|
“Muslims must confront this hateful ideology” Is it me, or does this phrase sound like a trigger phrase meant to activate someone listening? (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 08:10 |
|
|
Meg go read some migf posts and take notes. Your trolling skills suck.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
Meg From Family Guy posted:“Muslims must confront this hateful ideology” It's me. Now I am a radical islam.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 02:54
|
|
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:http://news.groopspeak.com/sen-graham-goes-off-script-and-tells-the-truth-about-the-republican-party-video/ The first half of this is great, Graham kinda goes off the cuff and you can tell this is his "honesty" moment. He has nothing to lose, and he's completely right about why the Republicans are gonna lose. Just make sure to turn off the speech when he starts talking about Benghazi, if you couldn't already figure that out.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 02:55
|
|
|
Meg From Family Guy posted:“Muslims must confront this hateful ideology” I would like an expansion of this, because I'm interested in linguistics.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 02:56
|
|
|
euphronius posted:I enjoyed Obamas sly reference to the religious right and the pro life movement. I wish it wasn't sly. Those people are loving dangerous
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 02:58
|
|
|
Silver Nitrate posted:This is dumb as hell. What are they going to do, start a sharing economy of terrorism? Voluntarily start self-enforced mass automatic censorship programs on their posters. You laugh, but Israel is already asking YouTube to start self-censoring Palestinians posting
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 03:05
|
|
|
The bill to ban people on the watch list from buying guns that Obama wants would allow for the potential purchaser to challenge the decision. (The bill in the Senate last week did not.) 
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 03:05
|
|
|
Meg From Family Guy posted:“Muslims must confront this hateful ideology”
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 03:05
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:Obama's recommendations for Congress: Meg From Family Guy posted:“Muslims must confront this hateful ideology” Obama should probably point this out if he hasn't already.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 03:09
|
|
|
ComradeCosmobot posted:There's a class-action lawsuit filed in New York claiming that Facebook is liable for letting terrorists connect to each other and spread information about how to stab Israelis. In the lawsuit, which 20,000 Israelis have joined, the plaintiffs are demanding that Facebook automatically detect and stop terrorists from finding each other and sharing this information without requiring people to report it first (i.e. automatic self-censorship). Seems like it would just make these groups congregate to more secretive, harder-to-track services.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 03:11
|
|
|
LookingGodIntheEye posted:How exactly would you enforce that? Have a dedicated crew of people at Facebook monitoring posts? Flag posts by keywords? The articles don't elaborate too much, but some combination of algorithms to flag and human intervention in reading flagged posts, most probably. And you're right, of course, but that's not going to stop the people demanding that these services censor their users, especially when they can argue that the initial radicalization often happens as a result of susceptible people connecting to radicals on these services, and those susceptible people wouldn't use those "more secretive, harder-to-find" services.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 03:14
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:Can we just start calling it The Forever War. It's not The Forever War until the eugenics commission makes homosex mandatory for all.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 03:47
|
|
|
Facebook already has a moderation system including humans, they'll just add pro-ISIS to a "delete on sight" list that already has stuff like child porn.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 03:56
|
|
|
LookingGodIntheEye posted:How exactly would you enforce that? Have a dedicated crew of people at Facebook monitoring posts? Flag posts by keywords? That's actually how content moderation works for sites currently, including facebook I think. http://www.wired.com/2014/10/content-moderation/
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 03:59
|
|
|
Al Gore said he won't endorse anyone until the primary is over. Also, for some reason, he had to clarify that he is 100% not running in 2016.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 04:19
|
|
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:Al Gore said he won't endorse anyone until the primary is over. So, Al did nothing?
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 04:24
|
|
|
HootTheOwl posted:So, Al did nothing? Yeah, but he had an interview with People magazine about his new climate initiative and those were the headlines they ran with. #AmericanMedia
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 04:28
|
|
|
CNN reporting that Al Gore has legally changed his name to Joe Biden, and has not ruled out running in 2016!
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:03
|
|
|
Nelson Mandingo posted:It's me. Now I am a radical islam. Now we must start the Goon Project. Corsair Daniyeel and his Scurvy Nasheeds.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:05
|
|
|
haveblue posted:Facebook already has a moderation system including humans, they'll just add pro-ISIS to a "delete on sight" list that already has stuff like child porn. shame too, we gain shittons of valuable intel from dumbass ISIL recruits posting poo poo on facebook/twitter ISIL social media posts are like a giant JDAM magnet
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:05
|
|
Cat Army 
|
Joementum posted:The bill to ban people on the watch list from buying guns that Obama wants Wait, which guns does Obama want?
