|
Blinkz0rz posted:also what's the deal with literally every company out there being a "B2B marketing analytics firm"" you see when a dumb social startup gets xx million in venture capital they need to figure out some sort of marketing plan. these companies bleed those startups dry
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 15:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 15:00 |
|
|
Brain Candy posted:you would send out your resume, just like you should do yesterday
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 15:34
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:you see when a dumb social startup gets xx million in venture capital they need to figure out some sort of marketing plan. these companies bleed those startups dry so a sustainable industry, then how soul sucking is the work at that kind of company? i'm at a really cool company that does tons of good poo poo (tm) in the developing world and if it weren't for the fact that they underpay i'd stay here forever
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 16:16
|
|
|
all work is soul-sucking, that's why they have to pay you to do it work-like activities that are intrinsically rewarding are either practically unpaid or actually cost you money per hour
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 16:30
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:all work is soul-sucking, that's why they have to pay you to do it lmbo u have a lovely job
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 17:08
|
|
|
I updated my resume on monster and I've gotten four recruiter voicemails so far today aaaaaag my phone
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 17:58
|
|
|
in order to get a thing to build, i need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib. that works, but now apache can't load that module unless it also has LD_LIBRARY_PATH set in its environment. but there are web pages where people talk about how LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong thing, and you should use LDFLAGS instead. but the first few pages like this are talking about solaris, and then something called "rpath" gets involved, and i'm all confused 
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 19:01
|
|
|
prefect posted:in order to get a thing to build, i need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib. that works, but now apache can't load that module unless it also has LD_LIBRARY_PATH set in its environment. but there are web pages where people talk about how LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong thing, and you should use LDFLAGS instead. but the first few pages like this are talking about solaris, and then something called "rpath" gets involved, and i'm all confused are you sure you're not using Go?
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 19:09
|
|
|
that was one nice thing about solaris, you could have the LD_LIBRARY_PATH directories added into the compiled binary so that you didn't have to have the right poo poo set later
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 19:10
|
|
|
prefect posted:in order to get a thing to build, i need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib. that works, but now apache can't load that module unless it also has LD_LIBRARY_PATH set in its environment. but there are web pages where people talk about how LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong thing, and you should use LDFLAGS instead. but the first few pages like this are talking about solaris, and then something called "rpath" gets involved, and i'm all confused ld_library_path is a sick and disgusting hack. and it is automatically (deliberately) broken for the root user. don't do that the correct way to do this is to use the "-rpath" option to gcc, which specifies the runtime search path for libraries. this is mandatory on solaris and optional on linux, and imho it is the only sane way to compile things
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 19:41
|
|
|
linux precedence order for runtime paths, off the top of my head: 1. LD_LIBRARY_PATH, if you are not root 2. the rpath variables hardcoded into the binary 3. generic library paths in ld.so.conf unless you are working for a linux distribution, you should pretty much never be using 1 or 3
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 19:42
|
|
|
prefect posted:gently caress developers who make code publicly available without meaningful documentation agreeing with the "no, gently caress YOU" guy
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 19:46
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:linux precedence order for runtime paths, off the top of my head: how about setting LD_RUN_PATH while building? 
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 20:05
|
|
|
LD_RUN_PATH sets your rpath during the build, so you should be good e2: mdf12! Brain Candy fucked around with this message at 20:17 on Oct 28, 2014 |
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 20:12
|
|
|
a thing is being given me to use that's build around glib, how much am i going to suffer trying to deal with that
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 20:23
|
|
|
fritz posted:a thing is being given me to use that's build around glib, how much am i going to suffer trying to deal with that in particular i wanna write a c++ class to wrap around and call a bunch of c functions all of which are in a g_main_loop_run and dang i can just feel the threads bubbling up
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 20:27
|
|
|
fritz posted:in particular i wanna write a c++ class to wrap around and call a bunch of c functions all of which are in a g_main_loop_run and dang i can just feel the threads bubbling up you should just have the one gui thread if you just have a g_main_loop_run compared to qt, .net or java gtk is pretty... uh, backward?
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 20:29
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:you should just have the one gui thread if you just have a g_main_loop_run it's for reading stuff from hardware and im gonna have a couple different things built on it, only one of which is a gui there's no actual gui stuff in the code ive been given, the g_main_loop looks to just continually query the hardware
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 20:41
|
|
|
thanks for the advice -- i was able to get it all working without feeling too much shame 
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 21:13
|
|
|
the other extremum of this project i just talked to the guy and he's pushing really hard for me to do everything in visual studio so that it makes things easy on him and im like: nope (but it looks like cmake will play nicely with some older version of visual studio build files ???)
