|
Calico Heart posted:Young Adult Novel movies have been the most consistently entertaining bad movies recently Nobody liked the novel sequel to The Giver.
|
# ? May 19, 2015 19:56 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 04:17 |
|
Calico Heart posted:Actually all these babby's first dystopia movies aimed at teens are great. I could watch a dozen more movies trying to desperately find a new stupid way to make society that just can't handle how unique you are, man Would you say they're ?
|
# ? May 19, 2015 20:05 |
|
Holy poo poo who bought that.
|
# ? May 19, 2015 20:19 |
|
Jose Oquendo posted:Holy poo poo who bought that. A saint. The gates of Valhalla are open to them.
|
# ? May 20, 2015 03:17 |
|
That image should be made to only display when you're using Chrome.
|
# ? May 20, 2015 03:42 |
|
|
# ? May 20, 2015 06:53 |
|
I still think this is the dumbest title.
|
# ? May 20, 2015 07:02 |
That's actually kinda cool
|
|
# ? May 20, 2015 07:05 |
|
Maxwell Lord posted:I still think this is the dumbest title. It sounds like a 30 year old Japanese puzzle game to me. Lode Runner. Spelunker. Maze Runner.
|
# ? May 20, 2015 07:22 |
|
Calico Heart posted:Young Adult Novel movies have been the most consistently entertaining bad movies recently At least as far back as 2003 (Please see if this is still on Netflix ASAP if you haven't seen it yet): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdjShe0ouiw
|
# ? May 20, 2015 07:48 |
|
Arnold is a robot? Man, they really are spoiling everything in that movie!
|
# ? May 20, 2015 09:14 |
|
I would like this more if his insides were chocolate
|
# ? May 20, 2015 09:44 |
Neo Rasa posted:At least as far back as 2003 (Please see if this is still on Netflix ASAP if you haven't seen it yet): This is the best Wrinkle in Time movie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhsCCQrCNAs
|
|
# ? May 20, 2015 17:01 |
|
mr.capps posted:I would like this more if his insides were chocolate I count myself lucky that I did a GIS for "chocolate terminator" and this was what came up. Could've been much worse.
|
# ? May 20, 2015 17:04 |
|
Guns are impervious to x-ray thats why people can bring them onto planes
|
# ? May 20, 2015 17:20 |
|
I mainlined this entire thread over two weeks, what is wrong with me. I have this poster rolled up in a tube somewhere: Simple and to the point. Plus: Hirschfeld.
|
# ? May 20, 2015 23:38 |
|
This is apparently a comedy about a chef. Not that the poster tells you much except that Bradley Cooper is a really handsome dude. I mean, he's just sitting there. At least make him hold a skillet and a knife in a really attractive manner or something.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 00:23 |
|
I don't know, I got chef right away. Not comedy though. Maybe he could be throwing a pie?
|
# ? May 21, 2015 00:25 |
|
The MSJ posted:This is apparently a comedy about a chef. Not that the poster tells you much except that Bradley Cooper is a really handsome dude. I mean, he's just sitting there. At least make him hold a skillet and a knife in a really attractive manner or something. Looks super funny.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 00:27 |
|
Yeah, I can see chef, he's wearing a chef uniform. Unless it's a relatively low-key comedy I'm not seeing that aspect, though.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 00:27 |
|
Maybe it's a comedy inspired by Jeanne Dielman and it's three hours of the Saturday night dinner shift.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 02:32 |
|
The MSJ posted:This is apparently a comedy about a chef. Not that the poster tells you much except that Bradley Cooper is a really handsome dude. I mean, he's just sitting there. At least make him hold a skillet and a knife in a really attractive manner or something. Is he playing in Kitchen Confidential character again?
|
# ? May 21, 2015 02:49 |
|
I got 'chef' only because the outfit combined with the pose gave sort of a Gordon Ramsay look. I'd probably watch a movie about a Gordon Ramsay character. Bradely Cooper looks way too nice for that, though.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 02:55 |
|
I think it's zoomed in just far enough to make it somewhat unclear if it's a chef outfit or just a white shirt. The color palette also definitely screams "fashion ad". Whether there's a reason for all this, I don't know.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 03:04 |
|
"Bradley Cooper is Adam Jones" Yes, and who is Adam Jones that I should watch this movie?
|
# ? May 21, 2015 03:09 |
|
Waffleman_ posted:"Bradley Cooper is Adam Jones" I think he's a chef. On Mars.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 03:15 |
|
Waffleman_ posted:"Bradley Cooper is Adam Jones" Bradley Cooper is controversial and troubled NFL cornerback Adam "PacMan" Jones.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 03:16 |
|
quote:Plot Wow, sounds enthralling.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 03:27 |
|
That sucks. Everyone knows you need to make a movie for each crew member first, Seriously, though, I hope that description means this is another remake of Seven Samurai.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 03:35 |
The MSJ posted:Seriously, though, I hope that description means this is another remake of Seven Samurai. That would be Antoine Fuqua's Magnificent Seven.
