Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

JT Jag posted:

The NPR chief's take is pretty lovely too imo, but fitting for the institution

Yeah I thought so too, it really does seem like they've earned that moniker of Nice Polite Republicans. It's insane that it's the Huff Post guy who is right in track.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

OJ MIST 2 THE DICK
Sep 11, 2008

Anytime I need to see your face I just close my eyes
And I am taken to a place
Where your crystal minds and magenta feelings
Take up shelter in the base of my spine
Sweet like a chica cherry cola

-Cheap Trick

Nap Ghost

euphronius posted:

The most recent nlrb case for independent contractor status is fedex home delivery 361 NLRB no 55 (2014)

Under that 11 factor test I would say uber drivers are employees and not contractors.

Now do the test for professional wrestlers

Mc Do Well
Aug 2, 2008

by FactsAreUseless
The sharing economy should be nationalized.

ComradeCosmobot
Dec 4, 2004

USPOL July

KomradeX posted:

Yeah I thought so too, it really does seem like they've earned that moniker of Nice Polite Republicans. It's insane that it's the Huff Post guy who is right in track.

Excuse me but if you aren't giving both sides equal weight or if you are *gasp* expressing an opinion! Then you're just biased and unfit to be called a real reporter. As the Daily Show put it 11 years ago:

quote:

STEWART: Here’s what puzzles me most, Rob. John Kerry’s record in Vietnam is pretty much right there in the official records of the US military, and haven’t [sic] been disputed for 35 years?

CORDDRY: That’s right, Jon, and that’s certainly the spin you’ll be hearing coming from the Kerry campaign over the next few days.

STEWART: Th-that’s not a spin thing, that’s a fact. That’s established.

CORDDRY: Exactly, Jon, and that established, incontravertible fact is one side of the story.

STEWART: But that should be — isn’t that the end of the story? I mean, you’ve seen the records, haven’t you? What’s your opinion?

CORDDRY: I’m sorry, my opinion? No, I don’t have “o-pin-i-ons”. I’m a reporter, Jon, and my job is to spend half the time repeating what one side says, and half the time repeating the other. Little thing called ‘objectivity’ — might wanna look it up some day.

STEWART: Doesn’t objectivity mean objectively weighing the evidence, and calling out what’s credible and what isn’t?

CORDDRY: Whoa-ho! Well, well, well — sounds like someone wants the media to act as a filter! [high-pitched, effeminate] “Ooh, this allegation is spurious! Upon investigation this claim lacks any basis in reality! Mmm, mmm, mmm.” Listen buddy: not my job to stand between the people talking to me and the people listening to me.

mcmagic
Jul 1, 2004

If you see this avatar while scrolling the succ zone, you have been visited by the mcmagic of shitty lib takes! Good luck and prosperity will come to you, but only if you reply "shut the fuck up mcmagic" to this post!
http://www.vice.com/read/watch-kill...e=vicetwitterus

This is pretty loving awesome.

Hyrax Attack!
Jan 13, 2009

We demand to be taken seriously

I understand that Uber seems to have major issues, but what's the consensus on Airbnb? I've only used it once in Portland and it was a great experience, and the owner had just expanded to two rentals so it must have been going well for him. There was a line item in the bill for the city's hotel tax, so that wasn't being evaded.

I know this is a tiny sample size, but overall is Airbnb reasonably ethical and not screwing anyone over?

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

Airbnb depends entirely on local municipalities looking the other way wrt application of rental property codes and taxation on rental income.

Luigi Thirty
Apr 30, 2006

Emergency confection port.

The vast majority of Airbnb units in cities are owned by slumlords taking advantage of the total lack of regulation on their unlicensed hotels. They've taken something like 40% of units off the rental market in San Francisco. Most Airbnb owners in New York own more than ten units.

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

Mojo Threepwood posted:

I know this is a tiny sample size, but overall is Airbnb reasonably ethical and not screwing anyone over?

AirBnB is wreaking havoc on the rental market in most major cities and in many cases listings are outright illegal.

