Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Forums Terrorist
Dec 8, 2011

I know it's impossible but if Bibi is somehow passed over to head the next coalition I eagerly await the following meltdown

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

With Iran negotiations ongoing, the PA teetering on the brink of death, Obama visibly annoyed at Netanyahu, and a week-long national holiday just two weeks away, it's not really a good time for Israel's government to spend too long figuring itself out and putting itself together.

Doflamingo
Sep 20, 2006

Forums Terrorist posted:

I know it's impossible but if Bibi is somehow passed over to head the next coalition I eagerly await the following meltdown

I would gladly give away MIGF's firstborn to make this come true.

SpiderHyphenMan
Apr 1, 2010

by Fluffdaddy

Doflamingo posted:

I would gladly give away MIGF's firstborn to make this come true.
I couldn't pass over that deal!

SNAKES N CAKES
Sep 6, 2005

DAVID GAIDER
Lead Writer
Meanwhile, in the US:

quote:

Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) challenged Rep. Steve Israel (D-N.Y.) to say it to his face in a tweet Saturday.

It all started Friday when King said on Boston Herald Radio that he didn’t understand why some American Jews put being a Democrat before being Jewish.

Israel responded to King’s comments in a tweet: “I don’t need Congressman Steve King questioning my religion or my politics. I demand an apology from him & repudiation from GOP. #dangerous.”

Then Saturday King responded, on Twitter, by calling out Israel for not saying this to his face.



Not to be outdone, Israel flexed some Jewish muscle, again on Twitter, chiding King as a “Talmudic scholar” and calling him “mashugana,” adding, “Look it up.”

Let's hope this doesn't weaken Obama's negotiating position.

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos

Girls Out West has gotten weeeeeiiiirrd. :psyduck:

DaveWoo
Aug 14, 2004

Fun Shoe
Obama speaks about Israel/Netanyahu:

quote:

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama is operating under the assumption that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu does not support the creation of a Palestinian state, despite the Israeli leader's post-election efforts to recast himself as amenable to a two-state solution.

"We take him at his word when he said that it wouldn't happen during his prime ministership, and so that's why we've got to evaluate what other options are available to make sure that we don't see a chaotic situation in the region," the president said in an interview with The Huffington Post on Friday.

Though he pledged to keep working with the Israeli government on military and intelligence operations, Obama declined to say whether the United States would continue to block Palestinian efforts to secure statehood through the United Nations. In a phone conversation the two had on Thursday, he said he indicated to Netanyahu that "it is going to be hard to find a path where people are seriously believing that negotiations are possible."

In his first public comments on Tuesday's elections in Israel, Obama's deepest discomfort was saved for Netanyahu's Election Day warning about Arab Israeli voters going to the polls "in droves."

"We indicated that that kind of rhetoric was contrary to what is the best of Israel's traditions. That although Israel was founded based on the historic Jewish homeland and the need to have a Jewish homeland, Israeli democracy has been premised on everybody in the country being treated equally and fairly," said Obama. "And I think that that is what's best about Israeli democracy. If that is lost, then I think that not only does it give ammunition to folks who don't believe in a Jewish state, but it also I think starts to erode the meaning of democracy in the country."

Gotta admit, that's quite a bit harsher than I expected him to say publicly.

emanresu tnuocca
Sep 2, 2011

by Athanatos

DaveWoo posted:

Obama speaks about Israel/Netanyahu:


Gotta admit, that's quite a bit harsher than I expected him to say publicly.

I really don't know a whole lot about American politics or about how good of a president Obama really is or what his foreign policy legacy gonna look like but I gotta say, I kinda like the guy.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

DaveWoo posted:

Obama speaks about Israel/Netanyahu:


Gotta admit, that's quite a bit harsher than I expected him to say publicly.

Jesus. Those are some strong words from the sitting President, as Israel goes.

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012

GreyjoyBastard posted:

Jesus. Those are some strong words from the sitting President, as Israel goes.

