|
RangerScum posted:
woah did she take a photo and print it and then take another photo of someone holding it? blown
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2014 20:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 14:25 |
|
|
Whitezombi posted:woah did she take a photo and print it and then take another photo of someone holding it? blown Actually, the photo was taken by a vampire. Spooky!
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2014 20:05
|
|
|
And I thought I was the only one that dreamed in vintage.
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2014 21:51
|
|
|
the last few pages have been brought to you by VSCO 2 and 3.
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2014 22:10
|
|
|
dukeku posted:I love surrealist Flickr garbage! I unironically love Brooke Shaden's work. And she seems nice and genuinely passionate about making her arts, if a bit wrapped up in the whole ~*foLLoW yOuR dReAmZ*~ that seems to be a common theme amongst the creativelive/seminar selling crowd. BrosephofArimathea fucked around with this message at 23:36 on Feb 25, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2014 23:30
|
|
|
MrBlandAverage posted:She was featured on the Flickr blog. That means she HAS to be good! I don't even need to look at the pictures. same
|
|
#
?
Feb 25, 2014 23:32
|
|
|
BrosephofArimathea posted:I unironically love Brooke Shaden's work. And she seems nice and genuinely passionate about making her arts, if a bit wrapped up in the whole ~*foLLoW yOuR dReAmZ*~ that seems to be a common theme amongst the creativelive/seminar selling crowd. Same. I even took a workshop from her. While the style is getting a bit tired (there's only so many things you can levitate and put in your hair) she is an expert on planning a shoot, drawing inspiration from your surroundings and post. I really like her workflow and attitude. She's an artist.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 00:04
|
|
|
There's plenty of garbage artists in the world, Brooke Shaden included.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 00:21
|
|
|
Something makes me uncomfortable with having a corporate sponsors page on your website
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 00:45
|
|
|
Spedman posted:Something makes me uncomfortable with having a corporate sponsors page on your website I want to cover my camera in sponsor stickers like a NASCAR.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 00:47
|
|
|
PushingKingston posted:The best part is how eerily similar they all are. They all take each other's workshops and circle jerk about it on flickr.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 01:18
|
|
|
Spedman posted:Something makes me uncomfortable with having a corporate sponsors page on your website You all are insufferable. Heavens forbid a young artist figure a way to make a living off her art/hobby/passion. Of course the only real way is to apply for grants or sell the 50th banal shot off the side of a road using expired velvia. I literally want to shoot all of you, starting with Reichstag. You are the people (though I know very few of you actually studied art) that made art school completely horrible with your cliquish behavior of what is and isn't acceptable to admire. Santa is strapped posted:They all take each other's workshops and circle jerk about it on flickr. Artists?! forming a group with similar styles and talking about it? Never before in history has this occurred, and of course were it to, the art created would be worthless. poopinmymouth fucked around with this message at 01:49 on Feb 26, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 01:19
|
|
|
Someone needs a hug.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 01:26
|
|
|
It's especially hilarious because one can clearly see that you assume all 50,000 flickr followers these white teens have are ignorant buffoons, but of course your 3 admirers are serious artists who know what good photography is. I would literally get more out of looking through a 4th grader's notebook of Lisa Frank stickers than look through Reichstag's body of work, but he gets to piss over any photo that has even a modicum of joy or passion in it, and everyone else rushes to either fellate his opinions, or be the new cheerios pisser of the day. Oh unless it's a boring film shot, then we all are supposed to go gaga. Bonus if it's grainy or of 3rd world poverty porn.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 01:26
|
|
|
Whether it's a square cropped girl with her head on the ground and her feet in the air or a ham sandwich on a toilet seat, you're probably better off moving on to the next gallery.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 01:29
|
|
|
Spedman posted:Something makes me uncomfortable with having a corporate sponsors page on your website This is dumb poopinmymouth posted:I literally want to shoot all of you, starting with Reichstag. You are the people (though I know very few of you actually studied art) that made art school completely horrible with your cliquish behavior of what is and isn't acceptable to admire. This is also dumb
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 01:31
|
|
|
Bruce Weber for Barny's https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9FL3cwdhFo
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 01:37
|
|
|
poopinmymouth posted:I literally want to shoot all of you, starting with Reichstag. You are the people (though I know very few of you actually studied art) that made art school completely horrible with your cliquish behavior of what is and isn't acceptable to admire. poopinmymouth posted:I would literally get more out of looking through a 4th grader's notebook of Lisa Frank stickers than look through Reichstag's body of work, but he gets to piss over any photo that has even a modicum of joy or passion in it, and everyone else rushes to either fellate his opinions, or be the new cheerios pisser of the day.  "You don't get to judge other people's taste, but yours is lovely."
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 01:39
|
|
|
poopinmymouth posted:Bruce Weber for Barny's These are decent but I think "awesome" is a bit of a stretch.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 01:42
|
|
|
poopinmymouth posted:It's especially hilarious because one can clearly see that you assume all 50,000 flickr followers these white teens have are ignorant buffoons, but of course your 3 admirers are serious artists who know what good photography is. Garbage opinion from a garbage apologist.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 01:59
|
|
|
Also, Lisa Frank is really cool.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 01:59
|
|
|
dukeku posted:Garbage opinion from a garbage apologist. But does the garbage have joy and passion?