They also have at least as scummy a PR operation as Uber.

haveblue fucked around with this message at 17:49 on Dec 15, 2015

ComradeCosmobot
Dec 4, 2004

USPOL July

Mojo Threepwood posted:

I understand that Uber seems to have major issues, but what's the consensus on Airbnb? I've only used it once in Portland and it was a great experience, and the owner had just expanded to two rentals so it must have been going well for him. There was a line item in the bill for the city's hotel tax, so that wasn't being evaded.

I know this is a tiny sample size, but overall is Airbnb reasonably ethical and not screwing anyone over?

At best you can say they are, but only indirectly. Typically the idea of landlords taking property off the market to turn them into Airbnb rentals gets brought up most often in cities where the housing stock is already extremely thin (e.g. San Francisco, New York). There's also legitimate concerns of having a hotel in the neighborhood without notifying your neighbors, since more people coming in and out of a neighborhood can be seen as risky in terms of increasing crime and other ordinance violations (being too loud at night, etc.), not to mention the fact that Airbnb doesn't have to abide by the stricter health and safety regulations of hotels.

But none of this is all that new. Regular Bed & Breakfasts often end up doing the same thing (but not to this degree). These issues aren't explicitly Airbnb's fault the way Uber can be directly faulted for how they treat their drivers. Airbnb causes problems, yes, but, so far as I'm aware, it doesn't outright screw people over as much (other than leaving them in the lurch if your guests are lovely and destroy your place and initially ignoring regulations to start "disrupting" business before finding out if it's legal). They aren't great by any stretch, but there's a reason people focus on Uber rather than Airbnb.

Ceiling fan
Dec 26, 2003

I really like ceilings.
Dead Man’s Band

KomradeX posted:

Yeah I thought so too, it really does seem like they've earned that moniker of Nice Polite Republicans. It's insane that it's the Huff Post guy who is right in track.

I'm so glad Huff Post aired that and let us know what is really going on.

Stultus Maximus
Dec 21, 2009

USPOL May

Luigi Thirty posted:

The vast majority of Airbnb units in cities are owned by slumlords taking advantage of the total lack of regulation on their unlicensed hotels. They've taken something like 40% of units off the rental market in San Francisco. Most Airbnb owners in New York own more than ten units.

Which I'm sure is an unintended side effect that Airbnb in no way anticipated because they just want to drive the "sharing economy" and not the intended result of technolibertarians undermining regulation and labor practices via "on the internet!"

feedmegin
Jul 30, 2008

haveblue posted:

AirBnB is wreaking havoc on the rental market in most major cities and in many cases listings are outright illegal.

They also have at least as scummy a PR operation as Uber.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/07/airbnb-fined-illegal-tourist-lets-barcelona-catalonia

People buy houses/apartments in what are supposed to be residential zones so they can airbnb them full time, bypassing regulations on hotels. People in the houses next to those houses are often not happy at having a constant stream of random, sometimes sketchy strangers revolving-door next to them in what is supposed to be a house in a residential district not a hotel in a business district.

Ashcans
Jan 2, 2006

Let's do the space-time warp again!

I am assuming that a lot of people doing AirBnB stuff don't have appropriate insurance, so when a loose railing comes off and you break your leg their homeowner's insurance is going to deny any responsibility based on the commercial nature of the use and they won't have any other coverage, leaving the guest suing the owner to try and recover any damages.

Luigi Thirty
Apr 30, 2006

Emergency confection port.

Ashcans posted:

I am assuming that a lot of people doing AirBnB stuff don't have appropriate insurance, so when a loose railing comes off and you break your leg their homeowner's insurance is going to deny any responsibility based on the commercial nature of the use and they won't have any other coverage, leaving the guest suing the owner to try and recover any damages.

There was an article about that recently. Someone used a rope swing on a rental property, it broke and killed someone, Airbnb said "not our property, not our problem!" after a week-long runaround and the homeowner's insurance didn't cover commercial use. I think they eventually got offered a refund. If it were a licensed hotel, the rope swing would have been inspected and either dismantled or repaired.

euphronius
Feb 18, 2009

Bed and breakfasts are usually licensed and conform to rental property codes.

Luigi Thirty
Apr 30, 2006

Emergency confection port.

Uber also literally just added a newer arbitration clause to their driver agreements that also bans drivers from participating in class action lawsuits, "past, present, or future."

The mayor of Seattle did not sign the unanimously approved Uber unionization bill because collective bargaining is too expensive. The city council can override his veto with a 2/3 majority in a second vote in thirty days.

