|
I figure my 5s is about on par with a new anroid phone, suits my needs except I guess it'd be nice to have apple pay I actually do really like the smaller size & appreciate the fact that it's a different size and shape from my work issued phone. that would be so confusing lol I look forward to the 7s
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 05:29 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 05:20 |
|
zen death robot posted:that emote is terrible an.d I want to destroy whoever paid $30 for it funny story, they paid for a tiny one because they were a hosed up retard and a mod reversed it and made it bigger, but not any more funny
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 05:40 |
|
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 05:42 |
|
Endless Mike posted:and now you constantly whine about it being slow and bad. constantly? nah only coz of ios7 wish there was a way yo downgrade
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 09:35 |
|
my apple tv arrived yesterday, and its really really good tim, youve done it again!!
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 15:24 |
|
Ludwig van Halen posted:my apple tv arrived yesterday, and its really really good How well does it play with iPads and iPhones? strongly considering getting one the same time I get the iPad pro
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 15:40 |
|
neonbregna posted:How well does it play with iPads and iPhones? strongly considering getting one the same time I get the iPad pro i didn't get the thing where you use your phone to set up wifi to work. It almost worked, but it errored or something and it wouldn't come back up. Had to resort to using the onscreen keyboard to put in my password. which is my other complaint, the on screen keyboard is really bad and you can't use your iphone or ipad as a keyboard for the times you need it. Mercifully, some apps let you login by entering an activation code into a browser, but some want username and password as for like casting or AirPlay though? idk, I didn't try it yet. chromecast soured me on the whole idea of using my phone as a remote. the remote is much better i'd say
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 15:45 |
|
so I saw the Steve jobs movie. I thought it was pretty good, albeit sorkiny as hell, but I can tolerate sorkin when he has a director that filters out his worst tendencies. anyway I was curious about a few specific details and I googled how much of the movie was factual and every tech site spergs about how so many facts are wrong and that makes it bad
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 15:54 |
|
Puppy Galaxy posted:so I saw the Steve jobs movie. I thought it was pretty good, albeit sorkiny as hell, but I can tolerate sorkin when he has a director that filters out his worst tendencies. anyway I was curious about a few specific details and I googled how much of the movie was factual and every tech site spergs about how so many facts are wrong and that makes it bad the mossberg review was pretty funny quote:Unlike Mr. Sorkin, I did know the real Steve Jobs, for about 14 years — the most productive and successful 14 years of his career. I spent scores of hours in private conversations with him over those years, and interviewed him numerous times onstage at a tech conference I co-produced. And the Steve Jobs portrayed in Sorkin's film isn't the man I knew. also quote:The movie mangles too many facts to list here. Mr. Jobs' intimates tell me he never held serious conversations with old collaborators and foes in the moments before he took the stage; he was intensely focused on his presentation. just lol
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 16:19 |
|
neonbregna posted:How well does it play with iPads and iPhones? strongly considering getting one the same time I get the iPad pro airplay works fine, remote.app doesn't work at all (presumably this will change with an update)
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 16:33 |
|
literally Samsung/android phones are such trash for nerds they couldn't pay James Bond 50 million to use it http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/james-bond-rejected-android-in-spectre/
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 18:07 |
|
Ludwig van Halen posted:the mossberg review was pretty funny yeah I was curious about the Mac not being able to say "hello," I was pretty sure that Lisa Jobs, John Sculley and Woz didn't actually have long theatrical conversations with Steve minutes before every product launch
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 19:39 |
|
I might be buy the laptop that is either touchscreen or hopefully a Mac but I have to look at the software my wife can use to work it out. she said "if you have two iOS devices you can do it so I will get a MacBook" so I have to work out how accurate that statement is coz the MacBook will be an expensive paperweight as far as running iOS apps goes if I do get a Mac i don't think a pro will be justified to be honest, I'm not rich enough to drop an extra grand for performance wen she's using it coz she doesn't care but between the air and the book, what's the go? pros and cons?
