|
I think what's going on is that he wants to go to Carson where he knows he'd have some control, since Inglewood would mostly be Kroenke's show.
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 05:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 09:24 |
|
|
Goodell is just saying what the owners want him to say, still bad though. So if the Chargers move in as co-renters with the Rams, will still they still have to pay a megahuge relocation fee? This thread brought it up but the more I think of it, the more I think that would be a bad decision for the Chargers to move in as a 2nd banana, regardless of market size.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 05:50
|
|
|
Pro-Rams rally at the coliseum.   those little airplane text things are a lot smaller than i thought
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 05:55
|
|
|
Best resolution would be no relocation plan gets enough votes and Spanos has to crawl back to San Diego with his hat in his hand for a one year deal at Qualcomm. No plan gets enough votes because their too busy planning to emergency draft after a meteor hits gilette saturday during the pats - chiefs game.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 05:56
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:those little airplane text things are a lot smaller than i thought Yeah, the ones flying over Levis telling Jed to go gently caress himself were surprisingly hard to read. chupacabraTERROR posted:Speaking of shitholes... Santa Barbara is the most exact opposite of a shithole city on the California coast and they work hard to keep the poors and the businesses out to keep it that way.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 06:01
|
|
|
Eltoasto posted:Goodell is just saying what the owners want him to say, still bad though. They'll still have to pay the fee. And they're going to be second banana to whatever team they go with. They'll be second banana even if they move by themselves.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:Santa Barbara is the most exact opposite of a shithole city on the California coast and they work hard to keep the poors and the businesses out to keep it that way. Santa Barbara sure. Isla vista on the other hand...
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 06:05
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:those little airplane text things are a lot smaller than i thought Half the reason they work is because everybody has to ask what they say.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 06:13
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:Pro-Rams rally at the coliseum. gently caress all of those people
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 08:09
|
|
|
Ron Jeremy posted:Best resolution would be no relocation plan gets enough votes and Spanos has to crawl back to San Diego with his hat in his hand for a one year deal at Qualcomm. And no plan will get done in SD because nobody is gonna vote to subsidize Spanos, so he'll just go to LA one year later. I think they're gonna try and push for Chargers/Rams in Inglewood. But if they give money to the Raiders then good luck to the next team that tries to extort a city for public money for a new stadium.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 09:43
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:Pro-Rams rally at the coliseum. FUCKIN PACKED Dang what's that like 1000 people?
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 18:39
|
|
|
Yeah, at this point that's really the only plan that sounds like it could get the necessary votes. It sounds like the Spanos/Kroenke issues are more than just a business disagreement but also that Spanos apparently hates Kroenke for a variety of reasons, namely trying to intrude on his perceived turf and circumvent the process by moving quickly into his backyard. I would assume when all is said and done that this will happen as there is just too much money at stake for both men to not play nice, but the Oakland thing does make it more interesting as I can't imagine the NFL will just cast them off without any help to find a stadium...yet as soon as they do it's going to potentially hurt their leverage with other markets when it comes time for the next public stadium shakedown.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 18:44
|
|
|
i've seen people claiming that davis and spanos signed a contract as part of their agreement, which precludes spanos from breaking the agreement without davis' approval. if true, and the plan is to do a joint kroenke/spanos stadium in inglewood, davis would have to sign off on it. so the nfl would have to satisfy the raiders before they could get the deal done. i think what they'll end up doing is that a portion of the $1.1 bn provided by the rams and chargers as a relocation fee will be used to help the raiders get a stadium in oakland. then the nfl can say "we still only spent x amount. the rams and chargers spent y amount because of the unique situation which doesn't apply here" during the negotiations with the next city.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 18:51
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:i've seen people claiming that davis and spanos signed a contract as part of their agreement, which precludes spanos from breaking the agreement without davis' approval. if true, and the plan is to do a joint kroenke/spanos stadium in inglewood, davis would have to sign off on it. so the nfl would have to satisfy the raiders before they could get the deal done. i think what they'll end up doing is that a portion of the $1.1 bn provided by the rams and chargers as a relocation fee will be used to help the raiders get a stadium in oakland. then the nfl can say "we still only spent x amount. the rams and chargers spent y amount because of the unique situation which doesn't apply here" during the negotiations with the next city. mark davis has spent 50 years making sure everyone will always underestimate him he's even shrewder and more ruthless than his dad ever was
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 19:29
|
|
|
mark davis is basically bashar al assad.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 19:30
|
|
|
Couldnt the Chargers stay in SD and just call themselves the LA Charges.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 20:51
|
|
|
euphronius posted:Couldnt the Chargers stay in SD and just call themselves the LA Charges. As a finance professional, I can say that yes, this Simple Fix would easily result in 2.0x the current Chargers valuation, which is Dean's ultimate goal anyway. It worked for the Angels!
