Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
mastajake
Oct 3, 2005

My blade is unBENDING!


April fools? ..........please?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

radical meme
Apr 17, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

zoux posted:

Yeah I sure hate how my house smells like good rear end barbeque all the time - a liberal piece of poo poo.

I love BBQ and the smell of burning mesquite but drat, too much of a good thing always gets old.

ReidRansom
Oct 25, 2004


Fair enough, but I'd say it would all depend on who was there first. You move in next to an existing BBQ place, that's on you.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

ReidRansom posted:

Fair enough, but I'd say it would all depend on who was there first. You move in next to an existing BBQ place, that's on you.

Tell that to all the fuckers that move into a downtown condo and then immediately start complaining about the music.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer
The House finally passed a budget. Naturally, they defeated an amendment that would cost basically nothing that would study whether there's a gender pay gap with state employees. I can't find a reason why, but I'm gonna imagine it's "lol gently caress them broads."

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

PostNouveau posted:

The House finally passed a budget. Naturally, they defeated an amendment that would cost basically nothing that would study whether there's a gender pay gap with state employees. I can't find a reason why, but I'm gonna imagine it's "lol gently caress them broads."

I see after all the talk about how lovely all the state facilities are, they decided to take money away from the Facilities Commission.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer

Badger of Basra posted:

I see after all the talk about how lovely all the state facilities are, they decided to take money away from the Facilities Commission.

Gotta keep $5 billion in reserve for tax "relief".

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Badger of Basra posted:

I see after all the talk about how lovely all the state facilities are, they decided to take money away from the Facilities Commission.

The Senate is doing a lot more with facilities than the House, but the cuts there might be because they are anticipating the creation of a special Facilities Deferred Maintenance fund, which the special committee in the Senate is looking at. I'd look more into it but I don't wanna read a budget document, sorry.

Hot Dog Day #91
Jun 19, 2003

they're replacing the roof on a big state office building this summer, so there's that at least.

brozozo
Apr 27, 2007

Conclusion: Dinosaurs.
DMN editorial board comes out swinging against Ken Paxton

http://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/20150402-editorial-special-prosecutor-needed-in-ken-paxton-case.ece

A Houston Chronicle article on the same subject

http://www.houstonchronicle.com/new...twitter-premium

Dante Logos
Dec 31, 2010
So it turns out that the debate over repealing the Texas DREAM Act was cancelled for April 3rd. What's the story on that?

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer
Well this is awful: Texas Bill Would Name Judges Who Give Minors Permission to Have Abortions

Nonsense
Jan 26, 2007

What a horrific bill. It will overwhelmingly pass.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer
Oh hey, some Republican proposed an Indiana-style religious freedom law.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011


But...we already have an RFRA

Are we just going to add anti-gay language to ours in a somehow even-less-plausible gambit than Indiana's?

ReidRansom
Oct 25, 2004


Somewhat fortunately, our lawmakers here seem to be more beholden to business than they are to the vice and virtue police and will probably kill it for fear of pissing off all the giant corporations headquartered here.

Hilarious that they want it to override local ordinances though.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

Local control can just be a cover for "local tyranny", per Senator Huffines. :regd09:

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

That poo poo's been filed for months.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

This poo poo is still going on?

http://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/news/2015-04-06/district-4-contest-arrives-in-court/

quote:

Defeated City Council candidate Laura Pressley had her first day in court Monday morning, in a pre-trial hearing before visiting Judge Daniel H. Mills, of Pressley's election contest against City Council Member Greg Casar. Mills was amiably skeptical of Pressley's claims, but tentatively planned a trial for June.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

The House passed it's tax cut plan which is actually....good?

It would cut the sales tax rate, which as we all know is a regressive tax that disproportionally affects the poor, from 6.25 to 5.95. Similarly to the Senate, it also cuts the franchise tax by a set percentage.

So the Senate is pushing for property tax cuts (the plan they passed would give back an avg. of $220 to property owners) and the House is pushing for sales tax cuts. Who will win?

Up now is the full day pre-k funding bill.

zoux fucked around with this message at 19:02 on Apr 8, 2015

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

zoux posted:

The House passed it's tax cut plan which is actually....good?

It would cut the sales tax rate, which as we all know is a regressive tax that disproportionally affects the poor, from 6.25 to 5.95. Similarly to the Senate, it also cuts the franchise tax by a set percentage.

So the Senate is pushing for property tax cuts (the plan they passed would give back an avg. of $220 to property owners) and the House is pushing for sales tax cuts. Who will win?

Up now is the full day pre-k funding bill.

