|
Rand Paul, in a bid for attention, has challenged Bernie Sanders to a one on one debate. Sanders has not yet responded.
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 04:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 23:09 |
|
|
Patter Song posted:Rand Paul, in a bid for attention, has challenged Bernie Sanders to a one on one debate. Sanders has not yet responded. As much as I'd love to see that, Bernie probably only has time to debate presidential candidates now.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 04:15
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:Rand Paul, in a bid for attention, has challenged Bernie Sanders to a one on one debate. Sanders has not yet responded. Which he can't do unless he wants to be booted out of the Democratic debates, iirc.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 04:18
|
|
|
Nintendo Kid posted:Which he can't do unless he wants to be booted out of the Democratic debates, iirc. The rule is supposed to be just against the Dems debating each other, but DWS would totally reinterpret it your way.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 04:21
|
|
|
Jewel Repetition posted:More quotes from that Matt Drudge interview because I'm watching the rest of it. So did they just do a bunch of coke together and record the ensuing conversation?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 04:34
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:Rand Paul, in a bid for attention, has challenged Bernie Sanders to a one on one debate. Sanders has not yet responded. You're missing the word "desperate"
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 05:03
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:Rand Paul, in a bid for attention, has challenged Bernie Sanders to a one on one debate. Sanders has not yet responded.  Rand, your weird hair is no match for Bernie's
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 05:07
|
|
|
McDowell posted:The biggest nuclear grave for ISIS you ever seen. Unparalleled use of advanced ordinance. We're gonna make Israel, Iran, and the Arabs bury the hatchet in it. Enough sending our brave men and women over there for what? Dolash posted:What if the pilots and passengers had all had guns, huh? Of course, in this scenario the terrorists would've been allowed to bring their guns on the plane too, so maybe the pilots should bring some heavy ordnance to even the odds. I mean for gently caress's sake, if nothing else we don't even need to do so, conventional bombs have proven to work really well against them without the whole "rest of the world unites against us in horror". Trump might order carpet bombings of Raqqa/Mosul et al, sure, but why would you think he'd jump to the "nuke" option?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 05:53
|
|
|
The day Trump nukes ISIS and brings peace to the Middle East will undoubtedly become a new national holiday. Cold beers and hot radioactive death. USA
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 05:57
|
|
|
fade5 posted:Where does this dumbass idea that's we'd actually use nuclear weapons against ISIL even come from? We would we even do that? When you're inventing something to argue against, hell, you might as well make it big.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 05:58
|
|
|
McDowell has made enough crazy posts in gip that for awhile a few of us was worried he would pull a caro.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 05:58
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:The rule is supposed to be just against the Dems debating each other, but DWS would totally reinterpret it your way. I doubt they'd kick him out of the debate for so obviously petty a reason. But I also don't know why Bernie Sanders would agree to our anyways, even if he crushed Paul (which is likely, Paul is a doofus) there still wouldn't be an upside for Sanders.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 06:06
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:Rand Paul, in a bid for attention, has challenged Bernie Sanders to a one on one debate. Sanders has not yet responded. lmao
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 06:08
|
|
|
Patter Song posted:Rand Paul, in a bid for attention, has challenged Bernie Sanders to a one on one debate. Sanders has not yet responded. I'm actually worried about how well Bernie can do in a debate, but he easily beats Randy and it wouldn't be pretty.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 06:13
|
|
|
No need https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUXwDMqjC-A
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 06:18
|
|
|
Youth Decay posted:I'm actually worried about how well Bernie can do in a debate, but he easily beats Randy and it wouldn't be pretty. the best response would be "maybe I'll have time after I'm elected"
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 06:20
|
|
|
Get hosed, Rand.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 06:30
|
|
|
This is so fuckin' dumb EDIT: Once SNL and the daily show got ahold of that Debate Libertarianism might finally go in the dustbin of history. There's a reason it's fringe, it doesn't stand up to any real scrutiny. Full Battle Rattle fucked around with this message at 06:51 on Oct 10, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 06:48
|
|
|
The best part is the woman behind Paul who looks like he is constantly letting out rank farts. Which he is basically doing with his mouth.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 07:36
|
|
|
Top Bunk Wanker posted:When you're inventing something to argue against, hell, you might as well make it big. You misunderstand, I mean to suggest there's not even a real possibility that a President could use a nuclear strike against a non-nuclear power, since I'm skeptical the U.S. military would carry out such an order. The conventional bombing is much more likely, but even then some kind of all-out carpet bombing would probably lead to significant political pushback. McDowell was arguing for.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 08:55
|
|
|
Edit: Misread Rand Paul as Paul Ryan, which is apparently a phenomenon that happens. Whoops.
