|
evilweasel posted:nothing left for rubio to tear i bet there is, he may be as dangerous to JEB! as trump
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 20:10 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 04:17 |
|
The Nastier Nate posted:There's something really sad about JEB, the 5th/6th place candidate attacking Rubio who is in 4th place. Both are polling in single digits in most states. I understand why he's doing it, but it reeks of desperation, like saying JEB couldn't run with the big dogs so he's picking on the young up and coming scrapper who is just trying to get by and make a name for himself. Doubly so because Rubio considers JEB as one of his political influences. i love that he's not even trying to take on a candidate who is higher ranked, and who has sufficient support that if he leeched them all their support away, his numbers would improve. even if JEB! somehow completely absorbed all of rubio's votes, that would still leave him, what, 3rd or 4th in line? it's like he's completely committed to proving Trump's definition of his character to be explictly true. "try to take on one of the top dogs? that sounds like a lot of work "
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 20:10 |
|
I'll admit to being a bit charmed by his immediate admission that his analogy is facile and useless, leaving him with no real idea of how to engage in foreign affairs. You don't often see that kind of honesty from a political campaign.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 20:11 |
|
McDowell posted:https://youtu.be/j1lXpmylh5M Or give them a low-five?
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 20:12 |
|
McDowell posted:https://youtu.be/j1lXpmylh5M this is an official video put out by his campaign lol
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 20:14 |
|
homeless poster posted:i love that he's not even trying to take on a candidate who is higher ranked, and who has sufficient support that if he leeched them all their support away, his numbers would improve. even if JEB! somehow completely absorbed all of rubio's votes, that would still leave him, what, 3rd or 4th in line? There's a very firm belief that the establishment candidate will eventually turn it around when the polls "matter" so that's why he's basically writing off Trump/Carson/Fiorina. He just has to make sure his backers continue to buy that story.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 20:18 |
|
Bush needs to take down Rubio because he is in trouble TODAY of being replaced as the non-Trump, serious candidate for the establishment GOP. Regardless of what Trump does, people are now looking more closely at Rubio as an alternative to Bush. Everyone is hoping (except for us) that Trump will just fade away, but if Rubio is standing at the top of the rubble pile as the establishment candidate then Bush is a goner.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 20:20 |
|
Plus, every time Bush tried to attack Trump, it backfired horribly. Maybe he's hoping Rubio will be an easier target.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 20:23 |
|
Nonsense posted:If Jeb! was actually smart, and the Republican party actually stood a chance, he'd drop out Monday. Nonsense. If he were smart, he'd milk those rubes who think he still has a chance for all the travel and per diem they've got.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 20:23 |
|
Josh Lyman posted:Cruz's suit is so ill-fitting At the very least Trump should give him the number of a good tailor because holy poo poo Cruz's suit is terrible. Cardboard Box A posted:She is right about Everquest inflicting “pain, misery, violence, torture" though. She should try EVE Online. Mrit posted:He reminds me more of Tim Tebow. Everyone thinks he is awesome... until they see him play. See also: Jason White, who was basically Teebow but without the religion boost.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 20:36 |
|
Having Jeb! take down Rubio and Trump take down Jeb! would be loving hilarious.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 20:37 |
|
Slaughterhouse-Ive posted:Having Jeb! take down Rubio and Trump take down Jeb! would be loving hilarious. Jeb! ain't takin' down a kitten offa tree.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 20:41 |
|
Samuel Clemens posted:Plus, every time Bush tried to attack Trump, it backfired horribly. Maybe he's hoping Rubio will be an easier target. A properly hydrated Rubio is a tough target to take down.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 20:45 |
|
Nonsense posted:If Jeb! was actually smart, and the Republican party actually stood a chance, he'd drop out Monday. Candidates dropping out when the funding's still there isn't about being smart or not, it's about self interest. Or, in Walker's case, having the leash tugged on.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 20:56 |
|
LFPR is at a near 4 decade low. 3 straight months of job growth for immigrants and job decline for those born in the USA. Jeb! and Rubio are just 2 out of touch fossils who are nearly indistinguishable from Hillary Clinton when it comes to our border, our immigration policy, and the plight of the blue collar worker and the American middle class. I'm sure the political elites and the media morons will be highly entertained by this cripple fight for second place. Meanwhile Donald Trump continues to bypass the establishment and take his message directly to us, the American people.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 21:08 |
