|
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2014/12/04/introducing-net-core.aspx
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 00:59 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 22:36 |
|
as much as I hate perl I do have to give it credit for actually making all that object and array referencing stuff nicely explicit and not concealing the mechanics an array can't contain other arrays, only references (or numbers or strings) but a reference can point to another array (or any variable) so when you copy the array, you do indeed get a copy of everything in it, including the reference, and obviously the copy of the reference refers to the same array that the original reference did
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 01:03 |
|
Papes posted:what's the best resource for learning how to use laTex? a hammer so you can pound your head with it until you forget about learning latex
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 01:29 |
|
a good start
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 01:36 |
|
text me
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 01:55 |
|
Shaggar posted:a hammer so you can pound your head with it until you forget about learning latex
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 01:56 |
|
are there any cross-platform UI libraries that are not rear end i have just started loving about with swt but it feels like some visual basic 6 poo poo so i might give Qt a try instead see if it feels less 1998
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 02:08 |
|
penus de milo posted:are there any cross-platform UI libraries that are not rear end qt is the best cross platform ui library by far
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 02:10 |
|
penus de milo posted:are there any cross-platform UI libraries that are not rear end jquery
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 02:18 |
|
AngularJS
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 02:23 |
|
Shaggar posted:a hammer so you can pound your head with it until you forget about learning latex i had a group project last year with 6 other guys. one of them wasnt a CS student, but was a psychology student from the year above us looking for some easy credits (lol) he keeps pushing for us to use latex to write a sh itty report. then he sits back and we have to end up doing it while he claims he doesnt know how to program or use latex anywa
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 02:23 |
|
hobbesmaster posted:qt is the best cross platform ui library by far this is my experience as well
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 02:47 |
|
wxwidgets might be ok i dont know but wxpython is bad
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 02:48 |
|
also honestly, these days swing isn't all that bad.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 02:48 |
|
http://foundation.zurb.com/apps/
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 02:49 |
|
wow, a grid, that will defininitely come in handy
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 02:53 |
|
browsers are for ui if you're afraid of being called a full stack dev then use the new javafx poo poo, whatever they call it. or just use swing, it doesn't look that bad. or qt I guess but I haven't used qt. you should really use the browser though
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 03:00 |
|
use the native cocoa widgets
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 03:05 |
|
dbcooper posted:Ok, I'll bite. i just said it because it rhymed a bit
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 03:05 |
|
Forgall posted:I wasn't interviewing a guy with ten page resume, but my boss showed a thing like that to me once to ask for my opinion. It was more like a crazy person manifesto than a resume really. these are my favorite
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 03:27 |
|
uncurable mlady posted:browsers are for ui this is so unbelievably wrong
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 03:59 |
|
rotor posted:this is so unbelievably wrong do tell I mean, it's not like there doesn't exist a staggeringly vast array of useful components that will let you create an interface that runs on every OS and device you could possibly care about with a markup and styling language that's trivial to use not to mention you're able to abstract computation away for many tasks and dramatically increase the amount of individual devices you can run your software on since pretty much everything can run a browser the modern web browser is possibly the greatest runtime and presentation layer we've ever seen and some people just refuse to believe
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 04:06 |
|
uncurable mlady posted:the modern web browser is possibly the greatest runtime and presentation layer we've ever seen this is true and also incredibly sad
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 04:11 |
|
Arcsech posted:this is true and also incredibly sad well, yes
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 04:11 |
|
clearly you should use QtWebKit then
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 04:23 |
|
Arcsech posted:this is true and also incredibly sad nope cross-platform runtime and presentation, maybe
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 04:26 |
|
uncurable mlady posted:do tell I'm the complete ignorance of any desktop software the only thing browsers do better is they're mostly platform-agnostic, mostly.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 04:29 |
|
if you think that the browser is better than .net/cocoa/linux poo poo never program again please
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 04:29 |
|
one cool thing that webapps did was they killed the idea that ui consistency was valuable
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 04:33 |
|
they really lowered user expectations for UI responsiveness too
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 05:35 |
|
the best application container is one that has a button that completely trashes your application state unless you take a lot of precautions with both the client code and the backend design
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 05:39 |
|
when did some programmer in junior high i wanted to see if you could make a vb program delete everything in C:/windows or simething it could atl east to a degree that hosed me up
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 05:40 |
|
webapps have their place, but it isnt for so many many things. some things just need to be a loving program. i had a fallen through contract recently where at the last minute they demanded their data entry application be a webapp because it would be to much hassle to update on the factory floor, bullshit. they wanted snappy and safe and they want run it through a loving browser. extra layer of poo poo complexity and stylesheets and html and poo poo componants. i told them they were wrong and to get back to me when the arsehole who decided this was nescessary failed
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 05:50 |
|
MALE SHOEGAZE posted:when did some programmer in junior high i wanted to see if you could make a vb program delete everything in C:/windows
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 05:51 |
|
rotor posted:the best application container is one that has a button that completely trashes your application state unless you take a lot of precautions with both the client code and the backend design you mean back or refresh?
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 05:52 |
|
Stringent posted:you mean back or refresh? oh right, two buttons
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 05:56 |
|
What about stop, which has seemingly arbitrary effects?
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 06:06 |
|
Yeah sure boss I'll whip up a quick gui for that Ships him an entire Web server and a shortcut to 127.0.0.1:6858 No boss that's the app it runs in the browser because that's how you make good uis
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 06:08 |
|
Bloody posted:Yeah sure boss I'll whip up a quick gui for that I had to do this once but it was because it was software that was to be run on an aircraft carrier (it was training software for marines not anything cool)
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 06:09 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 22:36 |
|
tbh, there's very few native apps made well enough to surpass what a webthing could do, especially these days. Even fewer that connect to a server. What you get with native app - Deep integration with os, notifications, etc - better local storage access - Faster What you lose - peace of mind that your state is synchronized with server Sadly, apple apps that are the worst offenders. Calendar, mail, contacts, radar, itunes.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2014 09:50 |