|
indoflaven posted:Kid Cudi on the JRE is a nice treat. Any good?
|
#
?
Sep 25, 2014 00:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2024 07:30 |
|
|
yeah it was ok. joe says that kid cudi coined the phrase "off the dome" and cudi just goes along with it like maybe i did.
|
|
#
?
Sep 25, 2014 03:15
|
|
|
#555 with rory albanese, former writer on daily show top 20 show for sure, lots of comedy history, hedberg, burr, atell, houston/bill hicks, funny loving stories
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2014 18:47
|
|
|
^I'll check it out. Any opinions on the W. Kamau Bell ep?
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2014 19:10
|
|
|
XIII posted:^I'll check it out. I liked it...it was really funny in parts and w. had some good counterpoints to joe's typical "stop being such a crybaby" rant
|
|
#
?
Sep 30, 2014 19:28
|
|
|
DJ BK posted:#555 with rory albanese, former writer on daily show +1, thanks for mentioning this because I usually skip the ones where I don't recognize the name of the guest. Great episode and not too much Joe railroading people with his weird ideas.
|
|
#
?
Oct 2, 2014 15:39
|
|
|
So, has Rogan totally stopped doing the ads with the guest? I never minded it, but I haven't listened in forever and I listened to two episodes this week where he did them by himself up top.
|
|
#
?
Oct 3, 2014 22:28
|
|
|
XIII posted:So, has Rogan totally stopped doing the ads with the guest? I never minded it, but I haven't listened in forever and I listened to two episodes this week where he did them by himself up top. I thought everybody just jumped 10 minutes into the podcast before pressing the play button XIII posted:Any opinions on the W. Kamau Bell ep? Joe has been a lot more receptive to social justice stuff ever since the internet got mad at him for saying that some people might not like Jon Jones because he is a black guy. Joe's opinions are formed by disagreeing with whoever is upset with him on twitter at any given point in time. It was funny hearing him wholeheartedly agree with opinions that he was mocking 2 weeks ago. A Keg fucked around with this message at 00:10 on Oct 4, 2014 |
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2014 00:06
|
|
|
A Keg posted:
Lol jesus christ
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2014 01:48
|
|
|
digging this thread out of the grave to say the Anthony Cumia podcast is complete poo poo
|
|
#
?
Oct 15, 2014 19:55
|
|
|
CortezFantastic posted:digging this thread out of the grave to say the Anthony Cumia podcast is complete poo poo Yeah I never listened to Opie & A but he came off as a douche. Paul Stanley is a snooze fest. indoflaven fucked around with this message at 00:17 on Oct 16, 2014 |
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 00:12
|
|
|
Rogan seemed overly argumentative with that Damer guy. I understand playing devil's advocate but goddamn did it get tiresome once he mentioned the singularity.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 00:18
|
|
|
Dip Facial posted:Rogan seemed overly argumentative with that Damer guy. I understand playing devil's advocate but goddamn did it get tiresome once he mentioned the singularity. I could understand his frustration because Damer was just saying things without being able to back any of it up with anything other than "well I'm an engineer, so I know"
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 00:48
|
|
|
TheVaultDweller posted:I could understand his frustration because Damer was just saying things without being able to back any of it up with anything other than "well I'm an engineer, so I know" Quite a few engineers are like this. I attribute it in part to personal insecurities of individuals attracted to the profession, but also the bias of the field they study. If an engineer wanted to understand why the equations he uses work (and the outlier situations in which those equations do not apply) then he would have studied more physics/math/chemistry from a academic perspective. So most engineers go around thinking they know the equations by which all life works and they have very great difficulty grasping fields like biology which depends on empirical observations of a situation and then describing theories to explain those observations. To an engineer, the theories that they work with have already been established and there is no argument among the elite (ie them). Then you add to that ...let's call it "field arrogance" the fact that communication of technical information clearly can be hard, and it is doubly hard to communicate technical information to a layman, specifically when you haven't practiced and prepared a formal talk, so you get people saying "I'm an engineer, trust me." It doesn't excuse the arrogance of course.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 05:37
|
|
|
indoflaven posted:Paul Stanley is a snooze fest. That was a flat spot in the middle where they were talking about Napster and privacy, but I enjoyed the rest of it. There's lots of talk about therapy and dealing with fame and stuff. Certain better than hearing about santa claus mushrooms for the 50th time.
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 11:51
|
|
|
The Bruce episode was poo poo because of joe, he came in heavy handed, and Bruce is a loving leading edge thinker. Joe just drools and spits "what about the singularity" joe needed to check his loving beliefs in technology, he made no effort in listening to why technology can't break out of its paradigm and Bruce won't be back I'm sure, loving joe rogan you had on jan irvin for chrissakes and a bunch of other terrible guests that you shouldve hit harder but didnt, guess he was saving his load for bruce
|
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 22:11
|
|
|
Any time somebody tries to bring a realistic perspective to science and technology, it gets under Joe's skin, because it's preferable for Joe to live in a world where poppers cause AIDS and dogs are psychic Science and technology is great as long as it's magic. Also, the guy who made Tony Hawk Pro Skater is good because he debunks conspiracy theories, but skepticism is bad because that one podcast host guy scammed EBay. Keg fucked around with this message at 00:00 on Oct 17, 2014 |
|
#
?