|
DaveWoo posted:Trump on mass school shootings: "You're going to have these things happen", “What are you gonna do” @RyanLizza In Greenville, South Carolina, Jeb Bush, arguing against calls for gun control after major tragedy, says, "stuff happens." Jeb! agrees! ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 21:16 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dHwhlRLRs4
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 21:21 |
|
Bar Crow posted:We should be teaching these angry, disenfranchised youths to "self-deport" quietly and without fuss. Perhaps an ad campaign to explain to them that everything is their fault and the world would be better off without them. Rocks posted:Bush at 4% homeless poster posted:i love that he's not even trying to take on a candidate who is higher ranked, and who has sufficient support that if he leeched them all their support away, his numbers would improve. even if JEB! somehow completely absorbed all of rubio's votes, that would still leave him, what, 3rd or 4th in line? The Nastier Nate posted:There's something really sad about JEB, the 5th/6th place candidate attacking Rubio who is in 4th place. Both are polling in single digits in most states. I understand why he's doing it, but it reeks of desperation, like saying JEB couldn't run with the big dogs so he's picking on the young up and coming scrapper who is just trying to get by and make a name for himself. Doubly so because Rubio considers JEB as one of his political influences.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 21:34 |
|
Another school shooting, another place where law-abiding citizens are not armed. But sure, Mr. President, let's take the guns even more away.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 21:44 |
|
Blattdorf posted:Another school shooting, another place where law-abiding citizens are not armed. But sure, Mr. President, let's take the guns even more away. Agreed
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 21:45 |
|
Blattdorf posted:Another school shooting, another place where law-abiding citizens are not armed. But sure, Mr. President, let's take the guns even more away. One of the dudes there was concealed carrying.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 21:47 |
|
Nintendo Kid posted:One of the dudes there was concealed carrying. Buy it wasn't any of the staff. Just a random guy. There was a different case a few years back where one of the teachers had a concealed carry and stopped a potential school shooting before the would-be murdered managed to fire a single shot. Can't remember the details, though.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 21:58 |
|
Stuff Happens is trending #1 on Twitter now (after #nationalsmileday, but people have figured out those are faux-promoted by now right?)
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 21:58 |
|
I think you guys are too quick to count out JEB! Look, he got out ahead of the Oregon massacre before Rubio. http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/jeb-bush-stuff-happens-oregon-shooting E:F,B
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:01 |
|
Blattdorf posted:Buy it wasn't any of the staff. Just a random guy. Yeah I sure do trust some random adjunct professor to be good at shooting
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:02 |
|
Nintendo Kid posted:One of the dudes there was concealed carrying. Yep. One was interviewed last night on the Factor. Wanted to make his way to the epicenter to see if he could help, but in the meantime he and his fellow students he was with came into contact with some form of authority (wasn't clear from his remarks if it was police or school officials) who instructed them to be locked down in an area. They complied, and also the gentleman commented that it is possible they may have been a hindrance rather than a help depending on their approach and where the shooter would have been by the time they arrived. i.e. the typical responsible permit holder exercising his second amendment rights and causing ZERO problems, so I am pretty drat sure no one other than FOX is ever going to interview him since the other media outlets are 100% in the tank for Democrats and 100% in the tank for the crusade against the Bill of Rights.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:03 |
|
Nintendo Kid posted:Yeah I sure do trust some random adjunct professor to be good at shooting That's why we should replace some percentage of professors with
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:05 |
|
Boosted_C5 posted:LFPR is at a near 4 decade low. Who could have possibly predicted that the elderly share of the population and average number of years of schooling would both continue increasing
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:05 |
|
Clearly rather than reform gun laws we should just make every last square inch of the US an armored fortress
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:06 |
