|
Doctor Bishop posted:The director confirmed the basic premise in an interview back in May. And he confirmed Mega-Rex.
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 12:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 00:18 |
|
|
Lizard Combatant posted:Why "fix" what isn't broken? Not hot on the 3D or cold steel look. They should just reuse the original poster and also the original film.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 13:14
|
|
|
DarkSol posted:Does that mean there will be a Futureworld remake too? I specifically requested no Futureworld remake. PriorMarcus posted:And he confirmed Mega-Rex. Will Mega-Rex be a robot? Because if my Westworld remake thing is to be fully realized... 
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 13:29
|
|
|
Those Hobbit posters are ab-pore-rrent.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 15:35
|
|
|
Those hobbit posters are almost as bad as the movies.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 15:40
|
|
|
Looks like they have more actual posters now.    
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 15:47
|
|
|
I'm still not over them calling the event that was an afterthought in the original book "The Defining Chapter."
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 15:52
|
|
|
Isn't Bilbo asleep during the Battle of Five Armies?
Shoehead fucked around with this message at 16:35 on Oct 15, 2014 |
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 15:57
|
|
|
Can't wait for this movie about a really cool British Jesus.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 16:36
|
|
|
is it called the defining chapter because it all comes from a single chapter of a book for children
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 16:38
|
|
|
It was supposed to say De Final Chapta but the poster company heard wrong.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 17:02
|
|
|
zenintrude posted:I specifically requested no Futureworld remake.  I'd want one. I'm probably one of the very few people to have the Blu-ray of Futureworld.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 17:37
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:Somebody ordered more pores? I wish this was Bilbo with eyes closed, lying on the ground.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 17:53
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:Somebody ordered more pores? Martin Freeman looks about as sick of this poo poo as the rest of us.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 18:12
|
|
|
I really, really wanted to like the Hobbit movies. I actually do enjoy the first. But the 2nd one was so loving soulless. It was drab, nearly joyless, and just so god drat boring for most of it. It was like someone who hated the Lord of the Rings movies trying to make a Lord of the Rings movie, and only capturing the things that they disliked about them, amplified by an order of magnitude. The Hobbit movies make me sad that they exist.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 20:10
|
|
|
TheJoker138 posted:I really, really wanted to like the Hobbit movies. I actually do enjoy the first. But the 2nd one was so loving soulless. It was drab, nearly joyless, and just so god drat boring for most of it. It was like someone who hated the Lord of the Rings movies trying to make a Lord of the Rings movie, and only capturing the things that they disliked about them, amplified by an order of magnitude. The Hobbit movies make me sad that they exist. I'm the hour-long FORGING A GOLDEN STATUE sequence that accomplishes nothing
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 20:18
|
|
|
I cannot for the life of me remember a single thing about the entire time spent in Laketown outside of "these are some really awesome-looking sets."
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 20:23
|
|
|
Stephen Fry chewed up some of that scenery.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:22
|
|
|
R. Mute posted:I think criticisms like the fact that it's ugly, lazy and uninspired are strikes against it even if it only tries to sell itself. And let's say you're a fan and you want a poster - do you want something that actually reflects something from this film or will you settle for a big red thing? I mean, if you find that aesthetically pleasing This is sort of off-topic at this point, but I'm surprised no one pointed out yet that the poster is a take on the English national football (and probably other sports) team crest.  Not sure if that changes your feelings at all, but it isn't just a random image of heraldic lions.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:44
|
|
|
That's because it has been pointed out twice.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:49
|
|
|
So I bought a thing.  Fitting for October I guess.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 21:52
|
|
|
Mantis42 posted:So I bought a thing. That's one of my favorite posters, especially the (OBVIOUSLY).
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 22:06
|
|
|
zenintrude posted:Oh cool, so glad someone in Hollywood got my letter asking for a 1:1 Westworld remake. Ah man, I would prefer that a Westworld remake be an inverse of the theme: instead of the park breaking down and the robots killing the participants, I'd prefer that a self-maintaining Westworld essentially be a bubble of robot order in a sea of anarchy following an economic collapse, still going through the motions. I want to see Chris the Gunslinger defending the park against invading bandits straight out of Mad Max.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 22:10
|
|
|
Whenever Futureworld comes up in this thread, which is more often than you'd think, I have to point out the tagline.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 22:18
|
|
|
Young Freud posted:Ah man, I would prefer that a Westworld remake be an inverse of the theme: instead of the park breaking down and the robots killing the participants, I'd prefer that a self-maintaining Westworld essentially be a bubble of robot order in a sea of anarchy following an economic collapse, still going through the motions. I want to see Chris the Gunslinger defending the park against invading bandits straight out of Mad Max. And now so do I.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 22:19
|
|
|
mind the walrus posted:Weird. I guess I've got egg on my face. Of all the things that had me excited for the movie - it was this tweet/pic where I said, "Ok, I'm game for this." https://twitter.com/colintrevorrow/status/504007845587980288
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 22:59
|
|
|
Mister Chief posted:Whenever Futureworld comes up in this thread, which is more often than you'd think, I have to point out the tagline. Which makes perfect sense in context of the film. What's the problem with it? 
