|
He looks like he should be in one of the Kick-rear end movies
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 18:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 07:04 |
|
|
Who is the one that isn't Quicksilver?
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 18:38
|
|
|
Wonder if they have to use this design for Quicksilver in Avengers 2.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 18:39
|
|
|
Hip-Hoptimus Rhyme posted:He looks like he should be in one of the Kick-rear end movies He looks like he should be presenting Smash Mouth with eggs.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 18:39
|
|
|
ThatPazuzu posted:Who is the one that isn't Quicksilver? I. Goldberg Shopper, everyone's favorite X-Man.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 18:53
|
|
|
Chamber (pre-chestsplosion)? Havoc? Hard to tell with just the weird glow around his chest and shoulders.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 19:21
|
|
|
Pretty sure it's Havoc. He had the whole "laser hula-hoop" deal in First Class. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJTe6L4rwlc
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 19:29
|
|
|
Guys it literally says who is on each of the covers.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 19:32
|
|
|
GonSmithe posted:Guys it literally says who is on each of the covers. To be fair it's in a bright blue that's really unreadable in that size format.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 19:34
|
|
|
GonSmithe posted:Guys it literally says who is on each of the covers. Maybe it's because I'm on my phone but it's too blurry to read, even if I zoom in.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 19:36
|
|
|
Y'all might want to get your eyes checked. I'm on my phone too, it says "Havok: Absorbs cosmic energy and releases it in plasma blasts." I do agree the blue font for the names was stupid, though.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 19:40
|
|
|
Rirse posted:Wonder if they have to use this design for Quicksilver in Avengers 2. The X-Men movies are done by Fox, not Marvel Studios, and as such are not part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Same with Spider-Man and Sony.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 21:08
|
|
|
Waffleman_ posted:The X-Men movies are done by Fox, not Marvel Studios, and as such are not part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Same with Spider-Man and Sony. Unlike those cases, Quicksilver WILL be appearing in Avengers 2. I doubt VERY much that it will have anything to do with this interpretation.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 21:23
|
|
|
Baron von Eevl posted:Unlike those cases, Quicksilver WILL be appearing in Avengers 2. I doubt VERY much that it will have anything to do with this interpretation. Isn't it both Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch? I'm surprised that the X-Men film isn't using her because they could write her reality manipulation powers as a path to time travel. I wonder if Vision is going to be in Avengers 2, especially if they have Ultron.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 21:42
|
|
|
What worries me about Quicksilver is how they will render him running. I've seen how they did the Flash running effects on TV and they all sucked rear end. Getting Quicksilver to look cool when in action will probably be the most challenging effects job of the movie.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 21:44
|
|
|
Baron Bifford posted:What worries me about Quicksilver is how they will render him running. I've seen how they did the Flash running effects on TV and they all sucked rear end. Getting Quicksilver to look cool when in action will probably be the most challenging effects job of the movie. Pretty sure they showed a picture of them literally shooting with lights shining from every direction in a small space and it said they were filming at like 4600FPS or some ridiculous number like that in order to be able to make a fast effect. Also the movie is being filmed in 48fps so that won't be an issue in that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 22:01
|
|
|
Yodzilla posted:They're not exactly posters but loving I found this hilarious Japanese poster for "Seven" a few days ago:  EDIT: Another poster for Jim Rash's character in "300" and he looks pissed. 
Robert Denby fucked around with this message at 22:27 on Jan 27, 2014 |
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 22:24
|
|
at every one of these Empire covers for Days of Future Past: 
|
GonSmithe posted:Pretty sure they showed a picture of them literally shooting with lights shining from every direction in a small space and it said they were filming at like 4600FPS or some ridiculous number like that in order to be able to make a fast effect. Huh, I thought HFR would be dead after The Hobbit until Avatar 2 comes out but I guess not.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 22:36
|
|
|
It's gonna make their poo poo sets look even worse. I cannot loving wait for the train wreck of the new X-men movie.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 22:37
|
|
|
Robert Denby posted:How are there twenty five different covers for the same issue? Jesus. This is probably the first time that Hollywood has tried to replicate the comic buying experience verbatim, since multi-cover comics were a big thing during the '90s speculator boom.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 22:39
|
|
|
Criminal Minded posted:I thought it was going to be pretty tame, which makes me wonder why they're even bothering. Mostly I'm just annoyed that they didn't let Bret Easton Ellis adapt it. Anyway, if it brings back actual capital-s Sexuality in movies I'll gladly give it my momney. Yeah, that's what I'm most afraid of. I would agree - why bother at that point.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 22:44
|
|
|
computer parts posted:Huh, I thought HFR would be dead after The Hobbit until Avatar 2 comes out but I guess not.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 22:55
|
|
|
Robert Denby posted:How are there twenty five different covers for the same issue? Jesus. Empire once did 100 covers for a big anniversary issue - 99 on shelves and the last for subscribers.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 23:11
|
|
Robert Denby posted:There's been quite a bit of news saying that Fox will not release "Days of Future Past" in HFR, even though most of the movie was shot at 48 frames per second. Brilliant, they've devised a method to combine the worst aspects of both framerates.
