Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer

GlyphGryph posted:

Reading the news of various websites definitely gives the feeling a chunk of the media really really doesn't seem to like the idea these cops might be charged any more than the cops do.

A lot of crime reporters spend all their time talking to police and tend to slowly adopt the idea that suspects are all inhuman scum who must be stomped out by our brave, brave officers.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ralepozozaxe
Sep 6, 2010

A Veritable Smorgasbord!

GlyphGryph posted:

At least they haven't been as bad as fox, bringing on "anonymous sources" to make up bullshit fantasy stories that don't even agree with each other.

Reading the news of various websites definitely gives the feeling a chunk of the media really really doesn't seem to like the idea these cops might be charged any more than the cops do.

At least we got to see two different Fox shows with different "anonymous sources" contradict each other within the span of an hour.

hobotrashcanfires
Jul 24, 2013

Thesaurasaurus posted:

Well hey, he's not wrong. If it weren't for the recent massive public outcry against police brutality, this probably would have been swept under the rug as usual.

Hah, yep. I hoped someone would remark on that irony.

Agrajag
Jan 21, 2006

gat dang thats hot

PostNouveau posted:

A lot of crime reporters spend all their time talking to police and tend to slowly adopt the idea that suspects are all inhuman scum who must be stomped out by our brave, brave officers.

Erin Burnett comes off like that.

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

Agrajag posted:

Erin Burnett comes off like that.

Didn't she previously give softball interviews to CEOs on CNBC?

St. Dogbert
Mar 17, 2011
I wonder how many of these people who unwaveringly support the police in all this would still do so if their local police union had a collective bargaining dispute with the city, or if it demanded additional mental health services to be paid for by the taxpayers? They'd probably be "socialist commie scum" within seconds.

DaveWoo
Aug 14, 2004

Fun Shoe

St. Dogbert posted:

I wonder how many of these people who unwaveringly support the police in all this would still do so if their local police union had a collective bargaining dispute with the city, or if it demanded additional mental health services to be paid for by the taxpayers?

Most of them, probably. Police unions are generally seen as "one of the good ones".

Even Scott Walker exempted police unions from his union-killing efforts.

FRINGE
May 23, 2003
title stolen for lf posting

DaveWoo posted:

Even Scott Walker exempted police unions from his union-killing efforts.
He was using the police during his Koch-puppet union busting. Of course he licked their rear end.

He cant wait to fulfill his fantasy of joining the Big Game and having some (he hopes) control over the various pieces of the Shadow State.

http://host.madison.com/wsj/news/lo...7cb61f0510.html
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...s_fighting.html
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/02/21/what_scott_walker_actually_said_125690.html

quote:

Gov. Scott Walker told thousands of conservative activists Thursday that his experience standing up to 100,000 protesters in 2011 has prepared him to face the threat posed by Islamic State terrorists.

...

Walker has also previously cited President Ronald Reagan’s firing of striking air traffic controllers as one of the most powerful foreign policy decisions he made, Franklin said.

quote:

Noteworthy, Walker argued that when Reagan fired the PATCO air-traffic controllers over their illegal strike, he was sending a message of toughness to Democrats and unions at home as well as our Soviet enemies abroad. Similarly, Walker believes his stance against unions in Wisconsin would be a signal of toughness to Islamic jihadists and Russia's Vladimir Putin.

Using force requires willing lackeys. The police are the only force bearing lackeys someone like Walker can get so far. He thinks that by beating down US citizens he is "sending a message to Putin".

He insane, and a piece of poo poo. So basically an insane piece of poo poo.

Of course he "supports" modern police unions.

FRINGE
May 23, 2003
title stolen for lf posting
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/police-have-killed-400-people-2015-new-grieving-family-every-75-hours

quote:

Police Have Killed 400 People in 2015, A New Grieving Family Every 7.5 Hours

Americans are less violent than ever, yet the police seem to be growing increasingly violent.

As of May 5, 2015, the police in the United States of America have killed 401 people that we know of.

Deaths By Law Enforcement 2015:

91 in the 31 days of January
85 in the 28 days of February
115 in the 31 days of March
101 in the 30 days of April
8 people in the 5 days of May

Extrapolating those numbers out to an hourly figure and the police have killed someone on average, every 7.48 hours. While there is no government-run database, Killed By Police has taken it upon themselves to keep track, and are doing a fantastic job thus far. It’s truly a Cop Crisis.

...

Meanwhile, the Officer Down Memorial Page is reporting gunfire related deaths of on-duty officers is down 43%.

Law Enforcement Deaths 2015:

9/11 related illness: 2
Accidental: 1
Assault: 1
Automobile accident: 12
Gunfire: 8
Gunfire (Accidental): 2
Heart attack: 10
Motorcycle accident: 1
Struck by vehicle: 2
Vehicle pursuit: 2

The death by assault was Patrolman George Nissen, and they are referring to injuries sustained 10 years earlier when he was attempting to break up a large fight on February 13th, 2005.

