|
Tracula posted:Can I reference my past post about his published book? You could but it wouldn't change my mind. I mean, Bob can be extremely stupid and pathetic, but it's self-contained. He doesn't start harassment campaigns against co-workers, he doesn't commit fraud with an indiegogo campaign, and he doesn't make people work for him for "exposure." He's cringeworthy but as long as he doesn't hurt anyone else I can't really dislike him.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 08:20 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 04:24 |
|
Alacron posted:Well I'm happy for him, Bob isn't offensive enough to me that I'd begrudge him some good fortune. I'm guessing the piece will be about web critics in general, with Bob as a case study, which might be interesting. But if that's the case I can't help but feel that a current or former Channel Awesome contributor would've been a better choice of subject. Whatever. Speculation over. High Warlord Zog fucked around with this message at 08:29 on Aug 1, 2015 |
# ? Aug 1, 2015 08:22 |
|
Annointed posted:As someone who is immune to ishtar, that to me is like putting a fly trap over a maggot infested garbage bin. Dammit, foiled again.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 08:30 |
|
DStecks posted:Man of Steel sucked, HBomberguy can suck my dick. What a joyless, pointless, aimless waste of my loving time. You know a movie's good when +50% of the dialogue is other people philosophizing about Superman, but by the end of the film I have no idea what Superman actually believes in or stands for. Like, I can't even say that killing Zod and all those implied civilians is out of character for him, because he never gets to assert his character. Clark Kent has no arc, he just is Superman and everybody spends the whole movie talking about "Wow, a Superman" or "Oh no, a Superman". I always thought Man of Steel is what you get when you try to copy Batman Begins for a Superman movie, but then remember you are Hack Snyder and have no talent.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 13:12 |
|
Dunno about you but I am SO looking forward to this discussion about SvB:DoJ. It's gonna be so much fun. Even typing SvB:DoJ is fun. Try it!
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 13:36 |
|
KayTee posted:Dunno about you but I am SO looking forward to this discussion about SvB:DoJ. I'm looking forward to the reviews of it especially Brad's midnight screening
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 13:54 |
|
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:33 |
|
Does the rifftrax crew do " documentries " ?
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:36 |
|
The site's FAQ, word-for-word: We support the equal rights for women in all industries. We are against online harassment of all types. We are for ethics and transparency in journalism. Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, Can we please talk about this instead of Man of Steel for 5,000,000th time? Though it may be harder to come up jokes that can top the brilliance of "Hack Snyder".
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:42 |
|
Time to dunk my head in cheap vodka, crush up mint candy to use as pretend-coke and watch this thing
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:47 |
|
Holy poo poo. They still have backers.
High Warlord Zog fucked around with this message at 15:02 on Aug 1, 2015 |
# ? Aug 1, 2015 14:59 |
|
Interesting movie. I give it two out of five Lorem Ipsums.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:02 |
|
The kind of people who would back them in the first place won't be shaken off by anything short of a public statement that Sarkeesian was right about everything.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:02 |
|
Many people, when presented with evidence that they have wasted time, effort, and money on a worldview that is foolish, will double down and renew their devotion with greater fervor. This is easier and more comfortable than accepting that they an their friends have made a completely ridiculous, stupid decision and devoted their lives to lies. It's really hard to be superior when you done hosed up.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:11 |
|
DStecks posted:Man of Steel sucked, HBomberguy can suck my dick. What a joyless, pointless, aimless waste of my loving time. You know a movie's good when +50% of the dialogue is other people philosophizing about Superman, but by the end of the film I have no idea what Superman actually believes in or stands for. Like, I can't even say that killing Zod and all those implied civilians is out of character for him, because he never gets to assert his character. Clark Kent has no arc, he just is Superman and everybody spends the whole movie talking about "Wow, a Superman" or "Oh no, a Superman". \/\/\/\/ EDIT: Yeah, and that's what I thought was part of the problem with the film. It was trying to mimic Nolan's Batman films by doing a similar visual style and bringing on the same screenwriter. I know this has probably been said a billion times before, but that dark tone doesn't really fit Superman. Max Wilco fucked around with this message at 15:41 on Aug 1, 2015 |
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:22 |
|