Luigi Thirty fucked around with this message at 18:12 on Dec 15, 2015

Paul MaudDib
May 3, 2006

TEAM NVIDIA:
FORUM POLICE
In Flint, Mich., there’s so much lead in children’s blood that a state of emergency is declared

(What's up with the passive voice, WaPo?)

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ

euphronius posted:

Bed and breakfasts are usually licensed and conform to rental property codes.

Also: taxed as a business. Airbnb has successfully lobbied in San Francisco to make it so that the property owners are responsible for paying the city the hoteling tax. Also, Airbnb has refused to turn over their records to the city so that the tax can be enforced.

Swan Oat
Oct 9, 2012

I was selected for my skill.

Luigi Thirty posted:

There was an article about that recently. Someone used a rope swing on a rental property, it broke and killed someone, Airbnb said "not our property, not our problem!" after a week-long runaround and the homeowner's insurance didn't cover commercial use. I think they eventually got offered a refund. If it were a licensed hotel, the rope swing would have been inspected and either dismantled or repaired.

https://medium.com/matter/living-and-dying-on-airbnb-6bff8d600c04#.rj1vnixjx

It's pretty affecting stuff

MaxxBot
Oct 6, 2003

you could have clapped

you should have clapped!!

haveblue posted:

All of those things should be possible with a traditional taxi company and occupational relationship, though, not the sort of "you're bound to the company but the company doesn't have responsibilities to you" grey zone that Uber established.

Of course, but in many cases traditional taxis didn't even start offering these things until long after Uber came along and started to take away their business. The taxis here didn't even accept credit cards until 2012 when the city council forced it on them and they still often refused to take them.

Rhesus Pieces
Jun 27, 2005

Luigi Thirty posted:

There was an article about that recently. Someone used a rope swing on a rental property, it broke and killed someone, Airbnb said "not our property, not our problem!" after a week-long runaround and the homeowner's insurance didn't cover commercial use. I think they eventually got offered a refund. If it were a licensed hotel, the rope swing would have been inspected and either dismantled or repaired.

Don't Uber and Lyft drivers have the same issue with their car insurance and vehicle registrations? I doubt they re-register their cars as livery or taxi vehicles at the DMV or with their insurance company unless the ride sharing company forces them to. Which they probably don't, because fewer drivers would sign up and these companies are all about skirting regulations to make a buck and sticking the contractor with the consequences if things go bad.

OJ MIST 2 THE DICK
Sep 11, 2008

Anytime I need to see your face I just close my eyes
And I am taken to a place
Where your crystal minds and magenta feelings
Take up shelter in the base of my spine
Sweet like a chica cherry cola

-Cheap Trick

Nap Ghost

Joementum posted:

Also: taxed as a business. Airbnb has successfully lobbied in San Francisco to make it so that the property owners are responsible for paying the city the hoteling tax. Also, Airbnb has refused to turn over their records to the city so that the tax can be enforced.

They did it in the most tone deaf passive aggressive manner I've seen.

OJ MIST 2 THE DICK fucked around with this message at 18:25 on Dec 15, 2015

Luigi Thirty
Apr 30, 2006

Emergency confection port.

Rhesus Pieces posted:

Don't Uber and Lyft drivers have the same issue with their car insurance and vehicle registrations? I doubt they re-register their cars as livery or taxi vehicles at the DMV or with their insurance company unless the ride sharing company forces them to. Which they probably don't, because fewer drivers would sign up and these companies are all about skirting regulations to make a buck and sticking the contractor with the consequences if things go bad.

Yeah, that's also correct. If your insurance company finds out you're driving for Uber or Lyft they'll cancel you. If you get in an accident they won't pay out. Uber claims to have their own policies to cover your accidents but good luck ever getting them to pay out or staying on the driver rolls.

Tempest_56
Mar 14, 2009

Rhesus Pieces posted:

Don't Uber and Lyft drivers have the same issue with their car insurance and vehicle registrations? I doubt they re-register their cars as livery or taxi vehicles at the DMV or with their insurance company unless the ride sharing company forces them to. Which they probably don't, because fewer drivers would sign up and these companies are all about skirting regulations to make a buck and sticking the contractor with the consequences if things go bad.

