|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jrose/pres/201502-JVMChallenges.pdf tl;dr: what they want to do is have value types and something equivalent to reified generics by, uh, 2030.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2015 22:31 |
|
|
# ? May 8, 2024 23:52 |
|
pseudorandom name posted:hopefully on iOS react native 2.0: 'gently caress it' edition
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 00:40 |
|
Bloody posted:cool shitpost about a thing from like two weeks ago this was relevant good work i am slow
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 01:45 |
|
Cool CSS effects using SVG: http://css-tricks.com/gooey-effect/
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 15:51 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:i am pretty sure this is why eclipse has a splash screen eclipse is made up of a billion plugins and that load screen is where it reads and loads each one. uis are created on demand which is why the first time you open certain dialogs it will be slow while it loads the classes but then be fast afterwards
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 16:01 |
|
Soricidus posted:swing is ok, swing performance is fine as long as it's done properly with worker threads and stuff. slower than native guis, faster than 100% of web apps i've ever had the misfortune of using. the two major gui apis for java (swing and eclipse swt) haven't changed since java 1.4.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 16:04 |
|
eclipse rcp looks kind of nice until you realize you have to use swt and then it really sucks
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 16:04 |
|
Shaggar posted:the two major gui apis for java (swing and eclipse swt) haven't changed since java 1.4. Hey, they added generics to things like JList. So now you can pass a Vector<? extends E> to the JList constructor.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 16:28 |
|
So is it Java 8 or Java 2 1.8??
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 17:04 |
|
Progressive JPEG posted:So is it Java 8 or Java 2 1.8?? the version numbers go like this: java 1.1 java 2 se 1.2 java 2 se 1.3 java 2 se 1.4 java 5 java 6 java 7 java 8 this is from the same vendor who gave us this version series for their operating system: 4.0 1.1 (4.1) 2.0 (5.0) 2.2 (5.2) 2.3 (5.3) 2.5.1 (???) 2.6 (5.6) 7 (5.7) 8 (5.8) 10 (5.10) 11 (yep, 5.11)
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 17:08 |
|
this video is great fun and will piss off shaggar https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RnqAXuLZlaE
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 17:09 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:this video is great fun and will piss off shaggar this is my favorite programming video
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 17:10 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:this video is great fun and will piss off shaggar
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 17:16 |
|
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 17:17 |
|
Majestic coding.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 17:19 |
|
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-678 loljava e: there's some bug in that apache project but apparently a tightloop in jdk7's epoll library is a real thing which i may or may not be getting hit by in production atm Sapozhnik fucked around with this message at 17:48 on Feb 5, 2015 |
# ? Feb 5, 2015 17:36 |
|
i think i found a compiler bug in avr-gcc or at least if not a bug then weird/unexpected behavior
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 21:17 |
|
the crux of it is the following pseudocode:code:
it does not do this
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 21:20 |
|
did you mark flag as volatile?
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 21:21 |
|
make flag volatile? Edit: ^^^^
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 21:21 |
|
Bloody posted:the crux of it is the following pseudocode: maybe it thinks flag is a string instead of an integer?
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 21:22 |
|
Subjunctive posted:did you mark flag as volatile? volatile makes it work yeah but i dunno i feel like it shouldn't be necessary in this case
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 21:23 |
|
Bloody posted:volatile makes it work yeah but i dunno i feel like it shouldn't be necessary in this case this is like the classic example of when to use volatile: there's a mutation that's not visible to the control flow. otherwise it could never hoist any loads, it'd have to rematerialize every time through the loop, you would cry yourself to sleep, etc.
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 21:28 |
|
tbh compilers targeting avr or msp or whatever should probably consider everything volatile and also aliased by everything else by default but yeah it's free to hoist poo poo out of loops unless you tell it not to (and even if you mark things as volatile, the spec allows a compiler to eliminates stores to a var where it can't find any loads but i don't think any compiler is petulant enough to actually do that)
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 21:46 |
|
prefect posted:maybe it thinks flag is a string instead of an integer? not trying to be mean here, and it's certainly something that I struggle with myself, but please don't give advice when you have at most a cursory understanding of the topic being discussed, especially when it's in as finicky a language as C
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 23:26 |
|
counterpoint: I've made a moderately successful career of it
|
# ? Feb 5, 2015 23:29 |
|
Subjunctive posted:counterpoint: I've made a moderately successful career of it yeah, the trick is to get it so that when the result of following your advice is a disaster, people think the problem is that they didn't listen to you enough it works great for economists too
|
# ? Feb 6, 2015 00:03 |
|
prefect posted:maybe it thinks flag is a string instead of an integer? Maybe it thinks it's a pokemon.
|
# ? Feb 6, 2015 00:18 |
|
Soricidus posted:tl;dr: what they want to do is have value types and something equivalent to reified generics by, uh, 2030. and they are driving away from OO as fast as they can (slowly)
|
# ? Feb 6, 2015 04:12 |
|
Bloody posted:
fixed that for you, grandpa
|
# ? Feb 6, 2015 04:41 |
|
atmega
|
# ? Feb 6, 2015 04:45 |
|
sarehu posted:Maybe it thinks it's a pokemon. an excellent point have you tried holding down + B when you trigger the interrupt, OP you have to press it on the third iteration or it doesn't always work
|
# ? Feb 6, 2015 05:15 |
|
Peanut and the Gang posted:Cool CSS effects using SVG: i'm going to acknowledge this cool effect.
|
# ? Feb 6, 2015 11:30 |
|
gonadic io posted:not trying to be mean here, and it's certainly something that I struggle with myself, but please don't give advice when you have at most a cursory understanding of the topic being discussed, especially when it's in as finicky a language as C i should have included a goofy smiley face to indicate the intended humor; my apologies
|
# ? Feb 6, 2015 12:59 |
|
Wheany posted:i'm going to acknowledge this cool effect. Ty. It's really cool.
|
# ? Feb 6, 2015 14:16 |
|
P.S. 2015 not 2005, sorry
|
# ? Feb 6, 2015 14:20 |
|
newreply.php posted:
now there are two red squiggly lines
|
# ? Feb 6, 2015 14:22 |
|
what the gently caress is this poo poo
|
# ? Feb 6, 2015 14:45 |
|
a stock photo (intended to be artsy by being out of focus and having an anachronistic subject) with some bloom applied and dumb text added
|
# ? Feb 6, 2015 14:50 |
|
|
# ? May 8, 2024 23:52 |
|
gonadic io posted:not trying to be mean here, and it's certainly something that I struggle with myself, but please don't give advice when you have at most a cursory understanding of the topic being discussed, especially when it's in as finicky a language as C sarehu posted:Maybe it thinks it's a pokemon.
|
# ? Feb 6, 2015 15:40 |