|
AAA DOLFAN posted:I was the most detrimental to him. This doesn't surprise me. As I said this whole time - great talent that doesn't put it on the field. I really don't like him Yeah, but like... Isaac Newton was the same loving way until a coach came along and recognized that he played better in a zone scheme. Chichevache posted:He's intentionally tanking so he can be on a better team, just like Bridgewater. I've heard that can happen in this very thread and it is a very plausible thing. I am gravely serious about this. Scoff if you want, but the evidence is piling up. Chilichimp fucked around with this message at 21:19 on Apr 3, 2014 |
# ? Apr 3, 2014 21:16 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 06:41 |
|
Apparently Seantrel Henderson felt "dehydrated and sick" which probably means he got sauced last night.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 21:21 |
|
Toymachine posted:Apparently Seantrel Henderson felt "dehydrated and sick" which probably means he got sauced last night. That actually sounds like a pretty fair conclusion to make.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 21:22 |
|
Toymachine posted:Apparently Seantrel Henderson felt "dehydrated and sick" which probably means he got sauced last night. Par for the course, get this man on an NFL team stat!
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 21:29 |
|
Chilichimp posted:Par for the course, get this man on an NFL team stat! Please, that sort of thing never stopped LT from performing.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 21:53 |
|
Chilichimp posted:Yeah, but like... Isaac Newton was the same loving way until a coach came along and recognized that he played better in a zone scheme. He overcame a lot to be the first player drafted 3 centuries after his death.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 21:58 |
|
Thaddius the Large posted:Please, that sort of thing never stopped LT from performing. Yea well cocaine is the best hangover remedy.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 22:29 |
|
Chichevache posted:He's intentionally tanking so he can be on a better team, just like Bridgewater. I've heard that can happen in this very thread and it is a very plausible thing. I am gravely serious about this. Hahaha
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 22:31 |
I'm excited that Kyle Fuller keeps getting a bunch of mid to late 1st round buzz. It'd be great for the Hokies recruiting to get a 2nd 1st rounder in 3 years after only having 3 in the decade prior. Also DBU etc
|
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 23:00 |
|
Brandin Cooks, on DeSean Jackson:quote:"His game is unbelievable," said Cooks. "The man can blow the top off, catch the deep routes, catch the underneath routes, produce in the return game. He’s just special. He’s a freak. I definitely admire his game. Maybe Chip Kelly is looking to take another speedy receiver in that first round, and that could be me. Who knows? And if that’s the case, a lot of people will wonder ‘Can he do it like DeSean Jackson?’ In my opinion, I can do it like him and do it better." e: I included that last paragraph to make doltos cringe
|
# ? Apr 3, 2014 23:58 |
|
The Notorious ZSB posted:I'm excited that Kyle Fuller keeps getting a bunch of mid to late 1st round buzz. How does he project as a slot corner? He's a guy I've been hoping the Texans grab. quote:It'd be great for the Hokies recruiting to get a 2nd 1st rounder in 3 years after only having 3 in the decade prior. Also DBU etc I think LSU has you guys beat there. EDIT: As DBU, I mean.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 00:04 |
|
The Notorious ZSB posted:I'm excited that Kyle Fuller keeps getting a bunch of mid to late 1st round buzz. It'd be great for the Hokies recruiting to get a 2nd 1st rounder in 3 years after only having 3 in the decade prior. Also DBU etc I want the Titans to draft him so he can wear his brother's jersey
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 00:19 |
|
Quest For Glory II posted:Brandin Cooks, on DeSean Jackson: Yelling TRSS was a way to troll fiz in IRC. The Giants Steve Smith had some bad knee injuries and disappeared, but was a very good route runner while he was healthy.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 00:57 |
|
