|
Blue Train posted:I dunno I guess you could have it be like in I robot or whatever movie where the car switches between manual and auto control, require hands on the wheel in auto mode in order to make the car go and have it pull over automatically if the hands are removed. it doesn't matter because autonomous cars are stupid other than possibly as a replacements to taxis, then have the taxi company be responsible for liability. Require hands on the wheel, you say?
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 16:05 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:52 |
|
requiring hands on the wheel would eliminate the one good thing about self driving cars: jacking it to the scenery
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 16:06 |
|
newreply.php posted:requiring hands on the wheel would eliminate the one good thing about self driving cars: jacking it to the scenery lol if you can't steer with your knees and do this anyway
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 16:07 |
|
Blue Train posted:I dunno I guess you could have it be like in I robot or whatever movie where the car switches between manual and auto control, require hands on the wheel in auto mode in order to make the car go and have it pull over automatically if the hands are removed. it doesn't matter because autonomous cars are stupid other than possibly as a replacements to taxis, then have the taxi company be responsible for liability. would also be nice for rental cars probably less wear & tear compared with traditional methods too
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 16:09 |
|
Broken Machine posted:lol if you can't steer with your knees and do this anyway finally all my practice will pay off
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 16:15 |
|
who the hell needs two hands to jack off besides i dunno that jonah falcon guy i guess
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 16:56 |
|
the problem is handoff in emergency situations where the car doesn't have time to let the driver know "okay, your turn to take over". so the human has to be paying attention the whole time instead of reading his mail or sleeping out enjoying his road head, which makes the whole thing pointless
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 17:37 |
|
lol
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 17:39 |
|
A Pinball Wizard posted:lol @ "clean nuclear energy"
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 18:35 |
|
Blue Train posted:company be responsible for liability.
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 18:36 |
|
semi trucks used to drive completely autonomously until a fat man ruined it for everyone
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 20:31 |
|
PleasureKevin posted:semi trucks used to drive completely autonomously was it Santa?
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 20:39 |
|
it was homer
|
# ? Dec 21, 2014 20:45 |
|
google got some reddit idiot to do a puff piece about their poo poo carsquote:1. Human beings are terrible drivers.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 01:21 |
|
will never read
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 02:31 |
|
pram posted:will never read tldr: self driving cars are better than humans, here is a list of reasons why they don't really work, I want to fellate Google and wish they were a thing right now
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 02:36 |
|
Find out why Google® Self-Driving Car™ and Sriracha™ sauce are the most epic things of 2014
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 02:44 |
|
all of these articles suppose that the robotic self driving beep boop cars will be miraculously cheaper than an 84 park avenue piloted by a weed smellin dude named jacob. like that dude's mom will be powerless to go into the world until google ('s proxy) unleashes the car roombas
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 03:06 |
|
quote:she'll probably never drive again. This reduced her from a fully-functional, independent human being with a career and a buzzing social life into someone who is homebound, disabled, and powerless. lol america
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 03:25 |
|
self driving cars will not be viable during our life times
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 04:19 |
|
Improbable Lobster posted:self driving cars will not be viable during our life times sure, because you'll be killed int he robot rebllions, sucker
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 04:22 |
|
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 04:33 |
|
fart simpson posted:lol america Seriously, it feels like every problem is made worse by America's FYGM approach to welfare and communal services. And then articles like these seem blissfully unaware that being without a car shouldn't constrain you unless you have a public infrastructure under par to the rest of the developed world.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 07:49 |
|
ya america suxx ballz thats why all the big pwnage companies making bomb stuff are here. "no theyre irish" says some retard bitch pedantantic fuckwad. STFU. usa #1
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:01 |
|
Maluco Marinero posted:Seriously, it feels like every problem is made worse by America's FYGM approach to welfare and communal services. united states public transportation infrastructure is worse than the rest of the developed world and also worse than most of the undeveloped world too
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:04 |
|
Smythe posted:ya america suxx ballz thats why all the big pwnage companies making bomb stuff are here. "no theyre irish" says some retard bitch pedantantic fuckwad. STFU. usa #1 the whopper is from Canada now
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:05 |
|
the whopper is an inferior burger, and now that teh "angry whopper" is deprecated, bk is super sucky again. theyre offerings suck. their new sazzy item is the a1 whopper burger, and it's bland and bad. the angry wopper was bks salvation and now its gone. they dont even have a spicy chicken sandwitch anymore. what the hell is happening at bk corporate??
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:07 |
|
whenever i tell people here that in my home town, there's literally no public transportation, at all, no train, no bus, nothing, and also there's only a single taxi (as in a single car that serves the entire multi-town area), and also my mother lives over 7 miles away from any store people think i'm joking or lying or exaggerating
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:08 |
|
Maluco Marinero posted:Seriously, it feels like every problem is made worse by America's FYGM approach to welfare and communal services. profoundly retarded
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:08 |
|
burger king is always been lovely. their food makes me constipated. why eat a burger king when there is literally anything else available wish u'd eat more of it etc.
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:09 |
|
fart simpson posted:whenever i tell people here that in my home town, there's literally no public transportation, at all, no train, no bus, nothing, and also there's only a single taxi (as in a single car that serves the entire multi-town area), and also my mother lives over 7 miles away from any store people think i'm joking or lying or exaggerating no one wants to pay tax money to put a bus line in my flyover shithole
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:09 |
|
pram posted:no one wants to pay tax money to put a bus line in my flyover shithole
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:09 |
|
wow, my poo poo small town with a population of 500 has no public transportation. injustice
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:10 |
|
pram posted:no one wants to pay tax money to put a bus line in my flyover shithole actually the first question people have once they realize i'm serious is "but how to people without a car get around?" pram posted:wow, my poo poo small town with a population of 500 has no public transportation. injustice every crappy village has at least a public bus in a lot of the world
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:11 |
|
IT IS LITERALLY A HUMAN RIGHT TO HAVE A SUBWAY OUTSIDE MY HOUSE IF I CHOOSE TO LIVE IN BUMFUCK NOWHERE
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:11 |
|
[ASK] me about being from ltierally twin peaks and there being no bus
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:11 |
|
fart simpson posted:every crappy village has at least a public bus in a lot of the world haha no
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:12 |
|
pram posted:haha no um, yes?
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:13 |
|
no. you stupid loving retard. go to any villiage in northeast mexico and tell me how many public busses you see
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:15 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 03:52 |
|
oh yeah mexico is "a lot of the world" i forgot. i didn't say everywhere
|
# ? Dec 26, 2014 08:18 |