|
Hijo Del Helmsley posted:Apparently the two options on the ballot are Chargers and Rams to Inglewood or Raiders and Chargers to Carson, and that's it. Is there a 3rd "No" option?
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 22:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 08:37 |
|
|
Athanatos posted:Is there a 3rd "No" option? Yeah, but there's been no indication that any of the owners want to table this
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 22:54
|
|
|
Please just end this poo poo so I can quit cheering for my dumb football team if need be
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 22:55
|
|
|
According to LaCanfora the vote is currently 18-6 in favor of the Carson deal. 24 votes needed.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 22:56
|
|
|
warcrimes posted:According to LaCanfora the vote is currently 18-6 in favor of the Carson deal. 24 votes needed. it was reported they had around 20 votes before.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 22:57
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:it was reported they had around 20 votes before. Didn't get the 24 needed, apparently. TIME TO NEGOTIATE LOL
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:02
|
|
|
warcrimes posted:Didn't get the 24 needed, apparently. JUST END IT
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:03
|
|
|
JRizzle posted:Please just end this poo poo so I can quit cheering for my dumb football team if need be Who are you picking if they do move? Chiefs?
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:06
|
|
|
JRizzle posted:Please just end this poo poo so I can quit cheering for my dumb football team if need be At this point I'm just rooting for Kroenke to fail as hard as possible, regardless of the outcome
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:08
|
|
|
I want only Oakland to move because their stadium is terrible and I want Ross to be happy and Kroenke to get hosed
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:17
|
|
|
I would love the Raiders in LA, but it's not worth it if it means wrecking the division.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:19
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:I would love the Raiders in LA, but it's not worth it if it means wrecking the division. Would it really wreck the division that much?
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:19
|
|
|
I really don't want the Raiders in LA. The gang culture affiliated with the team is something I don't want brought back.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:20
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:Would it really wreck the division that much? One of the teams would leave it, so yeah
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:21
|
|
|
Ross Angeles posted:One of the teams would leave it, so yeah lame. The NFL could milk two yearly division rivarly games in the city no problem.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:23
|
|
|
Sam FarmerVerified account @LATimesfarmer 26s26 seconds ago First round of votes completed. Rams/TBD in Inglewood gets more votes than Raiders/Chargers in Carson. Nobody at required 24 yet.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:23
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:At this point I'm just rooting for Kroenke to fail as hard as possible, regardless of the outcome
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:23
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:lame. The NFL could milk two yearly division rivarly games in the city no problem. It's not really a rivalry.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:25
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:Sam FarmerVerified account @LATimesfarmer 26s26 seconds ago
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
Ross Angeles posted:It's not really a rivalry. The NFL could make it one. Two fanbases of the same city in the same division meeting on mutual homefield twice a season could be an event if they let it. Trade Burfict and Suh to the teams if you nee to spice it up.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:28
|
|
|
Ross Angeles posted:It's not really a rivalry. It is too you goon.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:28
|
|
|
Ozu posted:So no one is moving to L.A unless Spanos decides to work with Kroenke. Ideally, this will result in the Raiders getting a few hundo mil from the league as a result, allowing them to build a new stadium in Oakland. Failing that, I'm fine with the Raiders moving to LA.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:30
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:It is too you goon. You really think that it would be in LA? The Raiders would have 9 home games a year.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:31
|
|
|
Ross Angeles posted:You really think that it would be in LA? The Raiders would have 9 home games a year.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:37
|
|
|
Jubs posted:I really don't want the Raiders in LA. The gang culture affiliated with the team is something I don't want brought back. Crime went up when the Raiders were here in LA, once they left crime went down and has continued to go down until this past year(rumors of Raiders return). Coincidence?! Not having a NFL team works well here in LA because most people are from other places and are loyal to their teams. So many Steelers bars and midwest fan clubs here. I liked the idea previously of a Downtown LA stadium next to Staples just because it is easy to get to via non driving. Oakland and SD currently have good accessibility(BART, amtrak , Trolley, lots of freeways) but Carson is hosed, Inglewood is better but still hosed for traffic. Terrible planning.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:39
|
|
|
Hijo Del Helmsley posted:Rams moving alone to Inglewood has apparently been removed from the ballot. My ideal scenario... ruined...
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:43
|
|
|
Casual Yogurt posted:Crime went up when the Raiders were here in LA, once they left crime went down and has continued to go down until this past year(rumors of Raiders return). Coincidence?! This happened in every city in America. It was the height of the crack epidemic.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
Kevyn posted:This happened in every city in America. It was the height of the crack epidemic. So the Raiders moving to LA caused crack, gotcha.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:50
|
|
|
warcrimes posted:So the Raiders moving to LA caused crack, gotcha. checks out
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
I want Kroenke schadenfreude. As well as leaving the Rams, Raiders, and Chargers where they are for the sakes of their fan bases, really, but Kroenke sounds like a shitlord.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
CBJSprague24 posted:I want Kroenke schadenfreude. Doesn't Oakland have the lowest attendance of any team in the NFL?
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:53
|
|
|
I hope Kroenke gets hosed for making me watch Jeff Fisher football for any amount of time.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:53
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:Doesn't Oakland have the lowest attendance of any team in the NFL? I think it's St. Louis. Raw numbers might be Oakland because they tarp off the upper deck.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:Doesn't Oakland have the lowest attendance of any team in the NFL? They had great attendance not long ago, but the team has been bad, and it can't be overstated how lovely the coliseum is.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:55
|
|
|
Ross Angeles posted:I think it's St. Louis. Honestly I get Oakland and even St Louis a little but I seriously never understood San Diego trying to leave
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:55
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:Honestly I get Oakland and even St Louis a little but I seriously never understood San Diego trying to leave It's a combination of not getting a new stadium because of political instability from about 2003-2012, and not wanting other teams to come into the southern california market unless the Chargers get a piece of the LA market
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
Volkerball posted:They had great attendance not long ago, but the team has been bad, and it can't be overstated how lovely the coliseum is. People are like "oh no the Coliseum can't be that bad" and I have to remind them that there were literally rooms overflowing with fecal matter. It's horrible and the A's/Raiders deserve new digs.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:57
|
|
|
Spoeank posted:People are like "oh no the Coliseum can't be that bad" and I have to remind them that there were literally rooms overflowing with fecal matter. It's horrible and the A's/Raiders deserve new digs. The Chargers and Raiders have the two worst stadiums in the NFL and Oakland's is so much worse than San Diego's
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:58
|
|
|
This bears being reposted: https://twitter.com/KendallGammon/status/673563060208963584/photo/1
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 15, 2024 08:37 |
|
|
The Raiders have to give some of their gameday gate revenues to the A's, so even if they had identical attendance numbers as the Rams, they'd be getting less revenue from it. e. Also they're still paying for the stadium/refurb/rehab or some poo poo, despite it being the oldest NFL stadium in the country.
|
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 23:59
|
|