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 23:48
|
|
|
They're collector's covers, you see. I don't see how any X-Men fan's collection would be complete without a badly photoshopped picture of Kid Vid over here.
|
|
#
?
Jan 27, 2014 23:54
|
|
|
Robert Denby posted:EDIT: Another poster for Jim Rash's character in "300" and he looks pissed.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2014 00:02
|
|
|
OppyDoppyDopp posted:'Why is he mad at Athens? Aren't the Spartans from Sparta?' Its all Greek to me.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2014 00:03
|
|
|
I heard the studios had to keep making Xmen and Spiderman movies or the rights go back to Marvel/Disney? Is this why they churn out all those movies?
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2014 00:12
|
|
|
I think that's part of the reason they rebooted Spider-Man. Like, a couple of the important actors like Kirsten Dunst couldn't return and they were like "poo poo, we gotta make a new Spider-Man movie poo poo poo poo REBOOT IT"
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2014 00:16
|
|
|
Waffleman_ posted:I think that's part of the reason they rebooted Spider-Man. Like, a couple of the important actors like Kirsten Dunst couldn't return and they were like "poo poo, we gotta make a new Spider-Man movie poo poo poo poo REBOOT IT" And then that quick and dirty reboot made $750,000,000, ensuring that they're going to keep doing this forever.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2014 00:18
|
|
|
The new Spider-Man was a better movie than the any of the movies in the trilogy so I don't mind at all. I enjoyed all of those movies when they came out (even the third to a degree), but they're all really hard to watch now.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2014 00:22
|
|
|
OppyDoppyDopp posted:'Why is he mad at Athens? Aren't the Spartans from Sparta?' 
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2014 00:38
|
|
|
Renoistic posted:The new Spider-Man was a better movie than the any of the movies in the trilogy Hahahaha, no it wasn't, it's not even close. Not to say it was a bad movie- the cast, at least, was spot-on, but the script was poo poo and it ended up as a dull rehash of the first Raimi Spider-Man. I'd much rather watch Spider-Man 3 again; there are so many baffling decisions in that it's pretty much become a first-rate comedy for me. Anyways, content- a Disney page on Facebook linked an article with a bunch of foreign posters for recent Disney and Pixar movies. Some are basically the same as the ones in the US, but a couple are pretty great:  Tangled (Japan)  Ratatouille (Russia)  Wreck-It Ralph (Japan)  WALL-E (Japan)  Up (Japan)  Toy Story 3 (Korea)  The Princess and the Frog (Finland)  Winnie the Pooh (Germany)  The Emperor's New Groove (Taiwan)
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2014 00:48
|
|
|
Nikaer Drekin posted:
Gotta be honest, seeing them listed like that: I vastly prefer the non-Pixar output.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2014 00:51
|
|
|
Yeah, the interesting one is that they labelled the Japanese release of Wreck-It-Ralph as "Sugar Rush", supposedly to monopolize on the single by AKB48, a Japanese idol group.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2014 00:52
|
|
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:Gotta be honest, seeing them listed like that: I vastly prefer the non-Pixar output. I think Up is the best of the bunch, but yeah- the TS3 one is pretty blah and Ratatouille isn't that interesting either.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2014 00:55
|
|
|
Nikaer Drekin posted:I think Up is the best of the bunch, but yeah- the TS3 one is pretty blah and Ratatouille isn't that interesting either. Isn't that Ratouille poster the one used for the current blu-ray release?
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2014 01:31
|
|
|
Rirse posted:Isn't that Ratouille poster the one used for the current blu-ray release? More than a few of them are.   
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2014 01:35
|
|
|
Young Freud posted:Yeah, the interesting one is that they labelled the Japanese release of Wreck-It-Ralph as "Sugar Rush", supposedly to monopolize on the single by AKB48, a Japanese idol group. Its funny how all the American promotional stuff played down the Sugar Rush angle and did the best they could to not let anyone know that the majority of the movie took place there.
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2014 02:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 6, 2024 07:04 |
|
|
Robert Denby posted:How are there twenty five different covers for the same issue? Jesus. This is 90s-style X-Men. Why wouldn't there be?
|
|
#
?
Jan 28, 2014 02:35
|
|