Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Doc Hawkins
Jun 15, 2010

Dashing? But I'm not even moving!


fishmech posted:

That doesn't work. Ask any of the dozens of black people killed in the past months just because the cops thought they might have had a gun.

Don't forget all the ones killed by The Armed and Un-badged, like Zimmerman and the home depot parking lot killer.

Although I suppose neither of those two claimed to believe their victims were even armed.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Motto
Aug 3, 2013

Mulva posted:

It's simple, if they start a rebellion and that rebellion eventually wins control of the country then they were divinely justified and a "heavn' born band", if not they they were a lone wolf mentally ill transgender liberal.

Then why does the Confederacy garner such adulation? (rhetorical question, I already know why)

blackguy32
Oct 1, 2005

Say, do you know how to do the walk?

radical meme posted:

I didn't realize that BLM was taking direct credit for each of those changes. Especially since none of those articles name or even mention Black Lives Matter. But, even incremental change, regardless of who is responsible for it, is a good thing.

I guess it's an extreme coincidence that all of these discussions and reforms are taking place now instead of the previous years.

Toph Bei Fong
Feb 29, 2008



blue squares posted:

Why would anyone care what libertarians think about anything?

Because one of the Koch brothers' signatures is on their pay check maximum allowable campaign donation and superPAC contributions?

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal
:rip:

http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/12/29/pataki-end-presidential-campaign/xAHnDOiCpjtoXojyaJJ8cM/story.html?event=event25

Ballz
Dec 16, 2003

it's mario time


Somewhere, Jim Gilmore is smiling.

Dr. Red Ranger
Nov 9, 2011

Nap Ghost

Luigi Thirty posted:

Another Sikh attacked today, this time in Louisiana. A man yelled racial slurs at a convenience store employee and smashed a beer bottle over his head when asked to leave.

http://www.knoe.com/home/headlines/Monroe-man-arrested-for-hate-crime--363724221.html?device=phone&c=y

Holy poo poo. I know this was from a few pages ago but I live in Monroe. I know some of the Sikh temple here; they have temple/community meetings at a rent house down the street from me with amazing food every couple of weeks. My bud Ranjit had to wear an American flag to work every day to avoid accusations of terrorism.

I feel like I have to go and ask if they want any volunteer help or something. This idiot islamophobia is out of control.

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe
If the only thing Black Lives Matter accomplished was to force reactionaries to angrily deface the printed statement "black lives matter" repeatedly, that would be enough. However they have accomplished a lot more than that.

ohgodwhat
Aug 6, 2005

Dr. Red Ranger posted:

My bud Ranjit had to wear an American flag to work every day to avoid accusations of terrorism.

*phew* I was wondering if we could tell if a brown person was one of the good ones, but I never realized Muslims/terrorists couldn't wear flag pins!

Dr. Red Ranger
Nov 9, 2011

Nap Ghost
It sounds stupid but that was his explanation. People would endlessly give him poo poo about his turban and beard, but if he wore the flag the idiots would at least leer at him and mumble instead of slurring him to his face.

This is the town that gave us a Duck Dynasty after all.

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

ohgodwhat posted:

*phew* I was wondering if we could tell if a brown person was one of the good ones, but I never realized Muslims/terrorists couldn't wear flag pins!



He took it off though. Ever.

quote:

On the October 5 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom, former radio host Mark Williams claimed that Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), "took his flag pin off after 9-11, and he felt, apparently, some sort of an affinity or some sort of a connection, because at that point he felt it OK to come out of the closet as the domestic insurgent he is."

David Corn, Washington editor of The Nation magazine, appearing along with Williams, noted that Obama recently said that he decided not to wear the pin "shortly after 9-11," not because of 9-11, as Williams suggested. When Corn said that Obama chose to take the pin off "because he didn't like the run-up to the [Iraq] war, and he decided that you show your patriotism by your ideals, not by what you wear on your lapel," Williams asked, "What has Obama done to demonstrate the patriotism that he says doesn't belong on his lapel? What's he done to demonstrate that, except get out there, badmouth this country, and help demoralize the troops, and help do his part to undermine this nation?"

You're supposed to have another flag pin on your shirt when you take off your jacket, and another one on your BVDs. When you gently caress (only to populate the nation with warriors) you're supposed to stick the pin into your chest.

But Rocks Hurt Head
Jun 30, 2003

by Hand Knit
Pillbug

fishmech posted:

That doesn't work. Ask any of the dozens of black people killed in the past months just because the cops thought they might have had a gun.

Then I guess they don't have anything to lose by actually carrying one :v:

Bullfrog
Nov 5, 2012

Vienna Circlejerk posted:

Hi. I'm a Unitarian Universalist. My denomination has really gotten behind this whole Black Lives Matter thing, but gosh, maybe it's just a waste of time.
...

