|
KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:Autotrader, Cars.com, Craigslist. I've been given a $10,473 out-the-door price over email for that one. That seem decent to all you goons for an '06 Prius with ~65k miles?
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 00:41 |
|
|
# ? May 20, 2024 01:19 |
|
khysanth posted:I've been given a $10,473 out-the-door price over email for that one. That seem decent to all you goons for an '06 Prius with ~65k miles? OTD just under 10k sounds fair ish to me.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 01:30 |
|
KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:OTD just under 10k sounds fair ish to me. I just saw the carfax says it was a former lease. Is this a big deal?
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 03:02 |
|
khysanth posted:I just saw the carfax says it was a former lease. Is this a big deal? quote:Jeremy's car was a Toyota Auris, which he claimed was "the fastest car in the world" because it was a rental and he could take the car "to the maximum" http://topgear.wikia.com/wiki/New_Zealand_Race https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYt9DO5WXr8
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 03:12 |
|
Hadlock posted:http://topgear.wikia.com/wiki/New_Zealand_Race A lease is not a rental car.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 03:13 |
|
khysanth posted:I just saw the carfax says it was a former lease. Is this a big deal? Pretty much most 2-3 year old used cars at a dealer were a lease, they're as fine as any other used car all other things being equal. Obviously that car had another owner in the intervening years which is again totally expected given the terms of most leases and the age of that car.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 03:28 |
|
Also, being owned for 5 ywears by the PO is a pretty good sign.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 04:01 |
|
khysanth posted:I just saw the carfax says it was a former lease. Is this a big deal? A personal lease is fine. Just another way of buying a car, basically. You want to avoid rental cars. I am a little surprised that the car had a coil replaced very early, though it doesn't seem like there have been any subsequent issues.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 12:55 |
|
KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:A personal lease is fine. Just another way of buying a car, basically. You want to avoid rental cars. He also had a fuel system cleaning. Someone got upsold on a "30,000mi service."
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 16:08 |
|
nm posted:He also had a fuel system cleaning. Someone got upsold on a "30,000mi service." Man, this is the shadiest upsell I see from new car dealers. I've got 2 Ford dealers near me, one of them is no bullshit and just does what I tell them to, the other tells me that I need a $90 throttle body cleaning every time I visit.
|
# ? Jul 10, 2015 16:10 |
|
I just got my first job out of grad-school. I'm moving to Boston from NYC and I am going to need a car. My wife also needs a car, so this is going to be an expensive time in our lives. My car: Proposed Budget: $5K cash, willing to finance + 11K (So 16K total) New or Used: Whatever Body Style: Hatchback How will you be using the car?: Daily commute (2 - 15 miles, housing is still being decided), monthly trips to family (160 miles round trip) What aspects are most important to you? The most important things to me are cost and fuel economy. I would like something fun to drive and I strongly prefer manual transmissions. Also I grew up driving in California, so snow is going to be an experience. I'm an aware and calm person, so I don't expect it to be too big a hurdle if I take it slow. Also, my job is non-essential and I can do some work from home. I'm thinking right now about a Mazda 3 or a Ford Fiesta. Honda Fits are nice too, but I don't like how they look. I also take great care and pride in equipment, enjoy working on cars, and tend to own things for a very long time. Wife's car: Proposed Budget: $5K New or Used: Used Body Style: Hatchback How will you be using the car?: Daily commute (10 - 30 miles, housing is still being decided) What aspects are most important to her? Can't drive manual, but otherwise similar to above. Maybe go for a Subaru Impreza, Honda Fit or Toyota Prius. She's a native to New England, so snow is a non-issue. Some financial information: I'll be making ~$96 k + 5 k relocation. I've signed papers, but I'm waiting on background checks and need to pee in a cup. My wife is currently unemployed (my fault for moving), but she is in a licensed profession. I expect she'll have a job within 4 months earning 45 - 60 k. We have about 15 k cash cushion. Her job might be essential, so she may need to drive through snow conditions. It seems bass-akwards that we're putting less money into her car, but that is because she will be moving up first and needs to bootstrap before financing will be available. Our current thought is for her to pick up something cheap but reliable (probably a early 2nd gen Prius) with cash on hand, and then finance my car. I'm thinking of buying a new Ford Fiesta SE (the 1.0 with the eco-boost). I expect to own it for 7-10 years and when I calculated out the cost per mile over that time-frame the new car actually came out cheaper than the used, assuming a 250,000 mile lifespan and equivalent maintenance requirements. But I'm also a new grad thinking of buying a new car and could probably use a stern talking to. Are we being reasonable? Are there better cars for us to be looking at?
|
# ? Jul 11, 2015 16:33 |
|
Dobbs_Head posted:I just got my first job out of grad-school. I'm moving to Boston from NYC and I am going to need a car. My wife also needs a car, so this is going to be an expensive time in our lives. You'll get a much newer car than a mazda3 and the mazda3s have some rust issues, which makes age in the ne a concern.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2015 18:41 |
|
KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:I live in Boston, too. I drove a RWD 1 series for years. Snow tires. With xDrive, you're paying $1,800 more to have a shittier car, and it will be on performance run-flats, so your snow performance will suck anyway. Did the RWD 2 series drive reasonably with snow tires on it during our winter from hell? If there's no need for xDrive, what are this thread's thoughts on using something like Lease Trader?