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 23:38
|
|
|
TheJoker138 posted:I really, really wanted to like the Hobbit movies. I actually do enjoy the first. But the 2nd one was so loving soulless. It was drab, nearly joyless, and just so god drat boring for most of it. It was like someone who hated the Lord of the Rings movies trying to make a Lord of the Rings movie, and only capturing the things that they disliked about them, amplified by an order of magnitude. The Hobbit movies make me sad that they exist. The really strange thing is, I didn't really care for the first one all that much. SO, you would think that I wouldn't like the Extended Edition, since the movie already felt so bloated. But the extra scenes took what was a bloated mess, really balanced it out, and made it an enjoyable movie. The second one I liked better than the first on it's own, but I was bothered by just about everything involving Legolas. I'm curious to see if the EE makes it better like with the first.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 23:46
|
|
|
Mantis42 posted:So I bought a thing. That's a bad-rear end poster and now I'm reminded to start my Hammer marathon for Halloween.
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 23:52
|
|
|
CaptainHollywood posted:Of all the things that had me excited for the movie - it was this tweet/pic where I said, "Ok, I'm game for this."  Too bad none of the original cast are showing up.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 00:44
|
|
|
achillesforever6 posted:He looks so smug that his dreams of bringing joy to children have come true Uh, B.D. Wong is coming back, and he MADE that movie.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 00:51
|
|
|
Waffleman_ posted:That's because it has been pointed out twice. Well poo poo. Must've accidentally skipped a page or something when I moved from mobile to desktop.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 03:15
|
|
|
Corek posted:Uh, B.D. Wong is coming back, and he MADE that movie. E: Also that poster and just about everything Trevorrow has been tweeting has made me feel excited as all hell.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 03:28
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 17:38
|
|
|
TheJoker138 posted:I really, really wanted to like the Hobbit movies. I actually do enjoy the first. But the 2nd one was so loving soulless. It was drab, nearly joyless, and just so god drat boring for most of it. It was like someone who hated the Lord of the Rings movies trying to make a Lord of the Rings movie, and only capturing the things that they disliked about them, amplified by an order of magnitude. The Hobbit movies make me sad that they exist. I pretty much checked out sometime after the spiders, and every other time someone was talking because the dialogues/monologues were heinous. I only enjoyed the experience because I was watching the film with my family and friends and when we went to dinner after we pretty much just caught up with each other and bitched about how god awful the dwarf/elf romance is. marshmallow creep fucked around with this message at 18:59 on Oct 16, 2014 |
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 18:56
|
|
|
Lotish posted:I pretty much checked out sometime after the spiders, and every other time someone was talking because the dialogues/monologues were heinous. I only enjoyed the experience because I was watching the film with my family and friends and when we went to dinner after we pretty much just caught up with each other and bitched about how god awful the dwarf/elf romance is. YEah that elf is like the one woman in world not totally in love with orlando bloom in those movies.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 19:17
|
|
|
TheJoker138 posted:It should be a Web 2.0 version of the original. 100% agreed. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 20:55
|
|
|
feedmyleg posted:100% agreed. This is horrible and perfect.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 21:04
|
|
|
feedmyleg posted:100% agreed. The mid-2000s called. They want their smothered-in-car-wax logo style back. Didn't you know that flat-looking logos with simple colors is the new hotness?  But seriously though, this is hilarious.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 21:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 27, 2024 00:18 |
|
|
Doctor Bishop posted:The mid-2000s called. They want their smothered-in-car-wax logo style back. Didn't you know that flat-looking logos with simple colors is the new hotness?  I figured the tone-deaf use of an older style would imply a feeling of disunity and tension. But mostly because he said web 2.0 and web 2.0 is mid 00s.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 21:15
|
|