Right Wing Media: congratulations Rush Limbaugh on three full years of sobriety!

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > Right Wing Media: congratulations Rush Limbaugh on three full years of sobriety!

«‹›3441 »

InequalityGodzilla: May 31, 2012

Great White Hope posted:

Right now this is looking like 2012 if Romney was stuck in the pack instead of Hulk Hogan facing Opponent of the Month.

Come on now, Rick Perry was Mitt's equal. He had good politics, charisma and uh...uh... Whoops.

# ? Jun 16, 2015 17:34

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? May 19, 2024 02:56

bpower: Feb 19, 2011

InequalityGodzilla posted:

Come on now, Rick Perry was Mitt's equal. He had good politics, charisma and uh...uh... Whoops.

Gets me every drat time. I never see it coming. lol.

# ? Jun 16, 2015 17:37

Samovar: Jun 4, 2011; I'm 😤 not a 🦸🏻‍♂️hero...🧜🏻

Actually, as an interesting aside, English already HAS a proper colletive word for 'you'.

It's 'you'.

You orignally was meant for you-plural, but somehow became you-singular. That's why we say 'you are' even though it would make more sense (since it is singular) to say 'you is'

The orginal you-singular word was ye.

# ? Jun 16, 2015 17:43

Vertical Lime: Dec 11, 2004

I didn't see this, or it's been too many pages, but Clear Channel or whatever their modern name is had to get desperate to find new stations for Rush in Indy and Boston:

http://radioinsight.com/blog/headlines/93209/rush-finds-new-home-in-indianapolis/
http://radioinsight.com/blog/headlines/netgnomes/93331/iheart-forced-to-blow-up-boston-am-for-limbaugh/

# ? Jun 16, 2015 17:46

Nintendo Kid: Aug 4, 2011; by Smythe

Samovar posted:

Actually, as an interesting aside, English already HAS a proper colletive word for 'you'.

It's 'you'.

You orignally was meant for you-plural, but somehow became you-singular. That's why we say 'you are' even though it would make more sense (since it is singular) to say 'you is'

The orginal you-singular word was ye.

It's because "you" as plural was also the formal way to say "you" singular. It's kinda related to the royal "we".

And it caught on because if you said you to someone you didn't know, it wouldn't offend anyone, where informal might.

# ? Jun 16, 2015 17:49

Darko: Dec 23, 2004

Who What Now posted:

Good BBQ uses sauce sparingly to accentuate the meat's natural flavor. Bad BBQ buries meat in a three-inch thick layer of sauce to cover up how dry and bland the meat is.

In the seasoning, perhaps. Amd VERY sparingly, as balanced with other seasonings. Never post-cooked, unless you messed up cooking it and need to cover it, or its a bad cut of meat.

# ? Jun 16, 2015 17:59

Warcabbit: Apr 26, 2008; Wedge Regret

Coohoolin posted:

Some English, Scots and Irish dialects will have "youse" as a plural. Works quite well I think and should be incorporated into the mainstream.

An' Brooklyn, see?

# ? Jun 16, 2015 18:36

El Gallinero Gros: Mar 17, 2010

Flobbster posted:

Why is the steamroller being driven by a bunch of blurry Craig Ferguson clones?

I'm more interested in how one attends "St.Jude's Christian Academy" which appears to operate inside a tree.

# ? Jun 16, 2015 18:38

site: Apr 6, 2007; Trans pride, Worldwide
Bitch

Went to Drudge to see what he said about Trump (nothing worth noting unfortunately), and the top articles are about the Pope talking about climate change and introducing a new "global authority"!!!

# ? Jun 16, 2015 19:39

icantfindaname: Jul 1, 2008

Doesn't everyone know the Pope controls everything in the world from his secret Illuminati chamber beneath St. Peter's? Didn't they read that Dan Brown book?

# ? Jun 16, 2015 19:50

Thump!: Nov 25, 2007; Look, fat, here's the fact, Kulak!