|
|
# ? May 21, 2015 04:01 |
|
Waffleman_ posted:"Bradley Cooper is Adam Jones" I really hate this trend. So many movies and poo poo with just some character name like I'm supposed to know who the gently caress they are. That might work for Marvel but you can't just make a movie called Joe McGuy and expect people to give a poo poo. The cover is, like here, almost always just the star standing there too, giving you no further hint as to what the hell it's about.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 04:24 |
|
It actually sounds like marketers taking the wrong lesson from Marvel/DC/Film Franchise characters who often come with long-standing relevance in the pop culture sphere and trying to establish a new film protagonist/potential franchise the same way. It comes across as arrogant as hell at best and tone-deaf at worst.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 04:27 |
|
mind the walrus posted:It actually sounds like marketers taking the wrong lesson from Marvel/DC/Film Franchise characters who often come with long-standing relevance in the pop culture sphere and trying to establish a new film protagonist/potential franchise the same way. It comes across as arrogant as hell at best and tone-deaf at worst. I can sort of understand Universal doing it with Dracula/etc. since they were straight up doing that in the forties/fifties anyway. But they failed three times in a row to make people care in modern times. Their first attempt was Van Helsing. Then The Wolf Man with Benicio del Toro, then again with Dracula Untold. Now ANOTHER Wolf Man reboot is happening to line up with Dracula Untold. Now I'm not even saying that's a bad idea, obviously Dracula, etc. are like the penultimate long standing relevance in pop culture characters. But have any of you seen Dracula Untold? Holy poo poo. I think Van Helsing is almost better because it's at last laughable.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 04:52 |
|
I was more referring specifically to posters that show an actor playing some character like, I don't know, Mordecai or whatever that Johnny Depp poo poo was and expecting said character to be instantly iconic the same way shoving Spider-Man onto a movie poster in 2001 was, even though Spider-Man at the time was a character with half a century of pop culture relevance.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 05:17 |
|
Yeah, I'm complaining about poo poo like this: One of those is a well liked movie, but just looking at these covers, good luck figuring out which. The main dude's name in a random-rear end action movie is like the least important part, I don't see why this is a trend (Bourne, I guess). John Carter is also an interesting wrinkle on this theme. Also odd how often it's a J name.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 06:39 |
|
No doubt, those titles are very generic and you have to be familiar with the movie to recognize them. John Wick and Jack Reacher are great though, but could've used better titles. I'm actually struggling to think of another title for John Wick, though they could've had a good tagline for it, like "don't set him off" or something. There is a fan poster where his tie is a burning fuse which should've been the real poster. The spanish title of it is "Sin Control", which can be read as "without control" or "out of control". Jack Reacher could've been a combo title using the book name, like "Jack Reacher: One Shot" or "One Shot: The Jack Reacher Archives" or something. And John Carter should've been "John Carter and the Princess of Mars". That would've gotten more butts in seats than what they got.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 06:56 |
|
Egbert Souse posted:Maybe it's a comedy inspired by Jeanne Dielman and it's three hours of the Saturday night dinner shift. As a waiter I would watch this in a heartbeat.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 07:05 |
|
effectual posted:And John Carter should've been "John Carter and the Princess of Mars". That would've gotten more butts in seats than what they got. The original title was John Carter of Mars. They took out the "of Mars" from the title because they found that movies with "Mars" in the title underperformed. So now we got a movie that's set on Mars but named after some guy instead, and look how well that did!
|
# ? May 21, 2015 07:09 |
|
effectual posted:No doubt, those titles are very generic and you have to be familiar with the movie to recognize them. John Wick and Jack Reacher are great though, but could've used better titles. I'm actually struggling to think of another title for John Wick, though they could've had a good tagline for it, like "don't set him off" or something. There is a fan poster where his tie is a burning fuse which should've been the real poster. The spanish title of it is "Sin Control", which can be read as "without control" or "out of control". At least put a THEY KILLED HIS DOG...NOW HE'LL KILL THEM!
|
# ? May 21, 2015 09:12 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 04:17 |
|
Cacator posted:The original title was John Carter of Mars. They took out the "of Mars" from the title because they found that movies with "Mars" in the title underperformed. So now we got a movie that's set on Mars but named after some guy instead, and look how well that did! It was mostly due to Mars Needs Moms iirc.
|
# ? May 21, 2015 09:16 |