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:16
|
|
|
"I loving HATE DUE PROCESS" --BARNIE "BONG" SANDLERS http://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/262250-sanders-says-gun-control-not-a-magic-formula quote:The Vermont senator said he supports a measure to prevent people on the “no-fly list” from purchasing firearms.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:20
|
|
This poster loves police brutality, but only when its against minorities!
|
Chantilly Say posted:Wait, which guns does Obama want? *flexes, looking left to right with increasingly desperation*
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:21
|
|
|
DeusExMachinima posted:"I loving HATE DUE PROCESS" --BARNIE "BONG" SANDLERS
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:28
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:That part of Obama's speech confused me. If someone is on the no fly list, does that not currently show up on a background check to get a gun? Iirc someone mentioned earlier that apparently that no, that does not factor into the background check when it comes to getting a gun.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:30
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:That part of Obama's speech confused me. If someone is on the no fly list, does that not currently show up on a background check to get a gun? Knowing this country, it probably does, but it just doesn't disallow you from owning a firearm.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:30
|
|
|
LookingGodIntheEye posted:Have a dedicated crew of people at Facebook monitoring posts? they already have one
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:30
|
|
|
Artificer posted:Iirc someone mentioned earlier that apparently that no, that does not factor into the background check when it comes to getting a gun.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:33
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:Weird. Is this because they actually care about due process and don't consider the no fly list to be valid, or does the gun lobby want literally as many people as possible to pass the background check no matter what? the latter, considering they don't have a problem with "you can't fly"
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:35
|
|
|
Artificer posted:Iirc someone mentioned earlier that apparently that no, that does not factor into the background check when it comes to getting a gun. The FBI currently does get an alert whenever anyone on the list buys a gun though.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:36
|
|
|
Samurai Sanders posted:Weird. Is this because they actually care about due process and don't consider the no fly list to be valid, or does the gun lobby want literally as many people as possible to pass the background check no matter what? More saliently, liberals should have a problem with it because of the former.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:36
|
|
|
DeusExMachinima posted:More saliently, liberals should have a problem with it because of the former. man i sure hope nobody in this thread already talked about how the list's existence is some bullshit for that exact reason, that'd just make you look like an rear end in a top hat who prefers to preach than actually talk about things
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:38
|
|
|
EDIT: I'm sorry if this is a stupid question, but isn't there "due process" in the sense that what it takes for you to get placed on a "no fly list" in the first place?LookingGodIntheEye posted:How exactly would you enforce that? Have a dedicated crew of people at Facebook monitoring posts? Flag posts by keywords? Facebook already has humans going through flagged posts. I once worked at a company where that work was outsourced to. It paid better than any other BPO assignment but the turnover and attrition rates were still super high.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:39
|
|
|
Is it public knowledge if any of the mass shooters of the past four years have been on the no-fly list, or on any other list of suspected terrorists?
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:41
|
|
|
gradenko_2000 posted:EDIT: I'm sorry if this is a stupid question, but isn't there "due process" in the sense that what it takes for you to get placed on a "no fly list" in the first place? There's due process in the "Stop & Frisk" sense. Literally The Worst posted:man i sure hope nobody in this thread already talked about how the list's existence is some bullshit for that exact reason, that'd just make you look like an rear end in a top hat who prefers to preach than actually talk about things I mean, even with that it's still troubling that Bernie is supporting keeping the list in existence.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:46
|
|
|
Artificer posted:Iirc someone mentioned earlier that apparently that no, that does not factor into the background check when it comes to getting a gun. As the founders intended
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:49
|
|
|
Remember that time Cat Stevens couldn't get on an airplane
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:52
|
|
|
Literally The Worst posted:man i sure hope nobody in this thread already talked about how the list's existence is some bullshit for that exact reason, that'd just make you look like an rear end in a top hat who prefers to preach than actually talk about things How do you feel about goon hero da Bern dropping trou and spraying liquid poo poo all over the 5th and 14th Amendments, Literally The Worst?
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 08:10 |
|
|
computer parts posted:I mean, even with that it's still troubling that Bernie is supporting keeping the list in existence.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2015 05:53
|
|