Max Wilco posted:Didn't David S. Goyer work on Man of Steel too, though? http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0333060/?ref_=nv_sr_1
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:24 |
|
On the SVU chat, was their video game episode better or worse than the CSI video game episode? In the CSI one they had silly masks and somehow had a group psychological break with reality so they all thought they were really playing a GTA style game.Jack Gladney posted:Don't forget the one where Mikhail from Lost is smuggling rare animals and the whole team passes around a basketball with a gibbon hidden inside to keep it away from him like they're the Globetrotters. What the gently caress? That poor gibbon. Munch at least should have realized that the laws of motion effect both the inside and the outside of the basketball. boom boom boom posted:I just don't see what Mr. Plinkett loving his cat has to do with Superman letting thousands of people die. Clark Kent lets 1 person die and Superman kills 1 alien. Unless we're going to start laying all the deaths in New York on the Avengers.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:32 |
|
Gyges posted:On the SVU chat, was their video game episode better or worse than the CSI video game episode? In the CSI one they had silly masks and somehow had a group psychological break with reality so they all thought they were really playing a GTA style game. If that's the same episode of CSI I'm thinking of, it's the one where it turns out that the game developer conspired with said group to rob a bank or something along those lines. I don't know if that makes it better or worse, though, but I remember it was pretty ludicrous. There was an episode of CSI: NY that focused on Second Life. I've seen a couple of clips of it and it's pretty hilarious.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 15:54 |
|
"Hack Snyder" is a loving stupid nickname anyway, because a hack is a person who uses lazy tricks to skirt by on the minimum effort, and Zack Snyder always throws the whole of his creative weight behind ideas he doesn't have the competence to execute.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 16:00 |
|
DStecks posted:"Hack Snyder" is a loving stupid nickname anyway, because a hack is a person who uses lazy tricks to skirt by on the minimum effort, and Zack Snyder always throws the whole of his creative weight behind ideas he doesn't have the competence to execute. Sounds like Adam Sandler needs a nickname.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 16:07 |
|
Gyges posted:On the SVU chat, was their video game episode better or worse than the CSI video game episode? In the CSI one they had silly masks and somehow had a group psychological break with reality so they all thought they were really playing a GTA style game. using the final battle in both avenger films is what most defenders of MOS use all he time. angry joe was using that with avengers 2 trailer when it showed bits of the final battle or the hulk fight.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 16:22 |
|
What have I wrought
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 16:29 |
|
Gyges posted:On the SVU chat, was their video game episode better or worse than the CSI video game episode? In the CSI one they had silly masks and somehow had a group psychological break with reality so they all thought they were really playing a GTA style game. I think the SVU one has Ice-T's character refer to a video game as "magical rape land" so there's that. There was one episode of SVU where a paedophile boasts to the detectives, "Our numbers are growing while yours are shrinking!"
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 16:33 |
|
Good site. There's quite a lot of good information about the origins of Lorem ipsum scattered liberally throughout. I never knew it had such a history. Also, check the google doc list of theatres showing the movie. http://www.sarkeesianeffect.com/where-to-watch-it.html
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 16:40 |
|
If you want a recent cop show that's more infuriating than crazy, check out Blue Bloods starring Tom Shelick.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 17:06 |
|
Cyron posted:using the final battle in both avenger films is what most defenders of MOS use all he time. angry joe was using that with avengers 2 trailer when it showed bits of the final battle or the hulk fight. Because they're analogous? If you blame the Avengers for the damage to the cities they're in, then it's perfectly fine to blame Superman in MOS. If you blame one but not the other, the question is what is the difference. If superheroes are the ones responsible for the damage resulting from them saving the Earth, that's fine. Just be consistent and make the argument that their good deeds in saving billions while tarnished by the thousands lost in the attempt don't make them mass murderers.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 17:22 |
|
BigRed0427 posted:If you want a recent cop show that's more infuriating than crazy, check out Blue Bloods starring Tom Shelick. I realize that this is the official thread of people who seek out terrible experiences for the fun of it, but why would I want to watch a TV show on the recommendation that it will infuriate me?