The guy's hero and role model is MLK. Netanyahu's crack about Arab voters pushed his buttons hard.

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.
Obama is pretty goddamn ignorant about Israel if he thinks that Israel was ever built on the premise of democratic equality and fairness, I don't know what science fiction he's been reading if he thinks that's part of Israel's 'Tradition'.

he wont do anything for real though, that's for sure.

Then Again, he does call Sisi's Egypt a 'moderate step forwards for stability and democracy' so I'm not surprised he's living in fantasyland in regards to the nature of certain governments.

Al-Saqr fucked around with this message at 01:30 on Mar 22, 2015

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Al-Saqr posted:

Obama is pretty goddamn ignorant about Israel if he thinks that Israel was ever built on the premise of democratic equality and fairness, I don't know what science fiction he's been reading if he thinks that's part of Israel's 'Tradition'.

he wont do anything for real though, that's for sure.

Yes, Al Saqr, because the leader of the free world is clearly more ignorant on what constituents democratic principles, than a random gulfstate'r.

Cat Mattress
Jul 14, 2012

by Cyrano4747

My Imaginary GF posted:

Yes, Al Saqr, because the leader of the free world is clearly more ignorant on what constituents democratic principles, than a random gulfstate'r.

Being denied freedom makes you much more acutely aware of what freedom is than when you take it for granted and get jaded and cynical about it, a good post.

SyHopeful
Jun 24, 2007
May an IDF soldier mistakenly gun down my own parents and face no repercussions i'd totally be cool with it cuz accidents are unavoidable in a low-intensity conflict, man

Al-Saqr posted:

Obama is pretty goddamn ignorant about Israel if he thinks that Israel was ever built on the premise of democratic equality and fairness, I don't know what science fiction he's been reading if he thinks that's part of Israel's 'Tradition'.

he wont do anything for real though, that's for sure.

Then Again, he does call Sisi's Egypt a 'moderate step forwards for stability and democracy' so I'm not surprised he's living in fantasyland in regards to the nature of certain governments.

He's a politician first, and as such knows which side his AIPAC is buttered on. If Obama truly spoke his mind about the situation I imagine it'd be far harsher.

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos

Al-Saqr posted:

Obama is pretty goddamn ignorant about Israel if he thinks that Israel was ever built on the premise of democratic equality and fairness, I don't know what science fiction he's been reading if he thinks that's part of Israel's 'Tradition'.

he wont do anything for real though, that's for sure.

Then Again, he does call Sisi's Egypt a 'moderate step forwards for stability and democracy' so I'm not surprised he's living in fantasyland in regards to the nature of certain governments.

Have you gone to any of the '48 Arab forums to see why they voted in droves for the Joint Arab List whom you said "doesn't represent them" yet? :allears:

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.

SyHopeful posted:

He's a politician first, and as such knows which side his AIPAC is buttered on. If Obama truly spoke his mind about the situation I imagine it'd be far harsher.

I guess so. But from what I've read on Obamas personality from people who study him is that he's not the type of person to express strong opinions and follow through strongly on them, I remember an article from a while ago about how he's a passive lead-from-behind type.

Absurd Alhazred posted:

Have you gone to any of the '48 Arab forums to see why they voted in droves for the Joint Arab List whom you said "doesn't represent them" yet? :allears:

1) I didn't say that the Arab list doesn't represent the '48 Palestinians who have Israeli citizenship, I said the system itself doesn't represent them.

2) A Palestinian MK says that the state doesn't represent them and is in active discrimination against them:-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEHk1bLJCBw

Al-Saqr fucked around with this message at 01:58 on Mar 22, 2015

Zeroisanumber
Oct 23, 2010

Nap Ghost

Al-Saqr posted:

Obama is pretty goddamn ignorant about Israel if he thinks that Israel was ever built on the premise of democratic equality and fairness, I don't know what science fiction he's been reading if he thinks that's part of Israel's 'Tradition'.

he wont do anything for real though, that's for sure.