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 23:58 |
|
Anything on snow tires is going to drive better than anything with AWD and not-snow tires. You realize that the enticing 499/mo lease payment includes the cash incentive, right?
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 00:34 |
|
KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:Anything on snow tires is going to drive better than anything with AWD and not-snow tires. Right, I was planning on getting AWD and snow tires (I thought getting snow tires in the winter was assumed). What surprised me is that a small car with RWD performed well in the snow, even with snow tires. KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:You realize that the enticing 499/mo lease payment includes the cash incentive, right? Yes, though tanks for making sure I wasn't making foolish assumptions - it's why I asked for feedback in the first place. Any red flags I should be aware of with lease trader (aside from what they clearly state - such as paying BMW to transfer, insisting on a mechanic, having a lawyer look over the lease, and needing to pay for shipping)? diadem fucked around with this message at 04:03 on Jul 14, 2015 |
# ? Jul 14, 2015 04:01 |
|
Poeple forget light weight cars have less momentum so they are much easier to control in those oh crap situations. My BRZ with a set of blizzak tires handles just about anything the Great Lakes decide to dump on me. Modern traction control is pretty amazing and combine that with the benefits of driving a lightweight manual car, you can prevent those little oh crap situations from turning into oh poo poo situations. If main roads have 6" of snow on them then I won't be driving no matter what car I own.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 05:21 |
Are Chryslers still godawful deathtrap unreliable pieces of poo poo? Part of me sees the 200c and says "That's nice and stylish and the interior looks pretty awesome and I could almost see myself in one" and another part says "CHRYSLER LOL"
|
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 07:14 |
|
The general opinion of people in this thread is that the 200 is a large piece of poo poo. Yeah, it's a nice looking car but for the price you can do a lot better. I am not a big fan of Chrysler products but I did look at them when I was looking for a new car. After comparing them to every other manufacturer I still did not feel compelled to buy one based on what I have read here on people's driving experiences with them. Edit: the two stories below mine seem to reflect what I have read here, they cite specific examples of why you should not buy a 200. Based on their input alone, I would not buy one. driguy fucked around with this message at 12:58 on Jul 14, 2015 |
# ? Jul 14, 2015 08:41 |
|
Dramatika posted:Are Chryslers still godawful deathtrap unreliable pieces of poo poo? Part of me sees the 200c and says "That's nice and stylish and the interior looks pretty awesome and I could almost see myself in one" and another part says "CHRYSLER LOL" Holy poo poo yes! I've been driving rentals for the last month or so and I can easily say that the modern Chrysler 200 is one of the worst cars I've driven in my life. Check out the car and driver review on this thing. They do a good job of tearing that car apart. THAT SAID - it isn't a bad idea to take a 200 for a test drive. Its exaggerated weaknesses will let you understand what not to take for granted in a car. Edit/Safety Disclaimer: Be aware that when you test drive it the blind spots are a bit more extreme than a normal car, so be more vigilant than you are used to. On a similar note, be pensive about trusting the backup camera. It's not as honest as backup cameras in other cars. Edit2: Yes - UConnect is actually pretty nice, but don't let that distract you from the issues plaguing the rest of the car. Also be warned that my Galaxy S6 has been constantly freezing ever since I paired with UConnect. diadem fucked around with this message at 12:30 on Jul 14, 2015 |
# ? Jul 14, 2015 12:20 |
|
I had a Chrysler 200 as a rental for a week. The car looked good. That's where the good stopped. Blind spots everywhere (this might be every mid-size sedan in this segment now?), lots of highway noise, gutless engine, etc. It made the 2015 Jetta SE 1.8T I had the month before seem like a BMW. edit: Also YES to to the previous poster, the backup camera is complete poo poo
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 12:40 |
|
Things have changed slightly. We landed an apartment a 10 minute bike ride from my work and a 5 minute walk from transport into downtown Boston. Which means we probably won't need 2 cars. Yay! The place is a little more expensive than the stuff further out, but not paying insurance on a second vehicle more than makes up for it. So we're shifting to buying a single car, looking for a maximum of 6-7 k. We're still thinking about a Honda Fit or a Prius. The Boston used car market seems pretty expensive, at least for the cars worth buying. People in Boston also seem to have actually driven their Prius's, with a lot of them on the high side of 160 k.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 16:24 |
|
Dramatika posted:Are Chryslers still godawful deathtrap unreliable pieces of poo poo? Part of me sees the 200c and says "That's nice and stylish and the interior looks pretty awesome and I could almost see myself in one" and another part says "CHRYSLER LOL" You're combing a chrysler drivetrain that isn't a V8 manual (the good Jeep engines were AMC motors) with chrysler build quality and Fiat engineering.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 16:35 |
|
The Pentastar V6 and the 8 speed auto seem pretty good.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 17:28 |
|
KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:The Pentastar V6 and the 8 speed auto seem pretty good. Do you mean 9 speed? http://www.truedelta.com/Chrysler-200/problems-1050/2015 http://www.truedelta.com/Jeep-Cherokee/problems-143/2014
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 17:42 |
|
No, I mean the 8 speed used in the 300. edit: this was in response to the "all non V8 manual chrysler powertrains are poo poo" comment, not a reference to the 200.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 18:07 |
|
I wouldn't use a rental to evaluate the model. Go test drive a new/used one off the lot maybe.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 19:27 |
|
Are there any huge known issues with the latest model year RAV4? My wife is pretty stressed out post-accident (December) and feels like she wants something with a little higher seating position and better safety rating than the 07 Prius. It's still worth a bit on trade-in (low miles) and her commute is short enough that we won't see a huge difference in gas $. I haven't seen anything major in a tacit googlin', but you guys are a really good source of known issues--and I know some newer Toyota engines have had TSB oil-drinking issues. Thoughts?
