Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Mr. Wiggles
Dec 1, 2003

We are all drinking from the highball glass of ideology.

Who What Now posted:

Which? That we'll all have deathbed conversions or we'll all convert after death?

At some point everyone will "convert", though I'm not sure that's the best term. Maybe "come to understand". But when that happens is going to be different for everyone.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Mr. Wiggles posted:

At some point everyone will "convert", though I'm not sure that's the best term. Maybe "come to understand". But when that happens is going to be different for everyone.

Man, you are as bad as the guys who claim Darwin recanted on his death bed.

Blood Boils
Dec 27, 2006

Its not an S, on my planet it means QUIPS

CommieGIR posted:

Conjecture is fun, isn't it! :ironicat:

Well of course it is, why else would anyone post in D&D? The English dictionary is your ally, not your enemy!

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Black Bones posted:

Well of course it is, why else would anyone post in D&D? The English dictionary is your ally, not your enemy!

But hardly proof of anything other than the meaning of words.

Mr. Wiggles
Dec 1, 2003

We are all drinking from the highball glass of ideology.

CommieGIR posted:

Man, you are as bad as the guys who claim Darwin recanted on his death bed.

Why would Darwin recant? That's silly.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Mr. Wiggles: Do you think God will ease aspiring rationalists into Heavenly splendor with some play-acting like they just got thawed out and computer uploaded or something?

Legacyspy
Oct 25, 2008

Mr. Wiggles posted:

Even if you're just doing the smugatheist troll thing, you have crap logic here. How do you know nothing would ever convince you, for starters?

I'm glad to see others calling you out on this. That isn't what I said. All I said is that it was possible.

I can imagine somethings which would convince me that God would exist. But then again, maybe I'm so closed minded, that even if I saw those things I actually wouldn't.

All I know, is that I don't believe that God exists. I am also under the impression (though I could be wrong, that is why I am asking) that God could convince me of his existence. I'm just asking why he hasn't. And TBH, I don't care that he he hasn't, because he doesn't exist.

Mr. Wiggles posted:

I guess I'm wondering why he's being so impatient about it.

I'm not impatient about it. Because God doesn't exist. How could I be impatient about it?

Mr. Wiggles posted:

Everyone will come to God eventually, some just sooner than others.

That is actually a good point I hadn't considered. If that is the case though, why is it so important to talk about? Just let people go through life doing what ever they want and eventually they will come to God.

Unless... they won't believe in God until they are in hell. In that case my question still stands. Why wouldn't God convince me of his existence...before I went to hell?

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment that I'm alive, I pray for death!

Who What Now posted:

Which? That we'll all have deathbed conversions or we'll all convert after death?

Wiggles, unless I'm misremembering, ascribes to the "hell is a prison locked from the inside" variation, with postdeath recognition of/reconciliation with God being not only probable but inevitable.

Captain_Maclaine fucked around with this message at 23:29 on Jan 27, 2015

Miltank
Dec 27, 2009

by XyloJW

Who What Now posted:

This is an important distinction to make because the church is always poised to seize credit for things it did not do and in some cases even tried to impede. Churches are nothing but jackals and vultures on social issues and mice wherever will get them the most support and accolades. They obviously aren't unique on this point, however, and there's no shortage of other people and organizations doing the same thing.
So is MLK the jackal in this metaphor or is it his congregation? Or maybe the congregations that supported his congregation?

CommieGIR
Aug 22, 2006

The blue glow is a feature, not a bug


Pillbug

Miltank posted:

So is MLK the jackal in this metaphor or is it his congregation? Or maybe the congregations that supported his congregation?

Obviously the very religious segregationists and Jim Crow supporters were the jackals.

Legacyspy
Oct 25, 2008

Captain_Maclaine posted:

Wiggles, unless I'm misremembering, ascribes to the "hell is a prison locked from the inside" variation, with postdeath recognition of/reconciliation with God being not only probable but inevitable.

Oh, if that is the case that resolves my whole question. But it also raises the question, why is it so important to talk about Christianity now? Like the very title is that the only thing that matters is Jesus. But if hell is a prison locked from the inside, then just let all us non-believers go about our lives. We will die,end up in hell, see that God is real, and go to heaven.

Disinterested
Jun 29, 2011

You look like you're still raking it in. Still killing 'em?

