|
Gyshall posted:Here is a man
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 18:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 11:46 |
|
|
Lieutenant Centaur posted:That Force of Will has just been confirmed, omfg Yeah, gonna need a source for that. Also liking Arashin, Silverblade Paladin was pretty good.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 18:58
|
|
|
Gyshall posted:Here is a man Temporary Silverblade Paladin? Seems cool. He needs a high power buddy to pair with though, and it's kind of awkward that the scariest things to pair him with will normally drop a turn or two after him. Like Ash-cloud Phoenix into this guy is scary, but you kind of want your three drops to be good on turn 3. The magical xmasland land in limited of course is t2 Frost walker into this guy on T3 e: the above is wrong in so many different ways because I am bad at reading cards. Entropic fucked around with this message at 19:07 on Mar 5, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 18:58
|
|
|
Lieutenant Centaur posted:That Force of Will has just been confirmed, omfg ...so like its fake and was clearly fake and a reference to an earlier joke we were making. Oh goddamnit I got trolled off a troll sonofabitch
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:00
|
|
|
Lieutenant Centaur posted:That Force of Will has just been confirmed, omfg Will be good in my card disadvantage EDH deck.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:01
|
|
|
I can't believe they reprinted FoW, that's nuts
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:01
|
|
|
whydirt posted:Impulse is also not a great name for a blue card (Maro has mentioned this on his podcast before). There's nothing impulsive about draw-go control. When people say to reprint a card they don't mean literally without changing errata and stuff. it would not have that text. Gyshall posted:Here is a man this is good Entropic posted:Impulse would probably be OK in Standard, it's probably a case of them being wary of letting Modern have it. yeah, i guess but I'm still not happy :/
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:01
|
|
|
Snacksmaniac posted:Will be good in my card disadvantage EDH deck. I'm putting 4 in every deck I own.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:02
|
|
|
Four forces and four everminds to pitch to them.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:02
|
|
|
Lieutenant Centaur posted:I'm putting 4 in every deck I own. it does synergize with itself, tbf
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:03
|
|
|
Gyshall posted:Here is a man I miss Mirran Crusader.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:03
|
|
|
Gyshall posted:Here is a man Foremost giving rabbles and other masters double strike all day~
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:03
|
|
|
Snacksmaniac posted:Four forces and four everminds to pitch to them. Magic sounds like it might turn into a BADGAME
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:04
|
|
|
This isn't Silverblade Paladin, even if you have a Warrior to pair it with this format is full of things that can stop a small creature with Double Strike, like Siege Rhino and Goblin token. There's a reason why even UW Heroic doesn't run Fabled Hero anymore.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:05
|
|
|
Spiderdrake posted:One day I hope to draft a cube deck where all my three drops have the word 'double strike' on them Double Strike is one of those trap abilities that is rarely relevant without running a surprise deck. I have this weird feeling Dragons is going to have Giant Growth in it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:05
|
|
|
I need to read cards more carefully, I missed that he only gives double strike to warriors. Still super good, but not as broken as I thought.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:05
|
|
|
Snacksmaniac posted:Four forces and four everminds to pitch to them. Oh well, whatever, Evermind.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
The trick is to call all of the opponent's creatures cowards.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
whydirt posted:Impulse is also not a great name for a blue card (Maro has mentioned this on his podcast before). There's nothing impulsive about draw-go control. (Note I say dumb rather than wrong per se.)
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
Zurgo went from 7 power and being indestructible to being Ironclaw Orcs.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:07
|
|
|
might have missed this earlier but why is zurgo a bellstriker now?
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:07
|
|
|
SO will the confirmed force of will reprint have a big effect on standard? Or is it mainly going to be for legacy players?
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:08
|
|
|
okay but to zurgo's defense ironclaw orcs is more than one orc and he is a single orc.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:08
|
|
|
Zurgo lost 5 points of power and became a format staple instead of a goofy fringe playable. Ottermode wins again.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:09
|
|
|
neetengie posted:might have missed this earlier but why is zurgo a bellstriker now? Um, did you miss the whole time-travel thing?
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:09
|
|
|
forbidden lesbian posted:Um, did you miss the whole time-travel thing? when was that?
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:09
|
|
|
forbidden lesbian posted:Um, did you miss the whole time-travel thing?
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:10
|
|
|
ahhh, new Zurgo. Anyone else remember Lazy Goblin from the first GDS? How far we've come. Edit: Better link, because it has R&D responses instead of the responses of people in the GDS: http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/responses-vapor-ops-2003-04-25
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:10
|
|
|
neetengie posted:might have missed this earlier but why is zurgo a bellstriker now? Like, are you not getting the whole conceit of the time travel thing?
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:11
|
|
|
newtestleper posted:SO will the confirmed force of will reprint have a big effect on standard? Or is it mainly going to be for legacy players? let's wait and see how the meta shakes out
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:12
|
|
|
neetengie posted:No, just wanna know the story reason for him becoming a bellringer now. They haven't really explained but the bell-ringer seems to be the guy letting people know when other dragon clans are nearby so the Kologhan can attack them and stuff.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:13
|
|
|
If anyone has any doubts the FoW mockup is from Reddit and the person that created it confirmed it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:13
|
|
|
neetengie posted:No, just wanna know the story reason for him becoming a bellringer now. Even the humblest of ankle shankers has been demoted to smashing party favors now. It's a tough one, this dragon eat dragon economy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:14
|
|
|
Elyv posted:ahhh, new Zurgo. The responses to Twiddle Bug are absolutely precious, given the context of Modern Blue Magic.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:15
|
|
|
Elyv posted:ahhh, new Zurgo. quote:Kenneth I. Patterson rest in peace, R&D
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:15
|
|
|
Emerson Cod posted:If anyone has any doubts the FoW mockup is from Reddit and the person that created it confirmed it. Confirmed its real, right?
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:16
|
|
|
Niton posted:The responses to Twiddle Bug are absolutely precious, given the context of Modern Blue Magic. Why? That card would've been bad but printable back then and is still bad but printable.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:18
|
|
|
Elyv posted:Why? That card would've been bad but printable back then and is still bad but printable. A bunch of the non-r&d respondants, as well as Randy, brought up that Insects should never be blue. Which is still true, but R&D let it slide one time, and that single Blue Insect is one of the pillars of eternal formats.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:23
|
|
|
this will go great in my edh deck this will go great in my edh deck Angry Grimace posted:
this will go great in my edh deck Spiderdrake posted:
this will go great in my edh deck Rinkles posted:
this will go great in my edh deck Gyshall posted:Here is a man this will go great in my edh deck
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 11:46 |
|
|
I would actually be okay with Force of Will in Standard if not for the effect it would have on Modern (people already whine when stuff gets banned). There isn't anything overly degenerate to counter with it and I wouldn't be surprised if standard control decks would rather just pay mana to counter stuff rather than take card disadvantage since the only thing you're really pitching are other counterspells.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 19:25
|
|