Oiled and Ready fucked around with this message at 09:05 on Oct 10, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 09:03
|
|
|
Oiled and Ready posted:Edit: Misread Rand Paul as Paul Ryan, which is apparently a phenomenon that happens. Whoops. phew i thought that was just me
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 10:12
|
|
|
They could nominate Reagan and see if we can turn it into the wight house.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 10:12
|
|
|
Dolash posted:You misunderstand, I mean to suggest there's not even a real possibility that a President could use a nuclear strike against a non-nuclear power, since I'm skeptical the U.S. military would carry out such an order. The conventional bombing is much more likely, but even then some kind of all-out carpet bombing would probably lead to significant political pushback. You think the U.S. military would pull a coup on the President? People controlling nukes are like robots that follow faceless orders to press buttons turn knobs and fling nukes as far as I can tell. Here's an excellent episode exploring nuke handlers from the AAA tier "War" series. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4Wb2p28tlY
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 10:24
|
|
|
these folks seem really angry, and are probably unpleasant to be around but if that first pic is about college football, then yeah agreed
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 13:41
|
|
|
No one is gonna nuke ISIS. If we really want to kill everyone in eastern Syria we'll just carpet bomb the whole drat area until things stop moving. It'll have the same outcome without breaking up NATO, sending nuclear fallout across the region, and encouraging other states to develop and use nuclear weapons.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 13:41
|
|
|
A GIANT PARSNIP posted:No one is gonna nuke ISIS. donald trump will nuke isis or buy their land and build hotels it's hard to tell which, sometimes
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 13:44
|
|
|
Mr. Pumroy posted:donald trump will nuke isis First one, then the other. Not sure which order he'll do it in though.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 13:52
|
|
|
Oiled and Ready posted:Edit: Misread Rand Paul as Paul Ryan, which is apparently a phenomenon that happens. Whoops. My favourite is "Trump, Rubio, Kasich, Bush, Walker, and Rand" as if Rand is the surname- which if we're talking Ayn Rand makes too much sense not to be a coincidence. I'd rather be Heinrich Himmler Junior than have people think I have anything to do with her
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 14:40
|
|
|
fade5 posted:Where does this dumbass idea that's we'd actually use nuclear weapons against ISIL even come from? We would we even do that? I never said America could or should do it unilaterally. Nuclear weapons have ideological value against the arms trade and relativist anti-science. Third World Reggin posted:McDowell has made enough crazy posts in gip that for awhile a few of us was worried he would pull a caro. I've posted in GIP maybe a handful of times?  When Assad crossed the 'red line' though I was ready for Obama to intervene and trigger a confrontation with Russia. I was just starting grad school and would have ditched for a recruitment center. That's probably as close as I can get to going Caro
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 15:05
|
|
|
Gotta be honest, of all the "recruitment incidents" of my life, invading Syria would have possibly been the dumbest.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 15:11
|
|
|
Gyges posted:Gotta be honest, of all the "recruitment incidents" of my life, invading Syria would have possibly been the dumbest. We weren't going to invade Syria - we were going to bomb Assad for gassing his own people - Congress said 'No' - Infowars said they did it to themselves. Really hosed up that Americans are easily manipulated by 'stuff happening' on television so they pass certain laws and do certain things. But when other upsetting things happen we don't act. There is no reason to it, except making money from suffering and the consolidation of power. War is only profitable at a controlled scale. It is a disease. When will we ever learn? Modern telecommunications promise a new kind of democracy - where is it?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 15:46
|
|
|
McDowell posted:We weren't going to invade Syria - we were going to bomb Assad for gassing his own people - Congress said 'No' - Infowars said they did it to themselves. What the gently caress are you even saying here amigo?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 15:48
|
|
|
Thump! posted:What the gently caress are you even saying here amigo? Every post McDowell makes is about nuclear warfare.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 15:49
|
|
|
Thump! posted:What the gently caress are you even saying here amigo? Why didn't we have a more reasoned response after 9/11? The world was behind us in Afghanistan - enormous good will was wasted with Iraq. This is the burden of every thinking American. We write the pages of history - this is the American Revolution.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 15:52
|
|
|
Source your quotes dude
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 15:55
|
|
|
McDowell posted:Why didn't we have a more reasoned response after 9/11? The world was behind us in Afghanistan - enormous good will was wasted with Iraq. This is the burden of every thinking American. We write the pages of history - this is the American Revolution. Because George Bush is a loving retard, that's why.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 15:57
|
|
|
Thump! posted:Because George Bush is a loving retard, that's why. Who elected him? Who is responsible for these decisions? How can we be more responsible in the future?
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 16:00
|
|
|
McDowell posted:Who elected him? Who is responsible for these decisions? How can we be more responsible in the future? Oooh I know the first one! 5 members of the supreme court.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 16:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 23:09 |
|
|
McDowell posted:Who elected him? Who is responsible for these decisions? How can we be more responsible in the future? We could start by launching Antonin Scalia into the moon.
|
|
#
?
Oct 10, 2015 16:11
|
|