|
rydiafan posted:I assume that image is from an advertisement for the weird stairs, and that is there to show space savings. No no no idiot that's obviously not it. Someone with a bit of imagination answer better. e: like maybe it's some indiana jones dealio where you have to step on the squares that spell out "OSHA" or you get dropped into a pit of Karate Bastard has a new favorite as of 20:15 on Sep 26, 2015 |
# ? Sep 26, 2015 19:53 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 10:33 |
|
Karate Bastard posted:No no no idiot that's obviously not it. Someone with a bit of imagination answer better. Remember, OSHA starts with an I in Latin.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2015 23:03 |
|
Bobby Digital posted:Remember, OSHA starts with an I in Latin. No, it ends in an I.
|
# ? Sep 26, 2015 23:34 |
|
FutonForensic posted:Reminds me of the Grapefruit Technique. I'm sure it's been pointed out before, but these are just shelves designed to look like stairs. There's a skylight at the top, you wouldn't be climbing up them at regular intervals.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 00:34 |
|
change my name posted:I'm sure it's been pointed out before, but these are just shelves designed to look like stairs. There's a skylight at the top, you wouldn't be climbing up them at regular intervals. They're so bad at being usable shelving space, though. How can you tell the difference between a stair/shelf hybrid that sucks at both, and shelves that still suck at being shelves?
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 00:39 |
|
anything is shelves/stairs if you're brave enough
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 01:39 |
|
Screaming Idiot posted:anything is shelves/stairs if you're brave enough Just store all your books on the floor like a animal. Am I doing right? Is this still cool?
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 01:43 |
|
AlphaKretin posted:Just store all your books on the floor like a animal. Just add waffle irons and you're done! Walla!
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 02:23 |
|
Screaming Idiot posted:Just add bread clips and you're done! Walla!
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 04:13 |
|
Build your stairs by putting books in a waffle iron, then use bread clips to join the resulting burnt mass together! Walla!
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 07:29 |
|
e - cyberia has a new favorite as of 11:29 on Sep 27, 2015 |
# ? Sep 27, 2015 11:20 |
|
Is that asterisk helping in some way? I imagine it will not match dotfiles in the root (if any?) leaving you with a system slightly less shanked up the arse than if you had left it out. What a pissy lifehack.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 11:57 |
|
Karate Bastard posted:Is that asterisk helping in some way? I imagine it will not match dotfiles in the root (if any?) leaving you with a system slightly less shanked up the arse than if you had left it out. What a pissy lifehack. Some versions of rm refuse to remove / recursively without an extra option.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 13:19 |
|
Boogaloo Shrimp posted:No, it ends in an I. I appreciated this enormously after all the gbs OSHA threads.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 15:45 |
|
What does that do, if you don't mind me asking?
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 17:39 |
|
Ignite Memories posted:What does that do, if you don't mind me asking? "sudo" is admin privileges, "rm" is remove files, and the "-rf" flag removes all subfiles and subdirectories.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 17:47 |
|
Ignite Memories posted:What does that do, if you don't mind me asking? sudo rm -rf .* rm = remove -r = recursive -f = force (no prompt) .* = a typical mistake junior admins make to get rid of bunch of "dotfiles" in a UNIX like system. dotfiles are usually files or directories that hold user-level config overrides for various programs. Unfortunately, '.*' also includes '..' which means to go up a level in the directory tree. It also includes ./* sudo = means "do as superuser" and this is the part that makes it devastating. 'sudo' means that command will climb all the way to the root level and delete files recursively from there. Every single file that isn't locked is nuked. In the late 80s or early 90s, this was almost a rite of passage for young admins. I, personally, destroyed an NNTP server at a startup ISP in the mid 90s with that one. Of course, back then we did everything as root, because "why not?"
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 17:48 |
|
Ignite Memories posted:What does that do, if you don't mind me asking? rm is the remove command. The r after the dash means it is recursive, so includes subdirectories. The f ignores confirmations. / is the root of the filesystem, roughly similar to C: under windows. Its basically 'delete everything, don't ask for confirmation' E:fb and forgot the sudo
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 17:58 |
|
It's a stupid prank anyways. If you're going to sell going into the terminal and running some commands as an alternative for just restarting your computer, most people would just restart it. I feel like people who are "all about" life hacks and making things circuitously more difficult are the only ones who would even try it.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 18:04 |
|
change my name posted:I feel like people who are "all about" life hacks and making things circuitously more difficult are the only ones who would even try it.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 18:31 |
|
flosofl posted:.* = a typical mistake junior admins make to get rid of bunch of "dotfiles" in a UNIX like system. dotfiles are usually files or directories that hold user-level config overrides for various programs. Unfortunately, '.*' also includes '..' which means to go up a level in the directory tree. It also includes ./* This is entirely wrong. .* does not traverse upwards in the directory tree. That would be absurd.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 19:09 |
|
Hey smartass how about you just try it instead of spouting nonsense <> sorry I know you're right, couldn't resist this is the wrong/dangerous/stupid/ineffectual advice thread right?