Gawdamn Papists are takin' over! :bahgawd:

# ? Jun 16, 2015 19:52

Rhesus Pieces: Jun 27, 2005

He's going to deploy the Swiss Guards to gas stations everywhere and they'll jab you in the rear end with their fancy pikes if you pull up in a gas guzzler :ohdear:

# ? Jun 16, 2015 19:55

Wayne Knight: May 11, 2006

Rhesus Pieces posted:

He's going to deploy the Swiss Guards to gas stations everywhere and they'll jab you in the rear end with their fancy pikes if you pull up in a gas guzzler

I'd vote for that.

# ? Jun 16, 2015 20:03

FuzzySkinner: May 23, 2012

Vertical Lime posted:

I didn't see this, or it's been too many pages, but Clear Channel or whatever their modern name is had to get desperate to find new stations for Rush in Indy and Boston:

http://radioinsight.com/blog/headlines/93209/rush-finds-new-home-in-indianapolis/
http://radioinsight.com/blog/headlines/netgnomes/93331/iheart-forced-to-blow-up-boston-am-for-limbaugh/

Query and Schultz own.

Limbaugh? not so much.

e: Also Jake Query is a well known critic of Mike Pence and the christian right over there. Mocks them all the time on Twitter and the radio.

# ? Jun 16, 2015 20:13

aeglus: Jul 13, 2003; WEEK 1 - RETIRED

Samovar posted:

The orginal you-singular word was ye.

Actually it was thou/thee. Ye was object form, you was subject form (so you can probably guess which is which in the case of thou/thee). One other reason why thou was eventually replaced by you is that � (basically th) was printed as y on most early printing presses.

Places like Ireland just went a different route than most other areas that speak English and have you being singular while ye remained plural but I think the formality of the words disappeared a while ago.

# ? Jun 16, 2015 20:20

Samuel Clemens: Oct 4, 2013; I think we should call the Avengers.

site posted:

the Pope talking about climate change and introducing a new "global authority"!!!

God?

# ? Jun 16, 2015 20:38

aeglus: Jul 13, 2003; WEEK 1 - RETIRED

Samuel Clemens posted:

God?

Pretty sure he means the Queen Spider.

# ? Jun 16, 2015 20:44

Intel&Sebastian: Oct 20, 2002; colonel...
i'm trying to sneak around
but i'm dummy thicc
and the clap of my ass cheeks
keeps alerting the guards!

1) wouldnt that be the old global authority?

2) FORGET ABOUT THE GILGAMEX!?!?

# ? Jun 16, 2015 21:31

A Fancy 400 lbs: Jul 24, 2008

I had MSNBC on for background noise while I was doing some housework and forgot to turn it off when The Ed Show came on. I'm actually kind of glad because he did a hilarious(ly terrible) fake interview with Donald Trump's campaign announcement and was giving Trump huge sloppy blowjobs while his guests were all like "Yeah, Trump does say a lot of poo poo that makes him stand out from the rest of the field. The problem is about 5% of it is based in any kind of reality" while Ed just got pissed that they would dare say something negative about Our Savior Trump. :allears:

# ? Jun 16, 2015 22:35

Thump!: Nov 25, 2007; Look, fat, here's the fact, Kulak!

Intel&Sebastian posted:

1) wouldnt that be the old global authority?

2) FORGET ABOUT THE GILGAMEX!?!?

Now I have the odd need to hear Pat Robertson describe the gilgamex vagina.

# ? Jun 16, 2015 22:50

Pirate Radar: Apr 18, 2008; You're not my Ruthie!
You're not my Debbie!
You're not my Sherry!

Nintendo Kid posted:

It's because "you" as plural was also the formal way to say "you" singular. It's kinda related to the royal "we".

And it caught on because if you said you to someone you didn't know, it wouldn't offend anyone, where informal might.

Sounds about right, at least that's one step less confusing than German.

# ? Jun 17, 2015 05:33

kik2dagroin: Mar 23, 2007; Use the anger. Use it.

quote:

RUSH: Look, folks, you know, I hate saying I told you so all the time. But when it needs to be said, I do not shrink from it. Did not I tell you early on that Pope Francis...? Remember this? Early on he started attacking capitalism using Democrat Party language. "Unfettered capitalism." I said, "This guy sounds like a Marxist," and remember the ruckus that that caused?