Black Bones posted:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/creation?s=t


Great video. I agree with Geuss that patterns are imposed by us, I'm not the one arguing that theology is nonhuman in origin! I thought the "If" made it clear that I'm making a presupposition that God is real.

Well, he's not just talking about theology, he's talking about people like you who posit the idea of a creator in your terms in the first place (which, after all, is a form of theology!)

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

Miltank posted:

So is MLK the jackal in this metaphor or is it his congregation? Or maybe the congregations that supported his congregation?

Neither, but rather the churches and political parties who tried to claim ownership of his deeds after death.

Captain_Maclaine
Sep 30, 2001

Every moment that I'm alive, I pray for death!

Legacyspy posted:

Oh, if that is the case that resolves my whole question. But it also raises the question, why is it so important to talk about Christianity now? Like the very title is that the only thing that matters is Jesus. But if hell is a prison locked from the inside, then just let all us non-believers go about our lives. We will die,end up in hell, see that God is real, and go to heaven.

For all I've argued with him over the years, one thing I won't accuse Wiggles of being is a proselytizing rear end in a top hat for, as much as he likes to talk about Christianity, he isn't trying to win convert because while he find his faith personally important, he's secure in the knowledge we'll all come around eventually and so it doesn't much matter if we do it now or later (and won't cost us much, if anything, if it's the latter). In this, he's leagues above Kyrie, who let's be honest, only cares about his faith as it gives him an excuse to smug it up and/or condemn the rest of us, or Brandor, who wants to blather endlessly about his feverish universalist delusions and shaky grasp of English, both of which he's mistaken for revelation.

Captain_Maclaine fucked around with this message at 23:51 on Jan 27, 2015

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Legacyspy posted:

Oh, if that is the case that resolves my whole question. But it also raises the question, why is it so important to talk about Christianity now? Like the very title is that the only thing that matters is Jesus. But if hell is a prison locked from the inside, then just let all us non-believers go about our lives. We will die,end up in hell, see that God is real, and go to heaven.
I would guess the moral lessons of Christ (though I would rate them slightly inferior to those of the Buddha if I'm not allowed to pick the Master Therion, they're still quite good) as well as wanting to spare people the possibility of an interminable period of suffering before their acceptance of divine truth. It might be eventually inevitable but it could take a million years.


CommieGIR posted:

Obviously the very religious segregationists and Jim Crow supporters were the jackals.

Who What Now posted:

Neither, but rather the churches and political parties who tried to claim ownership of his deeds after death.
Come on y'all, have the courage of your convictions. At least have the courage to say "he was a good man, but also a religious jackal whose ideology interfered with human progress." You could maybe say he's one of the good ones if you wanted.

mdemone
Mar 14, 2001

The "first cause" argument is such bullshit. We already know how the universe started. Pure nothingness is incredibly unstable, and tends to produce universes along with a foaming sea of every other kind of thing. It's the only way weak gravity can even exist.

Theoretical cosmology has progressed past the need for causality in the quantum-gravitational regime. Get on my level, God.

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

Nessus posted:

I would guess the moral lessons of Christ (though I would rate them slightly inferior to those of the Buddha if I'm not allowed to pick the Master Therion, they're still quite good) as well as wanting to spare people the possibility of an interminable period of suffering before their acceptance of divine truth. It might be eventually inevitable but it could take a million years.

Come on y'all, have the courage of your convictions. At least have the courage to say "he was a good man, but also a religious jackal whose ideology interfered with human progress." You could maybe say he's one of the good ones if you wanted.

Except that I am standing with my convictions? Do you just not read very good, or...? Here, it's like this. Individuals in the church are not the church, and good people are still good people with or without religion. Churches try to brush that fact under the rug and say that no they really are the only reason good people are good. Which is the point I was making.

Mr. Wiggles
Dec 1, 2003

We are all drinking from the highball glass of ideology.

Legacyspy posted:

Oh, if that is the case that resolves my whole question. But it also raises the question, why is it so important to talk about Christianity now? Like the very title is that the only thing that matters is Jesus. But if hell is a prison locked from the inside, then just let all us non-believers go about our lives. We will die,end up in hell, see that God is real, and go to heaven.