Where did you find these images? I want to share this with some people.

FlamingLiberal
Jan 18, 2009

Would you like to play a game?



I'm sure this is also the point for a bunch of people to say, "wait, he was running?"

Stereotype
Apr 24, 2010

College Slice
Also they keep saying "all lives matter" like they aren't trying to keep war refugees out of America.

Motto
Aug 3, 2013

Stereotype posted:

Also they keep saying "all lives matter" like they aren't trying to keep war refugees out of America.

I wonder how many of the people chanting "all lives matter" are just standard racists, obfuscating their denial that "black lives matter", and how many are especially stupid and genuinely believe the statement is an attack on whites rather than an assertion that black lives matter exactly as much as white ones.

e:\/\/\/ fair point

Motto fucked around with this message at 05:32 on Dec 30, 2015

Nostalgia4Infinity
Feb 27, 2007

10,000 YEARS WASN'T ENOUGH LURKING

Motto posted:

I wonder how many of the people chanting "all lives matter" are just standard racists, obfuscating their denial that "black lives matter", and how many are especially stupid and genuinely believe the statement is an attack on whites rather than an assertion that black lives matter exactly as much as white ones.

All of them.

Chokes McGee
Aug 7, 2008

This is Urotsuki.

One of the few absolutes I think we can all agree on in this forum.

it's a honeypot post to catch more racists

Nostalgia4Infinity
Feb 27, 2007

10,000 YEARS WASN'T ENOUGH LURKING
Anyone saying "all lives matter" is using it as a fig leaf to try and hide their racism.

That's how self-evident racism is in our society.

Teriyaki Koinku
Nov 25, 2008

Bread! Bread! Bread!

Bread! BREAD! BREAD!

Stereotype posted:

Also they keep saying "all lives matter" like they aren't trying to keep war refugees out of America.

It should be pretty obvious that the literal, physical deletion of "black" from "lives matter" from the aforementioned signs speaks volumes more than the dogwhistling cover phrase "all lives matter."

It's as if they secretly support the literal, physical deletion of blacks in other ways too. Actions indeed speak louder than words.

James Garfield
May 5, 2012
Am I a manipulative abuser in real life, or do I just roleplay one on the Internet for fun? You decide!
Also, "(science/engineering/computers/higher education) should be able to choose the best candidate for the job"

The Bloop
Jul 5, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

Nostalgia4Infinity posted:

Anyone saying "all lives matter" is using it as a fig leaf to try and hide their racism.

That's how self-evident racism is in our society.

I dunno. I think a lot of people are actually well meaning sheltered innocents/doofuses who have no active racist intent. They think they are saying something profound and all inclusive. Many call passive naïveté a form of racism, but I think that might overspend and dilute the meaning of the word. They aren't bigots, just ignorant. It's still bad, but it's not the same thing.

For most, though, you are exactly correct.

Tiny Brontosaurus
Aug 1, 2013

by Lowtax

Trent posted:

I dunno. I think a lot of people are actually well meaning sheltered innocents/doofuses who have no active racist intent. They think they are saying something profound and all inclusive. Many call passive naïveté a form of racism, but I think that might overspend and dilute the meaning of the word. They aren't bigots, just ignorant. It's still bad, but it's not the same thing.

For most, though, you are exactly correct.

Those are people who will defend every bigotry and never, ever step up to help fight it, so the distinction is pretty meaningless.

SLOSifl
Aug 10, 2002


"All lives matter" is like protesting Breast Cancer Awareness Month with a sign that says "All Cancer Awareness Month".

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

James Garfield posted:

Also, "(science/engineering/computers/higher education) should be able to choose the best candidate for the job"

What?

Luigi Thirty
Apr 30, 2006

Emergency confection port.

Trent posted:

I dunno. I think a lot of people are actually well meaning sheltered innocents/doofuses who have no active racist intent. They think they are saying something profound and all inclusive. Many call passive naïveté a form of racism, but I think that might overspend and dilute the meaning of the word. They aren't bigots, just ignorant. It's still bad, but it's not the same thing.

For most, though, you are exactly correct.

My mom had no idea that it was a racist slogan until I told her. She thought it was one of those wacky profound Facebook things. Same thing with all the other right-wing pseudo-profound image macros on Facebook she gets being a 50-something medical worker in Florida, as soon as I told her what they really meant (racism) she stopped sharing them. Victory?

She's also very concerned that her whole office supports Donald Trump.

Toph Bei Fong
Feb 29, 2008



A lot of it falls into that unexamined sort of racism, the sort where they'd probably be fine with the guy down at the convenience store being black, but not their boss or their landlord. And heaven forbid if "those" people with their baggy pants and sideways baseball caps started walking down the street, lowering the property values and generally messing up the place. See, it's not because they're black, because, you know, they're fine with the convenience store guy. They're just uncomfortable with their daughter dating him because he comes from circumstances and she deserves better. Totally not because he's black.