The Vatican (without naming me, of course, 'cause I'm just a peon) started denying it left and right. "The Pope is not Marxist! This is an extreme characterization of the pontiff's remarks. There's no way." But I stood by it at the time. I caught a heck of a lot of grief from the Drive-By Media for pointing out early on that Il Papa sounded like a Marxist. Well, this global warming encyclical -- that may be Latin for "rant" -- seems to confirm it. (I'm just kidding. I'm just kidding. I know that encyclical is not Latin for "rant." I just watched Trump.)

But he doesn't even disguise it folks in this encyclical. Doesn't even disguise it! Every other word seems to be about how unfettered capitalism is destroying the world and how the rich countries have to give more money to the poor countries to make amends. I mean, that's -- call it what you want -- Marxism, socialism, what have you. But if this thing is real, then it leaves no doubt here what the political leanings or inclinations of the of the of the pontiff are.
...
I've always found it interesting that as old as the earth is -- and I don't think there's an exact science to document it. For as long as people have been around, isn't it interesting that the vanity of humanity is the assumption apparently 50, 60, 70 years ago the earth was quote/unquote "normal." Whatever was going on back then, that was the norm. It just so happens that it's when we are alive. That's the norm.

So anything that happens above or below that line, from 70 years ago to today, we are responsible for, according to these people. But what is the norm? Does anybody know? Can there be scientific proof? What is the norm? The climate, the planet Earth. There's nobody that knows this. So all of this is speculative. It's all just politics. But it has a grand delusion about it, fulfilling the requirement that propaganda be part of the delusion.

You got a consensus, and everybody goes along with the consensus 'cause that's the path of least destruction and anybody who objects is a "denier" or "weirdo" or "kook" or worse. That is to discredit people who are not going along with the consensus. The Washington Post says, "In words likely to anger some of his conservative critics, the pope backs the science of climate change, saying 'plenty of scientific studies point out that the last decades of global warming have been mostly caused by the great concentration of greenhouse gases ... especially generated by human action.'"

Now, as we know, "plenty of scientific studies" say a lot of things turn out to be untrue. Most scientific studies are bought and paid for. Every scientific study on the dangers and benefits of various foods, from eggs to oats to red wine is shown to have been wrong. But, I mean, the empirical data here is there hasn't been any warming, actually, in the last 18 years -- and the latest data is that the last ten years we are witnessing a cooling!

"'The poor and the Earth are shouting,' reads the draft of the encyclical..."

The poor.

Now, near the end of the Washington Post piece, there is an allusion, not illusion, allusion to the fact that this whole papal encyclical on global warming is an attempt to ruin the pope. The leak "immediately fueled rumors about schemes to take down a pope many see as left-leaning on some issues."

So it can't really be that the pope is a Marxist. We've had a few calls that the pope's degree in 1936 is impossible, given his age. Well, find out what researcher fed me the information and just fire 'em then. Anyway, the leak "immediately fueled rumors about schemes to take down a pope many see as left-leaning on some issues."

It's not just the Washington Post. There are a couple of other people who have raised this possibility. In fact, you know, there's a history of this with this pope. The pope will be reported to have said something, or the pope will be reported to be writing something that is off the wall and hard to believe, and then later somebody will come along from the Vatican and deny it and say that it was a trick or it was incorrect and the pope never said it, almost like the Vatican sends out trial balloons.

So I guess it's possible this could be one of those things. If it is, typical move by the left. And, by the way, it's entirely believable that the left would attempt to co-opt the Catholic Church. The left does not like the Catholic Church and the left does not like any religion, but the Catholic Church particularly is an institution that they despise, fear, all of that because it stands as stark reminder in opposition to what the left believes and seeks. The efforts to corrupt the Catholic Church and religion, period, by the left have been undertaken for years. So I guess it's possible it could be a leak.

But I'll tell you what, to get serious about this for just a second. I mean, here you have a papal encyclical about how the rich nations of the world are destroying the planet with global warming and need to give even more money to poor nations. I mean, this is right out of the Democrat Party playbook, right out of the leftist Alinsky manual, or any other leftist manual. Meanwhile, Catholics and Christians are being wiped out all over the world by Muslims and other enemies. Literally wiped out.

Catholics and Christians are being targeted for mass murder all over the world, and here we get a papal encyclical on climate change and global warming? I don't know. The two don't go together. If we're gonna have a papal encyclical, you would think it be something opposing war or the real enemies of people. Is climate change an enemy of the Catholic Church? Is climate change an enemy of Catholics? Even if it is happening, as they say, is climate change a matter of faith? Is it something that the church believes is a weapon being used against the faithful? I don't know folks. It just doesn't wash here. And that's why when I first heard the pope start talking about economics, just like in this encyclical on global warming, just sounded like pure, not even diluted, Marxism.

Here is it is from The Daily Caller today: "Data from America�s most advanced climate monitoring system shows the US has undergone a cooling trend over the last decade, despite recent claims by government scientists that warming has accelerated worldwide during that time. The US Climate Reference Network was developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to provide 'high-quality' climate data. The network consists of 114 stations across the US in areas NOAA expects no development for the next 50 to 100 years. The climate stations use three independent measurements of temperature and precipitation to provide 'continuity of record and maintenance of well-calibrated and highly accurate observations.'

This is the most advanced climate station data, which shows that the US is in a 10-year cooling trend which, by the way, is also widely known and widely accepted by people outside the delusional consensus.

Michelle Obama, during a conversation with students in the UK, in the United Kingdom. Yeah, that's right, Pope Francis was born in 1936, so he couldn't have a degree in 1936. I got the date screwed up. But he's got a degree in chemical technicians or whatever. But the point is that in all the research to find out what kind of technical, scientific background Pope Francis has, I just found one thing, which is more than what Algore has in the field. But that is it. I don't know what the date of his actual chemical degree is. Looks like it's sometime in the late fifties or early sixties, before he took up religious studies. But '36 was the year he was born.
...
Okay. Sorry, folks, for the goof-up. Here's the skinny on Pope Francis and his education in chemistry. This is according to the National Catholic Reporter. "Pope Francis studied chemistry and worked as a chemist prior to entering the seminary," before he began his life with God. But the chemistry diploma is from "a state-run technical secondary school" -- this is the National Catholic Reporter --which is comparable to "a certificate from a community college in the US."

That's the extent of the pope's scientific education and knowledge. So all the rest of this is politics. All the rest of it is politics. That entire papal... Well, we haven't even seen it yet. Whatever has been leaked, the leaked aspects of the papal encyclical are pure politics. And they're right out of the left. Pick any Democrat Party candidate, and it's what they're saying. Any leftist, any socialist around the world, it's what they're all saying.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: This is Stacy in Fort Collins, Colorado. Great to have you with us. Hi.
...
CALLER: Thank you. I'm calling on a topic I never thought I would be calling about. Not politics, but religion. I am a Catholic, and I'm in so much pain today at the possibility that my pope is spreading Marxist error. I will refrain from judging him until I've read the encyclical, and I will hopefully give him the benefit of the doubt and maybe this is all taken out of context. But it will not shock me if it is true. I think there is... You know, a lot of people are using this as a way and a vehicle to discredit the Church.

But I want to point out that there is precedence for this in the Catholic Church all the way back from its inception. Judas was an apostle who chose politics and power over God, and he ended up betraying our Lord with a kiss. And if the pope chooses Marxism over the mystical body of Christ, this is indeed a betrayal on a scale that we haven't seen before. It also is a realization of what the Blessed Mother warned us against at Fatima, which was that communism would spread her errors.

So I am... I'm absolutely distraught that I have to come out and defend my church against this, but I hope that people don't use this just to discredit it. It's kind of like the Constitution. You know, we have the bedrock principles of our Constitution, and people pervert and try to use that for their own benefit all the time. So I see the church, whose documents have not changed... The teaching of the church is still the same, but people are using her to push their own agenda.

