumb. Also the low quality pic makes it look similar to the Cardinals helmet. From a distance they will no longer be easily identifiable as the Bucs.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 05:43
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:That long tail at the end looks kind of dumb. Also the low quality pic makes it look similar to the Cardinals helmet. From a distance they will no longer be easily identifiable as the Bucs. The shape looks nothing like the cards logo even as a blur. And we need to see the full uni before we can claim they will look like the cards. The cards logo curves upwards if anything, and the spikes fly off towards the sky. From the looks of it they took the current flag and curved it into one down arc to better conform to the helmet and make the waving look more dynamic. I actually like what I can see so far, but I'll withhold final judgement until thursday
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 05:57
|
|
|
the white helmet could only really make sense if there's more white in the jerseys i would think. white shoulders or something. hmm
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 06:47
|
|
|
Febreeze posted:The shape looks nothing like the cards logo even as a blur. And we need to see the full uni before we can claim they will look like the cards. Obviously the logo looks nothing like the Cards. But a white helmet with a small reddish logo on it is what the Cards is. From a distance there will now be nothing unique about this helmet. Before they had an entirely unique metallic pewter helmet which was easily recognizable. Now they're just another team with a boring white helmet.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 07:04
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:Obviously the logo looks nothing like the Cards. But a white helmet with a small reddish logo on it is what the Cards is. From a distance there will now be nothing unique about this helmet. Before they had an entirely unique metallic pewter helmet which was easily recognizable. Now they're just another team with a boring white helmet. It's hard to say from the image, but it looks like there might be a unique stripe/texture going down the middle. That would help. For the distance argument who cares? Why are you looking at tiny helmets from a distance? If you see them at a distance you'll probably also be seeing the uniform, which I assume will be very beneficial towards identifying the team. Nike, for all their faults, is good at making something stand out. I think you're getting too worried over a blurry picture.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 07:35
|
|
|
Febreeze posted:It's hard to say from the image, but it looks like there might be a unique stripe/texture going down the middle. That would help. For the distance argument who cares? Why are you looking at tiny helmets from a distance? If you see them at a distance you'll probably also be seeing the uniform, which I assume will be very beneficial towards identifying the team. Nike, for all their faults, is good at making something stand out. I think you're getting too worried over a blurry picture. Who cares? I care. Duh. Usually the game isn't zoomed in on the players and we are actually watching a view of the field from a distance. My complaint isn't about the uniform as a whole, but about the helmet that to me looks rather boring and not as striking as the old helmets. My complaint isn't about identifying the team, but about one of the few truly unique uniforms in the NFL being traded in for a look that, so far, does not impress me. Keep in mind that this is my opinion, which is obviously subjective. You mentioned that Nike makes uniforms that stand out. To my knowledge we only have three so far, the Seahawks, the Jags, and the Dolphins. While i love the Seahawks unis and i feel they are a significant improvement over the old ones, the other two uniforms are absolute poo poo. You yourself did a pretty good takedown of the Jags, and I don't know if any of us felt the Dolphins redesign was a good idea.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 09:02
|
|
|
White helmet, more white on the jersey (accents, shoulders like rap said, etc.) and red pants
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 10:23
|
|
|
Oh boy another team with a white helmet, I was just saying that we needed another to go with the eleven white/off-white ones we have now.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 13:19
|
|
|
Eifert Posting posted:Oh boy another team with a white helmet, I was just saying that we needed another to go with the eleven white/off-white ones we have now. Seriously. No creamscicle, no change needed.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 13:22
|
|
|
If it wasn't for that stupid rule the NFL put in about players having to wear the same helmet all year the Bucs probably wouldn't have changed anything. People want to see the creamscicle and this is the result.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 16:44
|
|
|
wandler20 posted:If it wasn't for that stupid rule the NFL put in about players having to wear the same helmet all year the Bucs probably wouldn't have changed anything. Stop victim blaming.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 17:49
|
|
|
Chichevache posted:Who cares? I care. Duh. Usually the game isn't zoomed in on the players and we are actually watching a view of the field from a distance. My complaint isn't about the uniform as a whole, but about the helmet that to me looks rather boring and not as striking as the old helmets. Vikings too, and they are better than the old ones by far. The Dolphins were a downgrade, we are in agreement there. I actually don't mind the Jags uniform. For me the Jags uniform is the same case as the Seahawks: It might look goofy at first, but then you realize that it stands out especially compared to the old unis. I can barely remember what the Jags used to look like, but I can recall how this one looks almost instantly and I watched maybe one jags game this whole year. It looks kind of dumb, but it's still more interesting that before. It's the helmet I can't stand, and even I will admit that it still stands out. Also saying that we see the field zoomed out proves my point that we will see the entire uniform at once, so white helmets shouldn't be as big a deal as long as the uniform still stands out along with it. That remains to be seen. If we got lots of pewter and creamsicle it'll be hard to confuse it with the Cards. If we get white pants and a red jersey, then we might have a problem. At this point I have faith in Nike to be bold enough, even if it looks goofy. Febreeze fucked around with this message at 18:03 on Feb 19, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 18:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 02:42 |
|
|
Febreeze posted:
 I already said it had nothing to do with confusing the uniforms. That helmet looks boring as poo poo from that photo and right now I am upset with it. Eifert Posting pretty much nailed it.Eifert Posting posted:Oh boy another team with a white helmet, I was just saying that we needed another to go with the eleven white/off-white ones we have now.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2014 18:12
|
|