|
Death? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Love it! |
|
49 | 28.00% |
| Leave it! |
|
59 | 33.71% |
| That is not dead which can eternal lie... |
|
67 | 38.29% |
| Total: | 175 votes | ||
|
Who What Now posted:That was, bar none, the clunkiest non-burn I've ever seen in these threads. Better than "micropenis". Don't you know it's not the size of the boat but the motion of the ocean? I hosed your dad.
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 02:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 20:58 |
|
|
Responding to "you've got a tiny baby dick" with "I'm a goddamn sexual tyrannosaurus! Please believe meeeee!" certainly doesn't make you look defensive or anything.
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 02:23
|
|
|
Ddraig posted:Except of course in all those countries where there are prohibitions on guns, which remarkably don't have the problem of black churches or schools being shot up on a regular basis. Again, the U.S. is in the minority in the world in terms of having the right to not incriminate yourself, and our protections against searches are stronger than they are in Australia where gun owners get randomly checked up on or in the UK where a local increase in gun violence is grounds to institute stop and frisk without review by the police chief. And remember all those guns were registered to begin with as well. So no, there's no comparison.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 02:26
|
|
This poster loves police brutality, but only when its against minorities!
|
Effectronica posted:Responding to "you've got a tiny baby dick" with "I'm a goddamn sexual tyrannosaurus! Please believe meeeee!" certainly doesn't make you look defensive or anything. I thought this was playground yelling time. He started it!
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 02:26
|
|
|
Effectronica posted:Responding to "you've got a tiny baby dick" with "I'm a goddamn sexual tyrannosaurus! Please believe meeeee!" certainly doesn't make you look defensive or anything. Don't kinkshame his dad-lust. His obviously never loved him and now he tries to fill that void with guns and DILFS.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 02:27
|
|
LingcodKilla posted:I thought this was playground yelling time. He started it! So did you go for the homo thing out of a misplaced sense of progressivism or did you abandon women and put "anal only" on your Grindr profile because everyone who sees your wedding tackle bursts out laughing?
|
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 02:29
|
|
|
Let's agree on a compromise. He hosed your dad, but your dad didn't love it too much.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 02:33
|
|
|
My dad's an adult who can gently caress whoever he wants. I'm pretty sure he has much higher standards and can do way better than this nobody, though.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 02:36
|
|
|
DeusExMachinima posted:Again, the U.S. is in the minority in the world in terms of having the right to not incriminate yourself, and our protections against searches are stronger than they are in Australia where gun owners get randomly checked up on or in the UK where a local increase in gun violence is grounds to institute stop and frisk without review by the police chief. And remember all those guns were registered to begin with as well. So no, there's no comparison. You should learn from your betters then.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 02:38
|
|
|
jfood posted:You should learn from your betters then. A island full of monarchist pedophiles who's prime minister literally hosed a pig, and a island full of racist convicts from the first island. "Betters" he says.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 02:57
|
|
|
C.M. Kruger posted:A island full of monarchist pedophiles who's prime minister literally hosed a pig, and a island full of racist convicts from the first island. Now now, lets not generalize.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:01
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:My dad's an adult who can gently caress whoever he wants. I'm pretty sure he has much higher standards and can do way better than this nobody, though. Well, this is the kind of recalcitrant obstructionism that needlessly impedes progress in formulating policy goals. I suppose like most extremists, you won't be satisfied until we say your dad hasn't been buttfucked at all.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:02
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Now now, this is the kind of recalcitrant obstructionism that needlessly impedes progress in formulating policy goals. I suppose like most extremists, you won't be satisfied until we say your dad hasn't been buttfucked at all. I don't understand. Like, what's the insult here? That my dad got laid? Or is it the insinuation that being a homosexual, or even just related to one, is supposed to be disgusting and shameful? Or is it just that he's the "woman" in the situation that I should be offended by?