Like Captain Maclaine alludes to above, I don't see the point in going about telling people they should believe in this thing or that thing. At the same time, I'm happy to talk about what I believe in because for me, it's really great. Like, I get a ton of personal satisfaction and happiness from Christianity, and so it's natural for me to be an enthusiastic booster of it. But part of my faith is in the truly universal nature of the promises of Christ, so the last thing I would want to do is go about telling someone "you have to believe this thing right now or you are a bad person" or some other such nonsense. Everyone is on their own road to paradise - who am I to judge it?

Mc Do Well
Aug 2, 2008

by FactsAreUseless

mdemone posted:

Pure nothingness is incredibly unstable, and tends to produce universes along with a foaming sea of every other kind of thing.


God is a Boltzmann Brain and we are its dream.

Miltank
Dec 27, 2009

by XyloJW

Who What Now posted:

Except that I am standing with my convictions? Do you just not read very good, or...? Here, it's like this. Individuals in the church are not the church, and good people are still good people with or without religion. Churches try to brush that fact under the rug and say that no they really are the only reason good people are good. Which is the point I was making.

The individuals actually are the church.

mdemone
Mar 14, 2001

McDowell posted:

God is a Boltzmann Brain and we are its dream.

You jest, but that is remarkably close to the general thrust of holographic cosmology, in which we treat space itself as emergent and gravity as an entropic force (just as in elasticity, or gas dynamics) arising from the movement of information toward equipartition on the light-like worldsheet receding from every degree of freedom in the Hubble volume, i.e. the cosmological horizon.

I'm pursuing publication for an article that rescues Hegel's Phenomenology in light of the fact that the cosmos is awakening to know itself, as these bits of information project into our spacetime and take the form of sentient beings (maybe not just us) writing down string cosmology.

Kyrie eleison
Jan 26, 2013

by Ralp
If she doesn't wear a habit, she ain't a nun.

Legacyspy
Oct 25, 2008

Mr. Wiggles posted:

Like Captain Maclaine alludes to above, I don't see the point in going about telling people they should believe in this thing or that thing. At the same time, I'm happy to talk about what I believe in because for me, it's really great. Like, I get a ton of personal satisfaction and happiness from Christianity, and so it's natural for me to be an enthusiastic booster of it. But part of my faith is in the truly universal nature of the promises of Christ, so the last thing I would want to do is go about telling someone "you have to believe this thing right now or you are a bad person" or some other such nonsense. Everyone is on their own road to paradise - who am I to judge it?

That is totally fair, and resolves my question.

Mr. Wiggles
Dec 1, 2003

We are all drinking from the highball glass of ideology.

Legacyspy posted:

That is totally fair, and resolves my question.

Ok. Sorry for misunderstanding you earlier.

Disinterested
Jun 29, 2011

You look like you're still raking it in. Still killing 'em?

mdemone posted:

You jest, but that is remarkably close to the general thrust of holographic cosmology, in which we treat space itself as emergent and gravity as an entropic force (just as in elasticity, or gas dynamics) arising from the movement of information toward equipartition on the light-like worldsheet receding from every degree of freedom in the Hubble volume, i.e. the cosmological horizon.

I'm pursuing publication for an article that rescues Hegel's Phenomenology in light of the fact that the cosmos is awakening to know itself, as these bits of information project into our spacetime and take the form of sentient beings (maybe not just us) writing down string cosmology.

Keep me updated. I always had an uneasy relationship with Hegel, so I'm always looking for new ways in.

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

Miltank posted:

The individuals actually are the church.

Nope

Disinterested
Jun 29, 2011

You look like you're still raking it in. Still killing 'em?

What the hell else is a church but a group of people? You're essentially doing your own personal version of 'corporations are people, friend'.

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

Disinterested posted:

What the hell else is a church but a group of people? You're essentially doing your own personal version of 'corporations are people, friend'.

What? I'm saying the exact opposite.

Martin Luther King doesn't belong to his church and Christians don't get to claim him as "theirs". Nor do Republicans, Democrats, or anyone else. He was his own person and his accomplishments are his own and it's a lovely thing to try and take that away and say "Christianity is to thank for everything MLK did".

Blood Boils
Dec 27, 2006

Its not an S, on my planet it means QUIPS

CommieGIR posted:

But hardly proof of anything other than the meaning of words.

Agreed.

Disinterested posted:

Well, he's not just talking about theology, he's talking about people like you who posit the idea of a creator in your terms in the first place (which, after all, is a form of theology!)

Yes, of course?

Nessus posted:

Do you think God will ease aspiring rationalists into Heavenly splendor with some play-acting like they just got thawed out and computer uploaded or something?

If that's their idea of paradise, sure, why not?

Mc Do Well
Aug 2, 2008

by FactsAreUseless
God personally wrote the BSG reboot to promote alt-heaven with a coat of Cylon technology.

Disinterested
Jun 29, 2011

You look like you're still raking it in. Still killing 'em?

Who What Now posted:

What? I'm saying the exact opposite.

Martin Luther King doesn't belong to his church and Christians don't get to claim him as "theirs". Nor do Republicans, Democrats, or anyone else. He was his own person and his accomplishments are his own and it's a lovely thing to try and take that away and say "Christianity is to thank for everything MLK did".

If all a church is is a group of people then you're making a basic mistake by setting a church up as a separate object for comparison with individuals.

The truth here is blindingly obvious. MLK was clearly influenced by his chirstianity, and it's therefore totally fair for Christians to say - MLK is a great example of the high moral standards a Christian cam achieve. It's only a problem when some Christians emphasise this over and above all other dimensions of MLK, including his association with the Black socialist movement. It's weird to try to attribute everything to an individual, nobody exists in an uninformed moral vacuum

On the other hand you can get to the position MLK did without believing in the Christian God, as many in the oft forgotten black labour movement did, as well as people like Malcolm X.

You're just setting up false dichotomies and driving your argument to weird conclusions.

Miltank
Dec 27, 2009

by XyloJW

Who What Now posted:

What? I'm saying the exact opposite.

Martin Luther King doesn't belong to his church and Christians don't get to claim him as "theirs". Nor do Republicans, Democrats, or anyone else. He was his own person and his accomplishments are his own and it's a lovely thing to try and take that away and say "Christianity is to thank for everything MLK did".

How do you separate what a man does from what a man believes? Its not about "claiming" Martin Luther King for PR points, he was a Christian minister first and foremost and to claim that Christianity was irrelevant to his life is retarded.

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

Miltank posted:

How do you separate what a man does from what a man believes? Its not about "claiming" Martin Luther King for PR points, he was a Christian minister first and foremost and to claim that Christianity was irrelevant to his life is retarded.

That is, in fact, exactly what it's about more often than not.

Miltank
Dec 27, 2009

by XyloJW

Who What Now posted:

That is, in fact, exactly what it's about more often than not.

So you are just shouting at strawmen then?

Blood Boils
Dec 27, 2006

Its not an S, on my planet it means QUIPS
It's really too bad MLK never spoke about or wrote anything down concerning his identity or beliefs

Who What Now
Sep 10, 2006

by Azathoth

Miltank posted:

So you are just shouting at strawmen then?

I wouldn't say that, considering you're here.

Nessus
Dec 22, 2003

After a Speaker vote, you may be entitled to a valuable coupon or voucher!



Miltank posted:

How do you separate what a man does from what a man believes? Its not about "claiming" Martin Luther King for PR points, he was a Christian minister first and foremost and to claim that Christianity was irrelevant to his life is retarded.
You could make the claim that he achieved such moral heights in spite of his adherence to idiotic sky-wizard woo, and bemoan how much more he could have achieved were it not for the incubus of the Nazarene, perhaps. But I really think he should instead get classed as "a credit to his community," you know, those people (god-havers)

Blood Boils
Dec 27, 2006

Its not an S, on my planet it means QUIPS

Nessus posted:

But I really think he should instead get classed as "a credit to his community," you know, those people (god-havers)

Yes yes but are god-havers allowed to agree with this, or will that somehow negate King's ministry/identity?

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




McDowell posted:

God personally wrote the BSG reboot to promote alt-heaven with a coat of Cylon technology.

It's pretty widely acknowledged that there are rather significant Mormon themes in the new (and old) BSG actually.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mc Do Well
Aug 2, 2008

by FactsAreUseless

BrandorKP posted:

It's pretty widely acknowledged that there are rather significant Mormon themes in the new (and old) BSG actually.

Oh I know, the idea of a play-acted rationalist heaven just reminded me of the implications of the new show's finale.

  • Locked thread