|
achillesforever6 posted:
rhythmic slap slap slapping. Ugh I can't believe JoePa still has defenders.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:10 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 23:51 |
|
TetsuoTW posted:Technically "Lebanese person", but in practice it seems more like it just means "fuckin some kind of brown person who fucks camels and poo poo what do i look like a fuckin scientist"
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:15 |
|
Spoeank posted:rhythmic slap slap slapping. Ugh I can't believe JoePa still has defenders. Oh I loving wish that were the case. Half my Facebook feed was a giant circle jerk when they announced this (I'm from PA - I went to Pitt, but like 95% of my non-community college bound classmates went to Penn State). It's loving insufferable how stupid people are when you mention JoePa.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:17 |
|
Given current events I find myself thinking more and more that our society does not care nearly as much about preventing child molestation as it claims to. It's disgusting and sad. We actually stumbled upon a moral panic worth caring about and we can't even get that right.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:25 |
|
achillesforever6 posted:
I don't know, this opinion seems right to me? I generally think people's public and private actions should be kept separate. I'm certainly not defending someone who covered up child molestation, but I don't really see why they should retroactively change his football record because of it. It just seems like two completely unrelated things.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:34 |
|
Jurgan posted:I don't know, this opinion seems right to me? I generally think people's public and private actions should be kept separate. I'm certainly not defending someone who covered up child molestation, but I don't really see why they should retroactively change his football record because of it. It just seems like two completely unrelated things. actually it's poo poo
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:39 |
|
Dazzling Addar posted:Given current events I find myself thinking more and more that our society does not care nearly as much about preventing child molestation as it claims to. It's disgusting and sad. We actually stumbled upon a moral panic worth caring about and we can't even get that right. The moral panic is worthless because it focuses almost exclusively on lone freaks, instead of powerful men of means, who tend to be the most prolific perpetrators of child molestation, and are the ones who rarely are ever punished for their crimes.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:41 |
|
Jurgan posted:I don't know, this opinion seems right to me? I generally think people's public and private actions should be kept separate. I'm certainly not defending someone who covered up child molestation, but I don't really see why they should retroactively change his football record because of it. It just seems like two completely unrelated things. He used the power granted by his position in the football program to cover up molestation by a member of the staff of the football program. That is, quite obviously, related to the football program.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:44 |
|
TetsuoTW posted:New Zealand is what would happen if Canada travelled back in time about 50 years. And we barely had our poo poo together for universal medical services by 1966. And it wasn't all that good.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:44 |
|
Death Ray posted:Journalistic courage doesn't just occur in France! I don't understand your metaphor at all. How are Muslim extremists the elephant in the room? I assume that was what you were going for, but even so, the first thing I thought was what do the republicans have to do with this. It really muddied the whole message. I also want to know who is even saying the things you're bitching about in your rant because I have not seen anything even close to calling Charlie Hebdo Nazi propaganda. Also are you really this upset about people not wanting to publish images of Muhammad. I mean they were aiming to offend with those images, being shocking is kind of their thing. There's plenty of graphics they make up for the daily show that would never get published in a newspaper and no one's ever died over the daily show.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:47 |
|
I agree with you, rodbeard, but I just want to express my hope that Death Ray doesn't become the new Deep Hurting.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:49 |
|
TetsuoTW posted:Technically "Lebanese person", but in practice it seems more like it just means "fuckin some kind of brown person who fucks camels and poo poo what do i look like a fuckin scientist" So kinda like how all hispanic people are "Mexicans" to American racists?
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:52 |
|
rodbeard posted:I don't understand your metaphor at all. How are Muslim extremists the elephant in the room? Oh, and here I was trying to figure out why the GOP was advocating for more sensitivity towards Islam.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:53 |
|
Lycus posted:So kinda like how all hispanic people are "Mexicans" to American racists? Yes, but in Florida they're Cubans and New York they're Puerto Ricans
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:54 |
|
Dazzling Addar posted:Given current events I find myself thinking more and more that our society does not care nearly as much about preventing child molestation as it claims to. It's disgusting and sad. We actually stumbled upon a moral panic worth caring about and we can't even get that right. What is so weird about that? Is it not normal to give football players and those directly associated with them special privileges? Do most football players even have to take exams or study anything to get a degree these days?
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 07:55 |
|
eNeMeE posted:Unless they're trying to destroy their native population that's not a very nice thing to say. We were complete and utter poo poo for Natives (now we're just mostly poo poo).
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 08:37 |
|
lurker1981 posted:What is so weird about that?
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 08:46 |
|
Spoeank posted:Yes, but in Florida they're Cubans and New York they're Puerto Ricans But if they're Cubans they're also the Good Ones, because they can be considered white most of the time except the times the Republican party wants to say that they have a Hispanic in office. If they're Puerto Ricans they're technically kinda already Americans and I really haven't seen anyone bitch about that yet.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 08:48 |
|
InequalityGodzilla posted:Ummmm...yes? Maybe they could get away with that poo poo in high school but I'm pretty sure most professors won't give two shits about how well you throw a ball, they'll flunk your rear end if you don't at least attempt to do the work. It's pretty hard to fail when the University pays other students to tutor you at the Athletic Center.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 08:52 |
|
InequalityGodzilla posted:Ummmm...yes? Maybe they could get away with that poo poo in high school but I'm pretty sure most professors won't give two shits about how well you throw a ball, they'll flunk your rear end if you don't at least attempt to do the work. Hahahaha oh you're serious.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 09:19 |
|
InequalityGodzilla posted:Ummmm...yes? Maybe they could get away with that poo poo in high school but I'm pretty sure most professors won't give two shits about how well you throw a ball, they'll flunk your rear end if you don't at least attempt to do the work. Malfeasance when millions in sweet, sweet alumni dollars are on the line? Impossible!
