|
they ask for the history of Islam and then immediately it puts them to sleep
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 20:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 09:33 |
|
|
An-Cap Update: Meltdown in progress. Accusing the one poster whose actually bothering to politely engage him of not thinking and challenging him to call-in to Stefan Molyneux's radio show. Pretty convinced he's a troll.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 20:30
|
|
|
paragon1 posted:An-Cap Update: Meltdown in progress. Accusing the one poster whose actually bothering to politely engage him of not thinking and challenging him to call-in to Stefan Molyneux's radio show. As I myself pointed out about my ad-homs on him, it's not trolling if they really believe it. It just makes them potentially a huge jerk.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 20:32
|
|
|
CoolCab posted:they ask for the history of Islam and then immediately it puts them to sleep I'd love a history of early islamic political development that includes regional arab and other groups' political development to provide background context. I'm a bit tired of going off historeographies based off Byzantine and Roman Catholic sources.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 20:33
|
|
|
RuanGacho posted:As I myself pointed out about my ad-homs on him, it's not trolling if they really believe it. It just makes them potentially a huge jerk. Well yeah sure, but he's basically doing the forums equivalent of throwing off his shirt while shouting "COME AT ME BRO" to the person whose being the nicest to him, so I have to wonder.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 20:35
|
|
|
It's all part of his elaborate plot to trap you by posting Libertarian thoughts in the Libertarian thread. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 20:37
|
|
|
loving thousand pages of that to go through. Is it worth it, fellow D&D aficionados/as?
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 20:46
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:loving thousand pages of that to go through. Is it worth it, fellow D&D aficionados/as? The Libertarian thread? God no, it's just where I go to unleash my rage at an unjust world. It's kind of nice that SA is accepting of a filthy statist like me 
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 20:50
|
|
|
Has there ever been a single forum thread worth reading in its entirety?Badger of Basra posted:Felipe VI In all the pictures I found he's clean shaven. What the hell was he thinking shaving that off?
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 20:59
|
|
|
Shear Modulus posted:In this post-Yingluck world who is the hottest current head of state/head of government? While Felipe's a fair argument, I may have to go with President(e?) Kirchner of Argentina.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 20:59
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:By the way, Alhazred, you never replied about bandes dessinées stores in Paris. Ended up going to a Boulinier and getting Aldebaran1, Avant l'Incal 1, and Alef Thau 2.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 21:01
|
|
|
So I've been thinking about the whole "starting sentences with so" thing and I've remembered that a long time ago one friend of mine noticed I do it and mentioned it. He wasn't mocking me (at least not so harshly) but it was the first time I ever realized that some people thought about it. I think I definitely use it for one specific purpose, that is to verbally reset the flow of conversation and indicate that I am now changing the subject to something entirely unrelated to what came before. "So I was driving to work today..." "So I'm at the grocery store and I'm looking for..." It's a habit, and maybe it's a bad one; but I don't buy into the hate. It's basically like a non-verbal placeholder like "um," or "uh;" but at least when I use it it's actually indicative of the fact that I'm moving onto something else. Hopefully that something else is something you'll find interesting enough to want to hear it, and/or discuss it, and not get hung up on the fact that I said, "So...." I think it's weirder to get haughty about it than to actually do it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 21:09
|
|
|
Alhazred posted:I have literally no idea about what you're talking about. I haven't even been to Paris. It was pages and ages ago, and apparently lost inside of an argument about... I want to say political hackery? I thought for some reason that you would be the person to ask because of that thread from way back, but perhaps I assumed wrongly and my memory is bad and I am getting old. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 21:17
|
|
|
It used to be bannable on SA to start thread titles with "So..."