The author here is in the UK, but goes into the subject quite well here: https://samkriss.wordpress.com/2015/02/24/a-short-note-on-racism/

quote:

That point was nicely identified by Ms Duncan, who delivered a long racist rant in front of a clearly horrified Ukip press officer (aghast, no doubt, that someone was actually saying what everyone’s thinking) and – unbelievably – an entire BBC camera team. She ticked just about every box: not just ominously referring to people with Negroid features but directly and openly voicing a specific, personal, visceral dislike for such people, and even recounting an instance in which she had discriminated against them (by pushing for Negro children to be excluded from sheltered housing). And she just kept on going, a bubbling sewer-sluice of the stuff, idiocy after idiocy. What’s strange is that she also insisted, and continues to insist, that she is not a racist. In an interview filmed after she had been fired from Ukip, she seemed to believe that her offence wasn’t a clearly voiced animus towards black people, but the anachronistic use of the word Negro. It’s a description, not an insult, she said. Like how Jews have bent noses. (Mine, I should add, is beaky and protruding but ramrod-straight.) But of course she didn’t think she was saying anything wrong – otherwise she wouldn’t have said it in front of a BBC camera crew, all of them surely trying to stifle their grins and hoping the word paydirt wasn’t visibly flashing across the whites of their eyes.

It’s strange. For a long time anti-racists have been trying to show that racism isn’t just an overt expression of hatred towards one racialised group or another, that it’s an unvoiced hierarchy structurally embedded in the fabric of society, that the construction of race itself is mutually inextricable from racism – and yet after all that, when someone performs the most basic, crude, open expression of racism, she’s unable to recognise it as such. In a way we’re the victims of our own success. In fact, it’s not hard to imagine a slightly more literate racist-apologist defence of Ms Duncan: of course, what she said was unacceptable, but it wasn’t really racist; after all, racism is a structural relation, and what’s one person’s simple prejudice next to the large-scale bigotry of an impersonal system?

Where does this chiasmic structure come from? What Duncan’s insistence on her non-racism demonstrates is that the word ‘racism’ has been emptied of all content. The formation I’m not racist but… is rightly mocked, but it needs to be taken very seriously: it’s the master-signifier of modern racial discourse. After decades of work we’ve finally hammered in the message that Racism Is Bad to the extent that almost nobody will now admit to actually being a racist (with the exception of Chelsea fans abroad); in fact, the word racist has come to mean nothing more than the thing that one is not.

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

Trent posted:

I dunno. I think a lot of people are actually well meaning sheltered innocents/doofuses who have no active racist intent. They think they are saying something profound and all inclusive. Many call passive naïveté a form of racism, but I think that might overspend and dilute the meaning of the word. They aren't bigots, just ignorant. It's still bad, but it's not the same thing.

For most, though, you are exactly correct.

I just don't understand how you can be taken aback at the statement "black lives matter." Either you have been conditioned to think it is a dogwhistle of some kind that means "ONLY black lives matter" (which would only make sense if you are used to hearing and enjoying dogwhistles) or you are a profound racist whose brain shorts out at the very idea.

ANIME AKBAR
Jan 25, 2007

afu~

Doctor Butts posted:

Protests broke off of e9 went down Ontario and are in front of the Q

Hey is there a twitter channel or facebook page which organizes this stuff? I want to get on board tomorrow but don't feel like wandering around public square like a dumbass, tia

AShamefulDisplay
Jun 30, 2013
I know the thread's moved on but I feel compelled to comment on the fact that when Affluenza Kid's mom whisked him off to Mexico, they ended up in loving Puerto Vallerta, literally a resort town.

Rhesus Pieces
Jun 27, 2005

Luigi Thirty posted:

She's also very concerned that her whole office supports Donald Trump.

Oh tell her to lighten up. Donald Trump is a totally legitimate and not-unhinged GOP candidate with good ideas on how to make America great again. Just listen to his national spokesperson



who wore a necklace made of bullets on live television oh sweet Jesus we're totally hosed

sit on my Facebook
Jun 20, 2007

ASS GAS OR GRASS
No One Rides for FREE
In the Trumplord Holy Land

Toph Bei Fong posted:

The author here is in the UK, but goes into the subject quite well here: https://samkriss.wordpress.com/2015/02/24/a-short-note-on-racism/

This is extremely proclick

Luigi Thirty
Apr 30, 2006

Emergency confection port.

A man in Brooklyn was charged with a hate crime for chasing four Pakistanis down a street while yelling "I want to see the blood of Muslims on the street!"