Ozu posted:This is awesome. oop Doltos posted:The flyer would be a hang glider in a tornado. Dolphins, yeah. I'd rather not have Lewan because he's a loving cock but I'll probably just do what I've done with every other rear end in a top hat the Dolphins have picked up: quietly ignore him and apologize every time another team's fans bring him up until he works his way off the team
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 02:07 |
|
sean10mm posted:In fairness the Manziel family history is actually full of crime. johnny football is the white deangelo barksdale.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 02:24 |
bhsman posted:How does he project as a slot corner? He's a guy I've been hoping the Texans grab. I mean honestly the only draftable talent we generally seem to have is at DB so by numbers sure, but LSU pumps out talent all over. DBs are all we got it feels like. Y'all beat the tar out of us last time we played so I can't really say much to refute that position I suppose. I'm sure he can play the slot, he's got enough speed to cover the smaller faster guys that seem to be put inside in the NFL, although I think he's better when he's on the outside and able to challenge WRs for the entire route 1 on 1. VT moved him all over and if he's in the slot it puts him closer to run coverage where he excels. Go watch the film of him against GT this past year to see what he can do put into that slot position closer to the snap (although he was playing our whip LB position it's kind of a hybrid role that often has slot coverage responsibilities). I guess if he makes it out of the first the Texans would be in a position to grab him at the top of the 2nd. Our other corner Antone Exum would be a great snag in one of those middle rounds though, talent wise he's just as good if not better from a pure athleticism position. Once he's 100% healed from a nasty knee injury he could be a very versatile player in some teams secondary.
|
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 03:38 |
|
erezaka posted:johnny football is the white deangelo barksdale. So who does Mike Evans hire to strangle him when they end up on the same team?
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 05:02 |
|
Most productive WRs are psyched to play with a QB they're familiar with, particularly ones they put up great numbers with
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 05:17 |
|
I didn't say he'd be happy about it but the game is the game. Johnny just didn't have heart.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 05:23 |
|
The Puppy Bowl posted:I didn't say he'd be happy about it but the game is the game. Johnny just didn't have heart. ...what?
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 14:16 |
|
Ehud posted:...what? He's referencing Avon Barksdale's decision to kill Stringer for wanting to go legit to keep up the Wire analogy.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 14:25 |
|
Hey guys. Nfl.com has a predict the pick thing so I made a group: http://predictpick.nfl.com/groups/view/1365 Group name: The Farthouse password: goons
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 14:32 |
|
Ehud posted:...what? He's making a wire reference but I for one would welcome us talking more like Todd McShay. I don't like Clowney, he lacks the will of a champion. You can see it how he hits the bags. He just got no will.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 15:08 |
|
Rotoworld posted:According to the Houston Chronicle's John McClain, the Texans will select UCF QB Blake Bortles or Texas A&M QB Johnny Manziel.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 17:16 |
|
John McClain is kind of stubborn and dumb at times, and his opinion poo poo generally rates from meh to terrible. But he does have sources within the organization so he is good for reporting actual news.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 17:18 |
|
Please take Manziel. Please.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 17:23 |
|
Quest For Glory II posted:Nothing sinks an organization like a quarterback drafted in the first round either!! Take Clowney Yeah, no. Take a QB Houston
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 17:31 |
|
Quest For Glory II posted:Nothing sinks an organization like a quarterback drafted in the first round either!! Take Clowney lol that guy didn't have anything to say for the entirety of Clowney's Pro Day. Not to say there's no chance Houston takes either of those guys, but McClain loves playing favorites. Pathetic!!!
