|
Aliquid posted:thanks for the heads up, i'm starting to dump at .45 Now you just need to get 5% above your original deposit 
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 19:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 05:00 |
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Biden NO is climbing, I think I'm gonna sidle on out of that market with a pretty profit instead of trusting my gut that he's not running. I would like to do this too but with everyone dumping out at 0.45 it's not gonna go up enough for me to get my money back 
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
That's exactly what's happening. I sold all my,no shares but two at .45, then refreshed and 100 more .45 shares were available so I got out completely.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 19:11
|
|
|
Glad that Yes shutdown is finally climbing. I was starting to get a little worried that it was never going up. At least I got a poo poo load of shares in the 20-38 range. I've got groups of shares set to sell over a wide range so as long as the market doesn't think a deal's coming out today I should finally be able to stop kicking my self for not guessing that CNN would cave and change their debate rules.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 19:20
|
|
|
They added a "biggest movers" category. I want to dumb my "Bush No Nomination" stocks because I need some liquidity and people might never actually believe he isn't going to win.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 20:39
|
|
|
That entire market is going to remain really sticky until at least after the new year.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 20:42
|
|
|
Bush NO was about 60% of my portfolio but I've been slowly liquidating them at a small profit to get more feisty in betting.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:07
|
|
|
loving walker
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:17
|
|
|
AARP LARPer has issued a correction as of 01:44 on Jan 23, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:19
|
|
|
I'm not feeling very sturdy anymore, the big things I have left are biden not running and the government not shutting down...
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:20
|
|
|
fronz posted:loving walker Looks like there's still a few cents you can squeeze out of buying some of the other guys' NOs if you jump on it quick. Still, the World is a better place for Scotty dropping out.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:21
|
|
|
fronz posted:It's only 80 cents to buy that Walker will not be the next to drop out (Yes is selling for 38). If that price goes down some more it'd be a steal, no way Kochs give up on him so early. Lol rip your money
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:25
|
|
|
oh my loving god he dropped out
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:27
|
|
|
People who had money in No on Santorum, Pataki, and Jindal must be creaming their pants right now.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:29
|
|
|
Man, I thought Huckabee was the worst, but Walker just cost me 30 bucks. gently caress him.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:30
|
|
|
tinstaach posted:Man, I thought Huckabee was the worst, but Walker just cost me 30 bucks. gently caress him. i do a lot of bets that are on other sides of the seesaw between getting money and real-life benefit; for instance, I have money on Bernie not winning Iowa. If he wins, I lose money but I'll still be happy.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:34
|
|
|
fronz posted:loving walker I think everyone here agrees that no one could have seen this one coming 
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
I had 70 shares on him not winning the primary 
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:40
|
|
|
I mean, there were whispers here and there that people jumped on that drove the No shares around 80 cents, which is why I bought in in the first place. But of all the ones that would turn out to not be bullshit... And some of the traders are lightning fast, it's been an hour or so and all the No shares for everyone else are gone, save for a handful of 99-centers on Graham. tinstaach has issued a correction as of 21:44 on Sep 21, 2015 |
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:41
|
|
|
Necc0 posted:I think everyone here agrees that no one could have seen this one coming His campaign was based on screwing over the largest number of people possible. Turns out, that only amounted to trolling a few people on PI.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:42
|
|
|
Necc0 posted:I had 70 shares on him not winning the primary I had over 120, bought at .80 and sold at .84 months ago lol
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:42
|
|
|
A Time To Chill posted:His campaign was based on screwing over the largest number of people possible. Turns out, that only amounted to trolling a few people on PI. Stealing this shamelessly
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
You know, after a few minutes of reflection, I'm comforted by this fact: If someone walked up to me a week ago and asked me "How much would you pay to see Scott Walker drop out with 15 Republicans still in the race?", my answer would be a lot more than what I lost today.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 21:57
|
|
|
AARP LARPer has issued a correction as of 01:44 on Jan 23, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 22:02
|
|
|
Is there a reason shutdown YES prices dropped so hard again in the last few minutes?
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 22:04
|
|
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2015/09/21/senate-republicans-working-on-plan-to-avoid-a-shutdown/
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 22:10
|
|
|
Abel Wingnut posted:http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2015/09/21/senate-republicans-working-on-plan-to-avoid-a-shutdown/ Bummer.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 22:16
|
|
|
i'm pretty sure it's not a bad thing for those holding YES in 'will the government shut down?'. anti-abortionists won't vote for it if it lacks language de-funding PP. and if it does, the senate likely won't pass it, and obama would certainly veto it. there's been no headway.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 22:22
|
|
|
AARP LARPer has issued a correction as of 01:44 on Jan 23, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 22:28
|
|
|
The house is and always has been where the shutdown is a problem this time. Boehner doesn't have the republican votes to pass a continuing resolution and a lot of people want to oust him from the leadership position, which partnering with Democrats to fund abortions might do.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 22:29
|
|
|
AARP LARPer has issued a correction as of 01:45 on Jan 23, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 22:32
|
|
|
Does no one even own any shares on Rand Paul dropping out? He's the only candidate with sell offers below 96. Come on and cash out now so I can makes some dimes. RE: Shutdown chat The biggest problem of all is that there's only like 4 days left where Congress is even going to be in session before October. I mean, they can get something done but it's sure going to be down to the wire in the best circumstance. We're quickly approaching the point where if Ted Cruz decides to use his Senatorial Privileges to their dickest extent, he'll be able to gently caress it all up on his own.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2015 22:40
|
|
|
People in the comments section on PredictIt have decided that Joe Biden is already running because of these two things at the FEC: http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/801/201508249000928801/201508249000928801.pdf http://www.fec.gov/fecviewer/CandidateCommitteeDetail.do?candidateCommitteeId=P60012465&tabIndex=1
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 03:33
|
|
|
Stereotype posted:People in the comments section on PredictIt have decided that Joe Biden is already running because of these two things at the FEC: It was filed almost a month ago and there's no finances associated with it  Or is that the joke
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 03:38
|
|
|
Uhhquote:Joseph R. Biden, Jr. shall become a candidate for president of the United States in the 2016 general election, by filing a Statement of Candidacy and/or a Statement of Organization of an exploratory committee for the office of president with the Federal Election Commission. So...isn't that the end of it? I mean he obviously isn't running running yet since he hasn't personally announced anything, but it seems like that should have been resolved as Yes.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 04:32
|
|
|
tinstaach posted:Uhh If you ask me, that's rules lawyery enough to get them to close the contract. I think I'll bail on it and take my meager amounts of profits while I still can.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 04:39
|
|
|
Apparently it's a different Joseph R. Biden Jr.? What the gently caress is going on
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 04:43
|
|
|
Seriously it was filed over a month ago I don't think there's anything to it
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 04:44
|
|
|
Yeah it's a fake: http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/08/deez-nuts-sparks-2016-fake-candidate-epidemic.html Someone's trying to panic the market, probably. There's an army of people who's entire careers are watching these things like hawks there's no way it would have slipped under the radar for a whole month.
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 04:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 05:00 |
|
|
Didn't they screw people by not closing the "first repub to drop" until way after Jindal suspended his campaign for a bit?
|
|
#
?
Sep 22, 2015 04:45
|
|