|
FEED ME A PHOTOSHOP
|
# ? Jan 23, 2015 02:37 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 00:49 |
|
postin' from work on a Friday
|
# ? Jan 23, 2015 22:47 |
|
Australia Day long weekend! Which involves me sending in job applications, and everyone else getting drunk having BBQ's while watching cricket. (I'll be doing a little of the later).
|
# ? Jan 23, 2015 23:47 |
|
Weekend time. Hailing Satan and floofing owls.
|
# ? Jan 24, 2015 02:46 |
|
|
# ? Jan 24, 2015 10:05 |
|
8th-snype posted:FEED ME A PHOTOSHOP
|
# ? Jan 24, 2015 13:19 |
|
hail satan i guess
|
# ? Jan 24, 2015 13:19 |
|
|
# ? Jan 24, 2015 15:17 |
|
Photo swap meet was a bust from a sales perspective (the vast majority of it was scrub-tier garage sale type stuff), although I met some cool people at least. Right now I am drinking beer, watching WW2 documentaries on Youtube, and writing a nice email to my girlfriend. Now Playing Dren posted:Made a non-scrub grilled cheese w/ Pain de Campagne bread, sharp cheddar, muenster, thin slices of Granny Smith apples, and turkey. It owned. I don't doubt that it owned, but sorry that's called a melt. Dren posted:Photoshop me like one of your half-bird half-witch girls emptyquotin' this tho Pompous Rhombus fucked around with this message at 23:21 on Jan 24, 2015 |
# ? Jan 24, 2015 22:56 |
|
8th-snype posted:FEED ME A PHOTOSHOP who needs photoshop when you have lightroom sliders all sliders to the max, all the time
|
# ? Jan 24, 2015 23:47 |
|
how is flickr so broken? there are photos I've taken that are publically available, but aren't in my photostream, because apparently my photostream is not collection of all photos I have on flickr. I think it's because the Lightroom plugin interacts with the photostream as if it's any other album, so if you happen to have uploaded a photo to flickr through a means other than Lightroom, or upload it via Lightroom but then remove it from Lightroom or delete your catalog accidentally, Lightroom just magically deletes those photos from your photostream--they're still on flickr, but the only way find them is if you already know the link from somewhere else, or if you find them from the albums page on flickr, which will show you photos by a user that are not in that user's photostream, the page that shows you all of a user's photos. If the photo is not in an album, and you have lost the link to it, that picture no longer exists, or at least cannot be found, unless you can guess the number assigned to it. Let's also talk about numbers, and the photostream itself: if I click on the link to my photostream, it will bring me to a page, and if you scroll to the bottom, it will say you're on page 2. Okay, let's click on the link for page 1. That brings you to the same page of photos, which still says it's page 2, but is composed of the most recent photos in your photostream. Okay, so we're still on page 2, which does not conform to anything I'd expect to be considered a second page, but okay, let's click on page 3. This brings you to the next page of your photostream. At the bottom, it will say it's page 4. Well, alright, if you say so. Let's click on the link for page 5, the last page of your photos. If you scroll to the bottom, it will say you are on no page within your photostream. Pages in your photostream have links at the bottom to other/next/previous page. The current page is displayed in a different color, and it's not a link, because you're already there, so you can't go from where you already are to a different place if that different place is the place you are already at, because then it would not be a "different place". Fine, this is all well and good. We're at the last page of a list of all your photos that does not include all your photos. That last page is page 5. Let's go to the previous page, which in we can infer, from basic arithmetic, is page 4. Let's click the link to go to the previous page; that link will take us to page 4. You click the link. It takes you to page 5, because that is the page previous to page 5, i.e. page 4. But you're not on page 4, you're on page 5, because that is where the link took you. Was the link right? Can I not do basic arithmetic anymore? Okay, the link was right. 5 - 1 = 5. Let's back to page 1, by clicking on the link to page 1. Let's then go to the previous page. There's a link at the bottom to the previous page, where it says we're on page 2, which is page 1. Obviously the page previous to page 2 is page 1. Let's click the link to go to the previous page, which is page 1. The link takes us to page 2, which is page 1, because 2 - 1 = 2, much like 5 - 1 = 5. Flickr runs on computers. Computers are good at math. Look around you. Who's on first?
