|
Manning will restructure his deal however they need it to push his cap hit farther out, aka Colts burning through 40 million in dead money two or three years ago and sucking for Luck.
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 16:41 |
|
|
Quest For Glory II posted:I have bad news, time traveller from 15 years ago I meant this coming season, jerk 
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:21
|
|
|
sirtommygunn posted:This is what happens when you ask for "anything". I guess I lowered my standards a bit too much, huh?
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:21
|
|
|
Brannock posted:The Bears seem weirdly active in free agency. Am I just imagining things? The NFC North typically aren't heavy participators in free agency, but I've seen the Bears come up frequently the past couple days. Its inflated by the fact that they had like over 20 free agents from the 2013 roster. The Bears needed to be active just to have 53 men on the roster for 2014. Edit: Also here are some fun Panthers facts: quote:@joshkatzowitz 2m Cam doesn't deserve this.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:23
|
|
|
gently caress this dumb team Mike Valenti @MikeValenti971 1m Per Former NFL Agent Joel Correy on cbssports Tate will get 5yr $35M, 17.5M guaranteed, $22.5M first 3yr. Dear god.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:26
|
|
|
Holy gently caress Carolina. If this holds WRs in the first and third will be mandatory.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:27
|
|
|
 I'm gonna guess the official was from Kansas City
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:27
|
|
|
Giants locked up Schwartz for 4 years 16.8 million. That'll do, Reese. That'll do
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:27
|
|
|
Detroit_Dogg posted:gently caress this dumb team
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:28
|
|
|
TheChirurgeon posted:Calvin Watkins @calvinwatkins 1m Lose Ware and gain a 30 year old malcontent with 20 career sacks. Cool. Any chance we keep Spencer or is this defense going to somehow be even worse?
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:28
|
|
|
Chris Gaines posted:
I doubt it. We already have an old OLB in Tamba Hali and no cap room.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:28
|
|
|
Detroit_Dogg posted:gently caress this dumb team Golden Tate right? That seems really uh, high
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:29
|
|
|
Chris Gaines posted:
Yeah, I bet KC wanted a 13mil/year edge rusher to back up either Hali or Houston
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:29
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Golden Tate right? That seems really uh, high Well they need a #2 receiver and drafting one would be too easy so
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:30
|
|
|
ok san diego then
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:30
|
|
|
Chris Gaines posted:
I don't know how you can read that about a declining front-7 defensive player and not immediately assume it was Oakland.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:30
|
|
|
Glennon Time is over. @AdamSchefter Bucs gave former Bears QB Josh McCown a two-year deal worth $10 million -- $4.75M this year $5.25M next year, per sources.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:30
|
|
|
Detroit_Dogg posted:gently caress this dumb team Hahahaha
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:30
|
|
|
Alfred P. Pseudonym posted:Lose Ware and gain a 30 year old malcontent with 20 career sacks. Cool. Any chance we keep Spencer or is this defense going to somehow be even worse? Meh. They need to retain Hatcher and nab Spikes so we can use the first on Clinton-Dix... Then we'll go back to the front 7 in 2nd and 3rd round.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:31
|
|
|
That makes 2/2 for the Bucs having a McKown at QB. Is he an automatic upgrade over Glennon or is this just for competition in camp?
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:32
|
|
|
Searching Twitter for "Broncos 19-0" is the most enjoyable thing I've done all day. Oh you sweet summer children 
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:32
|
|
|
Ozu posted:Glennon Time is over. That's not bad at all. Wish the Texans could have matched it for that price
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:32
|
|
|
Okay to be fair that's just what the CBS guy expects his target range to be, nothing official.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:32
|
|
|
Ozu posted:Glennon Time is over. I'm pretty hyped to watch Bears South.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:32
|
|
|
Is it possible some of these ridiculous overpays (ie Tate) are happening because teams know that the cap is going to shoot up drastically the next three years or so? Because Christ that is way too much for Golden loving Tate.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:33
|
|
|
Lions
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:33
|
|
|
Detroit_Dogg posted:gently caress this dumb team Call me crazy but "former NFL agent on CBS Sports" doesn't sound like an airtight source. In other words, this smells like bullshit and I haven't heard it anywhere else.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:33
|
|
|
Tate got how much? Edelman must be elated.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:33
|
|
|
MindlessHavok posted:Is he an automatic upgrade over Glennon or is this just for competition in camp? Yes. No matter who you're talking about.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:33
|
|
|
^^^ Glennon was not terrible at all last year. He's not great, but he also wasn't bad...kinda like McCown.MindlessHavok posted:That makes 2/2 for the Bucs having a McKown at QB. That's the question. He has been terrible his entire career up until Trestman came there last year so we have to wait and see.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:34
|
|
|
Hey, at least it's not Brandon Tate.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:34
|
|
|
Professor Funk posted:Is it possible some of these ridiculous overpays (ie Tate) are happening because teams know that the cap is going to shoot up drastically the next three years or so? Because Christ that is way too much for Golden loving Tate. Whats so bad about him
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:34
|
|
|
Why is everyone so down on Glennon? He's a rookie who threw for 19TDs and 9INTs. Yea the TD/INT ratio isn't everything but that's loving impressive for a rookie.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:35
|
|
|
Ok I said Tate was a serviceable #2 because of his route running ability but not 7m a year serviceable
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:35
|
|
|
Bundt Cake posted:Whats so bad about him He's not worth $23m guaranteed?
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:35
|
|
|
Bundt Cake posted:Whats so bad about him Locker-making GBS threads aside, you mean?
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:35
|
|
|
Professor Funk posted:Is it possible some of these ridiculous overpays (ie Tate) are happening because teams know that the cap is going to shoot up drastically the next three years or so? Because Christ that is way too much for Golden loving Tate. some of them, sure. This one, no. This one is just stupid.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:35
|
|
|
Professor Funk posted:Is it possible some of these ridiculous overpays (ie Tate) are happening because teams know that the cap is going to shoot up drastically the next three years or so? Because Christ that is way too much for Golden loving Tate.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:36
|
|
|
You guys, there's literally no deal yet. That post was just some agent pulling numbers out of his rear end.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 16:41 |
|
|
Febreeze posted:Giants locked up Schwartz for 4 years 16.8 million. That's a better contract than what I was expecting. Losing Joseph kinda sucks but on the whole I'm liking the Giants off-season so far.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2014 19:37
|
|
