|
Oberleutnant posted:
Oh, you aren't that bad. Sorry, couldn't resist!
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 16:38 |
|
|
# ? May 4, 2024 00:55 |
|
Jippa posted:After googling I just found out that "In nature, unsaturated fatty acids generally have cis as opposed to trans configurations". That just sounds weird. It literally just means "on the same side" and "on the other side" In chemistry it refers to whether some of the pertinent groups are on the same or opposite sides of the molecule. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cis%E2%80%93trans_isomerism So a cis isomer has both groups on one side, a trans isomer has them on other sides. Fatty acids would presumably have the acid groups on one side of the molecule rather than on opposite sides.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 16:46 |
|
All this talk of fatty acids is making me hungry.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 16:51 |
|
Lord of the Llamas posted:All this talk of huge dicks is making me hungry.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 17:03 |
|
Oberleutnant posted:Hint: it's the media. http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/471623/benefits-cheat-too-much-money-from-government-spends-gambling-food-bank quote:Benefits cheats admit they get 'TOO MUCH' dole: New documentary lifts lid on scroungers Some of the people I work with read this thing and believe it is news. They vote. :/
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 17:07 |
|
I love that the first reaction to benefits being better than working is always 'why aren't we cutting benefits?!' instead of 'why aren't we loving paying people more?'
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 17:11 |
|
What's the breakdown of the £1400 a month figure?
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 17:18 |
|
crispix posted:http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/471623/benefits-cheat-too-much-money-from-government-spends-gambling-food-bank You don't close down a service that helps people in need just because a small percentage of people choose to deliberately game that. They didn't close down the banks and stock markets because of people defrauding them, so why should No. I know. It's because one is for poor people. But I have to go through this motion every time someone blasts the benefits system because somebody cheated it.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 17:19 |
|
crispix posted:Some of the people I work with read this thing and believe it is news. I was sat reading that excerpt in our university coffee shop when a middle-aged guy sits down opposite me with a copy of the bloody Daily Star. What a load of shite. Also, is it just me or does it read like satire?
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 17:26 |
|
Guavanaut posted:No. I know. It's because one is for poor people. But I have to go through this motion every time someone blasts the benefits system because somebody cheated it. Double post, but you know what the solution is eat the rich
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 17:28 |
|
The best response is probably "so we kill him then?" Because ultimately that's what it comes down to, you either kill people or you pay for them to live. If people just won't work then they either end up in prison or dead, which do you think is appropriate here?
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 17:30 |
|
Lord of the Llamas posted:What's the breakdown of the £1400 a month figure? I'm not sure, the story doesn't mention any children or other dependants so if he's on his own you'd be looking at income based JSA (just over £300 a month), council tax support (varies based on local authority and CT band but unlikely to be much over £100) and the big unknown, housing benefit.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 17:31 |
|
Prince John posted:What were the police being pelted with? Styrofoam, paint, water bottles, think I saw a couple of sticks fly about. All I know is the worst damage the police suffered was maybe a slightly bruised ego, while we were organising support lines of water bottles and tissues for the black bloc folk ducking back to get their cut up faces and hands treated. EDIT: Oh and of course the infamous "smoke grenade". Coohoolin fucked around with this message at 17:38 on Nov 5, 2015 |
# ? Nov 5, 2015 17:33 |
|
Peanut Butter posted:Also, is it just me or does it read like satire? I imagine the people writing it are having a great laugh. I just don't understand how anyone can swallow tripe like that. Some of the people I've spoken to at work, they are able to believe the fantasy of everyone without a job living the high life, despite describing their own periods of unemployment as miserable and worrisome.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 17:39 |
|
Peanut Butter posted:I was sat reading that excerpt in our university coffee shop when a middle-aged guy sits down opposite me with a copy of the bloody Daily Star. What a load of shite. My mother only buys it for the crossword, never reads a page of it expect maybe the TV listings if needed. She used to get the Sun/Star for the crosswords, until the Sun one went to poo poo.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 17:49 |
|
crispix posted:I imagine the people writing it are having a great laugh. I just don't understand how anyone can swallow tripe like that. Some of the people I've spoken to at work, they are able to believe the fantasy of everyone without a job living the high life, despite describing their own periods of unemployment as miserable and worrisome. That's because they were honest benefit claimants who stressed out because they were seeking work and miserable because they were taking only their due. The jobless folk living the high life are screwing the system for every possible penny (and teaching their Horde of Illegitimate Children to do likewise) and are not worried about finding work because they never wanted to work.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 17:52 |
|
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 17:53 |
|
The only moral benefit payments are my benefit payments.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 18:06 |
|
Jedit posted:That's because they were honest benefit claimants who stressed out because they were seeking work and miserable because they were taking only their due. The jobless folk living the high life are screwing the system for every possible penny (and teaching their Horde of Illegitimate Children to do likewise) and are not worried about finding work because they never wanted to work. It's broadly theft. You can go to a shop and nick stuff or you can go to the jobcenter and nick benefits. If you're giving fraudulent information to get money out of people it's not a benefits problem, the problem is you're committing fraud. I don't really get why it's not viewed like that.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 18:10 |
|
http://i100.independent.co.uk/article/bbc-reassures-people-that-subtitles-claiming-posh-booing-noises-at-pmqs-were-fake--WJm7AzVT_x
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 18:10 |
|
Not Operator posted:The only moral benefit payments are my benefit payments. Amazing how pensions are never called benefits, isn't it?