Then Again, he does call Sisi's Egypt a 'moderate step forwards for stability and democracy' so I'm not surprised he's living in fantasyland in regards to the nature of certain governments.

He's playing the political game and for the first time since Bush 41 it's not a complete champagne blowjob for Israel.

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos
Actual contentish: I'm recovering from my trip so I'm not going to give any full Israeli Family Political Opinions, but I will say that at this point in time, quite a few of my folks still think Israel's image problem is just because Hasbara isn't good enough. :psyboom:

emanresu tnuocca
Sep 2, 2011

by Athanatos

Absurd Alhazred posted:

Actual contentish: I'm recovering from my trip so I'm not going to give any full Israeli Family Political Opinions, but I will say that at this point in time, quite a few of my folks still think Israel's image problem is just because Hasbara isn't good enough. :psyboom:

I'll bring this up to my supervisors.

SyHopeful
Jun 24, 2007
May an IDF soldier mistakenly gun down my own parents and face no repercussions i'd totally be cool with it cuz accidents are unavoidable in a low-intensity conflict, man

Al-Saqr posted:

I guess so. But from what I've read on Obamas personality from people who study him is that he's not the type of person to express strong opinions and follow through strongly on them, I remember an article from a while ago about how he's a passive lead-from-behind type.

Well sure, but expressing and having strong opinions are quite different. Obama's a smart cookie. Remember how he got Putin to take responsibility for Syria's chemical weapons? That was masterful, and I'm not a big fan of the guy.

SNAKES N CAKES
Sep 6, 2005

DAVID GAIDER
Lead Writer

quote:

Staunch supporters and swing voters: Meet the people who chose Netanyahu

Berko Kojero, 70, security guard and member of the Likud branch in Kiryat Malakhi (41 percent for Likud)

Bibi has a plus and a minus. He doesn’t help kids and the elderly and he doesn’t help with housing for young people. On the other hand, he managed to stop all our troubles. I thought about voting for [Kulanu chairman Moshe] Kahlon but the surveys tried to run Netanyahu over and so did all kinds of parties and people, so I voted Netanyahu in the end. I’ve always been [soccer team] Beitar Jerusalem and always Bibi. When I was 16, a young immigrant from Romania, I made [Menachem] Begin a promise.”

Avi Arbeli, 39, Web actor, Kiryat Malakhi

“In the south, Bibi won a sweeping victory. If not for the south, unfortunately [Zionist Union leader] Isaac Herzog would have brought disaster with an extreme left government including Meretz and the Arab parties. He would have given the Arabs two ministerial portfolios and membership in the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee. … I don’t trust them. Socially speaking, I’m against socialism, believe in working and making money, not supporting unions. I’m for privatizing the whole country. I thought about Kahlon but I saw in the surveys there was going to be an upheaval, right before, and so I voted wholeheartedly for Likud and I’m not sorry.”

Zohar Farkhan, 35, gardener, Moshav Hatzav (33 percent for Likud)

“Bibi is the best for security and Kahlon inside will give the economic side. I wavered between them but decided without paying attention to opinion polls. Bibi gave us security. There were missiles, but it was better than the second intifada.

Itzik Buhbut, 27, warehouse manager, Moshav Gefen (55 percent Likud)

“I thought about voting Herzog but at the last second there was family pressure. Everybody said [Likud] so I said alright already, fine. Bibi gave security and that’s the most important. What’s a job worth in a war? Netanyahu is also presentable abroad, he knows how to speak English …”

Ilan Sabag, 59, unemployed, Kiryat Gat (39 percent for Likud)

“Netanyahu seems honest with the Mizrahim, like Begin. I am a Likud voter since childhood. … Unfortunately the media doesn’t let the right wing express itself because it’s not objective. … There are serious social problems and Bibi made mistakes and didn’t help the poor, but it seems to me this time he learned. The truth is that I can’t not vote Likud, just like I haven’t switched soccer teams since I was 10, Maccabi Tel Aviv always. The vote for Bibi is from here [pats his heart].”

