|
Rorus Raz posted:Especially hated in this thread. That was the first time that I've seen it. I actually growled a tiny bit.
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 01:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 13:33 |
|
|
Day By Day is possibly  http://i.imgur.com/DrTxmMC.jpg  1 2As long as conservative cartoonists include "cattle futures" in their anti-Hillary cartoons, Hillary is not actually vulnerable.  3 4 5
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 01:43
|
|
|
colonel_korn posted:
Uh, Eric, Pat Quinn hasn't been governor for months. or is this just bitching about Quinn's pension in general? He's been in office in Illinois for like thirty loving years, I'd hope he's got something good set up. The more I think about this comic the dumber it is.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 01:43
|
|
13
|
Not that it's surprising, but this is just lazy as poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 01:44
|
|
|
I dig this cartoon a lot.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 01:48
|
|
|
There is literally not a single voter in these United States of America whose decision whether or not to vote for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidental Elections will be determined by her trade of cattle futures in the 1970s.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 01:49
|
|
|
This looks like Tom Baker. Why do we hate him? 
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 01:52
|
|
|
JT Jag posted:There is literally not a single voter in these United States of America whose decision whether or not to vote for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidental Elections will be determined by her trade of cattle futures in the 1970s. I imagine there are drat few whose decision on who they're voting for isn't already set in stone now, regardless who picks up the nomination.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 01:53
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 01:58
|
|
|
D.N. Nation posted:TL;DR version: The local justice system used essentially robbing black people to fund city government. Also, the local PD is on email record as being full of jokey racists. Like some cartoonists we know. I wonder how many of them traded work by some of those very same cartoonists. It's probably a nonzero number.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:00
|
|
|
Apple Pie Hubbub posted:Day By Day is possibly This is just getting ridiculous.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:04
|
|
|
JT Jag posted:Where is the Hillary foreign contributions talking point coming from? The Clinton's foundation took money from Bad Countries for the immediate relief effort in Haiti https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcuAw77J8_Y
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:05
|
|
|
Prokhor Zakharov posted:The Clinton's foundation took money from Bad Countries for the immediate relief effort in Haiti Christ that video is depressing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:09
|
|
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:This is just getting ridiculous. Pretty soon all Day By Day comics will be like that scene at the end of "Visitor Q"
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:10
|
|
|
Most realistic Biden I've ever seen Ramirez manage.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:10
|
|
|
I don't get this one. Lawmaker is in favor of a bill, and therefore should recuse themself from voting on decisions regarding it? Doesn't that imply that everyone should recuse themselves from all votes on bills since they'd have to be in favor or against it to make a decision anyway? I'm not seeing the conflict of interests here.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:12
|
|
|
Taciturn Tactician posted:I don't get this one. Lawmaker is in favor of a bill, and therefore should recuse themself from voting on decisions regarding it? Doesn't that imply that everyone should recuse themselves from all votes on bills since they'd have to be in favor or against it to make a decision anyway? I'm not seeing the conflict of interests here. Elena Kagan isn't a member of the legislature.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:14
|
|
|
Taciturn Tactician posted:I don't get this one. Lawmaker is in favor of a bill, and therefore should recuse themself from voting on decisions regarding it? Doesn't that imply that everyone should recuse themselves from all votes on bills since they'd have to be in favor or against it to make a decision anyway? I'm not seeing the conflict of interests here. Elena Kagen is a Supreme Court justice.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:15
|
|
|
Ruth Bader Ginsberg, known for sleeping during oral argument.Taciturn Tactician posted:I don't get this one. Lawmaker is in favor of a bill, and therefore should recuse themself from voting on decisions regarding it? Doesn't that imply that everyone should recuse themselves from all votes on bills since they'd have to be in favor or against it to make a decision anyway? I'm not seeing the conflict of interests here. Kagan is a Supreme Court Justice who had worked for Obama.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:15
|
|
|
tacodaemon posted:Elena Kagan isn't a member of the legislature. Zeroisanumber posted:Helena Kagen is a Supreme Court justice. Alright, "lawmaker" was the wrong term, but if a bill is going to the supreme court with the case being "is this legal", surely you'd have to either believe it was legal or not to make a decision, so how is it worth recusing yourself if you believe it's legal?
