|
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 19:42 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 00:56 |
Something oddly hypnotizing about the various elements of motion here. I think I actually watched it for a full minute.
|
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 19:46 |
|
The Spirit of America rejects the hand of Donald Trump.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 19:48 |
|
Donald Trump just tweeted that all bald eagles are clowns and just rose six points in the polls.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 19:49 |
|
I hear Ben Franklin's argument about how the turkey would have been a better choice for national bird, but watching that gif, I think we made the right call.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 19:49 |
|
zoux posted:Is the conclusion "black people aren't inherently stupid"? Basically. But also that most good evidence goes against the 'mismatch' hypothesis, and those pushing it likely have an axe to grind.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 19:54 |
|
Fried Chicken posted:Scalia: Affirmative Action Sends Blacks To Schools Too Advanced For Them Next Scalia shows up to the oral arguments wearing the billboard from Die Hard with a Vengeance.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 19:58 |
|
I'm starting to think Martin Shkreli is a trial balloon for the mega-rich, to see just how far they can push before someone takes them out in the modern age.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 19:58 |
Hulk Krogan posted:I hear Ben Franklin's argument about how the turkey would have been a better choice for national bird, but watching that gif, I think we made the right call. The bald eagle is a predator that rarely attacks dangerous or large prey, has a weak mating call, and eats mostly dead things and things it can steal from other predators. Yep, sounds about right. Also, Ben Franklin never argued for the turkey. It is true that he didn't like the bald eagle though: "For my own part. I wish the bald eagle had not been chosen the representative of our country. He is a bird of bad moral character. He does not get his living honestly ... besides he is a rank coward: The little king bird not bigger than a sparrow attacks him boldly and drives him out of the district." Talmonis posted:I'm starting to think Martin Shkreli is a trial balloon for the mega-rich, to see just how far they can push before someone takes them out in the modern age. In that case they've chosen a confounding sample: his face is just naturally quite punchable, which might skew their results.
|
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 19:58 |
|
Pohl posted:Yeah, which is why we need to raise interest rates! No one is sure why, but we really need to raise interest rates right loving now. So people with money can make more money, duh.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:00 |
|
Nonsense posted:I don't see Wu Tang keeping their end of the bargain. They'll release it online knowing the internet and general citizens of the world hates this dude. Apparently shrikelli could release it for free, or play it at promotional events, but that's incredibly unlikely to happen. Apparently he's currently streaming himself sitting around because of the possibility that he might play it at some point. But...
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:02 |
|
Hello I am the King of Good Ideas. I sit on my throne every day and pull Good Ideas out of my Good Idea Sack. Let's see what we have today. *rustle rustle* A-ha! quote:The Open Carry Walk and Crisis Performance Event will involve actors “shot” by perpetrators armed with cardboard weapons, said Matthew Short, a spokesman for the gun rights groups Come and Take It Texas and DontComply.com. http://www.statesman.com/news/news/gun-rights-groups-to-stage-mock-mass-shooting-at-u/npf38/ Verily, the Finest Good Idea I've seen yet.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:02 |
|
Rhesus Pieces posted:In other news, Jeb has burned through almost half of his enormous superPAC fund and has absolutely nothing to show for it. quote:In recent private meetings, Murphy has continued to express confidence in the super PAC’s value and Bush’s prospects, arguing that a large share of voters have not settled on a candidate. During an early morning breakfast meeting for Right to Rise supporters in Washington last week, he predicted that the group’s investments in ads touting Bush’s biography and gubernatorial record will pay dividends once the electorate focuses on its choices. The level of faith in this 15 minute documentary is amazing
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:04 |
|
Kurieg posted:Apparently shrikelli could release it for free, or play it at promotional events, but that's incredibly unlikely to happen. Apparently he's currently streaming himself sitting around because of the possibility that he might play it at some point. Is that real because if it is it's kind of amazing.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:06 |
Kurieg posted:Apparently shrikelli could release it for free, or play it at promotional events, but that's incredibly unlikely to happen. Apparently he's currently streaming himself sitting around because of the possibility that he might play it at some point. If that's real, it made my day. Imagining Method Man trying to pick Shkreli's deadbolt without letting go of his blunt.
|
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:06 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woLQI8X2R6Y
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:06 |
|
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:08 |
|
Kurieg posted:Apparently shrikelli could release it for free, or play it at promotional events, but that's incredibly unlikely to happen. Apparently he's currently streaming himself sitting around because of the possibility that he might play it at some point. I see RZA already has plans for a tie-in movie.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:09 |
|
pathetic little tramp posted:Hello I am the King of Good Ideas. I sit on my throne every day and pull Good Ideas out of my Good Idea Sack. Let's see what we have today. *rustle rustle* these hipsters are dumbasses.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:09 |
|
Maybe I'm just a SJW but this seems racist to me.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:10 |
|
I'm doing the catstare emoticon IRL right now.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:10 |
|
Scalia has definitely used the phrase "one of the good ones" at least five times during the course of his lovely, hateful life.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:13 |
My hatred for Scalia is pretty well-documented around here, I guess -- but I think it's kind of remarkable how I wind up hating him more every single time he opens his mouth. There must be something he's said in an opinion, or during oral argument, that doesn't make me want to squish his face with bolt-cutters, but damned if I've ever been able to find anything.