A look at the two which were struck by vehicles, both were accidents, with one occurring while the officer was off duty and had stopped to help someone on an icy road. The other was an accident where a semi truck crashed into the officer’s vehicle.

That leaves the eight by gunfire as deaths due to suspects actively attempting to harm them this year.

Deaths of officers directly at hands of suspects this year:

0 in January
0 in February
6 in March
0 in April
2 in May

quote:

Being a police officer isn’t even close to being in the top 10 most dangerous jobs in this country. According to the 2013 report by the Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics on work-related fatal injuries, “Police and sheriff’s patrol deputies” ranked as the 41st most dangerous occupation.

Series DD Funding
Nov 25, 2014

by exmarx

FRINGE posted:

He cant wait to fulfill his fantasy of joining the Big Game and having some (he hopes) control over the various pieces of the Shadow State.

Can Walker melt steel beams with his jet fuel?

FRINGE
May 23, 2003
title stolen for lf posting

Series DD Funding posted:

Can Walker melt steel beams with his jet fuel?
:rolleyes:

Yeah drones dont exist and the US has never taken off-the-record hostile actions anywhere on the planet.

Youre a loving idiot.

For anyone not brain damaged:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community

quote:

The Washington Post reported in 2010 that there were 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies in 10,000 locations in the United States that are working on counterterrorism, homeland security, and intelligence, and that the intelligence community as a whole includes 854,000 people holding top-secret clearances. According to a 2008 study by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, private contractors make up 29% of the workforce in the U.S. intelligence community and cost the equivalent of 49% of their personnel budgets.

The machine is large.

FRINGE fucked around with this message at 03:34 on May 10, 2015

hallebarrysoetoro
Jun 14, 2003
so can someone who understands "the law" explain to me how a prosecutor seeking a conviction has a conflict of interest? Are prosecutors only supposed to seek convictions against people they don't want convicted, because otherwise it would hurt the feelings of the accused which is a punishment worse than having your spine 80% severed?

Samurai Sanders
Nov 4, 2003

Pillbug

hallebarrysoetoro posted:

so can someone who understands "the law" explain to me how a prosecutor seeking a conviction has a conflict of interest? Are prosecutors only supposed to seek convictions against people they don't want convicted, because otherwise it would hurt the feelings of the accused which is a punishment worse than having your spine 80% severed?
I don't know "the law", but if they're a local prosecutor its because they need the future cooperation of the police to do their job every day. If it's a special prosecutor from somewhere else than...just general warm feelings about the police from working with them every day?

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

Also I went onto Officer Down Memorial Page and looked up the two negligent discharge incidents. One of them was in Ocala (I play airsoft there a few times a year), where another officer I guess had a finger on the trigger while standing around in a training exercise and shot him in the side where his vest has no armor. The other was in Mississippi, where the victim was roleplaying as a knife-armed suspect; the officer being trained hadn't checked to see that his gun was unloaded and proved that he could hit a target on the first shot.

Pegged Lamb
Nov 5, 2007
Probation
Can't post for 3 years!
The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air on this current mess 25 years ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bluQNcAjOA

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe

FRINGE posted:

:rolleyes:

Yeah drones dont exist and the US has never taken off-the-record hostile actions anywhere on the planet.

Youre a loving idiot.

For anyone not brain damaged:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Intelligence_Community


The machine is large.

Tell me about the shadow state? Are they in league with the grays or the reptoids? I trust you've done much research!

FRINGE
May 23, 2003
title stolen for lf posting

chitoryu12 posted:

Also I went onto Officer Down Memorial Page and looked up the two negligent discharge incidents. One of them was in Ocala (I play airsoft there a few times a year), where another officer I guess had a finger on the trigger while standing around in a training exercise and shot him in the side where his vest has no armor. The other was in Mississippi, where the victim was roleplaying as a knife-armed suspect; the officer being trained hadn't checked to see that his gun was unloaded and proved that he could hit a target on the first shot.
:doh:

Then I guess subtract two from that total.

The cops cant even avoid killing each other.

Samurai Sanders
Nov 4, 2003

Pillbug

Pegged Lamb posted:

The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air on this current mess 25 years ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bluQNcAjOA
I'm not anywhere close to black and that was the only sitcom I cared about growing up.

nm
Jan 28, 2008

"I saw Minos the Space Judge holding a golden sceptre and passing sentence upon the Martians. There he presided, and around him the noble Space Prosecutors sought the firm justice of space law."

hallebarrysoetoro posted:

so can someone who understands "the law" explain to me how a prosecutor seeking a conviction has a conflict of interest? Are prosecutors only supposed to seek convictions against people they don't want convicted, because otherwise it would hurt the feelings of the accused which is a punishment worse than having your spine 80% severed?
Here would be a classic conflict where reusing the prosecutor would be proper:
Judge who frequently rules against the prosecution and who is frequently papered by the state gets charged with a DUI. The prosecutor would be at least perceived as giving a worse deals and be less likely to dismiss a weak case because the judge has ruled against them.