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:07
|
|
|
C.M. Kruger posted:"Betters" he says. Look at what this thread has made of you people.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:07
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:My dad's an adult who can gently caress whoever he wants. I'm pretty sure he has much higher standards and can do way better than this nobody, though. Your dad should drop this zero and get himself a hero imo
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:11
|
|
|
jfood posted:Look at what this thread has made of you people. Go ask your quean if you can bear arms on her behalf
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:11
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Go ask your quean if you can bear arms on her behalf They can't. They are so oppressed by tyranny.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:12
|
|
|
jfood posted:You should learn from your betters then.  the right to be free from unwarranted search and seizure is not up for discussion either. Safety third.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:13
|
|
|
DeusExMachinima posted:
....um....you have to have a warrant in the UK/AU as well for Search and Seizure. What, you think they are some dystopian hell hole or something? And what are you suggesting, have access to firearms would make you immune from such? They'd just shoot you and do the unwarranted search and seizure anyways.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:18
|
|
|
Nessus posted:What I noticed about the film was that the Soviets were simultaneously ultimately strong and tremendously weak. Also, of course, how the Wolverines accomplished no meaningful military goals other than killing some people and engraving their name in a rock. Somehow I forgot to respond to this blasphemy. The Wolverines destroyed vital enemy equipment like tanks, resupply convoys, and the odd parked fighter jet. They also assassinated key officers and interrupted at least one mass execution. On top of that, they forced the enemy to restrict their movements to the "secure zone" and spend resources to deal with the partisan threat, and lowered the invader's morale. Saying they didn't achieve anything is spitting on their memory.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:20
|
|
|
CommieGIR posted:....um....you have to have a warrant in the UK/AU as well for Search and Seizure. Not for us evil gun-havers! Cops are allowed to turn up and go through the gun safe without warning.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:21
|
|
|
tumblr.txt posted:Not for us evil gun-havers! Cops are allowed to turn up and go through the gun safe without warning. And mysteriously, the UK hasn't had a school shooting since 1996. Huh. How about that. Even better: being a cop is a very safe job, and they patrol unarmed. Interesting. Its almost as if statistics and evidence show more than appeals to emotion and screams of 'tyranny! tyranny!'
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:25
|
|
|
New Zealand doesn't have streets flowing with blood and their gun laws are much looser than ours. Counterpoint: Americans are nuts
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:27
|
|
|
CommieGIR posted:What, you think they are some dystopian hell hole or something? 
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:27
|
|
|
CommieGIR posted:And mysteriously, the UK hasn't had a school shooting since 1996. So you straight up are willing to rationalize away civil rights, that's cool.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:29
|
|
|
tumblr.txt posted:New Zealand doesn't have streets flowing with blood and their gun laws are much looser than ours. You have to have a firearms license in New Zealand DeusExMachinima posted:So you straight up are willing to rationalize away civil rights, that's cool. gently caress you. You guys are rationalizing away ACTUAL Civil Rights in the guise of protecting your hobby. I'm sorry, firearms are not on part with Voting rights, civil liberties and equality. Stop pretending that somehow you guys are special and that regulating firearms is some moronic attempt to attack minorities.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:29
|
|
|
I meant no reference to gun rights with that. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt because I assumed you didn't count it (correctly, I see). But surely you counted the 4th Amendment, or the 5th! Apparently they're optional though if ignoring them makes you safer. Oh well.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:32
|
|
|
Effectronica posted:There's no reason to get mad at gun advocates. As conservatives, they are unable to interact with one of their subalterns without being condescending. It's like water running downhill. I'm pretty sure most of the gun advocates would consider themselves progressive on this forum at least. I for one think that if you engage rural voters with the threat of gun control they will resist any dialog for economic and social equality, which I hold in higher priority. gohmak fucked around with this message at 03:36 on Oct 25, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:33
|
|
|
tumblr.txt posted:Somehow I forgot to respond to this blasphemy.  CommieGIR posted:I'm sorry, firearms are not on part with Voting rights, civil liberties and equality.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:35
|
|
|
Addressing the elephant in the room - one demographic commits a lot of murders. If ~3% of the population was unable to get their hands on weapons, the total number of homicides would be halved. Instead of spending billions trying to get rid of everyone's guns, perhaps a more targeted effort would give a better payoff?