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 19:29 |
|
Phosphine posted:This is entirely wrong. .* does not traverse upwards in the directory tree. That would be absurd. You're right, I'm probably misremembering as it's been 20 years (and tales grow in the telling). I must have done a plain old * from the root. For some reason I had it in my head .* encompassed .. so it would climb the tree. I moved pretty quickly away from servers to networks not long after that.
|
# ? Sep 27, 2015 22:34 |
|
Phosphine posted:This is entirely wrong. .* does not traverse upwards in the directory tree. That would be absurd. I'm pretty sure there were old Unix implementations in the '80s where people were screwed over by bugs along those lines, though; I think I read about it in the old Unix-Haters list archives from around 1989-1990 or so. I'll see if I can dig up anything more specific. Also, Rob Pike has written that dotfiles became "hidden files" in the first place, back in the '70s, as a result of a bug in the handling of "." and ".." and it wasn't originally intentional. e: Found it; looks like it was a bug in the glob handling in some old SunOS release of csh. From the Unix-Haters mailing list archive: code:
(So flosofl probably is actually remembering correctly, if it's something that happened 20 years ago.) tacodaemon has a new favorite as of 22:50 on Sep 27, 2015 |
# ? Sep 27, 2015 22:40 |
|
Okay, wow, that's an amazing bug.
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 16:34 |
|
Would that even work without --no-preserve-root? (The full command would be then sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root /, no need for the asterisk.)
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 17:20 |
|
Y'all do see the lifehack in there right? #csh
|
# ? Sep 28, 2015 23:07 |
|
HardDisk posted:Would that even work without --no-preserve-root? The asterisk makes it so you're not removing the root, you're removing everything directly below the root. More compact, less suspicious.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2015 00:31 |
|
HardDisk posted:Would that even work without --no-preserve-root? That's a GNU extension that wouldn't have been on an early 90s SunOS version of rm.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2015 02:37 |
|
|
# ? Sep 29, 2015 02:40 |
|
If anybody does try this, let Darwin Awards know.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2015 03:19 |
Sordas Volantyr posted:If anybody does try this, let Darwin Awards know. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-B1ucdeBFo
|
|
# ? Sep 29, 2015 04:25 |
|
Sordas Volantyr posted:If anybody does try this, let Darwin Awards know. I don't remember 13 years old being that dumb
|
# ? Sep 29, 2015 08:13 |
|
Tired Moritz posted:I don't remember 13 years old being that dumb The video above your post is even worse. They stuck iron wool in the outlet for shits and giggles.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2015 10:24 |
|
When I were a lad we used to visit my mother's aunt every Saturday and her apartment had wall outlets with spring-loaded covering plates so to plug something in you'd have to press it against the outlet at a 90 degree angle and then twist it into the correct position (which would also turn the cover plate) and push it in. I don't think I'd ever been interested in sticking things into electric sockets anywhere else but man did I always play with those, turning them with Lego antennas and poo poo, because they were a lot more amusing (for about thirty seconds) than outlets without safety covers. Welp that was my "I was a stupid kid once" story hope you enjoyed it. Stay safe and stay legal, god bless the United States of America.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2015 12:27 |
|
Mom and dad not paying you sufficient attention? Try lighting small fires around the house and they'll stop ignoring you and the fact that you are ruining their life in no time! #LifeHack
|
# ? Sep 29, 2015 12:41 |
|
Tired Moritz posted:I don't remember 13 years old being that dumb Not one but two people in my 7th grade class stuck paper clips in power sockets. One of them set his history book on fire doing it. Another got his girlfriend pregnant so he could "prove I'm a better dad than my dad" So yeah 13 year olds are pretty awful.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2015 13:02 |
|
Len posted:Not one but two people in my 7th grade class stuck paper clips in power sockets. One of them set his history book on fire doing it. Another got his girlfriend pregnant so he could "prove I'm a better dad than my dad" So yeah 13 year olds are pretty awful. I don't know how to tell you this but you can't get your girlfriend pregnant by sticking paper clips in power sockets.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2015 13:10 |
|
Jerry Cotton posted:I don't know how to tell you this but you can't get your girlfriend pregnant by sticking paper clips in power sockets. Oh yeah? Then how'd I get two kids then, JACKASS.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2015 13:38 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 10:33 |
|
Fil5000 posted:Oh yeah? Then how'd I get two kids then, JACKASS. Maybe you should ask your neighbour.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2015 13:42 |