Similarly, someone accused of attacking a prosecutor would probably move for recusal.

They are claiming this is somehow similar. That the prosecutor is bringing this case, despite being weak, to solely gain political points. If that was the reason, recusal would be proper, but it doesn't seem that is actually true.

chitoryu12
Apr 24, 2014

FRINGE posted:

:doh:

Then I guess subtract two from that total.

The cops cant even avoid killing each other.

Officer Down thankfully lists them separately from actual homicides. A quick count for the current year gives me 9 deaths definitely caused through an attempt to harm or kill (8 were gunshots and 1 was a guy who got beat up back in 2005 and died of complications from becoming a quadriplegic recently). That gives 33 deaths from accidents or illness (including loving 11 heart attacks), if you don't count the officer crashing during a car chase to be homicide like it legally would probably be counted.

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

nm posted:

They are claiming this is somehow similar. That the prosecutor is bringing this case, despite being weak, to solely gain political points. If that was the reason, recusal would be proper, but it doesn't seem that is actually true.

Where prosecutors are elected, by this logic, how could they practice at all?

Vahakyla
May 3, 2013
CNN reports that "BREAKING NEWS, 2 police officers shot in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, official says. Reports say both officers have died."


No other info yet.

Homura and Sickle
Apr 21, 2013

hallebarrysoetoro posted:

so can someone who understands "the law" explain to me how a prosecutor seeking a conviction has a conflict of interest? Are prosecutors only supposed to seek convictions against people they don't want convicted, because otherwise it would hurt the feelings of the accused which is a punishment worse than having your spine 80% severed?

When an Assistant District Attorney takes on a cop case vigorously police will literally do a work slowdown on their pending cases to gently caress up their careers.

nm
Jan 28, 2008

"I saw Minos the Space Judge holding a golden sceptre and passing sentence upon the Martians. There he presided, and around him the noble Space Prosecutors sought the firm justice of space law."

hobbesmaster posted:

Where prosecutors are elected, by this logic, how could they practice at all?

Please see the words "weak case" and "solely."

Popoi
Jul 23, 2000

quote:

“We don’t have to prove that the person is guilty,” Waite said. “It’s that the money is presumed to be guilty.”
This really seems like the kind of thing that should provoke some serious reflection once you've said it out loud.

Samurai Sanders
Nov 4, 2003

Pillbug

Vahakyla posted:

No other info yet.
I need to know whether they were angels or not.

Spatial
Nov 15, 2007

Popoi posted:

This really seems like the kind of thing that should provoke some serious reflection once you've said it out loud.
Haha, it's the Sovereign Citizen Mafia.

hallebarrysoetoro
Jun 14, 2003

nm posted:

Here would be a classic conflict where reusing the prosecutor would be proper:
Judge who frequently rules against the prosecution and who is frequently papered by the state gets charged with a DUI. The prosecutor would be at least perceived as giving a worse deals and be less likely to dismiss a weak case because the judge has ruled against them.

Similarly, someone accused of attacking a prosecutor would probably move for recusal.

They are claiming this is somehow similar. That the prosecutor is bringing this case, despite being weak, to solely gain political points. If that was the reason, recusal would be proper, but it doesn't seem that is actually true.

Thank you. I understand this is mostly a PR game at this point but I couldn't put together a situation of conflict of interest of some sort other than possibly bringing a case against a relative/spouse.

murphyslaw
Feb 16, 2007
It never fails

Vahakyla posted:

CNN reports that "BREAKING NEWS, 2 police officers shot in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, official says. Reports say both officers have died."


No other info yet.

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/05/10/us/mississippi-police-officers-shot-dead/ here's a more recent article.

Branis
Apr 14, 2006

DaveWoo posted:

Most of them, probably. Police unions are generally seen as "one of the good ones".

Even Scott Walker exempted police unions from his union-killing efforts.

and the madison police protested alongside other union members in a show of solidarity.

Moxie
Aug 2, 2003

I walked through the Jean-Michel Basquiat exhibit in Toronto last night. Police brutality was a theme in several of his works, depicting incidents virtually identical to what we've seen in the past year. Those works were over 30 years old. Pretty loving demoralizing.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Michael_Stewart - the same old story, 1983 style. Demonizing the victim, possible strangulation, lack of care for the victim between arrest and delivery to the hospital.