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 09:32 |
|
Cloud Potato posted:
After The Numskulls, more like.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 09:37 |
|
InequalityGodzilla posted:Ummmm...yes? Maybe they could get away with that poo poo in high school but I'm pretty sure most professors won't give two shits about how well you throw a ball, they'll flunk your rear end if you don't at least attempt to do the work. Professors are a lot less likely to flunk your rear end when doing so would piss off big chunks of the university administration and / or alumni and fans who are university donors. Football players get rubber-stamped through classes all the drat time, all across the nation.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 09:39 |
|
fukkin jocks
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 09:40 |
|
Didn't somebody else make a Mitt Driving the Family Truckster cartoon during the heady days of Dog-On-Roof-Gate, or is it a gag that's so obvious it just seems like someone did that already?
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 09:58 |
|
Guilty Spork posted:It must be nice to be guaranteed a job so long as newspapers feel obligated to have something conservative to balance out Doonesbury. At least my local paper has the decency to hide Tinsley in the classified section instead of with the actual opinions and cartoons pages proper where people might accidentally read it.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 10:20 |
Unironically agreed What My Friends Think I Do
|
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 11:02 |
|
Have they escaped the binders? I'm confused.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 12:42 |
|
Spoeank posted:rhythmic slap slap slapping. Ugh I can't believe JoePa still has defenders. We are Pedo State
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 12:52 |
|
Dr. Killjoy posted:Mostly you gotta know that the current trend in austerity has been justified by an academic paper that relied on a faulty Excel spreadsheet formula - and when the formula is corrected points to austerity actually being negative for economic development. So uhh, yeah - bullshit. Could I get a link on all this mess? As someone who thinks the dismemberment of thwelfare state that has been happening this side of the 21st century is despicable, I'm ready for some schadenfreude.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 13:02 |
|
Jurgan posted:People were asking earlier, so I checked with my father, and he says Doonesbury still runs in the paper in Charleston. He was sure today's was new, but not so sure of the weekday ones. Doonesbury is in reruns Monday-Saturday, although they're not reprinting every strip -- it's more a "Best Of" thing. They're currently up to the late 70s and Mike and JJ's first date. Trudeau still does original strips for Sunday. Markovnikov posted:Could I get a link on all this mess? As someone who thinks the dismemberment of thwelfare state that has been happening this side of the 21st century is despicable, I'm ready for some schadenfreude. Here's a starter. Google Reinhart and Rogoff for more.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 13:09 |
|
As if it matters, everyone's still running with it anyway. If you could argue against austerity with logic its inability to do anything but make almost everyone really poor should have killed it off ages ago.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 13:37 |
|
Lycus posted:So kinda like how all hispanic people are "Mexicans" to American racists? To be fair 65% of Hispanics are Mexicans and the ones that aren't are usually concentrated in small areas (e.g., Puerto Ricans in New York City and Chicago).
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 13:43 |
|
Exclamation Marx posted:
Ah yes, the 70th anniversary, 70 being a well known milestone that people care about as opposed to 75 or 50. Also wow this is way lazier than usual, normally he at least has drawings even if they're terrible, this time he did half of one panel and then just added text.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 13:45 |
|
I know that "ignore comments" is the common refrain, but holy poo poo:Common Sense Post posted:So let me get this straight, they made a numerical error, so what they say is wrong? Yea, that sounds right.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 13:46 |
|
Taciturn Tactician posted:Ah yes, the 70th anniversary, 70 being a well known milestone that people care about as opposed to 75 or 50. Actually the President will not be able to attend the funeral itself because non-Muslims are barred. Does the word "apartheid" ring a bell? Labels: funeral, Obama, Saudi Arabia, Shuldig
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 13:48 |
|
JaggerMcDagger posted:Actually the President will not be able to attend the funeral itself because non-Muslims are barred. Does the word "apartheid" ring a bell? How would this stop him? :republismug:
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 13:54 |
|
Gilganixon posted:As if it matters, everyone's still running with it anyway. If you could argue against austerity with logic its inability to do anything but make almost everyone really poor should have killed it off ages ago. To be fair to austerity, there are very, very occasionally times when it is a good idea. If you have one country that is in a huge fiscal crisis (like, an actual fiscal crisis and not some bullshit "oh no our deficit is 0.5% of GDP, quick cut everything in the budget by 50%" crisis) and unable to get out of it, but the rest of the world is booming and has strong economic growth, in some circumstances an austerity program for that country can be a good idea (not necessarily is a good idea, but can be if you consider solving the fiscal crisis to be the #1 priority for whatever reason). Trying to have every developed country in the world run an austerity program at the same time during a recession is loving moronic.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 14:06 |
|
I guess the problem is more about the precendent that it will set regarding debt inside the EU, as well as giving a big gently caress you to Germany, which is a big no-no. The ECB wanted to increase spending if I'm not mistaken anyway, right?
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 14:26 |
|
|
# ? Jun 3, 2024 23:51 |
|
Chewbaccanator posted:I guess the problem is more about the precendent that it will set regarding debt inside the EU, as well as giving a big gently caress you to Germany, which is a big no-no. The ECB is beginning a round of quantitative easing to the tune of 60 billion euros a month until further notice in order to pump money into the European economy and avoid a deflationary spiral. There are worse ways to deal with low growth (austerity being one of them) but there are also better ways to deal with it, like using that massive amount of money on meaningful investments in government programs and projects rather than just handing it all to banks and hoping they do the rest for you.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 14:30 |