Oct 16, 2014 23:57
|
|
|
So is Joe ever gonna have some good guests on again or can I unsubscribe from this crap?
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2014 18:41
|
|
|
mcvey posted:So is Joe ever gonna have some good guests on again or can I unsubscribe from this crap? david choe was great
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2014 20:01
|
|
|
mcvey posted:So is Joe ever gonna have some good guests on again or can I unsubscribe from this crap? The lady from the Alaska show had some interesting stories about almost being killed by Alaska.
|
|
#
?
Oct 27, 2014 20:35
|
|
|
Mammoth man and Alaska woman were interesting. It was good to have a couple of episode free of all the usual soapbox bullshit you've heard 100 times.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 03:56
|
|
|
Speaking of which, I really really like Dr. Rhonda Patrick. A little dry and information dense, but you can actually learn some poo poo from this one.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 21:35
|
|
|
Peter North posted:Speaking of which, I really really like Dr. Rhonda Patrick. A little dry and information dense, but you can actually learn some poo poo from this one. She is clearly well read and very responsible about how she dishes out information, not scared to say 'I don't know', but she suffers from language issues where she's so used to the literature and having discussions with people who understand biochemistry at her level that she does things like repeatedly name every compound involved in a process. It's kinda adorable and edifying at the same time, brings me back to studying biochemistry in college before changing my major.
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 01:41
|
|
|
Has there been any mention about yet another old guest controversy in the death of a Rufous sports fighter?
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 02:55
|
|
|
oh boy oh boy it's another ~DUNCAN TRUSSELL EPISODE~
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 14:57
|
|
|
BottledBodhisvata posted:oh boy oh boy it's another ~DUNCAN TRUSSELL EPISODE~ hey everybody!
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 21:48
|
|
|
hello pals!
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 22:06
|
|
|
willie_dee posted:Has there been any mention about yet another old guest controversy in the death of a Rufous sports fighter? What happened?
|
|
#
?
Nov 19, 2014 22:27
|
|
|
always be closing posted:What happened? A Duke Roufus fighter died in his debut muay thai fight in one of their promotions. The referee, ringside doctor, cornermen, etc were all Duke Roufus guys. Rose Namajunas has come out and criticised them for how they treat their fighters in training.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2014 01:54
|
|
|
More like Duke Doofus, right, guys? How do they "treat their fighters"?
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2014 03:13
|
|
|
XIII posted:More like Duke Doofus, right, guys? Well one of them died in the ring, so uh, badly.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2014 19:05
|
|
|
Keg posted:Well one of them died in the ring, so uh, badly. But, if he died during a sanctioned fight, I would argue they "trained" him badly.
|
|
#
?
Nov 20, 2014 20:37
|
|
|
XIII posted:But, if he died during a sanctioned fight, I would argue they "trained" him badly. Nope, he was clearly mistreated in the fight. By all accounts he was a pretty good fighter, just not good enough.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2014 18:04
|
|
|
XIII posted:But, if he died during a sanctioned fight, I would argue they "trained" him badly. The referee let the fight keep going despite the fact that he was stumbling around like someone who was sniffing industrial glue, the cornerman had to physically prop his chin up in between rounds and was slapping him in the face to get his attention before the last round, the ringside doctor was checking his phone while everything of import was happening, and poo poo even the camera guy just happened to uh "misplace" the footage where he falls to the ground post fight.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2014 04:07
|
|
|
drat. That's hosed.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2014 05:24
|
|
|
Bill Burr from last week is a 5/5 easy, and his stand up special on netflix is 6/5, today joe had a transhumanist on to talk about living forever, I laughed when joe was blown away by sailing without a gps, (loving columbus joe?) he must be high as gently caress at that point in the show, then the dude reveals his privilege (college grad, goes sailing for 7 years, catches malaria, makes mini docs for nat geo, almost dies from a land mine) and now he wants the rest of the world to work on living forever. Jesus loving christ. This guy. Libertarian to the max. unbearable to the max. and you should skip bitcoin boy 2, why exactly was he on again? come on joe, he's reaching with these last 10 or so guests.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2014 03:19
|
|
|
What made the Bill Burr appearance 5/5? I ask as a fan of his but also with extremely limited time to listen to podcasts anymore.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2014 03:23
|
|
|
Thanks to whoever mentioned the Diaz/Joe church episode. Wound up downloading the Live one as well, and it's also pretty good. From what I'm reading on twitter the one with Schaub that just ended is going to be a can't miss. Joe is apparently giving it to him hard and honest, said he didn't want to do this podcast live.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2014 03:41
|
|
|
beep by grandpa posted:What made the Bill Burr appearance 5/5? Really, the answer could just be "it's Bill Burr". But, Bill just makes a really great guest and he and Joe work well together. One of the things I like most about Bill is he will say something about a topic he knows that he doesn't know much about and then call himself out for doing so.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2014 04:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2024 07:30 |
|
|
Bill Burr's episode was great. He's entertaining and it wasn't just another libertarian or magic mushroom circle wank. Joe was very critical of Brendan Schaub's performance against Travis Brown on the podcast they do with Callen. It was streaming live and they've pulled it down off of everything now.
|
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2014 08:10
|
|