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 19:59 |
|
LeeMajors posted:Are there any huge known issues with the latest model year RAV4? Show her IIHS small overlap crash video if you want to get out of buying a new car. I don't think any car looks good after this test. rav4 -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pl4-cO6pO34
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 21:25 |
|
Calidus posted:Show her IIHS small overlap crash video if you want to get out of buying a new car. I don't think any car looks good after this test. Pretty gnarly, but the '15 got a green G in that category. Im not opposed to getting a new car for her, just want to make sure im not wandering into a mechanically flawed vehicle.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 22:19 |
|
Calidus posted:Show her IIHS small overlap crash video if you want to get out of buying a new car. I don't think any car looks good after this test. You're not very good at looking at small overlap crash videos. That test is a perfect performance.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 22:27 |
|
LeeMajors posted:Pretty gnarly, but the '15 got a green G in that category. The AR is pretty reliable, it's been out in one variant or another for seven years and I haven't heard anything specifically bad. The AWD system is not the greatest, but it's not mechanically flawed.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 22:29 |
|
KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:You're not very good at looking at small overlap crash videos. That test is a perfect performance. It is a perfect performance but it looks terrifying and that is what I was going for.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 23:17 |
|
Calidus posted:It is a perfect performance but it looks terrifying and that is what I was going for. That still makes no sense, because if you compare that 'good' to a car that wasn't designed for that test, it really makes me want a RAV4.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 23:58 |
|
IOwnCalculus posted:That still makes no sense, because if you compare that 'good' to a car that wasn't designed for that test, it really makes me want a RAV4. I was trying to point out crashes are scary even in a big bad rear end suv at 40mph. I will stop making GBS threads up the thread now.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 01:57 |
|
mobby_6kl posted:I wouldn't use a rental to evaluate the model. Go test drive a new/used one off the lot maybe. My rental 200 had less than 100 miles on it.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 02:18 |
|
Auron posted:My rental 200 had less than 100 miles on it. My 200 rental had 325 miles on it
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 15:00 |
|
KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:The AR is pretty reliable, it's been out in one variant or another for seven years and I haven't heard anything specifically bad. The AWD system is not the greatest, but it's not mechanically flawed. That's good to hear, thanks for the info. It'll be the transverse 2WD since I live on a southern coastal plain. I haven't been able to find much of anything else bad about the 2AR, but my mom's car (10 Highlander) runs the 1AR-FE and it's been dead reliable for them. I just know some of the Camrys and older RAV4s were noted for drinking oil out of a McDonalds straw. She took my Prius and we bought a 'beater' (old 4Runner ) for me to drive when her car was totaled, but she has sort of gotten progressively more paranoid about being in another accident. I was a passenger in a pretty serious wreck when I was 16 (unhurt) and it made me jumpy as hell, so I can see where she's coming from. The Prius is rated really well, but she's used to an SUV (had an Escape) and feels way more comfortable in a larger car. RAV4 was a top safety pick and she loves the way it looks. Not like we can't afford it or anything, but letting go of extra money always feels bad. I hate dealers. Wish me luck.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 18:47 |
|
I make part of the engine for the Chrysler 200. I would not buy one. What you have to remember about it, the fiat 500, and whatever model Jeep has the same powertrain is that Chrysler went full retard and decided to fit an all new 9 speed automatic transmission built at an all new factory in South Carolina staffed with all new and somewhat clueless workers, into a series of low cost econoboxes. This is definitely a recipe for quality.
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 19:15 |
|
Thinking of picking this up tomorrow. Any red flags before I pull the trigger? Would it be unreasonable to ask for my mechanic to take a look on a certified pre-owned car? edit: I'd be driving it in Boston winters with snow tiers diadem fucked around with this message at 23:58 on Jul 15, 2015 |
# ? Jul 15, 2015 23:36 |
|
|
# ? May 20, 2024 01:19 |
|
diadem posted:Thinking of picking this up tomorrow. Any red flags before I pull the trigger? Would it be unreasonable to ask for my mechanic to take a look on a certified pre-owned car? No and no. I would always have a used car inspection unless you are qualified enough to do it. You never know what they might have missed or ignores
|
# ? Jul 15, 2015 23:40 |