As an insurance guy: Yes. Most auto insurance policies expressly forbid personal vehicles being used for taxi services. If the carrier or agent finds out, the driver's hosed. Most get along off the idea of 'I bet I can just lie to the claims guy and they'll never know'.

DrPop
Aug 22, 2004


Jacobin has good article on whether Trump is a fascist and if it matters anyway

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2015/12/donald-trump-fascism-islamophobia-nativism/

Jacobin posted:

Last week, Donald Trump ratcheted up his nativist rhetoric by proposing a ban on Muslims entering the United States. Trump was widely condemned, but despite Ted Cruz’s new lead in Iowa, the candidate has only reached new heights in national polls. 41 percent of Republicans now support him, with Cruz a distant second at 14 percent.

Many on the Left have looked worryingly at Trump’s rise and have been speculating that he might represent something even more dangerous than the usual varieties of right-wing populism. Could Trump be a fascist? And does the answer to that question even matter from a strategic perspective?

We asked Jacobin contributors for their thoughts.

Jennifer Roesch is an activist with the International Socialist Organization in New York City.
Richard Steigmann-Gal is an associate professor of history at Kent State University.
Daniel Lazare is the author of The Velvet Coup: The Constitution, the Supreme Court, and the Decline of American Democracy, among other titles.
Dylan John Riley is an associate professor of sociology at UC Berkeley and a member of the New Left Review editorial committee.
Jennifer Roesch

Since Trump came out last week and openly called for Muslims to be banned from the United States, the ruling class clearly decided it has had enough and got serious about repudiating him. The New York Times published an editorial denouncing the “Trump Effect,” while Jeb Bush’s campaign called it a fascist proposal. Hillary Clinton quickly rolled out a campaign appeal thinly disguised as a petition to “stop Trump” and Thomas Friedman lamented that Trump was destroying the United States’s ability to build a strong coalition against ISIS.

Unlike in Italy or Germany in the 1920s and 1930s, the US ruling class doesn’t face the kind of political crisis that would lead a section of it to abandon its “democratic” forms and resort to fascism. In fact, the bulk of the ruling class sees Trump as a threat to its ability to carry out its political agenda. A poll of millionaires was revealing: Clinton leads the pack with 31 percent of millionaires supporting her.

For these establishment figures, charges of fascism are a cynical ploy to distance their own rhetoric and policies from Trump’s open displays of racism and bigotry. But for millions of people horrified by his hate-mongering, there is a genuine fear about what Trump represents. I am in full solidarity with that sentiment. Trump has given confidence to some of the most right-wing elements in society.

While these elements are not organized into anything like a disciplined fighting force that could serve as the basis for a fascist movement, they do pose a real threat. Witness the recent wave of vicious attacks on Arabs and Muslims. We need to confront this bigotry and build solidarity with those under attack.

But if our side succumbs to panic about Trump, we miss the greater dangers we face. It is the “war on terror” carried out by a Democratic president for the last eight years that has created the breeding ground for racism and terrorism. It is the devastating social and economic crisis wrought by austerity that creates the conditions in which right-wing scapegoating can seem to provide answers. And as long as we remain trapped in the logic of lesser-evilism, trailing the Democratic Party further to the right, we are weakened in our efforts to build the kind of strong, independent left and social movements that could pose a real alternative to Trump.

Richard Steigmann-Gal

I believe fascism can be heard in Trump’s ominous declaration: “We’re going to have to do things that we never did before … And certain things will be done that we never thought would happen in this country.” Even more importantly, the rapturous response of Trump’s followers represents a wider fascist “mood” among the American electorate.

When fascism departs from normal political methods, it does so to restore the prerogatives of the beleaguered, once-dominant majority — defined ethnically or racially — who believes that the nation is “slipping away” from them. Does this come at the expense of parliamentary democracy? Neither Trump nor his supporters call for dictatorship. But it’s important to keep in mind that never did historical fascists abolish parliaments outright. They undermine parliaments from within to make them incapable of working effectively, thereby paving the way for a strong man. Trump doesn’t require uniformed followers in Congress when ideological allies in the Tea Party are doing all they can to render the legislative branch inoperable.

