|
eggsovereasy posted:Like grape juice? Mind Loving Owl posted:Back then wasn't it actually pretty hard to stop grape juice from ending up wine anyway? It's more that grape juice is nearly impossible to keep grape juice without techniques invented in the 19th century (incidentally, the guy who invented it was a reverend and dentist who did so because he wanted to replace wine at church functions with grape juice because alcohol is the devil https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Bramwell_Welch ). You could pretty much have grape juice for like 2 or 3 days in a cooled place before it started turning into wine, vinegar, or just got infested with various nasties that meant drinking it would be really bad.
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 21:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 12:47 |
|
|
Christ, whenever they bring up George Soros's childhood I begin to feel physically ill. Like it's understandable that you end up hating certain public figures, lord knows I do, but I don't try to pervert their periods of intense tragedy or human suffering into some demonstration of how evil they are.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 21:12
|
|
|
cafel posted:Christ, whenever they bring up George Soros's childhood I begin to feel physically ill. Like it's understandable that you end up hating certain public figures, lord knows I do, but I don't try to pervert their periods of intense tragedy or human suffering into some demonstration of how evil they are. They literally see him as The Jew Who The Nazis Turned Evil. The Nazi Jew. And really you just have to brush a little dirt off the surface to see that they feel the same way about "Hollywood liberals," i.e. every Jew who makes more money than them.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 21:26
|
|
|
OK, time to break out the hoods guys!quote:To: All
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 21:39
|
|
|
Finnankainen posted:OK, time to break out the hoods guys! tips.fbi.gov
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 21:41
|
|
|
Is Holder Norwegian now or something?
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 21:55
|
|
|
Mind Loving Owl posted:Back when I was a wee primary schooler a well meaning teacher gave me a whole stack of Creation magazines. One bit of bullshit I remember well was this condescending little article about Africa. The thesis was basically that since evolutionary scientists (and basically every other scientific discipline that deals with the history of mankind one way or another) believe human beings come from Africa that must mean they believe modern Africans are less evolved than white people. Peppered throughout the thing were creationists being amused that the blacks can do white people things. How was that even supposed to work? I mean, even if humans on different continents had evolved into different species, that doesn't mean black people stopped evolving just because they stayed in Africa. Not that "more evolved" has any actual meaning beyond "better adapted for survival in a specific environment".
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 22:01
|
|
|
Georgia Peach posted:Is Holder Norwegian now or something? Well he's definitely a Quisling 
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 22:10
|
|
|
VitalSigns posted:How was that even supposed to work? I mean, even if humans on different continents had evolved into different species, that doesn't mean black people stopped evolving just because they stayed in Africa. "If we evolved from Africans then why are there still Africans? Checkmate atheists." 
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 22:12
|
|
|
VitalSigns posted:How was that even supposed to work? I mean, even if humans on different continents had evolved into different species, that doesn't mean black people stopped evolving just because they stayed in Africa. If you forget everything you ever learned about evolution and think about it as a literal line from amoeba to man, freepers would say that this forces you to put black people in between white people and apes, since whites have changed some from black people who were "the original". Evolution to them spits out completed products so the idea that things are still evolving in completely foreign to them. Once chimps existed, bam evolution stops, they are now a species. This is also where the really dumb "if humans evolved from apes why are there still apes?" argument comes from. ^^^^beaten
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 22:13
|
|
|
"Our first child is arriving later this year" Chelsea Clinton and Marc Mezvinskyquote:To: Biggirl quote:To: Biggirl quote:To: trisham quote:To: Biggirl Chelsea pregnant! (My prediction) quote:To: proudpapa quote:To: proudpapa quote:To: proudpapa quote:To: proudpapa
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 22:41
|
|
|
quote:To: Biggirl What a nice sentiment! He couldn't possibly mean anything else, right? Right? 
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 22:46
|
|
|
quote:To: Biggirl Ok which one of you did this? e: huh Freeper since 2000. Their profile says they're for government assistance but not the way the -Ds do it. So only for white people. So gently caress this rear end in a top hat. Islam is the Lite Rock FM fucked around with this message at 22:50 on Apr 17, 2014 |
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 22:48
|
|
|
First time I'll ever post a FReep quote based on username/content: quote:To: proudpapa *zzzzzzz* ....huh? poo poo, sorry. Drifted off somewhere in the second paragraph. Let's do one more just because it's super-inane: quote:To: proudpapa Zeroisanumber fucked around with this message at 23:35 on Apr 17, 2014 |
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 23:33
|
|
|
Finnankainen posted:Sure, but the implication is that this discrimination constitutes speciation since you get two separate populations that don't interbreed even though they could. Sure it's dumb. He things that simply forbidding intermarriage without exerting severely different environmental-social pressure we would somehow evolve into different species when we haven't in the tens of thousands of years we were separated already. But the real question is why the gently caress would he even want do something like that deliberately? The "oh well the geckos/pikas do it so I guess we should do it too" seems like a poor excuse to secure the existence of his people and a future for white children.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 23:36
|
|
|
What beautiful projection: I think that Chelsea Clinton is unattractive. Which is all the left cares about. Now let me tell you about how unattractive she is. Also why don't they mention Scott Brown? He's so dreamy~~
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 23:39
|
|
|
Here's a good thread. I'm sure there'll be lots of well-reasoned discussion.quote:Report: Users of White Power Website Have Committed Nearly 100 Murders This is post #14, pretty much every post before it expressed the same sentiment: quote:To: Libloather Sure could twist a guy up having to defend yourself from blacks in prison: quote:To: Libloather Seriously, this post represents about 2/3rds of the thread: quote:To: Libloather SPLC: Worse than Nazis. quote:To: Libloather Let's end with a Knockout Game post: quote:To: IllumiNaughtyByNature
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 23:46
|
|
|
