|
Mr Interweb posted:Not sure if it was already covered, but the guy in that video himself says that Trump is full of poo poo. "You just don't understand how these people are. They hate our freedom." *looks at you with pity, shakes head sadly*
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 00:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 19:29 |
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:Y'all have the memory of a goldfish, he's done this for every debate and he's yet to have skipped one. He just uses it as an excuse to bash the hosts of the debate for not caring about veterans. Ah, I have not watched past the first.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 00:56
|
|
|
Aerox posted:The usual response from the more hardcore evangelicals is that stuff like 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, etc., are that they're intentional acts of God, because he's punishing America because we're so bad at being Christian. Rubio's answer is weaselly enough that the evangelicals will see it as a wink and a nod to what they believe, and know that Rubio can't REALLY say that because of all this gosh darn political correctness. these clowns are realy not any different from the westboro nuts. they just dog whistle it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 00:57
|
|
|
zoux posted:Individual twitter accounts of reporters I know to be good. You can use climate change denial as a litmus test to determine if a source is partisan poo poo. usually the bad web design gives it away but the climate change thing is a bit more tangible Of course the correct stance on climate change doesn't automatically mean it's a good source but it's a good way to eliminate a good chunk of the bullshit
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:00
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:It's strange how the left considers themselves moral arbiters and protectors of Muslim Americans when people say mean things about them, while their president blows them up because they're on a list and the response is a shrug. It is strange how you've never seen any Lefty be Anti-war
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:03
|
|
|
If Trump were a true political genius, he'd demand that the debate be pruned to the top 3 or else he's going to buy air time on a competing network and blow the ratings out of the water doing a live town hall.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:10
|
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:If Trump were a true political genius, he'd demand that the debate be pruned to the top 3 or else he's going to buy air time on a competing network and blow the ratings out of the water doing a live town hall. poo poo, this would be a dream scenario for me. Watching this go down and CNN crap their collective pants in fear while the Trumpster is praying his ratings go higher if he actually has to follow through... It's like the Mexican standoff at the end of The Good, the Bad and the Ugly except it's just bad and ugly and I pray they both shoot each other in the dick.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 01:17
|
|
|
I thought this was going to be about Kurt Loder.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:12
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:
Let's take a moment and marvel that Clinton's team has elected to put Rosa Parks in the back of the bus in this image foobardog posted:God, Clinton is really so lucky that she is up against the GOP Klownpanzer. Sure, she has really done good at showing she is quite capable and politically adept, but her attempts to reach out to the more left part of the base feels so much like pandering. When she reaches out to the left her hand is just extending 1 finger. Literally today she ended up to the right of the GOP on infrastructure spending. She already jumped back from the FAMILY act and is doing her own version of the anti tax pledge
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:13
|
|
|
Holy poo poo, this was still on? I thought it ended 15 years ago. What time slot has it been airing?
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:14
|
|
|
Fried Chicken posted:Let's take a moment and marvel that Clinton's team has elected to put Rosa Parks in the back of the bus in this image Someone with photoshop should see how it looks with her in the front, I suspect it doesn't look good at all. Granted this should then have made whoever was making it decide to scrap the idea.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:17
|
|
|
Wow it's almost like someone was trying to reference an event???
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:19
|
|
|
fishmech posted:Wow it's almost like someone was trying to reference an event??? The logo thing is irrelevant, but if part of your campaign is striving for gender equality you would probably want to show the end result rather than the beginning. e: my intention is just to lol at bad design decisions not to say Hillary is bad
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:23
|
|
|
ComradeCosmobot posted:
This must be an issue of conservative word play at work here, cause don't right-wingers constantly bitch about birth control pills? That was one of the reasons they went after Sandra Fluke so hard.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:25
|
|
|
Mr Interweb posted:This must be an issue of conservative word play at work here, cause don't right-wingers constantly bitch about birth control pills? That was one of the reasons they went after Sandra Fluke so hard. they generally don't want to ban birth control. they just don't see why the government should ever pay for it. who cares if it's so cheap you can easily hand it out for free and it prevents massive cost/expense down the road? women should keep their legs closed
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:27
|
|
|
Conservatives don't want to ban contraception- They just accept public schools providing misinformation and prudish social norms making them a hassle to acquire. Was it Sheldon Adelson who said that 'in my day birth control was for a woman to take a aspirin and keep it between her knees'?