Looks like the conservatives were right about secret democrat Joe Strauss!

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer
The Senate voted to move the office that investigates corruption. They're going to "depoliticize" the agency by having the Texas Rangers do the investigating and then refer the charges to the district attorneys in the lawmakers' home districts, which could never possibly have any politicization at all. I'm sure all the district attorneys will jump at the chance to indict a powerful local figure.

They did this because the corruption unit indicted Rick Perry.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Not even close.

This all stems back to the old DA Ronnie Earle who used his PIU jurisdiction to majorly gently caress with Republican legislators. Well, they felt they did, how much abusing he did depends on if you are a D or an R but the takeaway is that there was a lot of bad blood between the Legislature and the DA's office. So when current DA Rosemary Lehmberg got busted for a DUI, Perry said that if she didn't resign, he'd line item veto funding for the PIU out of the 2013 budget. She didn't, he did, and that's what he got indicted over after the fact.

It's a mega-bad bill that opens the door for venue shopping but getting the PIU out of Travis county is a GOP goal that goes way back.

Seriously, look into poo poo before you post, left wing conspiracy theories are just as ignorant and ridiculous as right wing ones.

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

zoux posted:

Not even close.

This all stems back to the old DA Ronnie Earle who used his PIU jurisdiction to majorly gently caress with Republican legislators. Well, they felt they did, how much abusing he did depends on if you are a D or an R but the takeaway is that there was a lot of bad blood between the Legislature and the DA's office. So when current DA Rosemary Lehmberg got busted for a DUI, Perry said that if she didn't resign, he'd line item veto funding for the PIU out of the 2013 budget. She didn't, he did, and that's what he got indicted over after the fact.

It's a mega-bad bill that opens the door for venue shopping but getting the PIU out of Travis county is a GOP goal that goes way back.

Seriously, look into poo poo before you post, left wing conspiracy theories are just as ignorant and ridiculous as right wing ones.

You realize that what you said and what he said don't contridict at all? This can both be a long term Republican goal and a bill that passed the senate because of Perry's indictment.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Except the PIU didn't indict/investigate Perry and all the Travis Co. DA personnel recused themselves.

All this "get the PIU out of Travis Co" stuff happened because of Lehmberg's DUI giving them a cassus belli to act, and nothing to do with Perry's indictment.

zoux fucked around with this message at 16:00 on Apr 9, 2015

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

zoux posted:

Except the PIU didn't indict/investigate Perry and all the Travis Co. DA personnel recused themselves.

All this "get the PIU out of Travis Co" stuff happened because of Lehmberg's DUI giving them a cassus belli to act, and nothing to do with Perry's indictment.

Except Perry's indictment (and the events that lead to it) is the final proof in their eyes that the PIU has been "politicized" regardless of who staffed the investigation.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Perry's indictment has zero to do with it. The Lege hated Perry, no one is going to bat for him, especially now that he's out of office.

Also,especially since the PIU had nothing to do with the indictment.

Speaking of the PIU, who passed on the chance to form a grand jury about Ken Paxton despite being rabidly partisan, Collin Co is looking at an investigation.

zoux fucked around with this message at 19:09 on Apr 9, 2015

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer

zoux posted:

Seriously, look into poo poo before you post, left wing conspiracy theories are just as ignorant and ridiculous as right wing ones.

Eh, fine I got that fact of who did the indicting wrong, but it's still stemming from the Lege having an axe to grind over the Perry indictment. Wouldn't it be an even farther-reaching conspiracy if they've been looking to take down the office since Ronnie Earle indicted Tom DeLay? That was a decade ago.

This is beside the point anyway. It's a step in the wrong direction that will result in DAs quashing corruption charges.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

What's more concerning, imo, is that it's up in the air about who is going to investigate and prosecute gas tax and insurance fraud. Like 95% of what the PIU does are those cases, and since they had their legs cut out from under them, they've been returning those cases to the local jurisdictions where they've happened. Those places often lack the resources and expertise to get convictions. I mean, they once in a blue moon indict a public official, but as usual the much more important but less interesting day-to-day stuff goes unnoticed.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer

zoux posted:

What's more concerning, imo, is that it's up in the air about who is going to investigate and prosecute gas tax and insurance fraud. Like 95% of what the PIU does are those cases, and since they had their legs cut out from under them, they've been returning those cases to the local jurisdictions where they've happened. Those places often lack the resources and expertise to get convictions. I mean, they once in a blue moon indict a public official, but as usual the much more important but less interesting day-to-day stuff goes unnoticed.

