|
Ice To Meet You posted:The first piece I am looking to acquire, though not a blockbuster, I think would be very helpful. It is Ozzie Smith (not the 37 year old one), or Troy Tulowitzki, or The MACHINE. If you are in possession of one of these items, please contact me. I will find something to suit your specific needs. sup?
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 04:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 21:28 |
|
|
someone trade me more dingers, I haven't acquired dingers in like a week now
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 04:47
|
|
|
 Trade Announcement Akabira Killer Mikes receive: 1902 Joe Kelley Communist Llamas receive: 1962 Frank Robinson
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 06:29
|
|
|
tatankatonk posted:
glorious
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 06:30
|
|
|
Smasher, other owners: the last two off seasons we have done a weighted (by success of team) lottery to determine, separately, draft order for rounds 4 and 5. Generally I think people have liked it. Except poor HulkaMatt who the random number generator just continually screws. Anyway, we don't have a 5th round this year so I'm wondering if folks still want to do a lottery or if they'd rather go back to the old model that's just sorted in ascending order (subpar first, then super, then EC) by last seasons win pct.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 14:06
|
|
|
I support the ascending order model.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 15:23
|
|
|
tadashi posted:I support the ascending order model. Lottery! For obvious, selfish reasons!
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 15:37
|
|
|
Why would the EC go last?
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 15:51
|
|
kw0134 posted:Why would the EC go last? Because they already got three picks to begin with.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 16:00
|
|
|
TheMcD posted:Because they already got three picks to begin with. So what?
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 16:01
|
|
|
kw0134 posted:Why would the EC go last? I don't know about "always," but for the handful of seasons I was in the Super League prior to round 5 being a thing, rounds 1-3 were EC only, and then the EC owners got tacked onto the back end of the final round. I'm totally indifferent to what we do; I just kinda wanted the choices to be "what we did the last 2 seasons" or "what we did the seasons before that" because the 4th round isn't really all that important and I don't want pages of crazy ideas about how best to order the round in which you pick like...Vern Stephens or whatever.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 16:01
|
|
|
Lottery of Subpars, followed by lottery of Supers, followed by lottery of Expansions!
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 16:15
|
|
|
oldskool posted:Lottery of Subpars, followed by lottery of Supers, followed by lottery of Expansions! You sure we shouldn't have a lottery of lotteries to determine the order of the league lotteries?
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 16:20
|
|
|
Pash posted:You sure we shouldn't have a lottery of lotteries to determine the order of the league lotteries? I like the way you think.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 16:34
|
|
|
FairGame posted:I don't know about "always," but for the handful of seasons I was in the Super League prior to round 5 being a thing, rounds 1-3 were EC only, and then the EC owners got tacked onto the back end of the final round. Nah, it was more like it alternated between EC and SL teams. And since half the league got murdered every season, that was mathematically possible.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 16:38
|
|
|
Remember the good old days when the SL teams got sweet gently caress all in the Dispersal?
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 16:41
|
|
|
The Merry Marauder posted:Remember the good old days when the SL teams got sweet gently caress all in the Dispersal? This is also acceptable to me.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 16:48
|
|
|
If you do a lottery, maybe make it a near statistical impossibility for a SL team to get a pick in the top third. That way it's extra funny when someone gets screwed.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 16:53
|
|
|
The Dispersal Draft is for the benefit of the EC, it's only recently that existing owners got anything. And unlike existing owners, it's entirely probable that these picks in the latter rounds will go to fill a particular need that will actually be used. The same teams that already had multiple drafts to fill their roster should not be going before teams that have gaping holes in their lineup who are supposed to be competing against the former.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 17:01
|
|
|
It's almost like nobody even wants funny lovely things to happen to other people around here...