|
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:14 |
|
Procedural question: this was in oral arguments, right? So while that mess you posted is horrendously racist, and while I'm the last person to defend Scalia, is it necessarily fair to paint him as arguing this? Isn't part of oral arguments that the Justices throw out a bunch of arguments for the attorneys to respond to, or is it sort of understood that they're arguing their own point of view and just using briefs and such as sources?
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:15 |
|
Supreme Court, Goddamn.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:15 |
|
This is getting the attention, but Roberts blasting that diversity has any value is pretty too
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:17 |
|
Guys it's not Scalia's fault that blacks are obviously inferior.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:17 |
|
Fried Chicken posted:This is getting the attention, but Roberts blasting that diversity has any value is pretty too And Roberts spent most of his time today asking when it's all going to end, apparently. Dude is very eager for Post Racial America.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:18 |
|
Hulk Krogan posted:Isn't part of oral arguments that the Justices throw out a bunch of arguments for the attorneys to respond to, or is it sort of understood that they're arguing their own point of view and just using briefs and such as sources? I guess but this is one of those things where its pretty obvious Scalia is throwing out an argument he wants someone else to agree with.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:20 |
|
Hollismason posted:Is that real because if it is it's kind of amazing. Doctor Butts posted:I guess but this is one of those things where its pretty obvious Scalia is throwing out an argument he wants someone else to agree with. Yeah he's fairly on record against anything requiring anyone to favor minority groups. The fact that it's also "Cause they're so dumb, you see." Is icing on the cake.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:23 |
|
Joementum posted:And Roberts spent most of his time today asking when it's all going to end, apparently. Dude is very eager for Post Racial America. "Uh I'm kind of on record as racism being over because of that whole VRA thing so..." e: Here's a con law prof at Temple arguing in an NYT oped piece that Trump's plan may actually be constitutional. zoux fucked around with this message at 20:27 on Dec 9, 2015 |
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:24 |
|
Fox News discussion today was about how islamophobia is made up and in fact the Muslims are the ones persecuting American Jews.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:28 |
|
Hulk Krogan posted:Procedural question: this was in oral arguments, right? So while that mess you posted is horrendously racist, and while I'm the last person to defend Scalia, is it necessarily fair to paint him as arguing this? Isn't part of oral arguments that the Justices throw out a bunch of arguments for the attorneys to respond to, or is it sort of understood that they're arguing their own point of view and just using briefs and such as sources? Yes, he has a well documented history of holding personal opinions that are very consistent with this. This is not devils advocacy, this is his argument to the other justices.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:29 |
|
zoux posted:e: Here's a con law prof at Temple arguing in an NYT oped piece that Trump's plan may actually be constitutional.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:32 |
|
Luigi Thirty posted:Fox News discussion today was about how islamophobia is made up and in fact the Muslims are the ones persecuting American Jews. There's a lot of headlines in Europe of attacks on Jewish people and antisemitism increasing because of Muslim immigrants and refugees. They'll probably start whipping that up here, despite all the pig heads left on mosques, and not long ago black churches were torched, but claims and hearsay rule now.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:33 |
|
Doctor Butts posted:I guess but this is one of those things where its pretty obvious Scalia is throwing out an argument he wants someone else to agree with. Oh, I'm absolutely certain that he is, because he's an rear end in a top hat and his saying something like this doesn't surprise me at all. I was just wondering about what the understanding is when a justice cites a brief or other source during oral arguments regarding whether they're playing devil's advocate or advancing an actual position. Edit: Yeah this basically answered my question: Mulva posted:Yes, he has a well documented history of holding personal opinions that are very consistent with this. This is not devils advocacy, this is his argument to the other justices.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:33 |
|
Powerful.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:34 |
|
Mulva posted:Yes, he has a well documented history of holding personal opinions that are very consistent with this. This is not devils advocacy, this is his argument to the other justices. This. There are multiple decisions where scalia quite frankly talks about "blacks" and what they should be doing instead.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:35 |
|
zoux posted:
"How can we really make this appeal to the current electorate?" "Make him even whiter."
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:37 |
|
|
# ? Jun 7, 2024 00:56 |
|
Is that what they pissed 50 million dollars away on? Is so LOL.
|
# ? Dec 9, 2015 20:39 |