|
sbaldrick posted:Now that I know this is a book I have to go look them up to read, thanks alot thread. Jack Reacher was based on a book too. Read those first.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 07:16 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 03:21 |
|
Avshalom posted:What I want to know is, who are the criminals faving and retweeting these? I'd bet a decent portion of them aren't human.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 07:20 |
|
Avshalom posted:What I want to know is, who are the criminals faving and retweeting these?
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 08:19 |
|
Will Asylum do a crappy* horror spoof called Mortdecay? I am aware that "crappy" is redundant here.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 12:00 |
|
AKA The Dead Careers Society.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 12:46 |
|
Stephen Baldwin had a career?
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 13:01 |
|
"It is The Expendables meets RED..." A future tag-line taken from an online review that isn't meant as a compliment and entices no one to buy the movie. "They're getting too old for this poo poo" The tag-line that should have been on there (it would work even if Danny Glover wasn't in it). Edit: "They ain't dying of old age" Pay me, movie studios. Mierenneuker fucked around with this message at 13:09 on Jan 20, 2015 |
# ? Jan 20, 2015 13:04 |
|
zVxTeflon posted:Stephen Baldwin had a career?
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 13:16 |
|
Oh my godness. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6Sc-nj2NTU I think that bit at the end is directed towards...us, you guys.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 13:17 |
|
Danny Glover has a 'no standing' clause in all of his contracts.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 13:51 |
|
CelticPredator posted:Oh my godness. This is such a weirdly empty trailer. Like, it feels like things should be happening in it, but they're not. Is this an action movie with no action scenes?
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 14:28 |
|
zVxTeflon posted:Stephen Baldwin had a career? He starred in one the finest movies of all time... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EWikCCfHJw VIVA LOS BIODOME
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 14:30 |
|
CelticPredator posted:Oh my godness. From the related videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwvCSfBQekI I watched that twice and I have no idea what's going on with this film. Tom Jane looks like he wandered in from a set of a western while still playing the Punisher. Then there's Stallone as a painter or something? E from Entourage looking like a waxdoll. Nelly? Tom Berenger? A Self-help book? Terry Crews!? Even the way the cast is announced at the end was headache-inducing. Now I am tempted to browse through the whole list of those random trailers and wonder why these were ever made..
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 14:49 |
|
TetsuoTW posted:At least half of Twitter is bots of some variety or other. They purged a ton of them recently and a lot of people of various levels of fame lost thousands of followers, and made upset tweets about it.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 14:53 |
|
I don't know, I just watched that on mute and skipped through most of it and I didn't see a problem. Seems like a really well-made student film Oh Rutger
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 19:55 |
|
Stare-Out posted:
At least the names match up with the faces. I know the reasons they don't always and it still bothers me.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 20:11 |
|
This looks like a fake movie. Also what the gently caress is Rutger Hauer doing at the 1:07 mark? It's like he's just fidgeting on the set, gotta jiggle that pouch around.
|
# ? Jan 20, 2015 22:22 |
|
Skwirl posted:He's got a weird version of Brad Pitt disease, where he's too handsome for his own good. They should both be character actors and perennial favorites for "Best Supporting Actor" awards, but for different reasons, aren't that good at being leading men. This is just straight up retarded if you look at his body of work pre-pirates. He's a fantastic actor, one the best working right now, his career is just completely misguided at the moment.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 00:38 |
|
Trump posted:This is just straight up retarded if you look at his body of work pre-pirates. He's a fantastic actor, one the best working right now, his career is just completely misguided at the moment. Naw, he's on the money. Brad Pitt and Johnny Depp are easily at their best when they get to do showy supporting roles that other character actors would do. They just happen to be super attractive so they play leads. I'll take the Brad Pitt from 12 Monkeys/True Romance/Kalifornia any day of the week over Mr. & Mrs. Smith Brad Pitt. This isn't saying that I dislike either actor. They've just both been pigeonholed into leading men status. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 00:46 |
|
But Ed Wood.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 00:48 |
|
Do Assassination of Jesse James and Fight Club count as leading or supporting Pitt?