The Bloop
Jul 5, 2004

by Fluffdaddy

SedanChair posted:

I just don't understand how you can be taken aback at the statement "black lives matter." Either you have been conditioned to think it is a dogwhistle of some kind that means "ONLY black lives matter" (which would only make sense if you are used to hearing and enjoying dogwhistles) or you are a profound racist whose brain shorts out at the very idea.

For those correcting or directly responding to BLM with ALM I agree. Like the other poster above, my mother used ALM honestly thinking she was just being even more inclusive and progressive. It was a stupid but honest mistake. In her case, all it took was showing her the all houses matter comic for her to realize that the statement, while actually very positive in a vacuum, is incredibly tone-deaf and racist sounding in the current climate.

And that was the bigot vs buffoon distinction I was making earlier. One is testing you to see if you'd be down with dropping some n-bombs together, while the other is well meaning but naïve. In other words one is worth engaging with about it.

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene


God drat America.

DeusExMachinima
Sep 2, 2012

:siren:This poster loves police brutality, but only when its against minorities!:siren:

Put this loser on ignore immediately!

Your Dunkle Sans posted:

It should be pretty obvious that the literal, physical deletion of "black" from "lives matter" from the aforementioned signs speaks volumes more than the dogwhistling cover phrase "all lives matter."

It's as if they secretly support the literal, physical deletion of blacks in other ways too. Actions indeed speak louder than words.

You are trying way too hard. They're vandals wrecking poo poo. Of course they disagree with BLM but trying to read into how a hellraiser fucks up someone's banner reminds me of those parody HALF-LIFE 3 CONFIRMED shops that pretend to draw all sorts of conclusions from random numbers on the Steam frontpage.

Most people (regardless of race or party, except for blacks, they get it obviously) I've run into across several states just think that someone saying BLM means they believe it's not a big deal when the cops unjustifiably shoot a white person. I'm not sure there's any way to communicate around that mental gap in any way that will fit in a hashtag, unfortunately.

Teriyaki Koinku
Nov 25, 2008

Bread! Bread! Bread!

Bread! BREAD! BREAD!

DeusExMachinima posted:

You are trying way too hard. They're vandals wrecking poo poo. Of course they disagree with BLM but trying to read into how a hellraiser fucks up someone's banner reminds me of those parody HALF-LIFE 3 CONFIRMED shops that pretend to draw all sorts of conclusions from random numbers on the Steam frontpage.

Most people (regardless of race or party, except for blacks, they get it obviously) I've run into across several states just think that someone saying BLM means they believe it's not a big deal when the cops unjustifiably shoot a white person. I'm not sure there's any way to communicate around that mental gap in any way that will fit in a hashtag, unfortunately.

Nope.

I take it you haven't been around many racists who literally wish death on all black people, have you?

The people reducing Tamir Rice as a "thug doing thug things" as has been mentioned in this very topic would not mind or even be delighted at the systematic elimination of black people in America.

Teriyaki Koinku fucked around with this message at 08:22 on Dec 30, 2015

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

DeusExMachinima posted:

You are trying way too hard. They're vandals wrecking poo poo. Of course they disagree with BLM but trying to read into how a hellraiser fucks up someone's banner reminds me of those parody HALF-LIFE 3 CONFIRMED shops that pretend to draw all sorts of conclusions from random numbers on the Steam frontpage.

Most people (regardless of race or party, except for blacks, they get it obviously) I've run into across several states just think that someone saying BLM means they believe it's not a big deal when the cops unjustifiably shoot a white person. I'm not sure there's any way to communicate around that mental gap in any way that will fit in a hashtag, unfortunately.

One of the biggest cons the hate movement has tried to pull over the decades is that racially-directed violence is just formless, disconnected violence that happens to be narrowly directed along racial lines. Maybe we'll never know the motives of these lone wolf shooters hellraisers but let's not dwell on the fact that nobody ever vandalizes a "CHEAP COLD BEER" banner or a "GRAND OPENING" sign but somehow these lone wolves hacked the word "black" out of a sign for totally race-agnostic shits and giggles.

Tobermory
Mar 31, 2011

In a new WSJ article, the ongoing NSA clusterfuck continues:

quote:

President Barack Obama announced two years ago he would curtail eavesdropping on friendly heads of state after the world learned the reach of long-secret U.S. surveillance programs.

But behind the scenes, the White House decided to keep certain allies under close watch, current and former U.S. officials said. Topping the list was Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The National Security Agency’s targeting of Israeli leaders and officials also swept up the contents of some of their private conversations with U.S. lawmakers and American-Jewish groups. That raised fears—an “Oh-s— moment,” one senior U.S. official said—that the executive branch would be accused of spying on Congress.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

FAUXTON
Jun 2, 2005

spero che tu stia bene

friendly heads of state.

Netanyahu's been about as friendly as Ahmadinejad and I would say there's a conceivable interest in keeping tabs on possible attempts to derail a major peace accord with one of the main regional powers.

  • Locked thread