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 21:23
|
|
|
i'm like 4 hours north of st louis and i only get nfc north games lol.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 21:30
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:i'm like 4 hours north of st louis and i only get nfc north games lol. I mean that would put you in Bears territory.
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 22:31
|
|
|
the LA committee is meeting at 6pm CST tonight to discuss a Spanos-Kroenke partnership
|
|
#
?
Jan 11, 2016 23:27
|
|
|
excellent, now let the meteor come
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 00:00
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:i've seen people claiming that davis and spanos signed a contract as part of their agreement, which precludes spanos from breaking the agreement without davis' approval. if true, and the plan is to do a joint kroenke/spanos stadium in inglewood, davis would have to sign off on it. so the nfl would have to satisfy the raiders before they could get the deal done. i think what they'll end up doing is that a portion of the $1.1 bn provided by the rams and chargers as a relocation fee will be used to help the raiders get a stadium in oakland. then the nfl can say "we still only spent x amount. the rams and chargers spent y amount because of the unique situation which doesn't apply here" during the negotiations with the next city.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 01:35
|
|
|
Davis just went Kroenke on the city of Oakland and Spanos told USA today he has no interest in Inglewood. lol. Buckle in, these next 24-48 hours are going to be crazy.
ColonelJohnMatrix fucked around with this message at 02:06 on Jan 12, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 02:03
|
|
|
Raiders to SD, calling it
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
ColonelJohnMatrix posted:Davis just went Kroenke on the city of Oakland and Spanos told USA today he has no interest in Inglewood. lol. Buckle in, these next 24-48 hours are going to be crazy. Buckle up buckaroos
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 02:30
|
|
|
ColonelJohnMatrix posted:Davis just went Kroenke on the city of Oakland and Spanos told USA today he has no interest in Inglewood. lol. Buckle in, these next 24-48 hours are going to be crazy. Lol. Mark Davis Heel Turn
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 02:33
|
|
|
Ross Angeles posted:Lol. Mark Davis rules
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
There's no chance St. Louis comes out on top when the dust settles. We're hosed
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 02:39
|
|
|
On the other hand, it will be nice to have my Sundays to myself. There's no way Dean doesn't try to block any other team going to San Diego.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 02:43
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:i've seen people claiming that davis and spanos signed a contract as part of their agreement, which precludes spanos from breaking the agreement without davis' approval. if true, and the plan is to do a joint kroenke/spanos stadium in inglewood, davis would have to sign off on it. so the nfl would have to satisfy the raiders before they could get the deal done. i think what they'll end up doing is that a portion of the $1.1 bn provided by the rams and chargers as a relocation fee will be used to help the raiders get a stadium in oakland. then the nfl can say "we still only spent x amount. the rams and chargers spent y amount because of the unique situation which doesn't apply here" during the negotiations with the next city. This is going to happen anyway, with or without Davis needing to be appeased from some contract. It will be the Raiders' consolation prize from the NFL.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 02:46
|
|
|
Ramadu posted:Mark Davis rules
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 02:47
|
|
|
Ramadu posted:Mark Davis rules
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 02:51
|
|
|
quote:HOUSTON – Oakland should not be an NFL city, the Raiders recently told top league officials and owners, maintaining during the relocation process that the future of the market for both the franchise and the league has been irrevocably damaged by Oakland and Alameda County politicians, the Orange County Register has learned. Rest of the argument here. http://www.ocregister.com/articles/raiders-699445-league-officials.html nobody puts baby in the corner. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 03:02
|
|
|
chupacabraTERROR posted:Santa Barbara sure. Isla vista on the other hand... On one hand you have a point on the other hand gently caress you go Gauchos. Olé, motherfuckers.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 03:03
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:There's no chance St. Louis comes out on top when the dust settles. We're hosed such bullshit St. Louis makes a strong attempt to keep the Rams and it doesn't even loving matter
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 06:50
|
|
|
Goodbye Chargers, and honestly, good loving riddance. So long as the Spanos family owns the Chargers, I doubt they will ever see a ring.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 09:19
|
|
|
A White Guy posted:Goodbye Chargers, and honestly, good loving riddance. So long as the Spanos family owns the Chargers, I doubt they will ever see a ring. For the Spanos family, a good season is how profitable they were and how their net worth went up. Wins are a nice side bonus.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 17:15
|
|
|
I wish the meetings were streamed
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 17:21
|
|
|
chupacabraTERROR posted:Raiders to SD, calling it Ross's nightmare
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 17:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 14, 2024 09:24 |
|
|
chupacabraTERROR posted:For the Spanos family, a good season is how profitable they were and how their net worth went up. Wins are a nice side bonus. Cards would be this way still if Michael Bidwill hadn't taken over the team, Bill gave no fucks about winning. The sweetheart stadium deal that Bill whined for and got is also having solvency problems because of lower tax revenues from depressed tourism. And it only cost $450M.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 17:32
|
|