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 00:48 |
|
I'm not saying they can't also be great in lead roles. Just that if they weren't stuck doing those they'd be doing a lot more interesting work as character actors. Also--and this is pretty much just with Depp--their natural inclination towards quirky characters overwhelms the movies, whereas if they were a supporting character it'd be pulled back a bit or at least take up less screentime.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 00:52 |
|
LesterGroans posted:Naw, he's on the money. Brad Pitt and Johnny Depp are easily at their best when they get to do showy supporting roles that other character actors would do. They just happen to be super attractive so they play leads. I want to disagree with you because I loved Mr. and Mrs. Smith, but... Snatch.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 01:59 |
|
I have no idea what I just found (besides Kyoon's homepage) https://hollywoodsubliminals.wordpress.com/
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 02:02 |
|
If I remember right, isn't Johnny Depp's predilection to quirky characters a response to his dislike of the teen heartthrob status he got during 21 Jump Street?
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 02:07 |
|
kiimo posted:I want to disagree with you because I loved Mr. and Mrs. Smith, but... Hey, I really like it too, but... Snatch.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 02:14 |
|
Mr. and Mrs. Smith is like the perfect hollywood action movie.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 02:18 |
|
Depp is also a huge fan of some UK sketch comedies (The Fast Show in particular, he even appeared in a sketch in their final episode) which is also probably why he's drawn to playing over-the-top, wacky characters. I personally like Depp but I agree he's definitely at his strongest playing against type and not so much as the quirky leading man character.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 02:25 |
|
Nckdictator posted:I have no idea what I just found (besides Kyoon's homepage) Seems legit. Trump posted:This is just straight up retarded if you look at his body of work pre-pirates. He's a fantastic actor, one the best working right now, his career is just completely misguided at the moment. I wasn't saying either of them were bad, just that they are amazing character actors that get cast as leads too often for their own good. Why the gently caress does a movie like The Mexican exist, if not for the fact a studio said "Hey, Brad Pitt and Julia Roberts are both really good looking people."
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 03:19 |
|
corn in the bible posted:Mr. and Mrs. Smith is like the perfect hollywood action movie. It's not a great movie, but the fight scene in the house is pretty great/iconic.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 04:11 |
|
Wait, Mr. and Mrs. Smith isn't terrible?
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 04:45 |
|
Skwirl posted:Wait, Mr. and Mrs. Smith isn't terrible? I think it's a good date movie for a married couple. You got action for him, you got some romance for her, it's about rekindling the spark that ignited your marriage... Feels good.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 05:00 |
|
Skwirl posted:Wait, Mr. and Mrs. Smith isn't terrible? It is. This is the first I've heard otherwise. I also don't understand the appeal of Angelina Jolie. She does not have the best track record with picking starring roles. But they mysteriously still make money, so she keeps getting work.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 05:10 |
|
Waffleman_ posted:If I remember right, isn't Johnny Depp's predilection to quirky characters a response to his dislike of the teen heartthrob status he got during 21 Jump Street? Yeah, if memory serves he felt like he was becoming a product and actively went against that in his choice of roles. Ironically, it would eventually happen, just not in the way he expected.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 05:11 |
|
Nckdictator posted:I have no idea what I just found (besides Kyoon's homepage) Aagh, why is this site so bizarrely comprehensive?
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 05:50 |
|
Nckdictator posted:I have no idea what I just found (besides Kyoon's homepage) Well I'm convinced. I know it's just because I'm trying to understand crazy person logic, but Illuminati stuff always frustrates me because nobody every explains why they would put this messaging out. Apparently Robocop is a movie where they're explaining their evil plans for the future, but their evil plan is portrayed in a negative light, so why did they make the movie and fill it with symbolism pointing back to them? You gotta give your villains a clear motive or it just doesn't have the same impact.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 06:21 |
|
Also the pyramid thing is not the Eye of Horus.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 06:24 |
ThePlague-Daemon posted:
Why would they put out hints at all? If they're this big, secret group who wants to murder us all, why put any hints about it anywhere? Are they being ran by the loving Riddler or something?
|
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 06:36 |
|
Nckdictator posted:I have no idea what I just found (besides Kyoon's homepage) This site has a link to buy a book called "Where Did The Towers Go?" which I can't believe isn't the title of a literal children's picture book a la "Will They Fly A Plane Into Our House?".
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 07:21 |
|
|
# ? May 27, 2024 03:21 |
|
TheJoker138 posted:Why would they put out hints at all? If they're this big, secret group who wants to murder us all, why put any hints about it anywhere? Are they being ran by the loving Riddler or something? As I recall, the logic crazy people use is that it's a subtle form of mind control. They hide their symbols in everything we consume, we subliminally take them in, so that when they finally turn up to lead the New World Order we just go 'oh, hey, yeah, they're legit'.
|
# ? Jan 21, 2015 07:29 |