Tzvia Yanuznakh, 35, invalid care nurse, Kiryat Gat

I voted for Bibi because my mother said it was the lesser evil. I don’t care, the main thing is that there be a little right wing and a little protection for the country. I don’t connect to the left because I have love for the country and the borders should stay as they are. It’s hard for me to believe in peace. From a social point of view, the poor will stay poor, the middle-class will stay middle-class and the rich will stay rich.”

Sharon Tal Mazaiki, 30, salaried worker, Yavne (34 percent Likud)

I voted for Netanyahu because Herzog is no better and certainly not [Zionist Union co-leader Tzipi] Livni. I also felt like the media was lynching him. … They deliberately showed the not so good things about him and made a big deal out of things that aren’t relevant. They also ganged up on him for going to Congress. I was curious about Herzog but I very quickly decided again on Likud. There are a lot of things to fix, but I don’t believe that if the government changes everything will be fixed. Thoughts like that show that a person is living in a bubble.”

http://www.haaretz.com/news/israel-election-2015/.premium-1.648016

Not particularly surprising, but it should help combat the notion that right wing voters are stupid or misinformed.

SNAKES N CAKES fucked around with this message at 02:04 on Mar 22, 2015

Al-Saqr
Nov 11, 2007

One Day I Will Return To Your Side.

SyHopeful posted:

Remember how he got Putin to take responsibility for Syria's chemical weapons? That was masterful, and I'm not a big fan of the guy.

errr.... wasn't that a huge political setback since he accidentally gave the Russians and Syrians the wiggle room they needed to escape NATO bombardment?!

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead
Herzog would have given the Arabs two ministerial portfolios! :ohdear:

emanresu tnuocca
Sep 2, 2011

by Athanatos

SNAKES N CAKES posted:

Not particularly surprising, but it should help combat the notion that right wing voters are stupid or misinformed.

Should it?

The second Intifada might have started under Barak's labor administration but it lasted all through Sharon's Likud administration, in which King Bibs was finance minister, the same administration in fact that enacted the gaza disengagement for which Bibi voted in favor (four times). These guys know jack poo poo, they blame Labor for the Intifadas although the first one broke out in the late 80s under Yitzhak Shamir's likud administration. And of course protective edge had the most Israeli casualties since the second lebanon war (in which Olmert's Kadima was in charge, again not labor ).

This notion of "Netanyahu the defender of Israel" is borne out shoddy knowledge of history and Netanyahu's own rhetoric about Oslo being the root of all of Israel's security problems. It's nonsense.

And indeed, Herzog never promised anyone from the Joint Arab List any ministerial positions or has ever indicated that they'd join his coalition, and in fact Aymen Odeh chairperson of the Joint List stated that they will not sit in a 'zionist coalition', so that's also rather ignorant.

SyHopeful
Jun 24, 2007
May an IDF soldier mistakenly gun down my own parents and face no repercussions i'd totally be cool with it cuz accidents are unavoidable in a low-intensity conflict, man

Al-Saqr posted:

errr.... wasn't that a huge political setback since he accidentally gave the Russians and Syrians the wiggle room they needed to escape NATO bombardment?!

Naw, he knew the general populace is weary of war and didn't want to send in the troops, so he set a low bar for conditions (give up chemical weapons) and when Syria and Russia jumped the hurdle he could claim he accomplished something of substance without putting US troops into direct combat.

Zulily Zoetrope
Jun 1, 2011

Muldoon

SNAKES N CAKES posted:

Not particularly surprising, but it should help combat the notion that right wing voters are stupid or misinformed.

Stupid and misinformed is a lot more generous than the alternative.

New Division
Jun 23, 2004

I beg to present to you as a Christmas gift, Mr. Lombardi, the city of Detroit.

Al-Saqr posted:

errr.... wasn't that a huge political setback since he accidentally gave the Russians and Syrians the wiggle room they needed to escape NATO bombardment?!

