As a Millennial I posted:

The Pete Santilli chat has caught on to the goatseing. I need new tactics or a new target.

Discendo Vox posted:

Who is John Galt?

Main Paineframe posted:

I dunno, usually the police threads get all whiny when local cops shoot someone who has committed no violence solely because they possessed a gun, broke into a building, committed a property crime, or said scary things! Typically it's suggested that the police should have nonviolently talked them down, and that it would be inappropriate to escalate a situation against someone who has yet to use violence, even if they said something threatening but made no effort to follow up on that threat with action. Laws which allow law enforcement to presume that someone is violent and use lethal force against them simply because they possess a firearm are also a popular target for criticism. Unless they're both white and right-wing, apparently, in which case every angry word about taking down the government should be treated like a murder charge and followed up with violence!

UV_Catastrophe posted:

When a comparable left-wing protest eventually happens, I am 100 percent sure that the authorities will thoughtfully consider using a gentle response like the one used in Burns, Oregon and will definitely not stomp them out of existence using every dirty trick in the book. I know this because we're all about fairness and the use of consistent logic here in the good old US of A, and we certainly don't dole out justice differently depending on political circumstance, no sir.

You see, it's important to pedantically defend things like the Bundy militia's legal right to ask friendly questions to locals about their employment status in the federal government and their right to receive Fed Ex packages in the driveway of the government building that they seized. Because if we defend these rights now, then the state is completely obligated to treat, say, the next Black Lives Matter protest with the same kind of even-handed fairness. If not, then those responsible will be turned into pillars of salt by the occult magicks of the D&D forum, which is the prevailing political force in this country, as we all know.

Can't believe you guys don't see this, smh.

theflyingorc posted:

I've never really seen a comparable left wing protest, closest thing is the old "hippies chain themselves to trees" routine. Maybe if one of those was armed

theflyingorc posted:

I've never really seen a comparable left wing protest, closest thing is the old "hippies chain themselves to trees" routine. Maybe if one of those was armed

Jumpingmanjim posted:

Intel&Sebastian posted:

I doubt anyone considered Wounded Knee 1973 right wing in any way.

As a Millennial I posted:

Whoever "Phillip Fry" is, you're doing it wrong

UV_Catastrophe posted:

When a comparable left-wing protest eventually happens, I am 100 percent sure that the authorities will thoughtfully consider using a gentle response like the one used in Burns, Oregon and will definitely not stomp them out of existence using every dirty trick in the book. I know this because we're all about fairness and the use of consistent logic here in the good old US of A, and we certainly don't dole out justice differently depending on political circumstance, no sir.

You see, it's important to pedantically defend things like the Bundy militia's legal right to ask friendly questions to locals about their employment status in the federal government and their right to receive Fed Ex packages in the driveway of the government building that they seized. Because if we defend these rights now, then the state is completely obligated to treat, say, the next Black Lives Matter protest with the same kind of even-handed fairness. If not, then those responsible will be turned into pillars of salt by the occult magicks of the D&D forum, which is the prevailing political force in this country, as we all know.

Can't believe you guys don't see this, smh.

kartikeya posted:

Seeing some Twitter noise about more militants (specifically some female ones) showing up this weekend.

Kilo147 posted:

haha, apparently one of the militia guys in Texas executed his buddy while drunk. And thes are the guys that are supposed to save us?

Kilo147 posted:

I'd be too worried about the kids.

also, http://usuncut.com/news/militia-leader-shoots-and-kills-friend-in-drunken-fight/

quote:

According to Bill Williamson, a friend and the failed organizer of 2 Million Bikers 2 DC, Carter was drunk and took Smith’s gun from his holster, at which point the sober Smith reacted quickly and pulled a spare gun, shooting Carter once between the eyes.

quote:

Joe Bleaugh, a friend of Carter’s and a member of the Idaho Three Percent movement, which is tied to the Pacific Patriot Network who approached the Bundy militia with “Articles of Resolution” this Sunday, said in a Facebook post that his friend had “violated one of the first rules of firarms [sic] safety.”

“NEVER mix guns & booze,” continued Bleaugh. “Guns and booze do not mix. End of story, and unfortunately the end of Charles’ life. What a waste, and by his own hand.”

drilldo squirt posted:

Wait, someone got shot?

Epic High Five posted:

So who is the good guy with the gun in this scenario

Epic High Five posted:

So who is the good guy with the gun in this scenario

Intel&Sebastian posted:

In Texas, guys were organizing a march or rally tongo to OR, news said that they were arguing, one grabbed the others holstered weapon, the guy pulled his back up gun and shot him in the face.

Epic High Five posted:

So who is the good guy with the gun in this scenario

McDowell posted:

There are only guys (and gals) with guns - and the objective lens of the new omniscient Justice.

Discendo Vox posted:

Turtle Sandbox posted:

Im glad the good guy with a gun had a backup gun for when his gun was taken by a bad guy, who now has a gun.

Intel&Sebastian posted:

In Texas, guys were organizing a march or rally tongo to OR, news said that they were arguing, one grabbed the others holstered weapon, the guy pulled his back up gun and shot him in the face.

Intel&Sebastian posted:

I mean, I can't deny the utility but I also have to assume that carrying a second gun is meant for exactly this situation or a "pick it up, punk"/hateful 8 scenario. Basically an insurance plan to cover your constant attempts to provoke a "good shoot".

UIApplication posted:

What time daily does Retards On Youtube happen because I sort of want to listen in tomorrow and pretend David Attenborough is narrating over it about some sort of specimen that flings PBR shits into the forest