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 17:40 |
|
Quest For Glory II posted:Nothing sinks an organization like a quarterback drafted in the first round either!! Take Clowney It's an ultra tough decision. Might be the hardest choice for a team in the history of having a #1. Basically Houston is set at many positions and had an incredible down year due to the play of a single position. That turn around from a playoff team to a 2-14 team doesn't happen often, especially when that 2-14 team has the potential to be a playoff contender again with the right QB. All signs point to them needing to take one, but they also happen to have a generational prospect at a position that is historically extremely tough to get stability at. I wouldn't want to be in the Texans shoes right now.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 17:41 |
|
Doltos posted:It's an ultra tough decision. Might be the hardest choice for a team in the history of having a #1. Wouldn't this theoretically be an ideal situation for trading down? When there's a prospect everyone else seems to value more than you might, you trade down. In this case it's not that Houston values Clowney less but that they'd like that QB they could take a few picks later.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 17:43 |
|
Rap posted:Wouldn't this theoretically be an ideal situation for trading down? When there's a prospect everyone else seems to value more than you might, you trade down. In this case it's not that Houston values Clowney less but that they'd like that QB they could take a few picks later. When is the last time someone traded out of the #1 overall spot, though? Isn't it very difficult?
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 17:50 |
|
Doltos posted:It's an ultra tough decision. Might be the hardest choice for a team in the history of having a #1. The big thing is that the team is still talented. Watt, Cushing, Swearinger, KJax and J-Jo are a good defensive core, and on offense we're getting Foster back (for better or worse), there's Andre and Nuk at receiver, and guys like Brown, Myers, and Brooks on the offensive line. The only QB worth taking at 1-1 is Teddy, and he's not good enough to pass up the possibility of Watt and Clowney on the same line.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 17:52 |
|
Shath Hole posted:When is the last time someone traded out of the #1 overall spot, though? Isn't it very difficult? I'm sure it is, and especially if Houston likes a particular QB prospect, which would mean they wouldn't feel confident trading down more than like 5 or 6 spots. It might be too tricky to pull off, but I wonder if Clowney's high expectations would help them get a good price for the No. 1
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 17:55 |
|
Hadn't really come up. In lucks year they could have gotten 4 first round picks from a team in the 20s. Last year they would have gotten a 5th from a top 5 team
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 17:55 |
|
AAA DOLFAN posted:Hadn't really come up. In lucks year they could have gotten 4 first round picks from a team in the 20s. Holy gently caress, that would cripple a franchise. 4 or 5 first round selections for a single player? Wow. I wonder if Atlanta trades up, they are in a great spot to trade up to 1 or 2 without it costing a fuckton. What would it cost to move up to 1 or 2 from 6? e: Looks like Atlanta would have to make up ~ 1400 points in value. Their second round pick is worth 520, so we are looking at a couple seconds and a third. I don't like it. weird Asian candy fucked around with this message at 18:00 on Apr 4, 2014 |
# ? Apr 4, 2014 17:57 |
|
Shath Hole posted:When is the last time someone traded out of the #1 overall spot, though? Isn't it very difficult? 2004. It is much easier to do now that the cap figures for rookies have changed. This would be a good year for it with Clowney and the QBs all potentially going #1 and a lot of teams showing interest.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 18:02 |
|
Bigass Moth posted:2004. It is much easier to do now that the cap figures for rookies have changed. This would be a good year for it with Clowney and the QBs all potentially going #1 and a lot of teams showing interest. Ahhh that was the Rivers for Manning thing, I forgot all about that! It seems so long ago.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 18:10 |
|
San Diego still picked 1st in 2004. It seems like that type of scenario would be best for Houston though. Draft Clowney and let the first team willing to draft the QB you want trade for him. Even if you miss out you still got a Clowney.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 18:11 |
|
It's not a rule guys. Remember Miami traded up from 12 to 4 with a single 2nd rounder. Chart said they got an extra 2nd rounder in value
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 18:13 |
|
|
# ? Jun 13, 2024 06:41 |
|
Knightmere posted:San Diego still picked 1st in 2004. It seems like that type of scenario would be best for Houston though. Draft Clowney and let the first team willing to draft the QB you want trade for him. Even if you miss out you still got a Clowney. Does doing this (trading players as opposed to picks) make any difference on the value chart aspect of draft day trades? AAA DOLFAN, they moved from 12 to 4 for an additional 2nd rounder??? Who did they fleece?
|
# ? Apr 4, 2014 18:15 |