Given that he had taken the decision to bomb to Congress, where it was about to die and deal the administration a humiliating and potentially crippling setback, he basically had to take the Russian deal.

Aurubin
Mar 17, 2011

How long does it generally take for a coalition to form? Only familiar with the cobbled wreck that is a Madisonian Republic.

Fuck You And Diebold
Sep 15, 2004

by Athanatos

Aurubin posted:

How long does it generally take for a coalition to form? Only familiar with the cobbled wreck that is a Madisonian Republic.

Well according to this Netanyahu is hoping to have one formed within two or three weeks.

1337JiveTurkey
Feb 17, 2005

DaveWoo posted:

Obama speaks about Israel/Netanyahu:


Gotta admit, that's quite a bit harsher than I expected him to say publicly.

The reason that Israel's government keeps up the appearance of wanting a two state solution isn't for the people who don't care either way and the people who don't believe them. It's for the people who do care and do believe that they want a two state solution, which happens to be enough people to matter. Give them a really solid reason to no longer believe and either they have to no longer care or they no longer believe. In the same vein if they act like they believe for political reasons, something like this gives an excuse to let down the facade a bit.

Spergin Morlock
Aug 8, 2009

New Division posted:

Given that he had taken the decision to bomb to Congress, where it was about to die and deal the administration a humiliating and potentially crippling setback, he basically had to take the Russian deal.

He only took it to congress because he KNEW it would die there unless Republicans put their money where their mouth was. When Russia and Syria latched onto Kerry's comment it provided a face saving way for all 3 groups out of that particular aspect of the conflict and left the American right wing fuming mad. Hardly a political defeat for the Obama administration, regardless of what McCain or Graham would have to say about it.

A Winner is Jew
Feb 14, 2008

by exmarx

Chadderbox posted:

He only took it to congress because he KNEW it would die there unless Republicans put their money where their mouth was. When Russia and Syria latched onto Kerry's comment it provided a face saving way for all 3 groups out of that particular aspect of the conflict and left the American right wing fuming mad. Hardly a political defeat for the Obama administration, regardless of what McCain or Graham would have to say about it.

He took it to congress because it would get defeated which would have totally nullified the right's claim to be strong on national defense or being the cause for "justice" in the world. Putin and Assad agreeing to unilateral disarmament of CW was still a win for Obama but it wasn't the one he was ultimately looking for. I mean yeah he's a centrist and isn't even remotely close to his left leaning promises... but you don't go from being a state senator to president of the US in the span of 12 years without being a loving masterful politician that knows how to work deals to his favor even if they're not 100% of what he wants. The only real fault I have with his presidency is that it took him way too long to recognize the extent of how batshit the right wing went when a black man was living in the white house and that a very large portion of the US only said they weren't racist when they very clearly still are.

Spergin Morlock
Aug 8, 2009

A Winner is Jew posted:

He took it to congress because it would get defeated which would have totally nullified the right's claim to be strong on national defense or being the cause for "justice" in the world. Putin and Assad agreeing to unilateral disarmament of CW was still a win for Obama but it wasn't the one he was ultimately looking for. I mean yeah he's a centrist and isn't even remotely close to his left leaning promises... but you don't go from being a state senator to president of the US in the span of 12 years without being a loving masterful politician that knows how to work deals to his favor even if they're not 100% of what he wants. The only real fault I have with his presidency is that it took him way too long to recognize the extent of how batshit the right wing went when a black man was living in the white house and that a very large portion of the US only said they weren't racist when they very clearly still are.

I agree they weren't looking or hoping for a unilateral disarmament when they started the whole thing, but they were happy to get it. Despite the whole "Wow Kerry just blew it" narrative that made it's way through the news right after it happened, I have to imagine the White House was pleased as punch that Putin/Lavrov/Assad jumped on it like they did.