Grand Theft Autobot
Feb 28, 2008

I'm something of a fucking idiot myself

Vahakyla posted:

CNN reports that "BREAKING NEWS, 2 police officers shot in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, official says. Reports say both officers have died."


No other info yet.

There's a notorious gunslinger from Hattiesberg that will probably be brought in for questioning.

upgunned shitpost
Jan 21, 2015

Branis posted:

and the madison police protested alongside other union members in a show of solidarity.

Until their supposed solidarity was tested on Free Speech Fridays and found wanting. You're not really down with the cause if you're out there locking people up for lawful activities.

FRINGE
May 23, 2003
title stolen for lf posting
MoJo jumped in the pool.


http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/12/american-society-police-state-criminalization-militarization

quote:

How Every Part of American Life Became a Police Matter

From the workplace to our private lives, American society is starting to resemble a police state.

If all you've got is a hammer, then everything starts to look like a nail. And if police and prosecutors are your only tool, sooner or later everything and everyone will be treated as criminal. This is increasingly the American way of life, a path that involves "solving" social problems (and even some non-problems) by throwing cops at them, with generally disastrous results.

...

Agrajag
Jan 21, 2006

gat dang thats hot

Pretty sure the moment a person can get his door kicked in and have a dog maul his face for burning a motherfucking tree in a motherfucking barrel instead of getting a motherfucking citation/promise to appear notice is a huge flag.

fuccboi
Jan 5, 2004

by zen death robot
Hmm I wonder how it got that way? Oh that's right statists on both the left and the right who'd rather give up essential liberty so they can lie to themselves that they are secure, free, and happy.

Ghost of Reagan Past
Oct 7, 2003

rock and roll fun
Good, relevant article, but just an FYI: it's from 2013.

FRINGE
May 23, 2003
title stolen for lf posting

Ghost of Reagan Past posted:

Good, relevant article, but just an FYI: it's from 2013.
Weird. It just popped up for me today in a feed, I didnt look at the date.

At least it still fits in 2015. :negative:

quote:

The term "police state" was once brushed off by mainstream intellectuals as the hyperbole of paranoids. Not so much anymore. Even in the tweediest precincts of the legal system, the over-criminalization of American life is remarked upon with greater frequency and intensity. "You're probably a (federal) criminal" is the accusatory title of a widely read essay co-authored by Judge Alex Kozinski of the 9th Circuit of the US Court of Appeals. A Republican appointee, Kozinski surveys the morass of criminal laws that make virtually every American an easy target for law enforcement. Veteran defense lawyer Harvey Silverglate has written an entire book about how an average American professional could easily commit three felonies in a single day without knowing it.

The daily overkill of police power in the US goes a long way toward explaining why more Americans aren't outraged by the "excesses" of the war on terror, which, as one law professor has argued, are just our everyday domestic penal habits exported to more exotic venues. It is no less true that the growth of domestic police power is, in this positive feedback loop, the partial result of our distant foreign wars seeping back into the homeland (the "imperial boomerang" that Hannah Arendt warned against).

Many who have long railed against our country's everyday police overkill have reacted to the revelations of NSA surveillance with detectable exasperation: of course we are over-policed! Some have even responded with peevish resentment: Why so much sympathy for this Snowden kid when the daily grind of our justice system destroys so many lives without comment or scandal? After all, in New York, the police department's "stop and frisk" tactic, which targets African American and Latino working-class youth for routinized street searches, was until recently uncontroversial among the political and opinion-making class. If "the gloves came off" after September 11, 2001, many Americans were surprised to learn they had ever been on to begin with.

A hammer is necessary to any toolkit. But you don't use a hammer to turn a screw, chop a tomato, or brush your teeth. And yet the hammer remains our instrument of choice, both in the conduct of our foreign policy and in our domestic order. The result is not peace, justice, or prosperity but rather a state that harasses and imprisons its own people while shouting ever less intelligibly about freedom.

moller
Jan 10, 2007

Swan stole my music and framed me!

Slipknot Hoagie posted:

Hmm I wonder how it got that way? Oh that's right statists on both the left and the right who'd rather give up essential liberty so they can lie to themselves that they are secure, free, and happy.

I was under the impression that the statist thing was usually referring to supporters of the federal government. Police departments are hyper-loving-local. Are you sure you don't mean authoritarians or something?

Edit: Municipalitists?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ghost of Reagan Past
Oct 7, 2003

rock and roll fun

moller posted:

I was under the impression that the statist thing was usually referring to supporters of the federal government. Police departments are hyper-loving-local. Are you sure you don't mean authoritarians or something?

Edit: Municipalitists?
Statists is a libertarian insult that lets you know you can ignore everything the speaker has to say.

  • Locked thread