Fascism insists that the existing political authority is “illegitimate” and offers itself as a parallel authority, complete with paramilitary violence, which will restore the “true” nation against impostors. By articulating the Birtherism found in the Tea Party and Oath Keeper movements, Trump exploits and expands distrust of legitimate electoral politics among disaffected, downwardly-mobile white Americans.

If Trump lacks his own militia, there is nonetheless a violent ethos at his rallies. But also relevant here are the Oath Keepers. A nationwide militia movement, like Mussolini’s squadristi, they are composed of veterans who promise to fight an “illegitimate” state and create a parallel authority that “protects” the nation from its own elected authorities. They are not (yet) tied to Trump organizationally, but they represent a similar current of militant — indeed militarist — radicalism.

When we apply “fascism” as a descriptive category, as most commentators are doing, we risk using external criteria like matching shirts or armbands to form a sterile check-list. But when we apply “fascism” as an analytical category, we understand its past social messages and following, and recognize the danger is poses today.

Daniel Lazare

Trump is not a fascist in the classic sense. There are no brownshirts in the streets, no talk of a revolution of the Right, no attacks on democracy or parliamentarism. Whereas Marine Le Pen heads up a powerful and efficient political apparatus in France, any such party organization is all but impossible in America’s eighteenth-century constitutional system. Instead of a movement, he presents himself as an individual — Donald Trump, Inc. — who will single-handedly knock heads and make the system work.

The more appropriate term, therefore, is Bonapartist — a tough leader who positions himself above the fray and simultaneously attacks enemies from the Left and the Right. This is how Trump was able to make mincemeat out of Jeb Bush — by savaging him from the left on 9/11 and tearing apart his idiotic comment that his brother “kept us safe.”

For that reason, he could do better against Clinton than most people assume by attacking her for backing the invasion of Iraq and for now calling for a Syrian no-fly zone. If he’s smart, he’ll assail the idea as nuts and will thus succeed in neutralizing liberals who will be unable to disagree. I can see him following Le Pen’s lead by promising to speak frankly with Putin, which will also go down well with much of the liberal-left. After all, he and Putin are pretty much cut from the same cloth.

But the important point is that he intends to operate within the constitutional order rather than outside it. Plainly, Trump is more than a flash in the pan like Newt Gingrich or Michele Bachmann. He has moved American politics several leagues to the right and will undoubtedly be even more successful in the event of another ISIS atrocity. If in the White House, he’ll function as a classic authoritarian, blustering and bullying and maybe imposing a state of emergency if conditions get hairy enough. But all this would establish him as a precursor to fascism rather than the genuine article.

Dylan John Riley

No, Donald Trump is not a fascist, and yes it matters very much that he is not one.

Fascism arose in countries that had mass militant left parties aiming at the transcendence of capitalism, were excluded from the spoils of imperialism, had very large backward agrarian sectors, and possessed very weakly developed capitalist states. Out of this context arose mass party formations of the far right that displayed some organizational and tactical similarities to the parties of the far left. None of these features obtain in the US today.

The Left, far from being well-organized and militant, is electorally irrelevant. The United States is the only great power left in the world. The agrarian question is non existent, and the American capitalist class enjoys the strongest capitalist state in history. The rise of Trump can be explained by the combined unravelling of the Republican Party, and the utter failure of the Democrats to offer anything to the white working class.

One of the most important class struggles today is unfolding within the Republican Party between the East Coast establishment and the party’s petty-bourgeois and partly working-class base. George W. Bush, because of his peculiar biography, was the last figure able really to hold these wings together. Trump’s rise is possible only because of the shift in the balance of class forces toward the enragé base.

In historical terms this process of disintegration opens up opportunities for the Left. The collapse of a major US political party, if it were to happen, can only be welcomed. In this context we should reject absolutely the hysterical lesser-evilism implicit in calling him a “fascist”; it is both historically inaccurate and politically disastrous because it plays into the logic of supporting whomever emerges from the Democratic Party primary.

Teddybear
May 16, 2009

Look! A teddybear doll!
It's soooo cute!


Tempest_56 posted:

As an insurance guy: Yes. Most auto insurance policies expressly forbid personal vehicles being used for taxi services. If the carrier or agent finds out, the driver's hosed. Most get along off the idea of 'I bet I can just lie to the claims guy and they'll never know'.