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 18:15 |
|
serious gaylord posted:http://i100.independent.co.uk/article/bbc-reassures-people-that-subtitles-claiming-posh-booing-noises-at-pmqs-were-fake--WJm7AzVT_x I like that they didn't say the subtitles were incorrect, merely that the BBC didn't create them.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 18:17 |
|
feedmegin posted:Amazing how pensions are never called benefits, isn't it? Those are for strivers see, not for shirkers who waste their lives in front of telly.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 18:39 |
|
Party Boat posted:I'm not sure, the story doesn't mention any children or other dependants so if he's on his own you'd be looking at income based JSA (just over £300 a month), council tax support (varies based on local authority and CT band but unlikely to be much over £100) and the big unknown, housing benefit. The article should be saying how some landlord is getting £600 of taxpayer money.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 18:42 |
Party Boat posted:I'm not sure, the story doesn't mention any children or other dependants so if he's on his own you'd be looking at income based JSA (just over £300 a month), council tax support (varies based on local authority and CT band but unlikely to be much over £100) and the big unknown, housing benefit. If he's faking a disability amongst whatever other lies he's told it could be PIP as well.
|
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 18:50 |
|
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 18:54 |
|
Glorious.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 18:54 |
|
Peanut Butter posted:Also, is it just me or does it read like satire? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON-7v4qnHP8
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 18:54 |
|
Something something joke about cottaging.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 19:06 |
|
Man aint wrong bout that
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 19:06 |
|
Oberleutnant posted:Anyway, I am now fully informed: An alternate reality Andy Zaltzman
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 19:15 |
|
Nobody had even thought about the hole in millennia in England's green and pleasant hillsides, when all of a sudden a buzzing emerged from the concrete jungle of a gay club full of gays. It rose above the concrete skyline like as a plague of locusts, a mushroom cloud of individual black vermin. Slowly, as the winds blew, they settled into the thatches and mock Tudor beams of a thousand houses, laying eggs which would hatch and wriggle and seek the nearest human warmth and, when found, whisper into their ear "have you tried it in the butt?"
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 19:17 |
|
bote what are you doing bote e: Puckeridge mrpwase fucked around with this message at 19:55 on Nov 5, 2015 |
# ? Nov 5, 2015 19:43 |
|
mrpwase posted:
It says on it, it's stopping, AS ALL BOTES SHOULD
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 19:53 |
|
it's the guanzhou to Puckeridge ferry, haven't you heard of it before? Runs hourly I'm pretty sure
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 19:57 |
|
After saving the nation from the dangers of facesitting, squirting, and watersports, it's nice to see them warning on the dangers of consensual anal sex.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 20:00 |
|
Pesky Splinter posted:After saving the nation from the dangers of facesitting, squirting, and watersports, it's nice to see them warning on the dangers of consensual anal sex. I'd be interested in his proposed epidemiology for how consensual anal sex spread from the concrete jungles of the inner cities to England's green and pleasant land.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 20:05 |
|
Pesky Splinter posted:After saving the nation from the dangers of facesitting, squirting, and watersports, it's nice to see them warning on the dangers of consensual anal sex. What actually happened with those laws? I seem to recall it ended up illegal to produce porn of that in the UK or something but not illegal to watch? Because I mean, if that's so, they're really only hurting the economy by creating a purely import market for being pissed on while a big woman sits on your face.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 20:08 |
|
OwlFancier posted:What actually happened with those laws? I seem to recall it ended up illegal to produce porn of that in the UK or something but not illegal to watch? that reminds me, how is your mum?
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 20:11 |
|
|
# ? May 4, 2024 00:55 |
|
JFairfax posted:that reminds me, how is your mum? Well hydrated, thanks.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2015 20:14 |