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 18:05
|
|
|
The Merry Marauder posted:Remember the good old days when the SL teams got sweet gently caress all in the Dispersal? As the worst owner ever entering this season, I don't see anything wrong with this.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 18:15
|
|
|
We're going with the weighted lottery. I don't think that wins and losses really are the end-all and be-all in terms of measuring a team's quality. e: I'm simming the next round of the playoffs in one hour. Have any roster changes in by then. Smasher Dynamo fucked around with this message at 18:29 on Nov 13, 2015 |
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 18:19
|
|
|
Cool. Someone check this for errors, then and make sure I haven't assigned poo poo incorrectly. I think given that we have 2 retiring teams I'm missing a team that should've demoted but won't (the Crows are one). I was planning to just give last place teams the "you got demoted" multiplier, though, to keep it simple. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WP-L6i6ql899Jvlep1CGE_f7TQuV_KTVlvXWeiMPSBg/edit
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 19:39
|
|
|
FairGame posted:Cool. Someone check this for errors, then and make sure I haven't assigned poo poo incorrectly. I think given that we have 2 retiring teams I'm missing a team that should've demoted but won't (the Crows are one). I was planning to just give last place teams the "you got demoted" multiplier, though, to keep it simple. Huh. This is the first time that a team winning the Tag Team means it won't get demoted/relegated, isn't it? I guess since it's always been Oranges/Losers or Doom/Pirates that makes sense.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 19:42
|
|
|
FairGame posted:Cool. Someone check this for errors, then and make sure I haven't assigned poo poo incorrectly. I think given that we have 2 retiring teams I'm missing a team that should've demoted but won't (the Crows are one). I was planning to just give last place teams the "you got demoted" multiplier, though, to keep it simple. The Slaughterhouse Nine weren't demoted to the Sub-Par League. In fact, they made the "playoffs," if you count the Wild Card game as a playoff game! Same with the Shiekhs and the RCMP! Who contributed to the DL? They messed the playoff teams up!!
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 20:06
|
|
|
CFBalla posted:The Slaughterhouse Nine weren't demoted to the Sub-Par League. In fact, they made the "playoffs," if you count the Wild Card game as a playoff game! Same with the Shiekhs and the RCMP! Who contributed to the DL? They messed the playoff teams up!! I am the dumbass in question. It's fixed now.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 20:17
|
|
|
FairGame posted:I am the dumbass in question. It's fixed now. Along that same line the South Dakota Marmosets did not make the playoffs.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 20:51
|
|
|
DOOP posted:sup? Hello. I don't know what you're looking for! If it's a real second baseman, I have this Chase Utley, but he's pretty young. Also this Joe Morgan, but he would cost more. Maybe you want something else? Pitchers? First basemen? I have extras of those. Or, I could just sell you draft picks. I don't know.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 21:07
|
|
|
  All right, let's-   Oh. Hmm.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 23:33
|
|
|
Sounds good.
|
|
#
?
Nov 13, 2015 23:40
|
|
|
Truly, the Feast or Fired was the most equally matched division in history.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 00:16
|
|
|
Trade Announcement Akabira Killer Mikes receive: 1985 Cal Ripken, Jr. Flying Dukaki receive: 1998 Alex Rodriguez
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 00:59
|
|
|
tatankatonk posted:
accepted.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 01:00
|
|
|
Okay, the amazing tiebreaker will be posted... next time!! Here are the stats:             But before that, we have: Pick 'em: The Most Electrifying, Incredible, Death-Defying, Rootin'-Tootin, Biggest And Best Fantasy-Sports-Entertainment Event Of All Time: Sub-Par Bowl V (approximately 45 hours from now Pick the winner, number of games, and final score of the last game The Gay Agenda @ Hope's Peak Despair
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 01:01
|
|
|
Listen, guys, I'm dying on my feet with regards to the Super-League. I'm willing to at least entertain the idea of bringing back the fifth round, just because I need the time. I know that you guys don't like how long the offseason is, but I need at least a month.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 01:02
|
|
|
Smasher Dynamo posted:Listen, guys, I'm dying on my feet with regards to the Super-League. If I get a vote, I say Five is Fantastic!
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 01:09
|
|
|
Pick 'em: The Most Electrifying, Incredible, Death-Defying, Rootin'-Tootin, Biggest And Best Fantasy-Sports-Entertainment Event Of All Time: Sub-Par Bowl V (approximately 45 hours from now) Pick the winner, number of games, and final score of the last game The Gay Agenda @ Hope's Peak Despair (I presume 7 games) 6, 9-5
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 01:10
|
|
|
Smasher Dynamo posted:Listen, guys, I'm dying on my feet with regards to the Super-League. This sounds like a job for the Super-Premiership.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 01:11
|
|
|
Hope's Peak, in 5, 7-3. If we bring back the 5th round, we can always shorten it by imposing a much tighter deadline for picking before being skipped.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 01:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 13, 2024 21:28 |
|
kw0134 posted:If we bring back the 5th round, we can always shorten it by imposing a much tighter deadline for picking before being skipped. Last season, the draft took ~36 days. Smasher says he needs "at least a month". I don't think we need to shorten it.
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2015 01:26
|
|