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:16
|
|
|
tacodaemon posted:Elena Kagan isn't a member of the legislature. Doesn't change that whatever bullshit argument is going on in Ramirez's head applies at least as much to everyone else on the Supreme Court, or in Congress, or anywhere else in the government. He's just mad that the Supreme Court isn't a bunch of clones of Antonin Scalia, basically. e: Aaaand there's an image that's gonna haunt my nightmares 
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:16
|
|
|
Taciturn Tactician posted:I don't get this one. Lawmaker is in favor of a bill, and therefore should recuse themself from voting on decisions regarding it? Doesn't that imply that everyone should recuse themselves from all votes on bills since they'd have to be in favor or against it to make a decision anyway? I'm not seeing the conflict of interests here. Kagan was in the soliciter's office while the bill was being drawn up (though isolated from the project by a chinese wall specifically because she was on the short list for a SCOTUS spot), therefore conservatives think she should recuse herself. Note that we have conservative justices getting 3/4th of a million in payouts from think tanks against the law, but that apparently is just fine
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:17
|
|
|
I'm sure Ramirez believes that justices appointed by Bush Sr. should have recused themselves from ruling on the recount in 2000.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:17
|
|
|
Subterfrugal posted:Ruth Bader Ginsberg, known for sleeping during oral argument.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:23
|
|
|
As editor of Investor's Business Daily, I am extremely dismayed at Hillary Clinton's history of doing business and investing, and also believe that members of the judicial branch should not have opinions on the legality or Constitutionality of things. Instead of an IQ, I have a Mohs rating. Subscribe to IBD today.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:29
|
|
|
JT Jag posted:There is literally not a single voter in these United States of America whose decision whether or not to vote for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Presidental Elections will be determined by her trade of cattle futures in the 1970s. If there were, an interview with that person would be absolutely amazing. "Oh, yes, she's a godless communist, and I don't think a woman should even be president, but the lady knows her cattle and, as a cattle man myself, I have to respect that. She's getting my vote, God help us all."
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:36
|
|
|
Xenochrist posted:Not that it's surprising, but this is just lazy as poo poo. Not as lazy as Ginsburg over on the left of the panel there, which pisses me off more than anything. There's hardly a more switched-on judge in the entire loving system.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:39
|
|
|
Smudgie Buggler posted:Not as lazy as Ginsburg over on the left of the panel there, which pisses me off more than anything. There's hardly a more switched-on judge in the entire loving system. It's a jab at Ginsburg. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/232735-ginsburg-wasnt-100-percent-sober-during-state-of-the-union
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 02:56
|
|
|
There is precisely one Supreme Court justice who has been literally caught napping during oral arguments, but gently caress if you'll ever see Rameriz mock that one.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 03:02
|
|
|
beepsandboops posted:I haven't been following the story really closely, but it also has the potential to be a HUGE cyber security risk. Not really. Shugojin posted:This looks like Tom Baker. Why do we hate him? Because we're still upset over Patrick Troughton leaving.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 03:11
|
|
|
chairface posted:The black panthers are behind it so it's evil. And look at you eating guvmint breakfast, ya commie puffball. Cereal helps protect the children against the dangers of masturbation, I'm told. Grand Theft Autobot fucked around with this message at 03:24 on Mar 7, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 03:16
|
|
|
minimalist posted:There is precisely one Supreme Court justice who has been literally caught napping during oral arguments, but gently caress if you'll ever see Rameriz mock that one. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 03:17
|
|
|
Can someone explain this?
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 03:25
|
|
|
Full-Bodied Flavor posted:Can someone explain this? Ramirez believes in Diamond Joe (The one true prophet of D&D), also Warren once said she had Indian ancestry.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 03:26
|
|
|
Full-Bodied Flavor posted:Can someone explain this?
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 03:26
|
|
|
You can see a preview of Ramirez's next "Arrows Pointing at a Presidential Candidate (Who Is Stinky)" cartoon there, on the left.
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 03:29
|
|
|
"Democrats ain't got poo poo. Hillary is their best, and once she falls all they've got is Crazy Joe, and a racist liar."
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 03:31
|
|
|
Full-Bodied Flavor posted:Can someone explain this? "Hillary is looking like a bad candidate for the presidency because of her scandals, but she's not as bad as others." Also Ramirez likes to draw Biden with a lampshade for a head, which I absolutely adore and if he could just keep doing that I would probably look forward to more of his comics. e:f,b
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 03:32
|
|
|
If diamond joe wins the nomination it's going to get really funny to see how far Ramirez is willing to take this
|
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 03:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 13:33 |
|
|
Plague of Hats posted:"Democrats ain't got poo poo. Hillary is their best, and once she falls all they've got is Crazy Joe, and a racist liar." The reaction of the GOPologists when Hillary Clinton or some other Democrat is elected President in 2016 is going to be so delicious. It'll be like Obama's reelection x 10. Deep Hurting fucked around with this message at 03:36 on Mar 7, 2015 |
|
#
?
Mar 7, 2015 03:33
|
|