|
feedmyleg posted:100% agreed. Just the sight of that made me irrationally angry for a moment. I guess some things are sacred.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2014 21:17 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 00:25 |
|
TheJoker138 posted:I really, really wanted to like the Hobbit movies. I actually do enjoy the first. But the 2nd one was so loving soulless. It was drab, nearly joyless, and just so god drat boring for most of it. It was like someone who hated the Lord of the Rings movies trying to make a Lord of the Rings movie, and only capturing the things that they disliked about them, amplified by an order of magnitude. The Hobbit movies make me sad that they exist.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2014 21:18 |
|
The t-rex needs to be simplified. No Web 2.0 logo is that intricate.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2014 21:22 |
|
achillesforever6 posted:MST3K or my Faith No More albums I like you.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2014 21:33 |
|
feedmyleg posted:
And here I thought web 2.0 was simply a term for the era of the Internet that started with the advent of sites like YouTube and Facebook.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2014 21:38 |
|
Doctor Bishop posted:And here I thought web 2.0 was simply a term for the era of the Internet that started with the advent of sites like YouTube and Facebook. In graphic design terms it refers to a very specific style. Flat design is post-2.0.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2014 22:26 |
|
So apparently there's going to be a movie about the whaleship Essex that got sunk by an angry sperm whale in 1820. Could be good, and Ron Howard's got some good movies on his CV.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2014 22:37 |
|
Nm
spanky the dolphin fucked around with this message at 10:54 on Feb 14, 2018 |
# ? Oct 16, 2014 23:17 |
|
feedmyleg posted:100% agreed.
|
# ? Oct 16, 2014 23:35 |
|
Amazing(ly bad).
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 00:12 |
|
feedmyleg posted:100% agreed. Perfect.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 00:48 |
|
Mantis42 posted:So I bought a thing. Nice Dirty Dozen poster too!
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 01:48 |
|
That Dirty Dozen poster has one of my favorite taglines of all time. Train them! Excite them! Arm them! Then turn them loose on the Nazis!
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 02:19 |
|
Shameless opportunity to repost '80s Jurassic Park from a while back. Lizard Combatant posted:NOT '80s ENOUGH!
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 03:07 |
|
Vagabundo posted:So apparently there's going to be a movie about the whaleship Essex that got sunk by an angry sperm whale in 1820. Could be good, and Ron Howard's got some good movies on his CV. Dang, that's pretty awesome.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 03:37 |
|
That poster should be amazing but the scale is so exaggerated that I just can't take it seriously.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 04:06 |
|
Yeah it reminds me of that scene in Godzilla where we swims under that aircraft carrier and just dwarfs it. Although if they go full balls to the wall insane with it and that's it's actual size, I am down.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 04:35 |
|
MikeJF posted:That poster should be amazing but the scale is so exaggerated that I just can't take it seriously. I don't think a more literal poster would work as well.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 04:37 |
|
Rough Lobster posted:Although if they go full balls to the wall insane with it and that's it's actual size, I am down. This is pretty much the only way I'd be interested in the movie.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 04:47 |
|
For reference, the Essex was 27 metres long, so the whale in that poster would be... about a kilometre, at a rough guess, maybe slightly less. I'm definitely seeing that movie. (Sperm whales cap out at about 20 metres, so including movie making and artistic licence, I'm guessing the whale'll probably end up about the same size as the Essex in the film, maybe a bit bigger) (I just noticed that they only have three of their four whaling boats in that poster, which is a neat little attention to detail, given that the ship lost its fourth to a grumpy whale a few days before the ship was smashed) MikeJF fucked around with this message at 11:56 on Oct 17, 2014 |
# ? Oct 17, 2014 11:49 |
|
Judging from the trailer the whale is nowhere near the size it is in the poster but somehow the exaggeration works for me. That's a cool poster.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 14:28 |
|
I would be okay with it except that when you're presenting a "true story" I'd rather it be, you know... true.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 14:36 |
|
Dick Trauma posted:I would be okay with it except that when you're presenting a "true story" I'd rather it be, you know... true. It's just a poster. It's supposed to be evocative. I really doubt the whale in the movie will be half a mile long.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 14:59 |
|
Make the whale a mile long, but also make the ship a spaceship and the whale a space sea serpent. Name the spaceship Moby and the space serpent Solarius. I don't know where I'm going with this.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 15:36 |
|
Baron von Eevl posted:It's just a poster. It's supposed to be evocative. I really doubt the whale in the movie will be half a mile long. And it's a neat poster. But I think it's wrong for this sort of movie. It would be like a poster for Apollo 13 showing the astronauts getting blown out of a hole into space because it's more dramatic. Speaking of which... space is a very dangerous place. The 3D eye spooge reminds me of this: And it's not a movie but goddamn look at that alien.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 18:19 |
|
Dick Trauma posted:And it's not a movie but goddamn look at that alien. That literally looks like a slightly dramaticized drawing of a creature made in Spore.
|
# ? Oct 17, 2014 20:05 |
|
Dick Trauma posted:I would be okay with it except that when you're presenting a "true story" I'd rather it be, you know... true. Do you honestly think a movie about the sinking of the Essex will actually feature a mutant whale? It's the poo poo that happens after the sinking that would make a compelling story, and I'd wager the film will focus on that.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2014 03:48 |
|
One of the better Mondo posters I've seen recently. The title's maybe a little too small, though.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2014 05:48 |
|
Erebus posted:One of the better Mondo posters I've seen recently. The title's maybe a little too small, though.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2014 05:56 |
|
The tiny text undercuts the idea of the poster, showing a tiny little Bruce Wayne going towards a giant bat shaped future. Wayne should be the smallest thing on the poster. But when you see Wayne you see the text and it pulls your focus.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2014 06:20 |
|
It's a poster. It won't be too small in real life.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2014 06:37 |
|
maybe its a poster for ants???
|
# ? Oct 18, 2014 07:05 |
|
|
# ? Oct 18, 2014 07:19 |
|
Vagabundo posted:Do you honestly think a movie about the sinking of the Essex will actually feature a mutant whale? It's the poo poo that happens after the sinking that would make a compelling story, and I'd wager the film will focus on that. Dick Trauma posted:And it's a neat poster. But I think it's wrong for this sort of movie. It would be like a poster for Apollo 13 showing the astronauts getting blown out of a hole into space because it's more dramatic. I've been talking about the poster. I don't have particularly strong feelings about it either way, it just seems like it belongs to a different sort of movie.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2014 08:19 |
|
This is... a drat effective poster. Catchy title, evocative imagery, a surprise hit of 'Tim Burton might be stepping out of his comfort zone again?', two actors I'm interested in seeing and a tagline that immediately lays out the basic plot. I didn't know about this movie until now. I want to see this.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2014 15:28 |
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:This is... a drat effective poster. Go watch the trailer, it looks great!
|
# ? Oct 18, 2014 15:59 |
|
This is the first Burton movie I've looked forward to in a long, long time.
|
# ? Oct 18, 2014 17:58 |
|
Erebus posted:One of the better Mondo posters I've seen recently. The title's maybe a little too small, though. At the Mountains of Madness??? *squints really hard at text*
|
# ? Oct 18, 2014 21:49 |
|
62: What happens in Beverly Hills when there are no cops around Mua Ha Ha Ha!
|
# ? Oct 19, 2014 01:23 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 00:25 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS3GiMoAkYA
|
# ? Oct 19, 2014 04:52 |