|
Wescoe's gone hippie if you haven't seen him recently. So no I doubt his hygiene is better than normal.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 03:47 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 18:57 |
|
Everyone knows you don't have to wash your hands if you skip wiping.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 03:55 |
|
To be fair, I could almost accept the reasoning that touching the sink fixtures at a convention hall bathroom filled with nerds would be a net decrease in cleanliness.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 03:58 |
|
UberJew posted:Seems like Sigarda does all of this, except instead of the drain breaking stalemates it's flying over the gummed up ground and not dying to a terminate Maybe they're packing maindecked board wipes, too, which Ghost-daddy dodges?
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 04:01 |
|
JerryLee posted:To be fair, I could almost accept the reasoning that touching the sink fixtures at a convention hall bathroom filled with nerds would be a net decrease in cleanliness. I pack an assortment of scented hand sanitizers in my Magic backpack for this reason. Also for the reason that some loving kid at ym lgs kept wiping his snotty nose with his loving INDEX FINGER and then shuffling my cards after I fetched.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 04:05 |
|
Shameless plug time! I posted a link a while back to my playmat designs on Inked, and I've since made a lot of them available (plus some extras) as t-shirts and hoodies on RedBubble. Gitaxian Investments & Securities is one that isn't available as a playmat, and the newest design is Oblivion Sewing & Alterations. If you're looking for a cheap MTG related Christmas present for someone - these might do the trick. =0)
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 04:08 |
|
Sigma-X posted:I think Rashad Miller is loving awesome and really deserves more recognition for creating the notion of streaming magic than he gets. I have my R He's just not a very good commentator.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 04:20 |
|
Sigma-X posted:sidenote: I think Rashad Miller is loving awesome and really deserves more recognition for creating the notion of streaming magic than he gets. I have my R Agree with this. Rashad is a cool dude and occasionally shows up for pre-releases at Hotsauce. Rinkles posted:He's just not a very good commentator. Also with this.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 04:55 |
|
Didn't hear about the Fabiano story before but glad he got a temp ban. Friend played him at a GP before and we were sure he was cheating then too but only after the game and after my friend told us the story. Magical wizard drama is the best. it's like reading Harry Potter books 4-6 all over again but with man children. Admiral posted:Shameless plug time! Could you make more of these stickers? Specifically snap caster and Al's demolition. Tia.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 05:18 |
|
Chill la Chill posted:Could you make more of these stickers? Specifically snap caster and Al's demolition. Tia. No problem, will be done by tonight. =0)
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 05:55 |
|
Admiral posted:Shameless plug time! "Attourneys"? What country are you from?
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 08:12 |
|
Every time I see people refer to LSV in writing I can only think of the header text at the beginning of Orphan Black episodes that warn the viewers that the content will contain Language Sex and Violence.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 08:16 |
|
Angry Grimace posted:Wescoe's gone hippie if you haven't seen him recently. So no I doubt his hygiene is better than normal. Don't you make fun of Bruce Jenner like that! He is such a brave person. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 08:18 |
|
Fuzzy Mammal posted:Don't you make fun of Bruce Jenner like that! He is such a brave person. Can we not.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 10:17 |
|
PhyrexianLibrarian posted:"Attourneys"? What country are you from? Hrmmm... well, poo poo. That's the last time I believe my lawyer friend. And for the record, Australia. But it seems even we don't spell it that way. Goddamn.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 11:20 |
|
Admiral posted:Shameless plug time! I love these (especially the Urza's one). One suggestion: If Redbubble allows, you could do the logo on the right front of the t-shirt, I think that'd look a lot like an actual company t-shirt. Also, is Gitaxian Investments & Securities going to be available as a playmat later? Or does all the blue make it doubtful? VV: Yeah that seems like an issue with thin text. I was thinking of the kinds of shirts that workers wear, with Big Al's as an obvious example. Shame abut Gitaxian too. Serperoth fucked around with this message at 12:00 on Dec 6, 2015 |
# ? Dec 6, 2015 11:23 |
|
Serperoth posted:I love these (especially the Urza's one). One suggestion: If Redbubble allows, you could do the logo on the right front of the t-shirt, I think that'd look a lot like an actual company t-shirt. Inked already knocked back the Gitaxian one as a playmat, due to it being too close for comfort to WoTC intellectual property. Nice call on the positioning of the logos though, I'll see how flexibile the sizing and positioning is. Might lose some of the detail though, the text in the Urza's design is pretty thin.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 11:57 |
|
Bread Set Jettison posted:Picture of Craig Wescoe: Well you caught me. But not really
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 15:44 |
|
Admiral posted:No problem, will be done by tonight. =0) Thanks. I'm also glad you made the tiny changes suggested from before and amended the http to reflect their sets.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 15:44 |
|
PhyrexianLibrarian posted:"Attourneys"? What country are you from? At tourneys
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 16:00 |
|
Hey looking for a little help here. I used to have a pretty good grip on it, but the modern meta at my local store has exploded and I have no loving clue how to build or contort my sideboard now. I'm on mono-blue fish, and quite frankly I don't know what to do. Just last night, here were the decks I saw at the event:meta posted:Jund Like what the gently caress is my sideboard supposed to look like to handle this meta? Currently I am running: maindeck posted:4 x Aether Vial "sideboard posted:4 x Hurkyl's Recall Should I add hibernation to the sideboard, or another card? Is fish just a bad deck in this metagame? What should I remove from the board? Should I instead cut the two Phantasmal Images from the main to move something from the board to the maindeck and thereby get 2 more sideboard slots? Now I'm not doing poorly, that past few nights I've gone 5-1, 4-2, and 3-2(which was my worst, still finished in packs though). However, I know there has to be something I can tweak here, but for the life of me, I have no idea.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 16:40 |
|
Admiral posted:Shameless plug time!