If they're caught doing that, though, welcome to insurance fraud town! We've disrupted your ability to move outside these barbed wires.

nachos
Jun 27, 2004

Wario Chalmers! WAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Trump = Napoleon would be a master counter to the fascism claims. His brand would go through the roof.

Oracle
Oct 9, 2004

Yeah, the emergency manager that Governor Snyder appointed decided to use the Flint River (notorious for the last 100+ years for being heavily polluted due to industrial runoff from the automotive industry) as the source of drinking water for the city instead of Lake Huron from a Detroit water company. Cue businesses in Flint paying extra money to relink to the Detroit water because the Flint River water was so corrosive it was loving up their machinery.

People began complaining about the water being rusty and smelling/tasting foul and feeling horrid and the city selectively tested a few homes that were on newly-replaced pipes and surprisingly found acceptable levels of lead in the water. Any tests of other homes were jerryrigged to produce acceptable results also (letting the water run for up to a half hour before testing it, stuff like that) or just outright lied about. Combine the corrosive water with already aging and underused infrastructure due to the steep population decline thanks to local industry disappearing and the water was a mess. (Personal anecdote: was staying at my grandmother's house over Xmas last year which is in Flint and took a shower in this water. It did something horrible to my hair to the point where it felt dirtier after the shower than before I got in. Went to my sister's just out of town just to shower again in her well water to get the film off and had to wash it like three times).

Concerned citizens had to finally go to an EPA guy in Chicago to test the water instead of just being blown off which is when the Superfund levels of lead in the water were discovered (I think the highest was like 10,000 times the legal limit) and then FOIA and such revealed documents that those in charge knew and were actively taking steps to cover it up.

It is a total shitshow and I hope to God everyone involved up to Snyder burns for it.

DrPop
Aug 22, 2004


Oracle posted:

Yeah, the emergency manager that Governor Snyder appointed decided to use the Flint River (notorious for the last 100+ years for being heavily polluted due to industrial runoff from the automotive industry) as the source of drinking water for the city instead of Lake Huron from a Detroit water company. Cue businesses in Flint paying extra money to relink to the Detroit water because the Flint River water was so corrosive it was loving up their machinery.

People began complaining about the water being rusty and smelling/tasting foul and feeling horrid and the city selectively tested a few homes that were on newly-replaced pipes and surprisingly found acceptable levels of lead in the water. Any tests of other homes were jerryrigged to produce acceptable results also (letting the water run for up to a half hour before testing it, stuff like that) or just outright lied about. Combine the corrosive water with already aging and underused infrastructure due to the steep population decline thanks to local industry disappearing and the water was a mess. (Personal anecdote: was staying at my grandmother's house over Xmas last year which is in Flint and took a shower in this water. It did something horrible to my hair to the point where it felt dirtier after the shower than before I got in. Went to my sister's just out of town just to shower again in her well water to get the film off and had to wash it like three times).

Concerned citizens had to finally go to an EPA guy in Chicago to test the water instead of just being blown off which is when the Superfund levels of lead in the water were discovered (I think the highest was like 10,000 times the legal limit) and then FOIA and such revealed documents that those in charge knew and were actively taking steps to cover it up.

It is a total shitshow and I hope to God everyone involved up to Snyder burns for it.

As a resident of Michigan who's heard about this nonstop for a while, I can't believe they're just declaring a state of emergency now. This deserves to blow up into something much huger than it has been and, like you said, there's a lot of people who should be blamed in the current administration.

Hulk Krogan
Mar 25, 2005



Ashcans posted:

I am assuming that a lot of people doing AirBnB stuff don't have appropriate insurance, so when a loose railing comes off and you break your leg their homeowner's insurance is going to deny any responsibility based on the commercial nature of the use and they won't have any other coverage, leaving the guest suing the owner to try and recover any damages.

This is the other problem I've seen, besides slum lords using it to dodge taxes/regulations. People have some property and think they're gonna turn renting it out on AirBnB into a business, but because it's a legal grey area, there's no process that might teach them at least a thing or two about how to properly run their business. Legitimate business owners can be dumb too but at least the process of incorporating, getting insurance/loans, applying for permits, etc sort of serves to let them know how things should work. AirBnB and the like basically make it so you end up with people who don't have proper insurance, don't use contracts of any kind beyond what AirBnB provides (which doesn't really protect anybody but AirBnB), and just generally have no business conducting this kind of transaction.