|
# ? Jan 25, 2015 10:10 |
|
I just drank a bunch of red wine and ate a bunch of delicious pasta, hail Satan.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2015 12:18 |
|
annapacketstormaya posted:how is flickr so broken? no satan; didn't read
|
# ? Jan 25, 2015 15:54 |
|
it's like oh Hey a flickr photo i'd like to see it bigger so i'll click on it becAuse that is a nIgh universaL user experience Standard across like every plAtform and application but no flickr is a special snowflake so clicking Takes you to another picture if you wAnted to see it big you needed to click on a weird icon down by the bottom to find a meNu
dakana fucked around with this message at 17:18 on Jan 25, 2015 |
# ? Jan 25, 2015 17:15 |
|
dakana posted:it's like oh Hey a flickr photo i'd like to see it bigger so i'll click on it becAuse that is a nIgh universaL user experience Standard across like every plAtform and application but no flickr is a special snowflake so clicking Takes you to another picture if you wAnted to see it big you needed to click on a weird icon down by the bottom to find a meNu
|
# ? Jan 25, 2015 20:30 |
|
flickr works fine for me but i'm not an idiot so
|
# ? Jan 25, 2015 21:37 |
|
Flickr works fine for me, too, I'm not smart enough to set up my LR to do automagic things for me.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2015 21:47 |
|
ansel autisms posted:flickr works fine for me but i'm not on salvia so
|
# ? Jan 25, 2015 22:51 |
|
I mean it works it just doesn't work well. The interface and overall user experience is just not good.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2015 23:12 |
|
dakana posted:I mean it works it just doesn't work well. The interface and overall user experience is just not good. Yeah, for the actual "displaying photos" bit it works great. It's just everything else about the site doesn't work.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2015 23:25 |
|
I just burnt copies of a DVD of photos for family as passing them around via an elderly relative was easier than farting around with online options.
|
# ? Jan 25, 2015 23:56 |
|
ansel autisms posted:flickr works fine for me but i'm not an idiot so
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 00:23 |
|
spog posted:I just burnt copies of a DVD of photos for family as passing them around via an elderly relative was easier than farting around with online options. dropbox link is a not bad way to share photos w/ your family
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 01:41 |
|
Dren posted:dropbox link is a not bad way to share photos w/ your family I really like Google Drive and use it to deliver files to all sorts of people.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 03:57 |
|
playing escape goat 2 hail satan
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 04:01 |
|
somebody called the police on me tonight because i was "acting suspicious" taking long exposures at night. just some random old commercial buildings. i'll consider myself lucky that I wasn't caught taking 20 minute exposures of random houses.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:50 |
|
BANME.sh posted:somebody called the police on me tonight because i was "acting suspicious" taking long exposures at night. just some random old commercial buildings. i'll consider myself lucky that I wasn't caught taking 20 minute exposures of random houses. I seriously want to know, however mundane it is, what you told the authorities. "Just pointing this camera at that building there, for 20 minutes." ???
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 08:39 |
|
I was making a reference to ansel autisms' 20 minute exposures. mine were only 1 minute long, and I was approached by the police about 20 minutes later, a few blocks away. I told them I was taking photos, they asked of what, I said old buildings and cars, they asked for my ID, ran it, and then told me to enjoy the rest of the night.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 08:48 |
|
BANME.sh posted:I was making a reference to ansel autisms' 20 minute exposures. mine were only 1 minute long, and I was approached by the police about 20 minutes later, a few blocks away. I told them I was taking photos, they asked of what, I said old buildings and cars, they asked for my ID, ran it, and then told me to enjoy the rest of the night. I envy your experience.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 09:00 |
|
VendaGoat posted:I envy your experience. Well I'd wager he's as white as freshly fallen snow...
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 09:04 |
|
VomitOnLino posted:Well I'd wager he's as white as freshly fallen snow...
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 09:06 |
|
Never had the cops called on me but I tend to get in my car and split after an exposure so who knows
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 10:38 |
|
Once a security guy drove up to me, looked at what I was doing, then left. His headlights got in my exposure.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 17:28 |
|
edit: nws
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 19:14 |
|
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 19:14 |
|
reminder that the shameful OP of this thread has left it open for like two consecutive weeks
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 09:04 |
|
SoundMonkey posted:reminder that the shameful OP of this thread has left it open for like two consecutive weeks ON PURPOSE (I have zero idea how to close a thread and frankly didn't expect people to actual post in it anyway) EDIT: wait I found it, see you folks on friday 8th-snype fucked around with this message at 10:55 on Jan 27, 2015 |
# ? Jan 27, 2015 10:52 |
|
HERE I REOPENED IT FOR YOU, YOU LAZY rear end
|
# ? Jan 31, 2015 01:01 |
|
|
# ? Jan 31, 2015 01:12 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 00:49 |
|
my weekend started last night, and I havn't been able to post in the thread, almost everything is terrible apart from my new pen.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2015 02:30 |