MALE SHOEGAZE posted:

i'm not a linux guy i'm polyamourOS

Docker Compose documentation posted:

Note: When mapping ports in the HOST:CONTAINER format, you may experience erroneous results when using a container port lower than 60, because YAML will parse numbers in the format xx:yy as sexagesimal (base 60)

St Evan Echoes posted:

do yaml or json have standard ways of validating their schema like xsd or w/e?

Lutha Mahtin posted:

there are a lot of cool things in swift but i would honestly trust microsoft more to run a free programming language project in which "community" stakeholders are ever even listened to. not that apple is evil, they just seem to have a very lazy and self serving approach to a lot of the open source projects that power their poo poo, only putting in the bare minimum of effort to ensure needed features and an advantageous development plan

Jeffrey of YOSPOS posted:

If you're not gonna use a functional language, at least use C so you are categorically prevented from working with those OO idiots. Namaste.

Phobeste posted:

oh nice you've never used c for large projects

Jeffrey of YOSPOS posted:

If you're not gonna use a functional language, at least use C so you are categorically prevented from working with those OO idiots. Namaste.

Phobeste posted:

oh nice you've never used c for large projects

Bloody posted:

its gettin there

Chamook posted:

FamDav posted:

yo tef where is that list what a library says vs what it means and is "high-performance" on it.

Shaggar posted:

Linux guy: "hey, today I used mailing lists and got excited about writing more shell commands. This is definitely the best way to do things!"

FamDav posted:

yo tef where is that list what a library says vs what it means and is "high-performance" on it.

triple sulk posted:

i haven't really used it at all but f# seems like a more usable version of haskell that gives c# more good features

ratbert90 posted:

I have, and if you can't use C for large projects you are bad at C or can't figure out how to use structs as objects.

Sagacity posted:

Because JSON is not broken enough let's use YAML instead because that is clear and umabigious and...

quote:

Using “:” allows expressing the integer part [of a floating point number] in base 60, which is convenient for time and angle values (the fractional part is always in base 10).

Example: 190:20:30.15

redleader posted:

allowing numbers to be specified in base 60 is one of the weirdest and most baffling design decisions i've yet encountered


that's a weakass justification for such an unexpected feature

Shaggar posted:

apple didn't want to use java or c# cause nih.

qntm posted:

octal is awful and needs to be killed, it has never given us anything good

Zemyla posted:

When OSX came out in 1999, Java was still poo poo from a butt and Microsoft was still trying to ritualisticaly murder Apple (and C# didn't even publically exist yet), and Apple wanted to use NeXTSTEP which they'd acquired along with reacquiring Steve Jobs.

I know fellating big business doesn't leave you with time for stuff like "the bare minimum of checking facts" but come on son.

FAKE EDIT: "arguing with shaggar lol"

Bloody posted:

when they decided to release swift, java and c# were both very good and very mainstream

Zemyla posted:

Besides, Java is the blandest, most boilerplatey language ever and C# is only better because of the features they stole from Haskell.

DaTroof posted:

http://json-schema.org/

qntm posted:

JSON is pretty bad but at least it's small enough that all of its gotchas can be grasped in about fifteen minutes of reading

the talent deficit posted:

WRONG

quote:

5.3. Validation keywords for arrays



5.3.1. additionalItems and items



5.3.1.1. Valid values

The value of "additionalItems" MUST be either a boolean or an object. If it is an object, this object MUST be a valid JSON Schema.

The value of "items" MUST be either an object or an array. If it is an object, this object MUST be a valid JSON Schema. If it is an array, items of this array MUST be objects, and each of these objects MUST be a valid JSON Schema.



5.3.1.2. Conditions for successful validation

Successful validation of an array instance with regards to these two keywords is determined as follows:

if "items" is not present, or its value is an object, validation of the instance always succeeds, regardless of the value of "additionalItems";

if the value of "additionalItems" is boolean value true or an object, validation of the instance always succeeds;

if the value of "additionalItems" is boolean value false and the value of "items" is an array, the instance is valid if its size is less than, or equal to, the size of "items".



5.3.1.3. Example

The following example covers the case where "additionalItems" has boolean value false and "items" is an array, since this is the only situation under which an instance may fail to validate successfully.

This is an example schema:


{
"items": [ {}, {}, {} ],
"additionalItems": false
}

With this schema, the following instances are valid:

[] (an empty array),

[ [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ], [ 5, 6, 7, 8 ] ],

[ 1, 2, 3 ];

the following instances are invalid:

[ 1, 2, 3, 4 ],

[ null, { "a": "b" }, true, 31.000002020013 ]



5.3.1.4. Default values

If either keyword is absent, it may be considered present with an empty schema.



5.3.2. maxItems



5.3.2.1. Valid values

The value of this keyword MUST be an integer. This integer MUST be greater than, or equal to, 0.



5.3.2.2. Conditions for successful validation

An array instance is valid against "maxItems" if its size is less than, or equal to, the value of this keyword.



5.3.3. minItems



5.3.3.1. Valid values

The value of this keyword MUST be an integer. This integer MUST be greater than, or equal to, 0.



5.3.3.2. Conditions for successful validation

An array instance is valid against "minItems" if its size is greater than, or equal to, the value of this keyword.



5.3.3.3. Default value

If this keyword is not present, it may be considered present with a value of 0.



5.3.4. uniqueItems



5.3.4.1. Valid values

The value of this keyword MUST be a boolean.



5.3.4.2. Conditions for successful validation

If this keyword has boolean value false, the instance validates successfully. If it has boolean value true, the instance validates successfully if all of its elements are unique.



5.3.4.3. Default value

If not present, this keyword may be considered present with boolean value false.

quote:

8.2. Array elements



8.2.1. Defining characteristic

The defining characteristic of the child instance is its index within the array. Recall: array indices start at 0.



8.2.2. Implied keywords and default values.

The two implied keywords in this calculation are "items" and "additionalItems".

If either keyword is absent, it is considered present with an empty schema as a value. In addition, boolean value true for "additionalItems" is considered equivalent to an empty schema.



8.2.3. Calculation



8.2.3.1. If "items" is a schema

If items is a schema, then the child instance must be valid against this schema, regardless of its index, and regardless of the value of "additionalItems".



8.2.3.2. If "items" is an array

In this situation, the schema depends on the index:

if the index is less than, or equal to, the size of "items", the child instance must be valid against the corresponding schema in the "items" array;

otherwise, it must be valid against the schema defined by "additionalItems".

ratbert90 posted:

Lol if you don't use OO C.


I have, and if you can't use C for large projects you are bad at C or can't figure out how to use structs as objects.

quote:

Any sufficiently large C program contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of C++.

NihilCredo posted:

Shaggar posted:

apple didn't want to use java or c# cause nih.

Zemyla posted:

When OSX came out in 1999, Java was still poo poo from a butt and Microsoft was still trying to ritualisticaly murder Apple (and C# didn't even publically exist yet), and Apple wanted to use NeXTSTEP which they'd acquired along with reacquiring Steve Jobs.

I know fellating big business doesn't leave you with time for stuff like "the bare minimum of checking facts" but come on son.

FAKE EDIT: "arguing with shaggar lol"