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:36
|
|
|
DeusExMachinima posted:I meant no reference to gun rights with that. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt because I assumed you didn't count it (correctly, I see). But surely you counted the 4th Amendment, or the 5th! Apparently they're optional though if ignoring them makes you safer. Oh well. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Let's see: 5th Amendment: 34 to 37 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 [2] In the US the 4th is not the end all, do all: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrantless_searches_in_the_United_States Nessus posted:Indeed; I believe the argument is that they are more important. Because like, they let you fight for your freedom and so on, just like when the Continental Army was totally and reliably supported by the colonial militia, instead of being treated like such utter garbage there was nearly an officers' coup very early on in the Republic's history. Having France on your side with their Navy helps a lot too. tumblr.txt posted:Addressing the elephant in the room - one demographic commits a lot of murders. If ~3% of the population was unable to get their hands on weapons, the total number of homicides would be halved. What, whites? https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/u...fender_2013.xls
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:36
|
|
|
gohmak posted:I'm pretty sure most of the gun advocates would consider themselves progressive on this forum at least. I for one think that if you engage rural voters with the threat of gun control they will resist any dialog for economic and social equality, which I hold in higher priority. tumblr.txt posted:Addressing the elephant in the room - one demographic commits a lot of murders. If ~3% of the population was unable to get their hands on weapons, the total number of homicides would be halved.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:41
|
|
|
Nessus posted:Personally I would be fine with letting people have all the guns they want, with the only restrictions being on poo poo like artillery shells, if in exchange we got a modern program of social democracy in this country. My only caveats would be "can you folks be magnanimous enough to declare victory already and find some other way to pat y'all selves on the back" and the aforementioned "not LeJackal, no guns for him" clause that has gotten general assent. I can agree to this, but good luck getting the NRA and associated lobbies to buy into this. They love touting the conservative line political: Small Government, Less Regulations, Less Safety Nets. CommieGIR fucked around with this message at 03:46 on Oct 25, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:42
|
|
|
CommieGIR posted:I can agree to this, but good luck getting the NRA and associated lobbies to buy into this. They low touting the conservative line political: Small Government, Less Regulations, Less Safety Nets.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:43
|
|
|
Nessus posted:I'm gonna be real with you that gun control was actually invented as a legislative concept purely to try and evoke new, natural-sounding verbal abuse from others for the benefit of our erotic gratification. It's all been a work; I actually shook Hillary's hand down at the local pistol range earlier in the month. "I know everything  says is pandering and is really a puppet for the finacial elite; Bernie's politics and record line up with my progressive values, but he did vote against the Brady Bill so I'm voting establishment Democrat"
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:44
|
|
|
Nessus posted:Personally I would be fine with letting people have all the guns they want, with the only restrictions being on poo poo like artillery shells, if in exchange we got a modern program of social democracy in this country. My only caveats would be "can you folks be magnanimous enough to declare victory already and find some other way to pat y'all selves on the back" and the aforementioned "not LeJackal, no guns for him" clause that has gotten general assent. I'll give up my guns once this country/world accepts communist technotopia.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:47
|
|
|
Um, you might want to read that again, consider what % of the population identifies as White vs Black, then look at the absolute numbers listed.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:47
|
|
|
gohmak posted:"I know everything I think a better analogy would be "I fully support cutting taxes on the rich, re-re-reinvading Iraq, and building a giant vanity border wall, but personally I think we should leave our oil in the ground so we can lord it over the Saudis when they run out, so I'm gonna vote for Obama."
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:48
|
|
|
tumblr.txt posted:Um, you might want to read that again, consider what % of the population identifies as White vs Black, then look at the absolute numbers listed. No, pretty much regardless of which way you look at that chart, more often than not Whites are the majority offenders.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 19, 2024 20:58 |
|
|
CommieGIR posted:No, pretty much regardless of which way you look at that chart, more often than not Whites are the majority offenders. But until whites take some responsibility for the state of their culture I'm not sure if we can do anything.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 03:50
|
|