|
Cardboard Box A posted:Yeah, Monopoly is a clone of a game made by Georgists (single-taxers) as a critique of how the capitalist system results in the formation of monopolies over land and resources and encourages rent-seeking behavior. never heard of this before but it owns The set had rules for two different games, anti-monopolist and a monopolist. The anti-monopolist rules reward all during wealth creation while the monopolist rules had the goal of forming monopolies and forcing opponents out of the game.[2] A win in the anti-monopolist, or Single Tax version and later called by Magie as "Prosperity Game", was when the player having the lowest monetary amount has double his original stake.[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Landlord%27s_Game
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:07 |
|
Dr.Zeppelin posted:Who could have possibly predicted that the elderly share of the population and average number of years of schooling would both continue increasing Oh look, this tired and false talking point that retirees and students are driving the decline and everything is fine that I definitely have not seen over and over and over again. The current participation rate among working aged Americans specifically, aged 25-54 i.e. excluding older Americans and typical college undergraduate AND graduate students, is also down and at over a 3 decade low. But thanks for playing. Boosted_C5 fucked around with this message at 22:20 on Oct 2, 2015 |
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:17 |
|
Nintendo Kid posted:Yeah I sure do trust some random adjunct professor to be good at shooting Unless he's a 90-year-old grandpa with trembling hands, he'll be able to do something. And he doesn't have to shoot. Just pointing a gun at someone goes a long way to make them think twice. Apparently, it is illegal to conceal carry on that campus. That there was someone with a gun near the place is surprising enough, but eventually he would attempt to stop the shooter. We'll probably never hear anything related to security issues at the campus because we need stricter gun control law.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:19 |
|
Boosted_C5 posted:Oh look, this tired and false talking point I definitely have not seen over and over and over again. back to 1985 levels, just like reagan would want
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:19 |
|
baw posted:back to 1985 levels, just like reagan would want We're not done yet. Before his time in office is done, Obama will validate his Jimmy Carter comparisons on the right and Obamanomics will send us all the way back to the 1970s. RECOVERY!!!
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:22 |
|
Blattdorf posted:Unless he's a 90-year-old grandpa with trembling hands, he'll be able to do something. And he doesn't have to shoot. Just pointing a gun at someone goes a long way to make them think twice. Yeah he'll probably shoot himself int he leg or maim one of the students. Also I assure you the guy that's obsessively planned his murder spree did plenty of thinking twice beforehand, before they decided to murder.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:24 |
|
Boosted_C5 posted:Oh look, this tired and false talking point that retirees and students are driving the decline and everything is fine that I definitely have not seen over and over and over again. Where does alternate 1985 fit into this timeline?
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:24 |
There are a lot more factors in the labor force participation rate beyond the Mexicans took er jerbs.
|
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:25 |
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:Nonsense. If he were smart, he'd milk those rubes who think he still has a chance for all the travel and per diem they've got. that's an excellent point, and something i was really confused about during the 2012 election cycle. you have all these dudes like santorum and newt who are never going to be a serious presidential candidate, but they get all these donors to pile money into a superPAC and they get to be in the media spotlight for 15 minutes. what the gently caress happens to all the superPAC money once a guy like that drops out of the race, assuming it wasn't already wasted down to $0? can they (or the controlling entity of the superPAC) just pocket the difference? if so, i feel like "unelectable presidential candidate" is going to become a viable part-time job for american oligarchs in the coming decades
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:25 |
|
Blattdorf posted:Unless he's a 90-year-old grandpa with trembling hands, he'll be able to do something. And he doesn't have to shoot. Just pointing a gun at someone goes a long way to make them think twice. This is true because people who go on killing sprees are well-known for their good decision-making skills.
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:27 |
|
|
# ? May 28, 2024 04:17 |
|
Boosted_C5 posted:We're not done yet. Before his time in office is done, Obama will validate his Jimmy Carter comparisons on the right and Obamanomics will send us all the way back to the 1970s. how will obamanomics do that
|
# ? Oct 2, 2015 22:30 |