|
Waterhaul posted:This can't be true when Doakes had been gotten rid of in season 2 Funny enough she wrote his death.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 20:04 |
|
|
# ? May 17, 2024 22:41 |
|
zoux posted:Not seen any of her work then? I've seen her play Annoying as gently caress in any number of things and nothing that actually stands out. (No, she wasn't good in Breaking Bad. She was... there.)
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 20:05 |
|
I like David Tennant a lot because I enjoy Doctor Who but even outside of that people say he's amazing in Broadchurch.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 20:06 |
|
Aphrodite posted:I've seen her play Annoying as gently caress in any number of things and nothing that actually stands out. Watch Don't Trust the B---- in Apartment 23
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 20:23 |
|
Well, this is a thing. I mean there's no way in hell Disney will give permission unless they get something in return-or they might just up and refuse outright.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 20:41 |
|
Don't know how Tennant is in Dr Who, but he's fantastic in Broadchurch. But maybe 80% of his talent comes from his Scottish accent, so it could be he's only at 20% strength in an American show. Yvonmukluk posted:Well, this is a thing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxk8aUei_p0
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 20:45 |
|
Yvonmukluk posted:Well, this is a thing. I don't think they'd announce it if negotiations weren't going well. Obviously Disney is going to get a piece, but I bet they're looking at the success DC has had in TV by having multiple shows on different channels and not caring quite so much about continuity, and since the X-Men are already separate from the MCU, they think "gently caress it, have a TV show."
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 20:48 |
|
I've never read Jessica Jones, and I've never seen anything with Krysten Ritter that I know of, so it's perfect casting.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 20:58 |
|
Skwirl posted:I don't think they'd announce it if negotiations weren't going well. Obviously Disney is going to get a piece, but I bet they're looking at the success DC has had in TV by having multiple shows on different channels and not caring quite so much about continuity, and since the X-Men are already separate from the MCU, they think "gently caress it, have a TV show." Well, it's also a tactic. Now if it falls apart the public blames Disney/Marvel.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 21:01 |
|
fatherboxx posted:Tennant chews scenery like a goddamn Langolier, looking forward to see him play a comic book villain. Looks like Purple Man is right up his alley. The infamous obligatory Secret Smile line of his: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NoUdPin-dhU
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 21:31 |
|
Skwirl posted:I don't think they'd announce it if negotiations weren't going well. Obviously Disney is going to get a piece, but I bet they're looking at the success DC has had in TV by having multiple shows on different channels and not caring quite so much about continuity, and since the X-Men are already separate from the MCU, they think "gently caress it, have a TV show." Yeah, but they really don't like Fox making money off their properties, and anything that lets them hold onto the license longer is something I don't think they like that much. Spite is a powerful motivator, especially since apparently they also put a hold on X-Men merchandising.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 21:43 |
|
greatn posted:I've never read Jessica Jones, and I've never seen anything with Krysten Ritter that I know of, so it's perfect casting. I will say I don't think she's got the look, but she's a fine actress and will probably do a good job. I don't know the guy playing Luke Cage, but as far as I'm concerned Marvel haven't made a single bad casting announcement for these Netflix shows yet.
|
# ? Jan 26, 2015 23:30 |
|
If I was doing an Xmen TV series, I'd do like a New Mutants series. Something self contained with a younger cast that is equal superhero show and school show. Though I admit I just want to see Cannonball, Sunspot and Magik on screen. I'm nigh invulnerable while i'm blastin'!
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 00:42 |
|
twistedmentat posted:If I was doing an Xmen TV series, I'd do like a New Mutants series. Something self contained with a younger cast that is equal superhero show and school show.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 00:48 |
|
Ah I don't remember that. It seems the lobotomy seemed to have worked.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 00:50 |
|
As many have said, the MCU is almost better off without mutants... so Marvel, if you're listening, let Fox have their dumb show but make them give back the loving Fantastic Four properties. Hell, even if it's just the associated characters, Silver Surfer, Doom, Galactus, there's some sick poo poo there. Maybe even go for blood and go for full or shared custody on the X-Men cosmic/non-mutant stuff like the Shi'ar and Gladiator and the Windjammers and Abigail Brand and Savage Land. That would be a great deal that be pretty much win-win for everyone. i do realize marvel is not listening
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 00:52 |
|
Marvel also benefits from vetoing Fox on stuff like this though. Marvel doesn't want a market over saturated by poo poo they don't fully own nor control. Right now, for superheroes, it is Disney vs. Time Warner/CBS tag team. Allowing Fox to enter the fray (and profit off of both sides since they have Gotham too) isn't really that beneficial to Disney at this point. I personally hope they block it, unless they manage to get some FF stuff back in trade, then it might be worth it since the most likely case is that this show dies in the first season anyway.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 01:27 |
I also think Tennant is a bad actor, for what it's worth.