The Chronicle says that unit will still handle those cases, but the Senate isn't giving them any money to fund those investigations. I don't know how much that affects the office's overall budget situation.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

PostNouveau posted:

The Chronicle says that unit will still handle those cases, but the Senate isn't giving them any money to fund those investigations. I don't know how much that affects the office's overall budget situation.

They've almost completely abandoned those cases due to the amount of funding they have from Travis Co, so I don't see that changing.

e_angst
Sep 20, 2001

by exmarx

PostNouveau posted:

The Senate voted to move the office that investigates corruption. They're going to "depoliticize" the agency by having the Texas Rangers do the investigating and then refer the charges to the district attorneys in the lawmakers' home districts, which could never possibly have any politicization at all. I'm sure all the district attorneys will jump at the chance to indict a powerful local figure.

Funny enough, I believe it was Oklahoma that just passed a bill that did the exact opposite: taking the ability to indict corrupt politicians out of the hands of their local jurisdiction and putting it in a centralized office. They did this because it was too tempting for the local DAs (who often have political ambitions) to not only make a name for themselves with a big corruption case, but also take down their biggest opponent in one fell swoop.

Lemniscate Blue
Apr 21, 2006

Here we go again.
I didn't see any discussion of this, but it looks like this poo poo isn't happening in light of the SC shooting: Texas Bill to Make It Illegal to Film Near Police Dropped

Trabisnikof
Dec 24, 2005

Lemniscate Blue posted:

I didn't see any discussion of this, but it looks like this poo poo isn't happening in light of the SC shooting: Texas Bill to Make It Illegal to Film Near Police Dropped

It was never going to happen, but it's good to see it is officially dead.

Vahakyla
May 3, 2013
Lol even the CLEA Cop Union was against it.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer
Quote of the day:

"This is a bill that puts in place litigation from one coast in the state of Texas to the other." -- State Rep.. Sylvester Turner (D-Houston) on the ban on cities passing fracking bans.

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer
Also, the insurance reform plan they're trying to pass is godawful and geared mostly at loving consumers. Here's a lowlight:

quote:

He added that one provision of the bill would require an insured person to sign an affidavit swearing to her amount of damages. In some cases, she might face liability and potential criminal prosecution over it, said Ellis.

This isn't just for people trying to scam with false damages; it includes when a third-party screws up an estimate (or the court just decides the insurer's lowball estimate is the right one).

PostNouveau fucked around with this message at 10:38 on Apr 18, 2015

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

Raw Milk bill in front of House Public Health Committee right now if you're interested in some nutty testimony and wise moms.

ReidRansom
Oct 25, 2004


lol raw milk, why always with the raw milk.

Also, open carry passed the house yesterday because of course it was going to. Guess there's just reconciling it with the senate version yet.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer
So Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick invited some Tea Party folks to be part of his "Grassroots Advisory Panel" so he could keep in touch with the word on the street or something. And yesterday they did something deeply stupid:

quote:

Yesterday, that Grassroots Advisory Board fired off a letter to the Texas Senate decrying one of Gov. Greg Abbott's top priorities for the session -- funding quality pre-K programming -- as a socialist, godless plot to break up Texas families.

Abbott championed funneling more money to pre-K programs during his run for the governor's office, and House Bill 4 and its companion Senate Bill 801 are largely modeled on those campaign promises. The measure wouldn't expand pre-K eligibility beyond what the state already funds -- half-day pre-K for 4-year-olds from poor, military, or non-native English speaking families. Instead, Abbott's plan would throw an extra $130 million, or about $1,500 per eligible student, at districts that adopt certain curriculum, accountability and quality standards.

And Patrick's hand-picked Tea Party-infused advisory team just took a big, self-righteous dump all over that plan. On letterhead bearing a state seal declaring "Lieutenant Governor's Grassroots Advisory Panel," the group wrote that instead of providing incentives to grow quality pre-K programs, government should "look out for ways to help at least one parent remain in the homes with children." The letter continues:

"(W)e are experimenting at great cost to taxpayers with a program that removes our young children from homes and half-day religious preschools and mothers' day out programs to a Godless environment with only evidence showing absolutely NO LONG-TERM BENEFITS beyond the 1st grade. ...
Texans are endowed with 'certain unalienable rights' which include the rights and duties of parents to rear their children with minimal intrusion from the State. This intereference by the State tramples upon our parental rightrs. The early removal of chlidren from parents' care is historically promoted in socialistic countries, not free societies which respect parental rights."


The letter then goes on to criticize the "Welfare State," and the "breakdown of the American family," which, according to Patrick's advisers, are apparently worsened by funding quality pre-K programs.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply