|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:Good god. Skydance paid a bucketload for the rights and they want to cash in as much as possible before they revert to Cameron in a few years.
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2015 23:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 22:42 |
|
|
Kush posted:I think the biggest reason they are hiding him from any promos is because MEGASPOILERS he is playing Skynet and it is really difficult to cut material for the trailer without spoiling that. That's way cooler than him playing Future Soldier #11 or whatever it looked like his part was from the preview in Entertainment Weekly months ago. I hope this is true and since you've just seen the movie I trust you.
|
|
#
?
Jun 25, 2015 23:56
|
|
|
AndyElusive posted:That's way cooler than him playing Future Soldier #11 or whatever it looked like his part was from the preview in Entertainment Weekly months ago. I hope this is true and since you've just seen the movie I trust you. That part was leaked early, along with the revelation that he's made of nanobots and some other stuff which hopefully isn't quite as dumb as it sounds.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 00:13
|
|
|
Matt Smith was apparently going to be the Terminator who infects John Connor with nanobots and they were going to pretty big lengths to hide it to make the twist catch people off guard. Of course, then that recent trailer came out and...
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 00:46
|
|
|
Yo I just saw this and really liked it. It's fun. So gently caress you all.
SebastianK fucked around with this message at 16:10 on Jul 14, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 00:48
|
|
|
Grendels Dad posted:Mother of God. I try not to be too down on this but the idea of there being two more after this no matter what is hella depressing.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 02:51
|
|
|
Like Cameron will actually ever make another T film. He's too busy making lovely movies about blue aliens.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 02:54
|
|
|
Well sure, if nothing else, the rights reverting back to him means no more lovely sequels (unless he farms it out to other directors I guess).
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 02:57
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:He's too busy making lovely movies about blue aliens. I really hope these sequels flop.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 03:00
|
|
|
Xenomrph posted:Well sure, if nothing else, the rights reverting back to him means no more lovely sequels (unless he farms it out to other directors I guess). I don't want any more Terminator movies. Even with Cameron. The story is so poo poo at this point that there isn't anything left to do with it. It's just loving boring garbage all the way through. (T1-T2 excluded)
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 03:02
|
|
|
CelticPredator posted:I don't want any more Terminator movies. Even with Cameron. The story is so poo poo at this point that there isn't anything left to do with it. It's just loving boring garbage all the way through. (T1-T2 excluded)
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 04:30
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:Like Cameron will actually ever make another T film. He's too busy making lovely movies about blue aliens. Is he really? It's been six years since the Blue Alien movie.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 04:39
|
|
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:Good god. Arnie's 67, gotta get these in the can now.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 04:41
|
|
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:Is he really? It's been six years since the Blue Alien movie. He's filming 3 of them back to back right now (or in post production, but either way they're coming out Winter 2016-18). e: Actually I'm off by a year. computer parts fucked around with this message at 04:51 on Jun 26, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 04:49
|
|
|
Milky Moor posted:Matt Smith was apparently going to be the Terminator who infects John Connor with nanobots and they were going to pretty big lengths to hide it to make the twist catch people off guard. Of course, then that recent trailer came out and... Both this and the previous spoiler are the same thing. The character is both of those things.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 07:43
|
|
|
Xenomrph posted:I'm the kind of "fan" who'd rather have a bazillion more sequels even if 99% of them are poo poo. I'd rather people try new ideas and gently caress it up than never try at all. If people tried new ideas, there wouldn't be a need for a bazillion Terminator sequels.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 08:06
|
|
|
Xenomrph posted:Why? Who cares? Worst case scenario, don't see the other sequels, pretend they don't exist, and then the movie rights revert back to James Cameron in 2019. I'm quite good at not seeing movies I don't like, but they'll still hog some space in popular discourse no matter how lovely they are and I simply don't look forward to skipping so many discussions about how Terminator-y Terminator 6: DOS Strikes Back is.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 08:13
|
|
|
How can there be a new >90% superhero movie like every month including about loving ant-man, but they can't make a decent Terminator flick in 20 years. Goddamn.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 09:40
|
|
|
mobby_6kl posted:How can there be a new >90% superhero movie like every month including about loving ant-man, but they can't make a decent Terminator flick in 20 years. Goddamn. Adaptations, dude. They still have 60 years worth of material to pick from, whereas for Terminator sequels they just have mountains of cocaine and variations of the question "What if, like, this time they time-traveled really hard?"
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 09:45
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:Like Cameron will actually ever make another T film. He's too busy making lovely movies about blue aliens. Why do people hate on avatar? I like nothing more to sticking in the blu ray extended edition and just bask in a stories beautiful visuals for a few hours. It really is a glorious film. I cannot wait for the sequels. Great hearing positive reviews so far for the new terminator film, however that won't last long when the usual goons get into fights about who hates it more. Just like ask good films.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 09:55
|
|
mobby_6kl posted:How can there be a new >90% superhero movie like every month including about loving ant-man, but they can't make a decent Terminator flick in 20 years. Goddamn. It's easy to make a good film when it all boils down to superhero/x fights a villain or villains. Throw in a dash of 'will they won't they' romance and, bam, winner. Terminator is, unfortunately for gently caress You It's Year-era of films, not quite so easy to piece together. T1 and T2 are basically complete things.
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 10:32
|
|
|
CelticPredator posted:If people tried new ideas, there wouldn't be a need for a bazillion Terminator sequels. Grendels Dad posted:I'm quite good at not seeing movies I don't like, but they'll still hog some space in popular discourse no matter how lovely they are and I simply don't look forward to skipping so many discussions about how Terminator-y Terminator 6: DOS Strikes Back is.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 12:55
|
|
|
mobby_6kl posted:How can there be a new >90% superhero movie like every month including about loving ant-man, but they can't make a decent Terminator flick in 20 years. Goddamn. Because it's easier to aim for mediocrity and succeed. When you make a film so inoffensive, you get your "it was okay, 3/5" reviews that all show as positive on RT or whatever. And all those superhero movies don't really have anything that "haunts" them in the past except shittier superheromovies. Movies like Terminator have goddamn masterpieces they are compared to, so it's inevitable you are running into disappointments. As I said, some (most) people are going to say Genisys was a piece of poo poo, but most people aren't going to say it was really mediocre. They tried something different, some of it works nicely, some of it fails, but I wasn't disappointed with it. It's the third best film in the franchise if that means anything to anyone. And I liked how it begins where the third ended.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 13:36
|
|
|
Myrddin_Emrys posted:Why do people hate on avatar? I like nothing more to sticking in the blu ray extended edition and just bask in a stories beautiful visuals for a few hours. It really is a glorious film. Because it was done better the first time as Dances With Wolves.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:03
|
|
|
Noah is a good recent example where it would have been so easy for the studio to have Russell Crowe star in a bland, predictable Bible adaptation, and it would have been a monster success without much effort at all. Instead they invested all that money in someone who wasn't going to play it safe, and they were punished for it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 14:04
|
|
|
Saw this yesterday and it's one of the worst movies I've ever seen. RIP Terminator franchise Emilia Clarke is so bad as Sarah Connor it's not even funny. Arnold is just there for comedy.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 15:37
|
|
|
Myrddin_Emrys posted:Why do people hate on avatar? I like nothing more to sticking in the blu ray extended edition and just bask in a stories beautiful visuals for a few hours. It really is a glorious film. It was aggressively boring, insultingly manipulative, cardboard characters, and starred Sam Worthington among other things.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 15:40
|
|
|
Worst thing about Avatar isn't that Cameron is making those instead of more Terminator (because like y'all said where else can you go with it) but that he never did that Battle Angel Alita adaptation he was always just about to do. Shame as that has tons of hyper violent robot action and dystopian landscapes for miles plus a ton of imagery in it was inspired by The Terminator and Hardware and Blade Runner anyway. Plus it inspired Cameron himself according to him along with other sci-fi stuff like Elysium. Cameraon was at one point even saying Avatar was like a test run for doing Battle Angel Alita. What could have been. The ship has definitely sailed though as any Battle Angel movie now would be dismissed as hyper derivative like Dredd 2012. oohhboy posted:It was aggressively boring, insultingly manipulative, cardboard characters, and starred Sam Worthington among other things. Did this dude just have like the greatest agent ever for two years or something?
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 15:49
|
|
|
Skilleddk posted:Saw this yesterday and it's one of the worst movies I've ever seen. RIP Terminator franchise I know this movie will be dogshit but I'm still giving Arnold  because I like Arnold.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 15:49
|
|
|
Skilleddk posted:Saw this yesterday and it's one of the worst movies I've ever seen. RIP Terminator franchise Oh dear, I was hoping at least it was stupid fun. If Arnold couldn't save it  . Really worse than Salvation?
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 15:56
|
|
Immortan posted:I know this movie will be dogshit but I'm still giving Arnold
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 16:02
|
|
|
I had a feeling Emilia Clarke might ruin this movie, she's so far from what Linda Hamilton did in T2 its ridiculous. Even just in the first trailer when I saw her firing a pistol it didn't look right, something was off about it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 16:07
|
|
|
Basebf555 posted:Noah is a good recent example where it would have been so easy for the studio to have Russell Crowe star in a bland, predictable Bible adaptation, and it would have been a monster success without much effort at all. Instead they invested all that money in someone who wasn't going to play it safe, and they were punished for it. Noah is the first movie in a long, long time that had me so bored I turned it off. And it featured talking rock monsters! You've got to do some serious loving up to make talking rock monsters boring.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 16:10
|
|
|
Wade Wilson posted:Noah is the first movie in a long, long time that had me so bored I turned it off. And it featured talking rock monsters! If the rock monster part is what had you bored it's probably best you didn't see the third act.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 16:24
|
|
|
oohhboy posted:Oh dear, I was hoping at least it was stupid fun. If Arnold couldn't save it
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 16:52
|
|
|
Wade Wilson posted:Noah is the first movie in a long, long time that had me so bored I turned it off. And it featured talking rock monsters! What. Now I need to see Noah.
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 17:05
|
|
|
AndyElusive posted:What. Now I need to see Noah. Its just interesting enough to get certain religious groups pissed off, but not quite good enough to overcome that and pull in the audience it needed to be the smash-hit it could have been. I love Arnofsky though and the film is beautiful to look at, so I actually enjoyed it quite a bit. A lot of the landscape shots remind me of the opening credits of Prometheus. It has a very pre-historical feel to it. Basebf555 fucked around with this message at 17:29 on Jun 26, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 17:26
|
|
|
AndyElusive posted:What. Now I need to see Noah. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M59hlry5kOU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IMBJyztU2Q
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 17:30
|
|
|
Immortan posted:I know this movie will be dogshit but I'm still giving Arnold
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 17:46
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 22:42 |
|
|
Why not just go blow poo poo up with him instead?
|
|
#
?
Jun 26, 2015 18:03
|
|