|
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 01:40 |
|
ufarn posted:Wow, the leaked trailer is pretty sick I remember liking that show, but man, Fox was totally right, I always thought it was related to the X-Men.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 02:08 |
|
On tonight's Flash the words Speed Force were said out loud.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 03:30 |
|
XboxPants posted:As many have said, the MCU is almost better off without mutants... so Marvel, if you're listening, let Fox have their dumb show but make them give back the loving Fantastic Four properties. Hell, even if it's just the associated characters, Silver Surfer, Doom, Galactus, there's some sick poo poo there. Maybe even go for blood and go for full or shared custody on the X-Men cosmic/non-mutant stuff like the Shi'ar and Gladiator and the Windjammers and Abigail Brand and Savage Land. Umm apparently Marvel is doing a F4 reboot: Official F4 Teaser Trailer I can't tell if it's supposed to tie into the greater MCU, but the visuals at least are pretty impressive. e: Nevermind that's Fox still, gently caress I could have sworn I saw the marvel page flipping at the beginning. I must be tired. WarLocke fucked around with this message at 04:24 on Jan 28, 2015 |
# ? Jan 28, 2015 04:21 |
|
WarLocke posted:Umm apparently Marvel is doing a F4 reboot: You did see that page flipping, its before every Marvel comic movie whether its made by their studio or by Sony/Fox. Not sure how you could miss the news that Fox was doing a new F4 movie though.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 04:27 |
|
mikeraskol posted:You did see that page flipping, its before every Marvel comic movie whether its made by their studio or by Sony/Fox. Must not be reading the Doom Blog
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 04:32 |
|
mikeraskol posted:Not sure how you could miss the news that Fox was doing a new F4 movie though.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 04:54 |
|
muscles like this? posted:On tonight's Flash the words Speed Force were said out loud. The door to crazy town has been kicked wide open.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 04:55 |
|
ToastyPotato posted:The door to crazy town has been kicked wide open. It was grabbed on both sides and pulled apart.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 05:16 |
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:Because they've not been doing the massive multi-year hype fest that Marvel does and that some people expect for some reason. Well I don't have a television so I miss out on most hype poo poo anyway. Apparently I had managed to never see it mentioned on the internets. Somehow? Welp.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 06:54 |
|
mikeraskol posted:You did see that page flipping, its before every Marvel comic movie whether its made by their studio or by Sony/Fox. I follow all this stuff moderately and the FF stuff has been very under the radar. Outside of the casting news, the only other blip FF made was on the supposed leaked script, and that only really made the rounds of websites the average fan would never bother reading. Marvel and DC have done huge hype generating press releases and what not for their movie announcements and this trailer was kind of just dumped on the public by Fox with little to no fanfare by comparison.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 07:17 |
|
The trailer is actually attached to Fox movie Kingsmen (based on Mark Millar's The Secret Service) which I think is already out in the UK.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 07:20 |
|
It's one thing to not know news or trailers or random clickbait rumors, but to not be aware that they were doing a new film at all is bit much. The whole thing about a black Johnny Storm was pretty much everywhere when it first got announced.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 07:20 |
|
WarLocke posted:Well I don't have a television so I miss out on most hype poo poo anyway. It's got Michael B Jordan as Johnny Storm, I'm kinda hyped for it. But yeah, all the movies based on Marvel properties have that Marvel logo at the beginning. All the X-Men movies and Spider-Man movies have the same thing.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 07:21 |
|
BrianWilly posted:It's one thing to not know news or trailers or random clickbait rumors, but to not be aware that they were doing a new film at all is bit much. The whole thing about a black Johnny Storm was pretty much everywhere when it first got announced. That kind of stupid poo poo is the kind of thing that lasts a few slow news cycles and then is forgotten quickly though. The amount of PR done for this is only really unusual compared to the way companies like Marvel do it. I doubt that many people know that movies like the new Mad Max, Tomorrowland and Mission Impossible 5 are coming out this year, but they will in the weeks leading up to release.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 07:44 |
|
I feel like Mad Max trailer went viral on social media already. I only just heard about Mission Impossible 5 today (through the Facebook sidebar.)
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 08:01 |
|
ToastyPotato posted:I feel like Mad Max trailer went viral on social media already. I only just heard about Mission Impossible 5 today (through the Facebook sidebar.) Mad Max has had a trailer out for a little while, as have Terminator and Jurassic World, but they weren't things that were big news for 12+ months before their actual release (unlike Captain America 3 or BvS).
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 08:13 |
|
That Mad Max trailer is so bad.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 14:58 |
Aphrodite posted:That Mad Max trailer is so bad. And yet it's the only one of the three films that has any reason to exist besides safe money.
|
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 16:12 |
|
Aphrodite posted:That Mad Max trailer is so bad. I Am going to make the wild prediction that it will be like any other 80 remake/revival we have seen so far: not 100% terrible, but ultimately way to safe too be memorable and thus, vastly inferior to its original counterpart.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 16:26 |
You guys know it's being made by the original director and that he's been trying to get it made for like 16 years, right? This isn't like the Robocop remake. I mean, it could still suck, but I doubt it's going to be bland.
|
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 16:32 |
|
e X posted:I Am going to make the wild prediction that it will be like any other 80 remake/revival we have seen so far: not 100% terrible, but ultimately way to safe too be memorable and thus, vastly inferior to its original counterpart. It's being made by the same guy that made the other two.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 16:52 |
|
|
# ? May 17, 2024 22:41 |
|
e X posted:I Am going to make the wild prediction that it will be like any other 80 remake/revival we have seen so far: not 100% terrible, but ultimately way to safe too be memorable and thus, vastly inferior to its original counterpart. The original Mad Max? Which outside of some indie appeal is probably the least memorable of the three? No one quotes Mad Max, FYI. Its the second and third everyone talks about. Lurdiak posted:You guys know it's being made by the original director and that he's been trying to get it made for like 16 years, right? This isn't like the Robocop remake. I mean, it could still suck, but I doubt it's going to be bland. Also this. I don't see what's so bad about the Fury Road trailer. None of the Mad Max films were masterpieces, so I am not sure why people are tearing the new one apart, unless they've always hated every Mad Max movie. I mean, yeah the inclusion and focus on "pretty women in peril" is kind of dumb but everything else looks pretty awesome as far as action movies go. Not really sure what it is being compared against.
|
# ? Jan 28, 2015 18:44 |