|
Hip Hop Hip Hop Anonymous
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2014 22:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 08:04 |
|
|
Come on New Zealand, we want a Hiphopopotamus and the Rhymenoceros movie.
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2014 22:35
|
|
|
So do we!
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2014 22:37
|
|
|
zenintrude posted:It's not cool for posters to feature guns pointed at the viewer, but it is cool for posters to feature swords pointed at the viewer. Did you miss the new John Wick poster I posted earlier?
|
|
#
?
Oct 6, 2014 23:37
|
|
|
Waffleman_ posted:I find it funny that the tagline is "The Defining Chapter" when the entire movie is an adaptation of one chapter of the book. A background event from that chapter, no less, because this is Middle Earth and we have to have epic fantasy fights in our adaptation of a literal children's book. Question for all: What's a worse idea? Turning the Hobbit into three movies or turning Newt Scamander Fantastic Beasts into three movies?
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 00:15
|
|
|
The Hobbit, because rather than just being an idea, it's an actual story stretched out to agonizing length. Fantastic Beasts at least is just a premise - "what if there was a series of movies about the guy who found all the creatures in a Hogwarts textbook and his adventures in finding them?", which is a basic premise about as simple and effective as Indiana Jones.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 01:12
|
|
|
CaptainHollywood posted:Question for all: will that second thing you said there have hour-long mind-numbing cgi fight scenes because if not then it can't be worse than the hobbit movies
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 01:16
|
|
|
What does this internationally revered fifty year old saga really need? More giant wolf chases!
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 01:22
|
|
|
It's the same thing that ruined King Kong but by all means go see the Hobbit movies because jobs depend on it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 01:24
|
|
|
CaptainHollywood posted:Question for all: This isn't true is it?
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 01:25
|
|
|
The Cameo posted:The Hobbit, because rather than just being an idea, it's an actual story stretched out to agonizing length. Just wanna empty-quote this because seriously, at least with Fantastic Beasts you can invent poo poo out of whole cloth so there are no dead zones and make a cinematic story, whereas with the Hobbit not only are you adapting a book to screen but you're doing it in the most painstaking way possible turning the plot into taffy you can chew on endlessly but never seems to really go anywhere.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 02:19
|
|
|
Here are the Key Art Awards nominations for print.... http://www.keyartaward.com/winners/2014/print/ kiimo fucked around with this message at 04:04 on Oct 7, 2014 |
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 03:37
|
|
|
I have that Pacific Rim poster framed, hell yeah.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 03:45
|
|
|
That loving X-Men poster? Seriously?
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 03:47
|
|
|
Mister Chief posted:That loving X-Men poster? Seriously? Well it certainly wins the award for "most improved." A lot of them are really iffy, though.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 04:01
|
|
|
kiimo posted:Here are the Key Art Awards nominations for print.... Most of those posters are really, really boring
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 04:08
|
|
|
Fayez Butts posted:Most of those posters are really, really boring But man, that kerning.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 04:44
|
|
|
which kerning?
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 04:48
|
|
|
Those Star Wars Rebels posters are the first good look I've had at anything from that since I first heard about it and honestly, just judging from those, it somehow manages to look even dumber than what they had going on before the Star Wars slate got wiped clean of decades' worth of expanded universe buildup. Frankly, it wouldn't surprise me at all if the only reason Disney did that in the first place was to have a completely clean surface on which to splatter their own brand of officially-sanctioned fan fiction that's really no different from the old except that it has the Disney stamp of approval on its forehead from birth. On the other hand, the featured Dominion posters are honestly pretty funny.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 05:30
|
|
|
Doctor Bishop posted:Frankly, it wouldn't surprise me at all if the only reason Disney did that in the first place was to have a completely clean surface on which to splatter their own brand of officially-sanctioned fan fiction that's really no different from the old except that it has the Disney stamp of approval on its forehead from birth. Yeah, it's called Episode VII. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 05:38
|
|
|
Ahaha three of the four protagonists in that Star Wars collection have Dreamworks face.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 05:43
|
|
|
zenintrude posted:Because I know how much you guys like this stuff... That's his "I can't believe I starred in that piece of poo poo Godzilla" face.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 07:33
|
|
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:That's his "I can't believe I starred in that piece of poo poo Godzilla" face. Is getting killed in the first act "starring" now?
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 07:45
|
|
|
"And" always means death. And Godzilla owns.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 07:45
|
|
|
Fayez Butts posted:which kerning? None of it, I was being sarcastic. "Here, have an award for boring designs with non-eye-searing font choices, clearly this is what is best in poster design."
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 07:45
|
|
|
CelticPredator posted:"And" always means death. It wasn't as good as the original, but then again what is?
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 07:46
|
|
|
I watched the Star Wars Rebels thing with my 8 year old son this weekend. Its kind of strange because the main character is Aladin. Not even like Aladin. He's Aladin. I Guess it makes a lot of sense in a board room discussion sort of way, but I had a knee jerk reaction to it. It was really strange seeing another franchise crammed into Star Wars. My son loving loved it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 12:12
|
|
|
Bloody Hedgehog posted:That's his "I can't believe I starred in that piece of poo poo Godzilla" face. So edgy man - your post cuts like a knife!
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 14:54
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 15:33
|
|
|
zenintrude posted:It's not cool for posters to feature guns pointed at the viewer, but it is cool for posters to feature swords pointed at the viewer. Also crossbows:  Although I think that poster might have been for the international market. I've only seen a handful of Indian films but I'm pretty sure I recognise almost every character stereotype they've got lined up there.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 16:59
|
|
|
Which one's Gurren
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 17:11
|
|
|
 Gandalf this time
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 20:07
|
|
|
You can't sleep here! Push off!
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 20:32
|
|
oddium posted:Which one's Gurren Thank you for making this dumb joke so I didn't have to
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 20:38
|
|
|
oddium posted:Which one's Gurren please lagaff
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 20:46
|
|
|
Dick Trauma posted:You can't sleep here! Push off! 
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 20:58
|
|
|
So simple, so brilliant.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 21:07
|
|
|
Vintersorg posted:So edgy man - your post cuts like a knife! The truth is a wicked blade. Also it's not 1996 and you're not in high-school, stop using the word edgy.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 21:52
|
|
|
Now this is a movie I'd pay to see. Sir Ian stumbling around piss-rear end drunk, shouting at pedestrians outside of liquor stores. Sort of like a grimy version of Peter O'Toole in "My Favorite Year." Man is this thing a mess...  A better tagline for this would be ROBERT REDFORD IS ON THIS POSTER FIVE TIMES!!! 
Dick Trauma fucked around with this message at 22:00 on Oct 7, 2014 |
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 21:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 08:04 |
|
|
Dick Trauma posted:Now this is a movie I'd pay to see. Sir Ian stumbling around piss-rear end drunk, shouting at pedestrians outside of liquor stores. Sort of like a grimy version of Peter O'Toole in "My Favorite Year." Or a classed-up Hobo With A Shotgun.
|
|
#
?
Oct 7, 2014 21:59
|
|