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 21:18
|
|
|
Joementum posted:It used to be bannable on SA to start thread titles with "So..." From the last page: Captain_Maclaine posted:Hell, back in the very early 2000s starting thread titles with "So I..." became so commonplace and annoying (if for no other reason then so many of there variations on "So I poo poo myself in public"), that Lowtax made it a bannable offense.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 21:19
|
|
|
paragon1 posted:An-Cap Update: Meltdown in progress. Accusing the one poster whose actually bothering to politely engage him of not thinking and challenging him to call-in to Stefan Molyneux's radio show. Angry ancap MRAs are hard to distinguish from trolls, is the thing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 21:21
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:loving thousand pages of that to go through. Is it worth it, fellow D&D aficionados/as? It's like 60 pages actually. And no, it really isn't.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 21:21
|
|
|
Pope Guilty posted:Angry ancap MRAs are hard to distinguish from trolls, is the thing. Well he's declared he's done with us for being so mean  So that's done with I guess. At least Lowtax got paid.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 21:22
|
|
|
Used to be a meme on NeoGAF until recently as well. Maybe a stupid fad that passed.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 21:40
|
|
|
Shear Modulus posted:Has there ever been a single forum thread worth reading in its entirety? groverhaus
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 21:43
|
|
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:While Felipe's a fair argument, I may have to go with President(e?) Kirchner of Argentina. she used to be but her plastic surgery is starting to show imo very fashionable, though 
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 22:07
|
|
|
paragon1 posted:It's like 60 pages actually. And no, it really isn't. It's more like 1000 posts since I had last looked into it; I cannot count nor can I express myself clearly.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 22:38
|
|
|
paragon1 posted:It's like 60 pages actually. And no, it really isn't. It's kinda like DnD's own mock thread, except instead of terrible webcomics it's terrible political ideas.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 22:46
|
|
|
The Greek and Roman history thread owns.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 22:54
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:terrible webcomics tw: redundancy
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 22:55
|
|
|
I am friends with lots of academics and they start using so when they get into lecture/explaining mode. I wonder it they say so when they want to gently caress. So I want to gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 22:57
|
|
|
john c. calhoun was kind of hot before he got all old and assholish
|
|
#
?
Oct 11, 2014 23:05
|
|
|
euphronius posted:I am friends with lots of academics and they start using so when they get into lecture/explaining mode. "So, shall we commence intercourse?"
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2014 00:25
|
|
|
I think a lot of people might react more positive to filler filled speech than direct sentences. Especially when you take position opposed to theirs.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2014 00:27
|
|
|
Randler posted:I think a lot of people might react more positive to filler filled speech than direct sentences. Especially when you take position opposed to theirs. There is a lot of merit to your contention, my dear German colleague, but I am afraid that I cannot in good conscience agree with it, as it runs counter to my own experience. I do appreciate your point of view, of course, and do not think it reflects poorly on any of your other judgments, which stand or fall on their own merits.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2014 00:30
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred, a man who believes Obama can force Congress to do what he wants. I don't think that's the world we live in.E: Hell, I doubt Boehner could get Congress to agree on the timing of a, 'Free Jello Shots with AIPAC' event if he tried.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2014 00:35
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:
To be fair, your posts are those of a person suffering severe delusions, so I'm not quite sure you're one to talk, champ.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2014 00:37
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:Absurd Alhazred, a man who believes Obama can force Congress to do what he wants. He can force the question. He can force them to refuse him this power. He can say, "you know, as it stands, I do not have the proper authorization to pursue ISIS. I think this is something that needs to be done for the security of the US/the good of our allies/the promotion of the Homosexual Agenda. I ask Congress to give me this power." And then they either do or do not do this. And when they go about their pathetic, cowardly way of not making a decision, he can say: "I respect Congress's decision, and will not pursue ISIS." Bam! Every Congressperson and Senator that is up for election in November has to answer some hard questions. Or maybe they authorize him, and then we see what happens. That's how the system works when it's lead by someone who respects it. And if he does back-room-dealing to get that through, or doesn't, it doesn't matter. He upholds our system of government instead of being complicit in this cowardly, muddled circumvention thereof. ETA: Wait, why is this in this thread? 
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2014 00:41
|
|
|
Badger of Basra posted:john c. calhoun was kind of hot before he got all old and assholish Jaw's too square. Not my type.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2014 00:42
|
|
|
Why are you giving the fake Washington/Illinois/Delusionville Insider any credence, again?
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2014 00:42
|
|
|
ThirdPartyView posted:Why are you giving the fake Washington/Illinois/Delusionville Insider any credence, again? Sometimes arguments are more important than the people expressing them.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2014 00:45
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:
And people call me delusional.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2014 00:45
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:And people call me delusional. That's because you are?
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2014 00:46
|
|
|
My Imaginary GF posted:And people call me delusional. I think mostly they call you ethically vacuous, and for good reason. Sometimes it is better to fail the right way than to succeed the wrong way. Obama can't even succeed very well the wrong way.
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2014 00:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 5, 2024 09:33 |
|
|
uh, what's this about? where did this come from?
|
|
#
?
Oct 12, 2014 00:47
|
|