RUSH: Well, here's the troubling thing. Politics by its very nature is subject to change. There's nothing... Very few articles of faith in real terms in politics. You've got a plethora of different political views. You have elections where people win and lose, various different theories are implemented, and people get to experience the results of those theories. In many cases it's hard, cold fact. Religion, at its root, is faith based. A church is the exact opposite of politics in the sense that politics is designed to bend and shape to the will of public opinion.

At least in a democracy or representative republic, it is.

Politics is designed to take the temperature of the American public and react accordingly (i.e., in elections), and there's all kinds of things that get encompassed in politics. The culture is part of politics, but religion is what it is. The Catholic Church is what it is. It's not supposed to bend and shape to accommodate the failings of the flock. It is not supposed to bend and shape so the flock can get away with committing sin. It's not supposed to redefine sin. The church is supposed to... This is why the left hates it.

CALLER: Correct, but the pope is not speaking ex cathedra. He is not speaking infallibly. He is giving out an encyclical, which is just his teaching. So it goes out to all the bishops and they can... You don't have to believe this to be Catholic. The bedrock principles that you have to believe as a Catholic are the same. So people can try and pervert them all they want to, but they don't change, like birth control and gay marriage. So people can try and politicize them all they want, but if you really look at the documents and the teachings of the Catholic Church, they are exactly the same as they were going back to Peter.

RUSH: For the most part, yeah. I mean, you've had Vatican I and Vatican II.

CALLER: Which is highly.... You know, this has been such a wound to the faith. I'm a traditional Catholic. I hate saying that word, but I go to the Tridentine Mass because I do see the modernism that has seeped into our church, and it has caused a great deal of pain and suffering. But the comfort that we have is that we do have these... You know, everything about the church is still there. So if people want to love the church, if they want to be Catholic, the rules haven't changed. The teachings and guideposts of it church are the same.

RUSH: The articles of faith.

CALLER: They are exactly the same. Despite how much people want to change them, they are the same.

RUSH: And that's the point. It is not supposed to bend and shape to popular opinion.

CALLER: Absolutely.

RUSH: That's why it's valuable. That's why terms like "the rock" are used. I know that the encyclical is not a religious article of faith, and Catholics are not required to believe it. It's not part of the actual teachings of the church. But what it represents... If this is true, if the pope has come out and said that, he just sounds like another member nation of the UN.
...
RUSH: I understand. It's gonna make a lot of people nervous because this is the kind of thing that the church has always been a safe haven from. There are exceptions, of course. But never forget, always remember, that even the Washington Post story reporting on this encyclical alludes to the possibility that it's totally made up and is a leak designed to harm Il Papa. And this has happened a lot. The pope is reported to have said something, whatever it is that sounds way off the beaten path, and people react to it.

And then later it is learned the Vatican announces, "The pope didn't say that! That was taken out of context. That's not what the pope actually said. This is the work of muckrakers trying to create problem. The pope never said it." It's happened a lot, which is what has made me think they engage in the trial balloon aspect of politics. Float something, see what the reaction is, and then decide later whether to legitimize it or say, "Nah-nah-nah-nah. That's a leak. That's not true."

We'll have to wait and see on this. But this has been predicted, rumored or what have you. This encyclical still hasn't been released, but even prior to today there has been speculation that what it's reported to be today was exactly what it is and is coming. Anyway, Stacy, so many years after Dan's Bake Sale at Fort Collins, it's great to know you're still there and part of us now.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/06/16/the_pope_s_leaked_marxist_climate_rant
Limbaugh also :gizz:

'd all over Donald Trump's presidential hat-thrown-in-ring speech. Hurray! I have been waiting for the Republican Primaries for years and now they're almost here! :woop:

# ? Jun 17, 2015 05:39

Ramadu: Aug 25, 2004; 2015 NFL MVP

icantfindaname posted:

Doesn't everyone know the Pope controls everything in the world from his secret Illuminati chamber beneath St. Peter's? Didn't they read that Dan Brown book?

The Black Pope in Solomons Temple

# ? Jun 17, 2015 06:14

FuzzySkinner: May 23, 2012

The Democrat Party doesn't like Catholics?

Really?

You mean the party that trotted out John F. Kennedy, and Robert F. Kennedy to my father's catholic family in the 1960's?