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 21:59
|
|
|
cmake will make a vs2013 solution and projects for you if you have it installed, its pretty great
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 22:00
|
|
|
hobbesmaster posted:cmake will make a vs2013 solution and projects for you if you have it installed, its pretty great this is the first project ive used it on where ive written my own cmakelists.txt and : dang yeah I dont wanna have to write another makefile ever again
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2014 22:09
|
|
|
 oh man it's "Just Works"
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2014 16:15
|
|
|
Crosspostin' from the get a (better) job megathread: quote:Take the set 1, 2, 3,... 9. Using operations of addition, subtraction, or concatenation, find sequences that sum to 100. That is, "1 + 2 + 3 - 4 + 5 + 6 + 78 + 9" is a correct answer; 7 and 8 were concatenated into 78. Given this problem space, is the quad-tree a good start? Is it really possible to optimize in that way?
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:31
|
|
|
gently caress them posted:Crosspostin' from the get a (better) job megathread: what, like in an interview? given that in an interview, stand up and leave
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:37
|
|
|
pee straight up into the air
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:39
|
|
|
write a fizzbuzz solution on the board
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:39
|
|
|
gently caress them posted:Crosspostin' from the get a (better) job megathread: forgive me if im an idiot, but there are infinite solutions to this problem are there not? trivially we need x and y where x - y = 100 if we are allowed concatenation x and y can be any integer blah blah some maths poo poo, there are an infinite amount of x and y to satisfy this req. even if u take the maximum size of an integer into acount u can go infititely outwards adding terms of ( + x - x) ad infinitum
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:43
|
|
|
bobbilljim posted:blah blah some maths poo poo, there are an infinite amount of x and y to satisfy this req. don't post my homework answers
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:48
|
|
|
Bloody posted:what, like in an interview? given that in an interview, stand up and leave Oh the dude didn't solve it or expect me to. He asked how I'd approach it with pseudocode, and liked my strategy. I'm just chewing on it because my brain is still turned on. bobbilljim posted:forgive me if im an idiot, but there are infinite solutions to this problem are there not? No, I explained badly. It's the sequence (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9), inclusive, in that order. Your operations are add, subtract, and concatenate, that is: (1 + 2 + 3 - 4 + 5 + 6 + 78 + 9) is valid, since I concatenate 7 and 8 to make 78. Also, it adds up to 100. So basically it's (1 + 2 + 3 - 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 C 8 +9) where "C" is "concatenate".
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:49
|
|
|
Bloody posted:what, like in an interview? given that in an interview, stand up and leave pretty much this unless you want to work with the kind of insufferable shitbag who thinks this is a reasonable interview question
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:50
|
|
|
Bloody posted:what, like in an interview? given that in an interview, stand up and leave rotor posted:pretty much this unless you want to work with the kind of insufferable shitbag who thinks this is a reasonable interview question
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:51
|
|
|
gently caress them posted:
oh lol in that case brute forcing it is probably as good a way as any but if you wanted something that would scale well up to larger sequences then thats above my pay grade
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:51
|
|
|
rotor posted:pretty much this unless you want to work with the kind of insufferable shitbag who thinks this is a reasonable interview question He just wanted me to talk about how I'd try to solve it, not actually DO it. And liked how I did. I was just wondering if that was the right way, the quad expression tree thing  bobbilljim posted:oh lol in that case brute forcing it is probably as good a way as any but if you wanted something that would scale well up to larger sequences then thats above my pay grade Bruting it isn't that hard, it's just 3^9.  19683 permutations!
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:51
|
|
|
gently caress them posted:He just wanted me to talk about how I'd try to solve it, not actually DO it. And liked how I did. so a few milliseconds of computation at most, neat
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 03:19
|
|
|
Bloody posted:so a few milliseconds of computation at most, neat Yeah but what if you wanted to extend it, or just understand it?
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 03:20
|
|
|
gently caress them posted:Yeah but what if you wanted to extend it, or just understand it? buy bigger computers
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 03:21
|
|
|
Bloody posted:buy bigger computers So nobody in the workplace ever does their own dynamic programming you just see someone else's implementation who is still in school or doing a thesis?
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 03:22
|
|
|
Bloody posted:buy bigger computers
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 03:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 16, 2024 15:00 |
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:all work is soul-sucking, that's why they have to pay you to do it haha
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 03:25
|
|
Failed Sega Accessory Ahoy!