I'm grateful to Chelsea Clinton, not because of anything she's ever done, but because she was responsible for one of the greatest reveals in history.John McCain posted:Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno. McCain told this joke at a Republican fundraiser in 1998, when Chelsea was 18 and TOTALLY FAIR GAME.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 23:49
|
|
|
protastic posted:What a nice sentiment! He couldn't possibly mean anything else, right? Right? He is saying that he hopes the child is born LGBT, because that is a bad thing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2014 23:50
|
|
|
CitizenKain posted:He is saying that he hopes the child is born LGBT, because that is a bad thing. I think it's even more than that: he hopes the child is born LGBT, because this will cause the end of the Clinton line or some horrific poo poo like that. I hope the child grows up happy, healthy, and with whatever sexual preference it has. BECAUSE I HOPE THAT FOR ALL CHILDREN oh god
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 00:00
|
|
|
Nobody wants a gay kid. You might say you don't care, but when the chips are down you'll turn into a child-beating bigot just like us. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 00:01
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:I'm grateful to Chelsea Clinton, not because of anything she's ever done, but because she was responsible for one of the greatest reveals in history. Reminder that not only did a large number of people defend this joke as if it somehow was evidence that McCain was presidential material, but it would still pale in comparison to him saying, with utmost seriousness, "I hate Gooks" in public during a presidential campaign.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 00:28
|
|
|
I guess it shouldn't surprise me that they just straight up defend Stormfront, but it kind of does. I mean they claim they aren't racist and such, so you think they'd try to distance themselves from a site that openly espouses the white supremacist mindset. I feel stupid now.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 00:29
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Nobody wants a gay kid. You might say you don't care, but when the chips are down you'll turn into a child-beating bigot just like us. I honestly want to meet the person who was progressive and understanding about LGBT people, until their child came out as gay and then suddenly realized how much they hated their own child.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 00:34
|
|
|
 I know nothing about Stormfront, let me tell you about how Stormfront is a democrat conspiracy. quote:To: ansel12; Cyber Liberty
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 00:39
|
|
|
Finnankainen posted:
I've said it before and I'll say it again: even if it wasn't for the gallows humor to be found on freep, this thread would be worth it as a first-hand study of the paranoid mind.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 00:41
|
|
|
quote:To: Biggirl Just gawking at this. Genuinely impressed by how many layers of ignorance this guy packed into just four sentences. Can't wait for the more/worse.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 00:43
|
|
|
Mr.Unique-Name posted:I guess it shouldn't surprise me that they just straight up defend Stormfront, but it kind of does. I mean they claim they aren't racist and such, so you think they'd try to distance themselves from a site that openly espouses the white supremacist mindset. Freep forever approaches the point where they're just an outright racist group while never actually getting there (in their eyes that means saying the n-word). Someone more  than me could probably plot a graph.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 00:49
|
|
|
MeLKoR posted:Sure it's dumb. He things that simply forbidding intermarriage without exerting severely different environmental-social pressure we would somehow evolve into different species when we haven't in the tens of thousands of years we were separated already. But the real question is why the gently caress would he even want do something like that deliberately? The "oh well the geckos/pikas do it so I guess we should do it too" seems like a poor excuse to secure the existence of his people and a future for white children. Maybe he's a fan of polydactyly or any of the other horrible poo poo that low genetic diversity brings.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 00:50
|
|
|
Neo_Crimson posted:Freep forever approaches the point where they're just an outright racist group while never actually getting there (in their eyes that means saying the n-word). Someone more They're already an outright racist group. What they keep approaching, and never quite reaching, is admitting and owning it like Stormfront does. That, and saying the N-word.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 01:04
|
|
|
I was under the impression the n-word thing was only because of extremely vigilant zotters.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 01:07
|
|
|
CitizenKain posted:He is saying that he hopes the child is born LGBT, because that is a bad thing. The impression I got was that he thought Chelsea would brainwash the kid into being gay, because that's what liberals do in freep-land.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 01:33
|
|
|
CitizenKain posted:He is saying that he hopes the child is born LGBT, because that is a bad thing. Being Freep, what he probably means is he hopes the kid has AIDS. I wish I was joking.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 02:22
|
|
|
Georgia Peach posted:To: proudpapa How on earth could you look at Chelsea Clinton and think shes a lardass? 
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 02:37
|
|
|
ratbert90 posted:How on earth could you look at Chelsea Clinton and think shes a lardass? Same reason why they think Michelle Obama is fat. Being a Democrat adds 50 pounds.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 02:48
|
|
|
ratbert90 posted:How on earth could you look at Chelsea Clinton and think shes a lardass? Their delusions include audio-visual hallucinations. Big Hubris fucked around with this message at 03:14 on Apr 18, 2014 |
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 03:11
|
|
|
I forget who's the political cartoonist where, like, he just draws all liberal people as if they way 300 pounds? Maybe that's the freepers' only point of reference.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 03:28
|
|
|
Notorious QIG posted:Being Freep, what he probably means is he hopes the kid has AIDS. I wish I was joking. Probably all of the above actually.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 03:39
|
|
|
ratbert90 posted:How on earth could you look at Chelsea Clinton and think shes a lardass? The poster is actually pointing to Hilary ("her lard rear end mother") rather than Chelsea, though he clearly envisions a future of bountiful, plentiful, overflowing Chelsea. The secret is that he has a fat fetish.
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 04:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 12:47 |
|
|
Neo Rasa posted:I forget who's the political cartoonist where, like, he just draws all liberal people as if they way 300 pounds? Maybe that's the freepers' only point of reference.  
Lord Hydronium fucked around with this message at 04:40 on Apr 18, 2014 |
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2014 04:36
|
|