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 02:06
|
|
|
pimm, you got issues, man.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 02:12
|
|
|
This was a really cool watch.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 02:25
|
|
|
Mr. Despair posted:This is dumb Fair point now that I have a think about it. But I think it was knee jerk response to seeing the sponsors tab and thinking "eww, you're doing this to make some serious money?". It comes back to the point if you have money from these people and it doesn't have any conditions on what you can/can't do, then all that money does is give you freedom to do your work 24/7, rather than doing lovely work in between your day job and sleeping. I think we'd all be pretty stoked about getting cash to take the pictures you want to full time. And here I was getting all uppity about thanking sponsors while writing a loving research grant proposal, naming anything or anyone that has ever supported me.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 02:46
|
|
|
Spedman posted:Fair point now that I have a think about it. But I think it was knee jerk response to seeing the sponsors tab and thinking "eww, you're doing this to make some serious money?". It comes back to the point if you have money from these people and it doesn't have any conditions on what you can/can't do, then all that money does is give you freedom to do your work 24/7, rather than doing lovely work in between your day job and sleeping. I think we'd all be pretty stoked about getting cash to take the pictures you want to full time. It happens; everyone my age got mad at Blink 182 for "selling out" back in the late 90s.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 02:50
|
|
|
Hey it would be really cool if everyone could not be complete dickheads and actually make me look at this thread. Also are you people actually serious-replying to PIMM? This is like Dorkroom 101 poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 03:30
|
|
|
edit: moved to the rules & suggestion thread
rcman50166 fucked around with this message at 04:53 on Feb 26, 2014 |
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 04:42
|
|
|
rcman50166 posted:I was browsing the thread thinking that a lot of the commentary is unnecessary and uncalled for. I wouldn't dare to try and post content in this thread. No joke. It's that hostile. Whoever changed your avatar is a loving dead man. But yeah jfc this is the exact reason the Terrible Photos thread went away.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 04:52
|
|
|
Is there a chrome extension that can replaced PIMM posts with THE posts?
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 04:55
|
|
|
dukeku posted:There's plenty of garbage artists in the world, Brooke Shaden included. This is stupid. It's one thing to call an artists work not your thing, i get that, not every style is going to appeal to everyone. But are you going to tell me with a straight face these arent good photos?   the falling of autumn darkness by brookeshaden, on Flickr  hiding fragments of the future by brookeshaden, on Flickr And if you listen to her talk, she never tries to be more then what she is. She simply enjoys surrealist photography and she doesnt hide the fact its manipulated or fake. She has a concept and she shoots it. We take images of banal things all the time and label it as art, so i dont know why a girl who understands composition, color, and concept isnt an artist.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 09:08
|
|
|
somnambulist posted:This is stupid. It's one thing to call an artists work not your thing, i get that, not every style is going to appeal to everyone. But are you going to tell me with a straight face these arent good photos? See earlier post w/r/t shutting up.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 09:17
|
|
|
somnambulist posted:This is stupid. It's one thing to call an artists work not your thing, i get that, not every style is going to appeal to everyone. But are you going to tell me with a straight face these arent good photos? I can see this and very similar work just by going to flickr and seeing the explore bar on the side. I look at this thread to see poo poo that isnt normally the run of the mill flickr explore junk.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 16:28
|
|
|
SoundMonkey posted:See earlier post w/r/t shutting up. I'm confused are we not allowed to talk anymore, or are we just not allowed to be dickheads.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 16:54
|
|
|
somnambulist posted:This is stupid. It's one thing to call an artists work not your thing, i get that, not every style is going to appeal to everyone. But are you going to tell me with a straight face these arent good photos? I think they're well executed, but I don't find them interesting in any way.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 16:55
|
|
|
Musket posted:I can see this and very similar work just by going to flickr and seeing the explore bar on the side. I look at this thread to see poo poo that isnt normally the run of the mill flickr explore junk. That's fine. But a lot of other people read and post in this thread and most of them probably aren't concerning themselves with catering to what you (or anyone else) specifically want to see. If you like it, cool. If you don't, ignore it. This seems simple enough.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 16:56
|
|
|
William T. Hornaday posted:That's fine. But a lot of other people read and post in this thread and most of them probably aren't concerning themselves with catering to what you (or anyone else) specifically want to see. Fair enough.
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 16:57
|
|
|
Its clear whom the Taste Makers are ITT 
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 17:20
|
|
|
Awkward Davies posted:I think they're well executed, but I don't find them interesting in any way. This is exactly my view. They're well executed and good looking yet I still find them shallow and repetitive and I think it's quite a stretch to call them "awesome."
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 17:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 14:25 |
|
|
Awkward Davies posted:I'm confused are we not allowed to talk anymore, or are we just not allowed to be dickheads. The latter, although in some cases the former might be a good idea too 
|
|
#
?
Feb 26, 2014 18:33
|
|