By the way, who's side was it that was making accusations that they were going to take orders directly from the Vatican? Sure wasn't the dems, was it?

# ? Jun 17, 2015 06:20

Troy Queef: Jan 12, 2013

FuzzySkinner posted:

The Democrat Party doesn't like Catholics?

Really?

You mean the party that trotted out John F. Kennedy, and Robert F. Kennedy to my father's catholic family in the 1960's?

By the way, who's side was it that was making accusations that they were going to take orders directly from the Vatican? Sure wasn't the dems, was it?

He's speaking to Catholics that basically vote solely upon the abortion issue, and generally speaking after Roe v. Wade a ton of Catholics went from a solid-Dem voting bloc (because of economic issues--most Catholic families in this country weren't very far removed from being poor immigrants in the '60s/'70s, and as such were pretty reliably pro-union, pro-civil rights, pro-peace (except with the Soviets), pro-more economic relief) to something much more muddled. (The whole "voucher" issue has also played a part in this shift, because of the sizable number of Catholics that send their kids to religious schools--another tradition that goes way back to early immigrant days, when a fervor was whipped up about Rome taking over the school system and as such the public schools became slightly anti-Catholic as a result--and want a bit of government coin to offset the cost of tuition.)

Also, again because of abortion (and increasingly, gay marriage) most of the people that whipped up the "ruled from the Vatican" sentiment when JFK (and before him, Al Smith--look up "rum, Romanism and rebellion") ran for office became very friendly with Catholic leaders and quickly forgot all about the whole Rome thing.

# ? Jun 17, 2015 06:36

Armani: Jun 22, 2008; Now it's been 17 summers since I've seen my mother

But every night I see her smile inside my dreams

GutBomb posted:

I read this article. This article is not what he purports it to be. It's about the history of swimming pools in the United States and how swimming pools used to be public. Once segregation kicked into high gear the public pools dried up and instead of public pools, new pools were gated affairs that required membership that was unsurprisingly unobtainable for most black people.

Get depressed: early public pools were heavily sexist, racist, and basically pedophile assembly lines.

http://thedollop.libsyn.com/the-dark-secret-of-swimming-pools

# ? Jun 17, 2015 09:53

RoanHorse: Dec 12, 2013

quote:

Look at what we now are commanded to accept, agree with, and support -- or else. Gay marriage, transgenderism, transracialism, trans-this, trans-that. We are supposed to sit by and accept all of this. Redefinitions of marriage to include...? No telling where it's going. But the definitions have been obliterated now.

Rachel Dolezal is actually loving delusional and it sucks that she's both being taken seriously, especially now that she's tied her hosed up story to Caitlyn Jenner's transition.
We had tons of trolls calling themselves 'transethnic' but that wasn't an actual thing that happened until Rachel was outed. It was always just dumb motherfuckers squinting or wearing blackface and justifying their use of slurs while simultaneously harassing trans people.

# ? Jun 17, 2015 15:03

WoodrowSkillson: Feb 24, 2005; *Gestures at 60 years of Lions history*

FuzzySkinner posted:

The Democrat Party doesn't like Catholics?

Really?

You mean the party that trotted out John F. Kennedy, and Robert F. Kennedy to my father's catholic family in the 1960's?

By the way, who's side was it that was making accusations that they were going to take orders directly from the Vatican? Sure wasn't the dems, was it?

Catholics are no longer huge democrats because of abortion and gay rights. My entire family has switched sides over the past 30 years or so and is now overwhelmingly hardline conservative, and the priesthood is also moving hard right.

# ? Jun 17, 2015 15:21

hhhat: Apr 29, 2008

Phone posted:

Welp, now you've done it. I'm telling the NC LAN thread.

There's only one barbecue sauce and it's Eastern style. Vinegar, brown sugar, and a poo poo load of red pepper. (the no items, fox only, final destination of bbq)

I came as soon as I could

# ? Jun 17, 2015 15:22

Shbobdb: Dec 16, 2010; by Reene

It's more "moral majority" coalition as opposed to "just" gay rights and abortion. It's less "since roe v wade" and more "since pat Robertson reached out to Catholic suburbanites".

