|
Adar posted:If all else fails, a brokered convention as such is a near impossibility because none of the first tier candidates would jump on the nomination sword. For it to work out they would have to have a savior candidate who could outpoll Hillary without many of the Trump voters. That person doesn't exist. Mitt
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 11:25 |
|
|
Joementum posted:Reminds me of one of my favorite stories of the 2012 primary. I would order the box set of the wacky sitcom that was the gingrich/santorum white house
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:08
|
|
|
Paradoxish posted:So, what, 59% are just like "No, blatantly racist and hateful messaging isn't insulting and wrong at all, why do you ask?" Reading that tweet, it's 41% disagree, 14% agree, and the remainder are undecided or ambivalent.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:09
|
|
|
wow, you can be funny
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:10
|
|
|
Fun fact: the Chairman of the Republican National Convention, who would be in the position to recognize nominations after the first round of balloting is... Paul D. Ryan.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:10
|
|
|
45% Hillary, 27% Trump, 15% Mitt
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:10
|
|
|
Joementum if Trump is still leading Mid January what would your position be at that point?
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:11
|
|
|
JT Jag posted:And by 'we' you mean the House Select Benghazi Committee, Fox News, right wing blogs, internet commenters, and no one else Also, you know - the FBI But otherwise yes, just those biased groups.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:11
|
|
|
Hollismason posted:Joementum if Trump is still leading Mid January what would your position be at that point? That he will not win the nomination. As I've said before, I won't be convinced otherwise unless he has a majority of delegates after Super Tuesday (March 1).
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:12
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:Also, you know - the FBI And then you go and ruin your streak of good posts.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:13
|
|
|
Yo what happens if Hillary gets indicted Trump vs Bernie - the RNC just might roll the dice there.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:13
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:Yo what happens if Hillary gets indicted Hillary won't get indicted (because she did nothing to get indicted for) so this is absolutely pointless.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:14
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:Also, you know - the FBI I wanna find a way to film your universe, I'll make millions. Oh wait, it's just Fox News, isn't it?
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:14
|
|
|
zoux posted:Actual article is behind a paywall but: How is it weighted?
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:15
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:Yo what happens if Hillary gets indicted
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:16
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:Also, you know - the FBI Didn't the FBI clear Hillary recently though?
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:19
|
|
|
JT Jag posted:Is your gimmick that you are lifting comments straight out of foxnews.com articles and posting them here? I'd frankly like him more if this were the case, sadly
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:19
|
|
|
JT Jag posted:Is your gimmick that you are lifting comments straight out of foxnews.com articles and posting them here? it essentially comes down to one guy, and yes it is a possibility A Winner is Jew posted:Didn't the FBI clear Hillary recently though? no
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:20
|
|
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:Hillary won't get indicted (because she did nothing to get indicted for) so this is absolutely pointless. Just so we're clear - Petraeus writes down information that's classified in a physical notebook, locks it in his drawer, never shows anyone = federal conviction, six figure fine, 2 years probation Hillary runs hundreds if not thousands of emails with classified data on a server sitting on the internet in a bathroom closet, no one can say for sure it wasn't compromised = nbd, no crime Do I have that right
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:21
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:Just so we're clear - You were right don't ruin it by acting like a dumb rear end It comes down to FBI Chief Comey
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:22
|
|
|
TheDisreputableDog posted:Just so we're clear - Reminder that Petraeus gave information his girlfriend who then published it. Also, none of the information on her server was classified at the time -- it was classified after the fact -- in intra-departmental squabbling. But hey, if you want to keep bringing up Benghazi and emails and whatever, sure -- it's been such a winner for y'all.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:24
|
|
|
baw posted:You were right don't ruin it by acting like a dumb rear end Doesn't it actually come down to Lorreta Lynch, who will never in a million years actually prosecute Hillary for anything?
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:24
|
|
|
zoux posted:Actual article is behind a paywall but: http://rvrcommunity.businesscatalyst.com/lifestyle/wall-street-journal-login The article states quote:Donald Trump’s proposal to ban Muslims from entering the U.S. is opposed by a solid majority of Americans, but there is more support for the idea and greater anti-Muslim sentiment within the Republican Party, a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll finds. Stop freaking out guys. He can't bash muslims and win a general election.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:24
|
|
|
MC Nietzche posted:Doesn't it actually come down to Lorreta Lynch, who will never in a million years actually prosecute Hillary for anything? If she decided to block an indictment recommended by the FBI it would be a poo poo storm
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:Didn't the FBI clear Hillary recently though? They walked back the classification of some of the data in her emails as "top secret". Everyone on the left started high fiving, but that's only one categorization within the classified data spectrum
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
I was lolling more at the 85% of GOP primary voters being down with Trump's unconscionable racism on the same day that the party apparatchiks are plotting die Endlossung to the Trumpfrage.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
Obama was smart enough to know the FBI wouldn't find anything despite not being briefed on the investigation http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/262639-obama-not-briefed-on-clinton-investigation
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:29
|
|
|
Why the gently caress are we talking about Clinton Emails?
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:32
|
|
|
A Winner is Jew posted:Didn't the FBI clear Hillary recently though? Clearing would imply she ever faced a charge or criminal investigation. The FBI was and is culling for classified data to ensure all the classified info, which the state dept had stupidly and ineptly and against regulation left stored on unsecured networks, could be identified, ramifications identified, and information stored or destroyed properly. Think accident investigator versus criminal investigation.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:33
|
|
|
CalmDownMate posted:Why the gently caress are we talking about Clinton Emails?
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:33
|
|
|
Joementum posted:Reminds me of one of my favorite stories of the 2012 primary. Reason will prevail! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPFsNtxH7FA Seriously, this is pretty much all I can see in a situation like this.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:35
|
|
|
CalmDownMate posted:Why the gently caress are we talking about Clinton Emails? cause people are getting trolled hardcore.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
To be fair trolling D&D is stupid easy. All you really have to do is say "I disagree".
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:39
|
|
|
fishmech posted:I wouldn't trade that because it would probably have horrible climate and environmental effects, and again it still wouldn't actually supply the US because the sun ain't shining at night. There has been a lot of progress in this regard—I know at least one thermal-solar plant has been able to maintain power output for ~15 hours with no sun, so it's able to provide uninterrupted power overnight. Obviously doesn't solve getting electricity from Nevada to Maine, but there are some much more flexible options out there than straight up photovoltaics.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:40
|
|
|
Nostalgia4Infinity posted:To be fair trolling D&D is stupid easy. All you really have to do is say "I disagree". Actually, it's pretty difficult to troll D&D well.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:40
|
|
|
Nostalgia4Infinity posted:To be fair trolling D&D is stupid easy. All you really have to do is say "I disagree". No one buys MIGF's shtick anymore, for instance.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:41
|
|
|
So I guess people are just dismissing the possibility that Hillary could face indictment, despite the evidence presented that it is a real possibility.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:42
|
|
|
Joementum posted:Actually, it's pretty difficult to troll D&D well. Turns out Joe is a dyed in the wool New Hampshire libertarian who loves watching liberals circlejerk at whatever morsel he drops in our laps
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:42
|
|
|
Joementum posted:Actually, it's pretty difficult to troll D&D well. I think you're right, but I don't think you're going to convince anyone if you phrase it like that.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 7, 2024 11:25 |
|
|
baw posted:So I guess people are just dismissing the possibility that Hillary could face indictment, despite the evidence presented that it is a real possibility. Hillary Clinton is the most vetted presidential candidate in history. If they were going to get her on something they would have by now.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:43
|
|