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 17:28 |
|
Night Danger Moose posted:Quoting this for myself so I can check it out once I'm not on mobile. I adore your work. You could always just use the Mark as Read option, for what it's worth.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 17:57 |
|
Poor Tom Ross. That radiant flames got him a little misty eyed. Too bad he was one off lethal the previous turn.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 21:01 |
|
Ross has had horrific luck on stream recently. All 3 of his losses this tourney have been on camera.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 22:19 |
|
Alaan posted:Ross has had horrific luck on stream recently. All 3 of his losses this tourney have been on camera. Last weekend he got destroyed in the first round at the SCG open. Dude's been on a pretty bad streak.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 22:33 |
|
Alaan posted:Ross has had horrific luck on stream recently. All 3 of his losses this tourney have been on camera. Remember the last guy that always won except on camera? Of course tom doesn't seem like a cheat but its at least humorous to remember.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 23:35 |
|
Sickening posted:Remember the last guy that always won except on camera? He just won on camera, too! He made top 8 thanks to it. SCGDEN Standard Open Top 8: Logan Mize, Todd Anderson, Paul Bradford, Tom Ross, Lee Marino, Vikram Kudva, Joe Lossett, Zach Mandelblatt
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 23:40 |
|
Niton posted:He just won on camera, too! He made top 8 thanks to it. How the hell did joe make it in? They spoke on camera like there was no way he could.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2015 23:45 |
|
Night Danger Moose posted:Quoting this for myself so I can check it out once I'm not on mobile. I adore your work. You're makin' me blush over here. =0) And yeah, Tom's not the only one to have Radiant Flames make him want to weep. Urgh.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2015 01:19 |
|
The card roughly translates to: quote:Mina and Denn, Wild-born 2RG
|
# ? Dec 7, 2015 01:47 |
|
Yup, ♦ is just the colorless mana symbol confirmed. Not really sure how expensive Filterland Expeditions will be. They're pretty much limited to being one-ofs in a few decks. Angry Grimace fucked around with this message at 01:54 on Dec 7, 2015 |
# ? Dec 7, 2015 01:51 |
|
Angry Grimace posted:Yup, ♦ is just the colorless mana symbol confirmed. The best confirmation (and the obviously correct one from the start)
|
# ? Dec 7, 2015 01:55 |
|
I don't understand why they wouldn't make the colorless mana symbol change, and introduce the colorless basic, in the first set of the block, seems like a bad decision
|
# ? Dec 7, 2015 01:56 |
|
....huh. That's...a thing. Were there only going to be 15 Expeditions in Oath? The enemy colored battlelands and 10 filterlands?
|
# ? Dec 7, 2015 01:59 |
|
/\/\/\: There are 20 (BFZ ones number 1-25/45). We don't know what the others are. We don't even know if they will print the other Battlelands in Oath. They could put them in SOI and avoid giving 4 color decks even better mana since they don't like printing punishing cards for this kind of greed anymore. Big Ol Marsh Pussy posted:I don't understand why they wouldn't make the colorless mana symbol change, and introduce the colorless basic, in the first set of the block, seems like a bad decision It was originally a 3 set block. The change up happened in the middle of design time and they handed a half finished block over to development. Angry Grimace posted:Yup, ♦ is just the colorless mana symbol confirmed. Source for those of us who are curious? Cernunnos fucked around with this message at 02:02 on Dec 7, 2015 |
# ? Dec 7, 2015 01:59 |
|
Angry Grimace posted:Yup, ♦ is just the colorless mana symbol confirmed. I'm kinda annoyed that it's just the symbol for colourless mana. I liked there just being numbers for colourless. I guess who ever called the number in the circle becoming "any mana" is right. I am still going to assume though that anything with a mana cost that specifically contains a ♦ symbol can only be paid with a ♦ and not coloured mana.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2015 02:02 |
|
We've already cards that includes both numbers and ♦ in their cost, so that basically has to be what it means.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2015 02:05 |
|
Gridlocked posted:I'm kinda annoyed that it's just the symbol for colourless mana. I liked there just being numbers for colourless. I guess who ever called the number in the circle becoming "any mana" is right. Well... duh? That's literally the entire point. Also it makes perfect sense to make it a symbol and not a number. When you tap something that gives two of a colored mana, it's WW/UU/BB/RR/GG. Why wouldn't it also be the same for colorless?
|
# ? Dec 7, 2015 02:06 |
|
|
# ? May 21, 2024 18:57 |
|
Gridlocked posted:I'm kinda annoyed that it's just the symbol for colourless mana. I liked there just being numbers for colourless. I guess who ever called the number in the circle becoming "any mana" is right. Numbers in circles was "any mana" if it was in a cost and "colorless mana" if it was something produced. Now Tron lands should produce ♦/♦♦/♦♦♦ instead of {1}/{2}/{3} to enforce this distinction but can still pay for everything Tron does since costs are in "any mana" format.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2015 02:07 |