How wedge issues are applied matters. Hispanic Catholics aren't running to the republican party. Urban Catholics are still solidly democratic (though the white ones is mostly a dying breed of racist union democrat).

# ? Jun 17, 2015 15:39

Tender Bender: Sep 17, 2004

It's amazing that the GOP is so committed to climate change denial that if the loving pope talks about it, their response is "The liberal conspiracy goes all the way to the Vatican!"

# ? Jun 17, 2015 15:47

FlamingLiberal: Jan 18, 2009; Would you like to play a game?

Yes Rush, the Catholic Church, which has enormous holdings in gold and other stuff, is totally run by a Marxist.

# ? Jun 17, 2015 15:48

Guilty Spork: Feb 26, 2011; Thunder rolled. It rolled a six.

Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:

The Weekly Standard Cover this week

Oh no! It's literally the homosexual steamroller!

# ? Jun 17, 2015 15:54

Happy_Misanthrope: Aug 3, 2007; "I wanted to kill you, go to your funeral, and anyone who showed up to mourn you, I wanted to kill them too."

Guilty Spork posted:

Oh no! It's literally the homosexual steamroller!

FALWELL WAS RIGHT

# ? Jun 17, 2015 16:32

Pirate Radar: Apr 18, 2008; You're not my Ruthie!
You're not my Debbie!
You're not my Sherry!

hhhat posted:

I came as soon as I could

What style of BBQ is that?

# ? Jun 17, 2015 16:45

Rev. Bleech_: Oct 19, 2004; ~OKAY, WE'LL DRINK TO OUR LEGS!~

Madmarker posted:

Hey, the South also has the best barbecue (Lexington Style)

People have gotten shot for claiming Lexington style is superior to eastern style, and they deserved every bullet.

Chantilly Say posted:

hhhat posted:
I came as soon as I could

What style of BBQ is that?

I'd say it most closely resembles Alabama style.

# ? Jun 17, 2015 16:50

RareAcumen: Dec 28, 2012

New York Deep Dish is not my favorite. I like lots of sauce in my pizza.

# ? Jun 17, 2015 16:53

icantfindaname: Jul 1, 2008

Armani posted:

Get depressed: [the] early ~~public pools~~ United States were heavily sexist, racist, and basically pedophile assembly lines.

# ? Jun 17, 2015 17:04

Periodiko: Jan 30, 2005; Uh.

A Fancy 400 lbs posted:

I had MSNBC on for background noise while I was doing some housework and forgot to turn it off when The Ed Show came on. I'm actually kind of glad because he did a hilarious(ly terrible) fake interview with Donald Trump's campaign announcement and was giving Trump huge sloppy blowjobs while his guests were all like "Yeah, Trump does say a lot of poo poo that makes him stand out from the rest of the field. The problem is about 5% of it is based in any kind of reality" while Ed just got pissed that they would dare say something negative about Our Savior Trump.

Wait, what? Ed Schultz? Are you... do you know who Ed Schultz is? Are you being Colbert'd? What?

edit:
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/hell-mustve-frozen-over-because-ed-schultz-is-defending-donald-trump/

quote:

�I know everybody thinks that Trump is a joke and he jumps in front of the parade all the time and is a carnival barker and all that kind of stuff, but if it is about the economy, he�s created more jobs than any of them, than all of the candidates put together. He�s done more deals, he�s signed more contracts, he has the business experience, he�s the guy who�s taking the risk, he�s the guy who has been successful. I mean, Trump�s business experience, compared to the rest of the Republican field, is unparalleled, so why don�t they listen to him?�

What?

Periodiko fucked around with this message at 17:10 on Jun 17, 2015

# ? Jun 17, 2015 17:06

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? May 19, 2024 02:56

Tarezax: Sep 12, 2009; MORT cancels dance: interrupted by MORT

How much did Trump pay to make Schultz say that?

# ? Jun 17, 2015 17:14

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > Right Wing Media: congratulations Rush Limbaugh on three full years of sobriety!

«‹›3441 »