|
Another John Wick Poster
|
# ? Oct 1, 2014 23:04 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 21:28 |
|
rawillkill posted:Another John Wick Poster
|
# ? Oct 1, 2014 23:06 |
|
I'm the aliasing on the sliced parts.
|
# ? Oct 1, 2014 23:08 |
|
I thought the MPAA was pretty strict on 'don't point guns at the viewer' when it came to posters. Has this changed, or did Lionsgate not run this by them before they decided to post it?
|
# ? Oct 1, 2014 23:13 |
|
I like KEANU REEVES
|
# ? Oct 1, 2014 23:51 |
|
Rageaholic Monkey posted:Christ, I hope text sliced in half isn't a new trend. The Divergent poster did that same thing, and I'm sure other posters have too. Text being sliced up has been a thing since like the beginning of loving time.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2014 03:15 |
|
kiimo posted:You guys still miss trailer VO? But it did always used to ruin every foreign film VHS preview for me as a kid in the 90s.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2014 06:18 |
|
I think it's cool that Keanu Reeves is blurred out in that poster. We should blur him out of more things to see if they improve.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2014 07:18 |
|
Robert Denby posted:I thought the MPAA was pretty strict on 'don't point guns at the viewer' when it came to posters. Has this changed, or did Lionsgate not run this by them before they decided to post it? It's not allowed in advertising which is rated “Approved (Without Restrictions)” or “Approved With Restrictions” but it's apparently allowed in advertising which is limited to “Restricted Audiences”. http://www.filmratings.com/downloads/advertising_handbook.pdf I guess no one told Quick Gun Murugun either:
|
# ? Oct 2, 2014 14:56 |
|
Keanu Reeves is going to kill me, blow my brains out with a pistol, and that's ok.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2014 15:44 |
|
.
boom boom boom fucked around with this message at 01:39 on Oct 6, 2014 |
# ? Oct 2, 2014 15:46 |
|
boom boom boom posted:
I hope so. That stuff offset the legit horror stuff nicely in the original.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2014 16:06 |
|
boom boom boom posted:this is probably the least helpful spoiler tags ever. Wikipedia calls it a meta-remake, and the plot synopsis says it takes place 65 years after the murders the original was based on. So I don't know what the loving deal is with this movie.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2014 16:21 |
|
Waffleman_ posted:Wikipedia calls it a meta-remake, and the plot synopsis says it takes place 65 years after the murders the original was based on. quote:According to Deadline, Addison Timlin (pictured) will star in the redo. Now, here’s the interesting thing about this project. It’s taking a “meta” approach. The 1976 film of the same name exists in the world of this picture. http://www.shocktillyoudrop.com/news/173247-meta-version-of-the-town-that-dreaded-sundown-finds-its-leading-lady/ I guess that's pretty meta.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2014 16:37 |
|
So before WB broke with Legendary we used to be on Seventh Son, which is a run of the mill fantasy movie that I kind of enjoyed. Here's our poster and ember jokes aside it is something that I wasn't ashamed of. We packed up all our assets, washed our hands of the film and said good luck because the box office isn't going to be great. Legendary took over and when box office isn't great they can blame us. It's win win. Except for this which just came out and call me crazy and I'm biased but is it me or does this suck rear end? I think the only good thing is the title treatment which we did. Ugh. "In the face of evil, claim your destiny." What does that even mean? edit: oh hey look they also released this with a garbage title treatment. "When darkness falls, the son will rise" Word play like this is kind of considered bush league, especially when it barely works. kiimo fucked around with this message at 18:57 on Oct 2, 2014 |
# ? Oct 2, 2014 18:48 |
|
kiimo posted:So before WB broke with Legendary we used to be on Seventh Son, which is a run of the mill fantasy movie that I kind of enjoyed. Here's our poster and ember jokes aside it is something that I wasn't ashamed of. Man those two posters do look bad. And that last one reminds me a lot of the Killer is Dead box for the PS3.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2014 18:59 |
|
Where we're going, we won't need torsos.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2014 19:07 |
|
Meatwave posted:I think it's cool that Keanu Reeves is blurred out in that poster. We should blur him out of more things to see if they improve. Keanu Reeves is dope and cool, I would actually fight a person over this.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2014 19:15 |
|
Julianne Moore looks really out of place, mostly since everyone else's faces are in half-shadow and she's a full moon.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2014 19:26 |
|
GrandpaPants posted:Also from the trailer, it doesn't look like anyone is actually taken in Tak3n. What a rip. Liam Neeson has been very clear on the point that nobody is abducted this time. There's still a metaphorical taking, though: as Mills is being framed, someone is trying to take his life away.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2014 20:13 |
|
|
# ? Oct 2, 2014 20:18 |
|
Another Ealing/Guinness: While the overall outcome is not a spoiler to anyone who's seen the first five minutes, it's still bizarre that the hows of it are spoiled. That said, Kind Hearts and Coronets is more about the poetry of the script (and how well Dennis Price sells it) than anything.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 04:54 |
|
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 05:42 |
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:It's not allowed in advertising which is rated “Approved (Without Restrictions)” or “Approved With Restrictions” but it's apparently allowed in advertising which is limited to “Restricted Audiences”. This needs to be the forums motto.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 05:52 |
I seriously love this poster. E: The 2010 remake did a similar thing but way worse.