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:28
|
|
|
Don't conservatives say that birth control pills are abortificents? I swear I heard someone like Santorum say that. And many others as well.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:30
|
|
|
McDowell posted:Conservatives don't want to ban contraception- They just accept public schools providing misinformation and prudish social norms making them a hassle to acquire. Nope, different rich rear end in a top hat.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:38
|
|
|
Mr Interweb posted:Don't conservatives say that birth control pills are abortificents? I swear I heard someone like Santorum say that. And many others as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MBO9tNNejo
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:38
|
|
|
Mr Interweb posted:Don't conservatives say that birth control pills are abortificents? I swear I heard someone like Santorum say that. And many others as well. That is the main part of the issue. Note that he only brought up condoms while he was going on his rant about nobody wanting to ban contraceptives. He didn't straight up mention birth control pills for exactly this reason.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:38
|
|
|
Hmm. So he thinks they're harmful but has no abortion related objections to birth control pills? So what do conservatives consider abortificents? I might have been confusing it with birth control pills but I swear I've seen them use the term to describe something related to birth control.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:49
|
|
|
I'm starting to think that going after conservatives by telling them how mean and terrible they are to various groups isn't that effective. At worst, they'll go Trump and celebrate the fact that they're being terrible and mean. At best, they'll say "well this is just what we have to do to stay [safe/Christian/free/etc]". Trump gains supporters by appearing to be a winner who gets what he wants. Maybe we should just start absolutely humiliating conservatives and making them look like foolish losers. It worked on Jeb!.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:49
|
|
|
Odd that Santorum and Cruz have never met.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:59
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:The logo thing is irrelevant, but if part of your campaign is striving for gender equality you would probably want to show the end result rather than the beginning. I'm not sure how you're supposed to represent the end result in a way that doesn't look ugly as hell within the confines of the logo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 02:59
|
|
|
Jeb's gonna put out an ad that's just "Rosa Parks!"
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:00
|
|
|
fishmech posted:I'm not sure how you're supposed to represent the end result in a way that doesn't look ugly as hell within the confines of the logo. Hence why the idea should have been ditched.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:01
|
|
|
fishmech posted:I'm not sure how you're supposed to represent the end result in a way that doesn't look ugly as hell within the confines of the logo. maybe a very 70's thing with fractions of the H trailing off to the left (putting Rosa at the front of the bus) Send me money, Hillary.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:01
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:Hence why the idea should have been ditched. Nope, as the idea is good and the actual image is good.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:06
|
|
|
I dunno, I'd give them the benefit of the doubt and say the image is meant to emphasize Parks starting from the back of the bus but then moving forward along the arrow. The emphasis is on the physically moving forward part, which is what the anniversary is all about. I don't think it's as bad as you all are making it out to be.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:07
|
|
|
Mr Interweb posted:Holy poo poo, this was still on? I thought it ended 15 years ago. What time slot has it been airing?
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:21
|
|
|
Your Dunkle Sans posted:I dunno, I'd give them the benefit of the doubt and say the image is meant to emphasize Parks starting from the back of the bus but then moving forward along the arrow. The emphasis is on the physically moving forward part, which is what the anniversary is all about. I don't think it's as bad as you all are making it out to be. Yeah, these were my thoughts exactly.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:40
|
|
|
 I did not have the stomach to click through.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:40
|
|
|
No way in hell I'll watch that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:41
|
|
|
O'Malley sure is setting himself up to take Biden's place as America's goofy uncle.
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:42
|
|
|
O'Malley/Sanders 2016???
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:48
|
|
|
foobardog posted:O'Malley sure is setting himself up to take Biden's place as America's goofy uncle. We're gonna go from Diamond Joe to Emerald Martin 
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:50
|
|
|
Joementum posted:No way in hell I'll watch that. "Well I'm O'Malley and I'm here to say..." *cringes, collapses into self like a dying star*
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
Mr Interweb posted:Hmm. So he thinks they're harmful but has no abortion related objections to birth control pills?
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 04:03
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 19:29 |
|
|
McDowell posted:Conservatives don't want to ban contraception- They just accept public schools providing misinformation and prudish social norms making them a hassle to acquire. Foster Friess
|
|
#
?
Dec 2, 2015 04:07
|
|