I actually had an experience where the owner tried to pin a bunch of bogus nonsense about noise and damage and having too many occupants on us and wanted us to pay her a bunch of money. Not only was she full of poo poo on all counts, but even if she wasn't, it turned out:

-Her co op did not allow sub-letting/Air BnB,
-Even if they did, she did not actually own the unit, but was herself renting it.
-She didn't have us sign any kind of contract or agreement laying out deposits or handling of damages or any of that, which AirBnB/VRBO explicitly suggest you do. So even if she was in the right she basically had no actual legal protection or recourse.

Hulk Krogan fucked around with this message at 18:47 on Dec 15, 2015

Kaal
May 22, 2002

through thousands of posts in D&D over a decade, I now believe I know what I'm talking about. if I post forcefully and confidently, I can convince others that is true. no one sees through my facade.

nachos posted:

Trump = Napoleon would be a master counter to the fascism claims. His brand would go through the roof.

Trump's supporters have no understanding of history and hate the French for being foreigners. I don't see how that would help his brand.

A Shitty Reporter
Oct 29, 2012
Dinosaur Gum

Oracle posted:

River of :toxx:

Require they only drink water from the river until they fix it or die.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead
:catstare:

I'm totally adding this story to my arsenal. My cold, black heart goes out to the citizens of Flint.

SnakePlissken
Dec 31, 2009

by zen death robot

Quick, someobody defund tha ACA before we have to pay for any mooching children's treatment!

Sorry, that's in pretty bad taste.

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe
Where does Trump stand on Airbnb anyway? Maybe he doesn't care because the people who use it are not likely to be his luxury hotel customers. Or are they?

Eggplant Squire
Aug 14, 2003


Oracle posted:

Yeah, the emergency manager that Governor Snyder appointed decided to use the Flint River (notorious for the last 100+ years for being heavily polluted due to industrial runoff from the automotive industry) as the source of drinking water for the city instead of Lake Huron from a Detroit water company. Cue businesses in Flint paying extra money to relink to the Detroit water because the Flint River water was so corrosive it was loving up their machinery.

People began complaining about the water being rusty and smelling/tasting foul and feeling horrid and the city selectively tested a few homes that were on newly-replaced pipes and surprisingly found acceptable levels of lead in the water. Any tests of other homes were jerryrigged to produce acceptable results also (letting the water run for up to a half hour before testing it, stuff like that) or just outright lied about. Combine the corrosive water with already aging and underused infrastructure due to the steep population decline thanks to local industry disappearing and the water was a mess. (Personal anecdote: was staying at my grandmother's house over Xmas last year which is in Flint and took a shower in this water. It did something horrible to my hair to the point where it felt dirtier after the shower than before I got in. Went to my sister's just out of town just to shower again in her well water to get the film off and had to wash it like three times).

Concerned citizens had to finally go to an EPA guy in Chicago to test the water instead of just being blown off which is when the Superfund levels of lead in the water were discovered (I think the highest was like 10,000 times the legal limit) and then FOIA and such revealed documents that those in charge knew and were actively taking steps to cover it up.

It is a total shitshow and I hope to God everyone involved up to Snyder burns for it.

"I believed in my heart that the water was fine." Oh well looks like that's that and no one is to blame.

Solkanar512
Dec 28, 2006

by the sex ghost

euphronius posted:

Under any honest application of common independent contractor law uber drivers are clearly employees. IMHO.

Taxi drivers differ in that their rates are usually set by the city and not the company and their only connection to the taxi company may just be dispatch.

There are two lawsuits in San Francisco involving Uber and employee misclassification.

Swan Oat
Oct 9, 2012

I was selected for my skill.
There was also a would be AirBnB person who rented out his apartment to someone who threw an orgy at it, and he has since been blacklisted by NYC landlords and is essentially homeless now, lol.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

climboutonalimb
Sep 4, 2004

I get knocked down but I get up again You are never going to keep me down

Now on YouTube. https://youtu.be/hrjs1UXC8rU

  • Locked thread