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 19:56 |
|
BWILL likely have to boot camp so I guess storage is of slight concern
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 19:57 |
|
echinopsis posted:but between the air and the book, what's the go? pros and cons? they dont make macbook cons, retard
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 19:57 |
|
all macbooks are cons
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 19:58 |
|
is 128gb enough for osx and windows I have no idea how bloated osx likely is and if half of 128gb is enough for os, word processor and few simulations apps maybe 256 minimum huh
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 19:58 |
|
Athletic Footjob posted:they dont make macbook cons, retard good one
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 19:59 |
|
128 is enough for a machine running os x as long as you dont plan to keep your pirated anime collection on there. but windows will quickly eat up half of that space with update files and other bullshit. having windows and osx both on there is asking for trouble
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 20:11 |
|
deffo go for 256 if you're dual booting
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 20:47 |
|
echinopsis posted:is 128gb enough for osx and windows I have no idea how bloated osx likely is and if if you're going to dualboot get a 256. i dunno how big osx is but win10 is 30GB. what simulation apps are you going to install, CATIA/CAD stuff? The core office apps take like a gig along with whatever stuff it installs at random all over the place.
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 20:56 |
|
does osx have the same problem as windows where default hibernation and pagefile will take up as much storage as the memory size so you lose like 16gb to page files and another ~16gb to hibernation or around 32gb of total disk space instantly if you have 16gb of ram?
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 21:01 |
|
cool thanks 128 not enough simulation is life support machine poo poo. I have no idea bout it
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 21:01 |
256 even if you don't store tons of stuff. need room to stretch out and relax. OS X takes up like 10gb on its own
|
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 23:14 |
|
DaNzA posted:does osx have the same problem as windows where default hibernation and pagefile will take up as much storage as the memory size so you lose like 16gb to page files and another ~16gb to hibernation or around 32gb of total disk space instantly if you have 16gb of ram? Not from what I have seen Got a personal Mac laptop with 256GB SSD, got plenty of space even with two VMs on it
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 23:33 |
|
ok so what about the macbook vs the air?
|
# ? Nov 4, 2015 23:51 |
|
cpu or screen which is more important
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 00:13 |
|
you tell me what's better value for money, it's my wife's compy and she is likely to care about neither how much does one need to compromise on the CPU to get retina? like how "slow"
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 00:36 |
your wife will love the dual core tengra 2 chipset
|
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 00:39 |
|
the macbook has more storage, more ram, an infinitely better screen. that's the one to get. she isn't going to be transcoding video.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 00:41 |
|
there isn't a huge amount in it but the combo of an i5 and non retina screen gives it a buit more power. also has USB slots and w/e and is cheaper but the macbook is smaller and silent and has a much better screen. but costs more. air is more cost effective if that is the biggest factor but just be awarre the air screens are rly showing their age now. best thing wouldk be 2 take her 2 the fruit stand to try them bith
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 00:42 |
|
id pick the macbook perosnanlly but
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 00:43 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:the macbook has more storage, more ram, an infinitely better screen. that's the one to get. she isn't going to be transcoding video. i was in the store yesterday and i tried to fiddle with one of the macbooks and it was chugging like crazy. unusable.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 00:44 |
|
THC posted:i was in the store yesterday and i tried to fiddle with one of the macbooks and it was chugging like crazy. unusable. demonstrably untrue
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 00:47 |
|
*thc loads up final cut pror to edit 4K footagge of his tiny dick* well the resolutiokn is incredible but thisultrabook is so slow....
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 00:49 |
|
no just trying to open safari and actuate mission control, it was very laggy. there was something wrong with it.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 00:49 |
|
Those things can be laggy on my 13" rmbp so idk
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 01:03 |
|
unless thinness and weight are the top, top priority, i'd get this instead of a macbook 2015 just for the larger screen, faster cpu/gpu for lovely sites like youtube and facebook, a traditional usb for all your existing crap and things theyll still sell with usb3 for some time, 256gb ssd, same price point, etc http://www.apple.com/shop/product/FF840LL/A/refurbished-133-inch-macbook-pro-27ghz-dual-core-intel-i5-with-retina-display height: 1.31 cm vs 1.8 cm weight: 0.92 kg vs 1.58 kg if it were 2016 or 2017 i'd probably just say get the macbook, but imo mbp13 better atm
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 01:03 |
|
Christ I paid 2000 canadian tire dollars for that thing
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 01:05 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 05:20 |
|
I'd get an mba before a MacBook. screen is nice but the keyboard is hot garbage.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 01:13 |