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 17:58 |
|
Gyges posted:Clark Kent lets 1 person die and Superman kills 1 alien. Unless we're going to start laying all the deaths in New York on the Avengers. I think the final action sequence in Avengers 2 works as a direct response to the Metropolis fight in Man of Steel. The Avengers spend most of the time saving people. they save individual people, they risk their lives to save random bystanders. A lot of the tension in the fight comes from whether or not the SHIELD ships will get there in time, and whether or not the Avengers will get everyone on board in time. You actually get the impression that everybody lived, because the superheros save the day. I'm sure, that if we think about that situations as if it was a totally realistic event, a bunch of people would've gotten their head smashed in by falling masonry and some surgeries got interrupted by the power going out and yada yada yada. But the movie presents what happened as, "bad guy tried to kill a lot of people, superheroes stopped the bad guy and saved everyone" In Man of Steel you don't see Superman try to save anyone. He just fights with other Superman for an hour, causing ten 9/11s in the process.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 18:06 |
|
I don't think the situations were the same. Fighting fodder as a team is different than fighting someone superior by yourself. I highly recommend this thread since they still have this same circular discussion in it every now and then, two years after the film was released.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 18:12 |
|
Isn't batguy vs superman about how people don't trust superman because of all the casualties when he was fighting zod?
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 18:29 |
|
I love that this derailed into lovely crime show plots. Like legitimately this is making me laugh out loud.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 18:40 |
|
Miss Wallace posted:I love that this derailed into lovely crime show plots. Like legitimately this is making me laugh out loud. CSI:Cyber is hilarious. It's every bad technojargon trope and buzzword you can think of said straight-faced. And has James Van Der Beek.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 18:49 |
|
Neddy Seagoon posted:CSI:Cyber is hilarious. It's every bad technojargon trope and buzzword you can think of said straight-faced. And has James Van Der Beek. Oh my god that's real? I saw a comic about it and thought it was a joke.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 19:17 |
|
prahanormal posted:Isn't batguy vs superman about how people don't trust superman because of all the casualties when he was fighting zod? Yes, some people will see him as a savior and some people will blame him for the Kryptonian invasion. Batman gonna Batman and we will get Dayman vs Nightman. The waitress still won't go out with Charlie though. Neddy Seagoon posted:CSI:Cyber is hilarious. It's every bad technojargon trope and buzzword you can think of said straight-faced. And has James Van Der Beek. They actually made a CSI:Cyber? Fuuuuuuuuck.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 19:20 |
|
Who the gently caress let that go through without it being called CSYber???
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 19:24 |
|
Neddy Seagoon posted:CSI:Cyber is hilarious. It's every bad technojargon trope and buzzword you can think of said straight-faced. And has James Van Der Beek. This gives me life.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 20:08 |
|
prahanormal posted:Isn't batguy vs superman about how people don't trust superman because of all the casualties when he was fighting zod? It's pretty hilarious because it means that Kevin Costner was absolutely right the entire time. Superman lives thirty years in obscurity, using his powers only ever to save people's lives, and then saves the planet from annihilation, and everyone is like "BUT CAN WE TRUST HIM THOUGH?"
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 20:29 |
|
My mom watches CSI:Cyber. That should give you an idea of who the target audience is.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 22:25 |
|
Violet_Sky posted:My mom watches CSI:Cyber. That should give you an idea of who the target audience is. well that tells me nothing because I don't visit your mother for her conversational skills
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 22:42 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 04:24 |
|
A savior being met with skepticism? Rolling on the floor laughing at the mere thought
|
# ? Aug 1, 2015 22:58 |