Dolash
Oct 23, 2008

aNYWAY,
tHAT'S REALLY ALL THERE IS,
tO REPORT ON THE SUBJECT,
oF ME GETTING HURT,


1337JiveTurkey posted:

The reason that Israel's government keeps up the appearance of wanting a two state solution isn't for the people who don't care either way and the people who don't believe them. It's for the people who do care and do believe that they want a two state solution, which happens to be enough people to matter. Give them a really solid reason to no longer believe and either they have to no longer care or they no longer believe. In the same vein if they act like they believe for political reasons, something like this gives an excuse to let down the facade a bit.

Yeah, I have to respect Obama for playing politics as best he can to try and put real pressure on Netanyahu and Israel. There's decades of baggage and politics surrounding America's involvement with Israel and Palestine, you have to navigate that very carefully and constructing a narrative where the current Israeli Prime Minister has revealed himself as not a credible partner in the peace process is part of that. He has the incredibly challenging job of getting people to distinguish between Israel as a whole and the Israeli government as headed by Netanyahu, since making that distinction is the only way to build support.

It's a little interesting since this is the kind of stuff people are actually talking about when they argue about politicians supporting Israel. Just about every American politician will say they support Israel, but that's clearly just a product of the overwhelming beltway consensus. Real "support" means turning a blind eye to incidents like this because the politician in question also doesn't care about a two-state solution and thinks it's just convenient cover for Israel to carry out the slow destruction of the Palestinians, while the accused enemies of Israel are the ones who will seize an opportunity to hold Israel accountable in the unlikely case that it appears.

The best legacy Obama could realistically achieve on Israel/Palestine would be to widen the diplomatic gulf between Israel and America on the subject of the two state solution enough that Hillary won't be able to walk it back entirely. Implementing some kind of new Middle East peace plan that deliberately acknowledges that the current Israeli government has failed to live up to its side of the bargain would destroy the credibility of any effort by the next administration to plaster over the differences and claim the two-state solution is still being fairly negotiated by all parties.

Or the PA collapses before summer, all hell breaks loose and Hillary inherits an utter quagmire. Who knows!

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

Al-Saqr posted:

Obama is pretty goddamn ignorant about Israel if he thinks that Israel was ever built on the premise of democratic equality and fairness, I don't know what science fiction he's been reading if he thinks that's part of Israel's 'Tradition'.

Never assume that what comes out of a politician's mouth is what they really think. The "only democracy in the Middle East" talking point Israel likes to use is very effective, and Americans widely believe it (despite the fact that it isn't true). By saying that the way he did, he was openly threatening to tear down that talking point.

SNAKES N CAKES posted:

Not particularly surprising, but it should help combat the notion that right wing voters are stupid or misinformed.

Why are you saying that? Literally more than half the quotes you posted boiled down to "I voted Likud because I've always voted Likud and I'm not going to change my team now no matter what", and half of the remainder said they had to vote right-wing because leftists are idiot race-traitor communists who would destroy the country.

Duckbox
Sep 7, 2007

I thought the multiple football comparisons were especially telling.

The sort of people who would consider voting for their elected representatives to be analogous to cheering for their team are not what I'd call informed or conscientious citizens.

Doflamingo
Sep 20, 2006

Back to the Israeli elections for a sec: did we talk about Herzog offering Kachlon everything but the kitchen sink, up to and including rotation as PM? Because holy poo poo. :catstare:

Bear Retrieval Unit
Nov 5, 2009

Mudslide Experiment

quote:

Socially speaking, I’m against socialism, believe in working and making money, not supporting unions. I’m for privatizing the whole country.
-Avi Arbeli, 39, Web actor, Kiryat Malakhi
lol

The Insect Court
Nov 22, 2012

by FactsAreUseless

Main Paineframe posted:

The "only democracy in the Middle East" talking point Israel likes to use is very effective, and Americans widely believe it (despite the fact that it isn't true).

lol

Would have been interesting to see the usual suspects spin a Herzog victory and a ruling coalition that included the Joint List. They would have scrambled to figure out how to say 'Uncle Tom' in Arabic.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

illrepute
Dec 30, 2009

by XyloJW
عم توم, it's not hard

  • Locked thread