|
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 06:54 |
|
TheJoker138 posted:E: The 2010 remake did a similar thing but way worse. Horror remakes in a sentence.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 13:56 |
|
I'm the guy who said "No her underwear needs to be more up her rear end."
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 16:00 |
|
Yodzilla posted:I'm the guy who said "No her underwear needs to be more up her rear end." This rape's just not making me horny enough.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 16:14 |
|
I'm not exactly sad that I finally watched the original, but I can't think of any reason to watch a remake. I had similar feelings about Last House on the Left (but watched it anyway because Riki Lindhome). In the end, that one wasn't a bad movie and was slightly less repulsive than the original, but that isn't really a compliment. It's supposed to be repulsive. Someone would really have to do some convincing to get me to watch an I Spit on Your Grave remake. Even if I was in a mood to watch something difficult, I'd probably just finally make myself sit through Cannibal Holocaust.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 17:14 |
|
Yodzilla posted:I'm the guy who said "No her underwear needs to be more up her rear end." All these scratches and bruises are distracting. Just splash a little mud on her.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 17:51 |
|
Mondo is releasing an exclusive edition of the Gaurdians of the Galaxy soundtrack! What amazing exclusive art will they use? I will never, ever understand the appeal of Tyler Stout and his busy, confusing, headache-inducing, ugly-rear end posters. MajorB fucked around with this message at 18:52 on Oct 3, 2014 |
# ? Oct 3, 2014 18:47 |
|
Geekboy posted:I'm not exactly sad that I finally watched the original, but I can't think of any reason to watch a remake. The remake is a lot less exploitive and insulting, so there's that. It's still not objectively good or anything but it's better than the original. The posters take an opposite tac, which is bizarre.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 18:54 |
|
The remake poster isn't as good because it isn't as clear that she's holding the knife by the loving blade.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 19:22 |
|
I know I'm late to Mila Kunis chat but she was really great in Black Swan, which coincidently has a great poster.kiimo posted:So before WB broke with Legendary we used to be on Seventh Son, which is a run of the mill fantasy movie that I kind of enjoyed. Here's our poster and ember jokes aside it is something that I wasn't ashamed of. Yeesh, you aren't crazy, your poster is a lot better than what they went with.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 20:27 |
|
Mister J posted:The remake poster isn't as good because it isn't as clear that she's holding the knife by the loving blade. No she's not, she's holding it blade up by the handle.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 20:32 |
BARONS CYBER SKULL posted:No she's not, she's holding it blade up by the handle. Look closer.
|
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 20:46 |
|
actually i should read closer because i misread what he posted i blame it being early in the morning
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 20:49 |
|
MajorB posted:Mondo is releasing an exclusive edition of the Gaurdians of the Galaxy soundtrack! What amazing exclusive art will they use? Ooof. This is a pretty ugly poster. Peter's the only character that looks like he was drawn right. Everyone else is misshapen.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 21:25 |
|
oh well, soundtrack on vinyl
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 21:32 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 21:28 |
|
Lotish posted:Ooof. This is a pretty ugly poster. Peter's the only character that looks like he was drawn right. Everyone else is misshapen. It wouldn't look quite so terrible if he'd actually use some drat colour rather that making everything shades of grey with one accent colour thus rendering everything incomprehensible, but I guess that's his Thing and he's determined to run it into the ground as long as tasteless idiots will keep paying top dollar for it.
|
# ? Oct 3, 2014 22:31 |